madmitch Posted February 15 Share Posted February 15 I don't think they have used actuaries in calculating and budgeting that amount. 1.5 baht per tourist? That 50m baht pot will last long. Policies often contain an "Other Insurance" clause, stating that the travel policy will only pay in excess of other insurance that might be in place. This includes Government pools and schemes. If the Government call this scheme "insurance" there could be some issues in claiming on travel insurance; you can't claim twice for the same incident. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post John Drake Posted February 15 Popular Post Share Posted February 15 3 hours ago, webfact said: Tourists qualify for coverage if the incidents are not due to their negligence, intention for illegal activity, or risky behaviour. That ought to disqualify 99 percent of them. 1 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ben Zioner Posted February 15 Share Posted February 15 3 hours ago, webfact said: The government studied how much money they've paid to help tourists in the past. They feel confident that they have enough for now. Well that's definitely the way to manage a country. Being someone who never traveled without a robust insurance I just don't get why the Thai taxpayer should foot the bill for idiot foreign tourists. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ty Hareways Posted February 15 Share Posted February 15 1 hour ago, NemoH said: Asian tourists just stay a few days n go home whereas western tourist stay in for months. The western tourists should buy local insurance I've actually asked several expats who have 'local' insurance but they say they've not heard of any where a one month 'tourist' can actually buy the same insurance for just one month. Whilst i have 'farang' travel insurance i still don't trust them so would gladly pay a local company for one month....i believe thai companies also pay up front for any treatment needed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
smedly Posted February 15 Share Posted February 15 3 hours ago, webfact said: The allocated 50 million baht budget tiny compared to tourist revenue Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
madmitch Posted February 15 Share Posted February 15 6 minutes ago, Ty Hareways said: I've actually asked several expats who have 'local' insurance but they say they've not heard of any where a one month 'tourist' can actually buy the same insurance for just one month. Whilst i have 'farang' travel insurance i still don't trust them so would gladly pay a local company for one month....i believe thai companies also pay up front for any treatment needed. I think he means buy travel insurance from their own country, not local as in Thailand as that isn't generally available. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
realfunster Posted February 15 Share Posted February 15 1 hour ago, jippytum said: 50 million baht budget for one year is a very small budget. Many insurance companies in Thailand offering health coveragen lost billions during covid some going bankrupt. I know this is for tourist visa holders but go fund me requests for help in Thailand are usually for massive hospital bills following accidents. 1) Yes, it is not a lot 2) The ones that went bankrupt were mostly/exclusively the ones offering the completely braindead and greedy COVID insurance for THB 1,000 with a THB 100,000 cash payout for a positive test not linked to any related health issues or actual medical costs. You may even remember a brief social media fad of people licking handles and sticking things in their mouth/nose to get infected and their payout. These companies were a bunch of complete idiots, as were the insurance regulators who gave their approval to such policies. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aussie999 Posted February 15 Share Posted February 15 1 hour ago, Scott Tracy said: Taxpayers elsewhere do exactly the same. Not sure exactly what you mean, but considering the amount of money tourists spend, in Thailand, the government can well and truly cover medical costs. Fact, all goods purchased by tourists carries a tax. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Spock Posted February 15 Share Posted February 15 1 hour ago, retarius said: I don't really understand tourists reluctance to have travel insurance. This scheme goes some way to covering this. But what about riding a motorcycle with no driving license or not wearing a helmet....is that excluded, as are visa exempt tourists excluded? I took out travel insurance yesterday for a 3 week trip to the US (where healthcare is madly expensive.....total cost less than $100). Why on earth don't these creeps buy it or stay away? Really? I took out a comprehensive policy last year with an extra motorbike coverage which cost me $500 Australian for 30 days in Thailand. This is at least two times more expensive than pre-covid. I could have got cheaper, but not much more so. You got a very cheap policy. For me, travel insurance is now a significant cost in any trip OS. It's getting ridiculously expensive. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
worgeordie Posted February 15 Share Posted February 15 4 hours ago, webfact said: or risky behaviour Going out on the balcony for a smoke in Pattaya ... regards Worgeordie 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bluejets Posted February 15 Share Posted February 15 2 hours ago, harleyclarkey said: Thailand survives on tourism so mending a few stupid idiots who arrive with no insurance is a drop in the bucket Well, you have the first part correct but....let the boofheads sort out their own problems. Why should Thailand foot the bill? These wankers are well aware of what can happen and what the consequences are for not being covered and not following the law. Too much of this bs goes on now as it is. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TallGuyJohninBKK Posted February 15 Share Posted February 15 1 hour ago, biggles45 said: You have to be in Thailand with a tourist visa to use this plan.' There seem to be TWO different versions in the opening two news reports above of what is actually required to be eligible under this scheme, with very different implications. The first is the one you quoted above -- have to have a tourist visa, which excludes a lot of tourists who come via other means, including visa exempt. And then the other, second news report above has the following broader definition: "They must be visiting Thailand with a tourist visa or for tourism purposes." I have no idea which version is the actual one the Thai government plans to follow with this. But there's a pretty big difference between those two different versions. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post FritsSikkink Posted February 15 Popular Post Share Posted February 15 3 hours ago, ChaiyaTH said: They were required to cover that anyway by international human rights, what a jokers. international human rights has no legal status to order anything from a country. 2 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TallGuyJohninBKK Posted February 15 Share Posted February 15 Quote Tourists qualify for coverage if the incidents are not due to their negligence, intention for illegal activity, or risky behaviour. I wonder how this new tourist insurance scheme is going to classify the constantly occurring tourist hotel/condo balcony falls? Covered, or, excluded risky behavior? Same with riding/traveling on Thai island speed boats? Covered or excluded risky behavior? It would be interesting in the coming year/years to find out, if we ever do, what kinds of cases were accepted for coverage vs. what kinds of ones were denied/rejected. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
arick Posted February 15 Share Posted February 15 They can keep their 50,000. Give me back the money this country stoled from me 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
arick Posted February 15 Share Posted February 15 All the African and the rest of Asia will be sending their children to Thailand to be killed and collect the benefits. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
retarius Posted February 15 Share Posted February 15 51 minutes ago, Spock said: Really? I took out a comprehensive policy last year with an extra motorbike coverage which cost me $500 Australian for 30 days in Thailand. This is at least two times more expensive than pre-covid. I could have got cheaper, but not much more so. You got a very cheap policy. For me, travel insurance is now a significant cost in any trip OS. It's getting ridiculously expensive. I'm going the other way, buying it here for a trip to the US. I haven't got any motorcycle coverage. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
newnative Posted February 15 Share Posted February 15 3 hours ago, Callmeishmael said: I would presume that riding a motorcycle without a proper license or not wearing a helmet will constitute "negligence or risky behavior". As it should. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
barrybike Posted February 15 Share Posted February 15 (edited) So they are bringing back a charge on exit or entry for a visa to cover this cost Edited February 15 by barrybike 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
barrybike Posted February 15 Share Posted February 15 21 minutes ago, arick said: They can keep their 50,000. Give me back the money this country stoled from me Did u not spend it , how were u stoled 🤔 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Frankie baby Posted February 15 Share Posted February 15 Why don't they do something about the exorbitant fees charged by the hospitals & medical centres. That would go a long way in helping people pay their own way? 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mrfill Posted February 15 Share Posted February 15 The 35 million tourists will no doubt be totally reassured that the govt has allowed an average of 70 baht for their medical needs. 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Fugitive Posted February 15 Share Posted February 15 1 hour ago, worgeordie said: Going out on the balcony for a smoke in Pattaya ... Combined with alcohol/substances in your bloodstream? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cardinalblue Posted February 15 Share Posted February 15 Better to get a tourist visa now…for proper funding, thailand needs to raise visa fee to cover future medical expenditures Finally some common sense 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Geordieabroad Posted February 15 Share Posted February 15 I have been retired in Thailand for 8 years and just returned from holiday in Laos today i leave Thailand 3 - 4 times per year on short holidays, would they expect me to pay "tourist" medical insurance every time i come back? 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chrissables Posted February 15 Share Posted February 15 4 hours ago, Dibbler said: “The government was thinking about charging tourists a special fee to help pay for this insurance, but they've decided to wait a while. For now, they will usegovernment money to help tourists in need.” Wow, so people who pay tax in Thailand are to foot the medical bills for random tourists who hurt themselves. Knowing this hospitals are free to charge what they want for the misadventures of a few who should have taken out travel insurance. Amazing Thailand indeed! The government has been taxing all flights with a fee for medical help for years. You used to have to pay at a kiosk at the airport, but they added it to ticket prices. So nom the tax payers should not be paying as the government has the money already, but........... 1 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cabradelmar Posted February 15 Share Posted February 15 I mean, is not a bad idea. Albeit limited... Tourist (visa) only and if not breaking the law (helmet law, traffic/maritime law, etc.). What they should do... When you look at who is being hurt and dieing... It's mostly those engraged in adventure activities (motorcycles, boating, etc.)... Just require the outfitters to make all foreigners buy supplemental insurance at the POS (non waivable). Like when you rent a car, but without the ability to take a waiver. Then your risk reduction is properly focused, and the pool of payees captive. Given the numbers (total payees vs payouts), insurance underwriters could make a bundle, and you only make those most at risk pay-in. Just a thought. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thailand49 Posted February 15 Share Posted February 15 5 hours ago, Liverpool Lou said: You're saying that "international human rights" dictates that tourists killed or injured, anywhere in the world, have medical costs covered (up to a certain amount) and compensation mandated by international law? Could you be more specific with that claim and, perhaps, show something to back it up? Thanks LL, for asking. If true then someone is in violation for some time. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bday Prang Posted February 15 Share Posted February 15 3 hours ago, vivananahuahin said: Farang is always in fault, no discussion, never a Thai driver. That is not true 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Liverpool Lou Posted February 15 Share Posted February 15 3 hours ago, vivananahuahin said: Farang is always in fault, no discussion, never a Thai driver. B0llocks. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
.png.3b3332cc2256ad0edbc2fe9404feeef0.png)
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now