Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
5 hours ago, Mavideol said:

me old propaganda trying to scare Nato, nothing to worry about he has no balls and knows if he does something like that it will be his end

 

Russia test-fires missiles to simulate 'massive' response to nuclear first strike

https://au.yahoo.com/news/russia-test-fires-missiles-simulate-162252510.html

 

Of course Vladimir is not going to use these weapons, we all know that. You know that, Z guys also know that.
It is similar to bungee jumping on Phuket. Those who sell tickets for you - these people don`t want you die after jump for sure. And you know that this is safe. But most people are not brave enough to jump.
Vladimir knows that although the Americans are confident that he will not launch a nuclear bomb at them, most of them will refuse to jump into this and will make concessions.

  • Sad 1
  • Haha 1
Posted
14 hours ago, stevenl said:

So you think a foreign nation sending boots on the ground is no big deal?

First off, we do not know for sure if the NK soldiers will be deployed to the front lines to fight or to observe/learn and if they are, we do not know if they will be deployed to Ukraine or to the Kursk region.

 

If the latter, this is, to me, entirely acceptable as Russia and NK has a military alliance to assist each other in the event of an attack on either, not unlike Nato's Article 5. Kursk is after all, Russian territory.

 

Secondly, there are already many foreign nationals (soldiers, mercenaries etc) already on the ground in Ukraine, fighting against the Russians. If it's no big deal for one side, then it shouldn't be a big deal for the other.

  • Confused 2
  • Sad 1
Posted
53 minutes ago, Gweiloman said:

First off, we do not know for sure if the NK soldiers will be deployed to the front lines to fight or to observe/learn and if they are, we do not know if they will be deployed to Ukraine or to the Kursk region.

 

If the latter, this is, to me, entirely acceptable as Russia and NK has a military alliance to assist each other in the event of an attack on either, not unlike Nato's Article 5. Kursk is after all, Russian territory.

 

Secondly, there are already many foreign nationals (soldiers, mercenaries etc) already on the ground in Ukraine, fighting against the Russians. If it's no big deal for one side, then it shouldn't be a big deal for the other.

 

While I somewhat agree with your first point, your second point needs proof.

 

Foreign fighters do fight for Ukraine against Russia, but I don't know of any mercenaries. Do you have proof of mercenaries as defined by the First Additional Protocol to the Geneva Conventions ?
https://ihl-databases.icrc.org/en/ihl-treaties/api-1977/article-47?activeTab=

 

  • Like 2
Posted
7 hours ago, tgw said:

 

While I somewhat agree with your first point, your second point needs proof.

 

Foreign fighters do fight for Ukraine against Russia, but I don't know of any mercenaries. Do you have proof of mercenaries as defined by the First Additional Protocol to the Geneva Conventions ?
https://ihl-databases.icrc.org/en/ihl-treaties/api-1977/article-47?activeTab=

 

A mercenary is any person who:

(a) is specially recruited locally or abroad in order to fight in an armed conflict;

(b) does, in fact, take a direct part in the hostilities;

(c) is motivated to take part in the hostilities essentially by the desire for private gain and, in fact, is promised, by or on behalf of a Party to the conflict, material compensation substantially in excess of that promised or paid to combatants of similar ranks and functions in the armed forces of that Party;

(d) is neither a national of a Party to the conflict nor a resident of territory controlled by a Party to the conflict;

(e) is not a member of the armed forces of a Party to the conflict; and

(f) has not been sent by a State which is not a Party to the conflict on official duty as a member of its armed forces.

 

 

It was confirmed by a poster on AN who has been fighting there that some of the foreign fighters are paid. So it seems to me that yes, there are mercenaries fighting over there.

 

  • Confused 2

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Topics

  • Latest posts...

    1. 1

      Europe Braces for Escalation: Germany Mobilizes NATO Troops Amid Putin's Nuclear Threats

    2. 227

      Why I left Thailand

    3. 2

      Ellen DeGeneres Relocates to the U.K. After Trump’s Election Win

    4. 2

      Ellen DeGeneres Relocates to the U.K. After Trump’s Election Win

    5. 8

      Putin has vanished

    6. 2

      Ellen DeGeneres Relocates to the U.K. After Trump’s Election Win

    7. 1

      Europe Braces for Escalation: Germany Mobilizes NATO Troops Amid Putin's Nuclear Threats

    8. 0

      Shocking Online Threats: Trans Woman Targets JK Rowling and Nancy Mace in Call to Violence

  • Popular in The Pub


×
×
  • Create New...