Which Side Will Thailand Choose?

[Brewster67]

For some time I have believed we are currently in a global crisis. 

 

The PROXY war in Ukraine, Israel genocide, The US trying to poke China at every opportunity. Even little UK as good as declaring war on Russia with their tiny army.

 

If the sh7t hits the fan especially between the US and its western monkeys against China... Where will Thailand come down??

 

The US are going to definitely put pressure on Thailand to side with the west, but siding with China is way better for their interests.

 

In my opinion we have never been closer to nuclear war and some US political idiots even think the US can win a nuclear war.... Hopefully the Pentagon is staffed with people who are a lot more realistic.

[Hummin]

2 minutes ago, Brewster67 said:

For some time I have believed we are currently in a global crisis. 

 

The PROXY war in Ukraine, Israel genocide, The US trying to poke China at every opportunity. Even little UK as good as declaring war on Russia with their tiny army.

 

If the sh7t hits the fan especially between the US and its western monkeys against China... Where will Thailand come down??

 

The US are going to definitely put pressure on Thailand to side with the west, but siding with China is way better for their interests.

 

In my opinion we have never been closer to nuclear war and some US political idiots even think the US can win a nuclear war.... Hopefully the Pentagon is staffed with people who are a lot more realistic.

Who have the better deal you think? 

 

another factor to consider

A recent 2022 study estimated that as many as 15 percent of the total Thai population can be classified as Sino-Thai. Of the Sino-Thai community, at least 25 percent are involved with major Thai businesses, and 53 percent of Thai prime ministers have been of Chinese descent.

 

https://www.airuniversity.af.edu/JIPA/Display/Article/3606690/characterizing-chinese-influence-in-thailand/

[OneMoreFarang]

For whatever reason, I also thought about this today.

I think Thailand will try to stay neutral, as much as that is possible.

But if pressured, then I guess they will be more on the side of China and not the USA.

One reason for that is, IMHO, that the USA is in decline and China has still a lot of potential for the future. And obviously China is more or less around the corner, the USA is far away.

[OneMoreFarang]

9 minutes ago, BigBruv said:

Nukes are fake - fear based mind control. 

Tell that to the people in Hiroshima and Nagasaki. 

Or just learn from history.

[save the frogs]

11 minutes ago, BigBruv said:

PS. Nukes are fake - fear based mind control. 

I came across that conspiracy many years ago.

Could be.

The "threat" of nuclear war has been going on for decades and decades and never goes away. 

Is North Korea another fear-based mind control maybe?

 

[Tropicalevo]

19 minutes ago, Brewster67 said:

The US trying to poke China at every opportunity

I think that if anyone is doing any poking, it can only be China.

Taiwan, Philippines, Indonesia, Cambodia, Sri Lanka and the 'buying' of some African nations. To name just a few. 'Soft' loans everywhere and they come with a political price.

[Brewster67]

10 minutes ago, BigBruv said:

 

The one who pays the most - as always

 

PS. Nukes are fake - fear based mind control. 

If you don't believe, hide under ya desks in crash position!

Nukes are NOT fake, they really do exist...

 

But I also believe that an all out nuclear war is very much survivable, in fact it would probably only wipe out about 10% of the global population.

 

All this stuff about nuclear fallout and nuclear winter is way over-exaggerated.

 

I would say the worst place to be after a nuclear war is the USA, there is something about 300 million guns being in the hands of the public that makes me think after a nuclar war, their problems are only starting.

[Hummin]

1 minute ago, Brewster67 said:

Nukes are NOT fake, they really do exist...

 

But I also believe that an all out nuclear war is very much survivable, in fact it would probably only wipe out about 10% of the global population.

 

All this stuff about nuclear fallout and nuclear winter is way over-exaggerated.

 

I would say the worst place to be after a nuclear war is the USA, there is something about 300 million guns being in the hands of the public that makes me think after a nuclar war, their problems are only starting.

What do we really know before it eventually happens? 

 

We are already in a seriously period of wild life dissapearing, crucial wildlife for us humans, and a nuclear war would not help much. So everything between 10% to 90 maybe 99 percentage can be realistic, 

[CharlieH]

If it ever came to it, I'd just put my head between the knees as kiss Yr A** goodbye, I'd rather go in it, than try to live after it, that's for sure.

[BigBruv]

9 minutes ago, OneMoreFarang said:

Tell that to the people in Hiroshima and Nagasaki. 

Or just learn from history.

 

Learn from your TV boomer 👍

Those 2 cities were not even in the top 5 most destroyed cities in Japan

Also look into Dresden

 

NOT everything you see on the TV or in His story books reflects the truth

 

[Brewster67]

3 minutes ago, Tropicalevo said:

I think that if anyone is doing any poking, it can only be China.

Taiwan, Philippines, Indonesia, Cambodia, Sri Lanka and the 'buying' of some African nations. To name just a few. 'Soft' loans everywhere and they come with a political price.

So you prefer Africa borrowing from the US controlled IMF is a better option?... Having to give up their vote to the USA in the United Nations and held in a debt trap designed to impoverish them is a better deal than what China offers?... 

 

You need to read Confessions of an Economic Hitman by John Perkins whose job it was to do exactly that... While China forgives debt all over the place.

 

Taiwan is a part of China ,,, Did you know that???..... But the USA is using them as a club to batter China with.
Philippines is nothing more than a fishing dispute blown out oif all proportion by the USA and their puppet Marcos.

Indonesia has no beef with China you made that up.

Cambodia also has no beef with Chinam Although the USA is definitely trying to create one.

Sri Lanka?.... First time I heard of Sri Lanka having trouble with China.

All those countries you named have one thing in common.... Their biggest trading partner by a mile is CHINA.

[OneMoreFarang]

14 minutes ago, Brewster67 said:

Nukes are NOT fake, they really do exist...

 

But I also believe that an all out nuclear war is very much survivable, in fact it would probably only wipe out about 10% of the global population.

 

All this stuff about nuclear fallout and nuclear winter is way over-exaggerated.

 

I would say the worst place to be after a nuclear war is the USA, there is something about 300 million guns being in the hands of the public that makes me think after a nuclar war, their problems are only starting.

 

For all those deniers of reality: Watch and learn!

 

 

[jayboy]

23 minutes ago, OneMoreFarang said:

One reason for that is, IMHO, that the USA is in decline and China has still a lot of potential for the future. And obviously China is more or less around the corner, the USA is far away.

 

I suppose that is why the ambitious and intelligent from all over the world who wish to make a new and better life always head for China rather than the United States.

[scottiejohn]

43 minutes ago, BigBruv said:

 

The one who pays the most - as always

 

PS. Nukes are fake - fear based mind control. 

If you don't believe, hide under ya desks in crash position!

Don't for get your tinfoil hat!

[patman30]

just imagine if WW3 does break out and conveniently and completely coincidentally whilst remaining neutral
Thailand just legalizes stuff, like kratom, weed, shrooms, coke, smack, gambling and prostitution just in the nick of time
mmmmmm...........🤔
 

[jvs]

37 minutes ago, Brewster67 said:

Nukes are NOT fake, they really do exist...

 

But I also believe that an all out nuclear war is very much survivable, in fact it would probably only wipe out about 10% of the global population.

 

All this stuff about nuclear fallout and nuclear winter is way over-exaggerated.

 

I would say the worst place to be after a nuclear war is the USA, there is something about 300 million guns being in the hands of the public that makes me think after a nuclar war, their problems are only starting.

So those guns will take care of 60% of the US population?

 

[theblether]

29 minutes ago, OneMoreFarang said:

Tell that to the people in Hiroshima and Nagasaki. 

Or just learn from history.

 

Dropping the bombs was the best thing that ever happened to Japan. It saved millions of Japanese lives. 

 

As for the OP, get a grip on yourself. We're nowhere near nuclear war and even Putin has said it won't happen. The only way a nuke will be used is by a minor state, the major players have far too much to lose. Nixon was one of the first to mention the minor player risk. 

 

As for China. China cannot win any type of war against the USA and allies and they know it. They developed a gigantic Achilles Heel with the Three Gorges Dam, and a single cruise missile would wipe out around 80% of China's military capability. It would also kill 50 million Chinese and render around 400 million homeless. 

 

Some of your need to get off Twitter and actually read history and genuine world political analysis. 

[Brewster67]

28 minutes ago, jayboy said:

 

I suppose that is why the ambitious and intelligent from all over the world who wish to make a new and better life always head for China rather than the United States.

They head for the USA because they have no border and they know if they head for China they would be deported in a heartbeat.It's got absolutely NOTHING to do with what is a better economy. the US doesn't have an economy, it is an ocean of debt that they will soon not be able to sustain and their currency is about to be collapsed by the new BRICS currency.

 

It's over for the USA and that is why they are trying to start fires all over the place, and is why all those people pouring in from Mexico will learn the mistake they made.

[stoner]

25 minutes ago, scottiejohn said:

Don't for get your tinfoil hat!

 

they make them nuke resistant now. 

[UWEB]

5 minutes ago, Brewster67 said:

They are real, it is the radioactive wasteland narrative that is fake... Radioactive fallout becomes safe after just 48 hours, 72 hours at the longest. As long as you have 72 hours of food and water in your home, just stay put and keep the doors and windows closed and you will be fine... All this cr7p about the world being uninhabitable for a million years is nonsense.

 

Nuclear weapons in space is also nonsense.... in a vacuum, no detonation can take place, no air to feed the thermal pulse and also the required chain reaction can not occur in a vacuum, it requires atoms to provide the chain.

I guess you are wearing also a Alu Head?

[Neeranam]

1 hour ago, Brewster67 said:

For some time I have believed we are currently in a global crisis. 

 

The PROXY war in Ukraine, Israel genocide, The US trying to poke China at every opportunity. Even little UK as good as declaring war on Russia with their tiny army.

 

If the sh7t hits the fan especially between the US and its western monkeys against China... Where will Thailand come down??

 

The US are going to definitely put pressure on Thailand to side with the west, but siding with China is way better for their interests.

 

In my opinion we have never been closer to nuclear war and some US political idiots even think the US can win a nuclear war.... Hopefully the Pentagon is staffed with people who are a lot more realistic.

As a Thai, I'd vote to go with China, unless Trump wins the election. Biden doesn't know what day it is.

[Rimmer]

Some conspiracy troll posts and replies have been removed

[Brewster67]

26 minutes ago, UWEB said:

I guess you are wearing also a Alu Head?

The tinfoil hat belongs squarely on the heads of those who deny the actual science of nuclear fission and fusion.

 

Even David Icke your king admits nukes axist.

 

Conspiracy theories gone completely MAD.

[theblether]

For all of you still fixating on the decision to nuke Japan - it is well known that Truman was motivated to drop the bombs due to estimated American casualties. He rightly didn't want to risk losing as many as a million Americans to death and injury. 

 

What most people don't know is that 11 million Japanese were either starving or seriously malnourished. It is further estimated that 1 million Japanese soldiers died of disease and malnutrition during the war. Disease ran rampant as their immune systems were compromised. 

 

Any lengthy land invasion would have been preceded by a blockade, further cutting off meagre food supplies to the island nation. With people already starving to death, the humanitarian option was to nuke the country into submission, then turn on the food tap to prevent a catastrophic famine. 

 

Truman's decision to nuke Japan was one of the most humanitarian acts by an individual in world history. His further decision, supported by Congress, to rebuild the country rather than go on an orgy of vengeance, elevates Truman to one of the greatest humans to have ever graced this planet. 

 

 

[jayboy]

38 minutes ago, Brewster67 said:

They head for the USA because they have no border and they know if they head for China they would be deported in a heartbeat.It's got absolutely NOTHING to do with what is a better economy. the US doesn't have an economy, it is an ocean of debt that they will soon not be able to sustain and their currency is about to be collapsed by the new BRICS currency.

 

It's over for the USA and that is why they are trying to start fires all over the place, and is why all those people pouring in from Mexico will learn the mistake they made.

 

Don't be silly.I was referring to the ambitious and intelligent not the hordes of impoverished Africans seeking refuge.The vast majority including many thousands from China itself know that the USA is the place to prosper and do well.Educate youself before you next post on this subject.

 

https://www.nytimes.com/2023/10/03/business/china-brain-drain.html?unlocked_article_code=1.uE0.e_4W.qXPJzpkdZQLm&smid=url-share

[CanadaSam]

1 hour ago, Brewster67 said:

some US political idiots even think the US can win a nuclear war

 

They are inconsequential as they are not in control of the nukes.  Whereas Russia, on the other hand, has so many low-level people in charge of deciding if WW3 should start (and end) with Nukes, it is truly scary.

 

1 hour ago, Brewster67 said:

But I also believe that an all out nuclear war is very much survivable, in fact it would probably only wipe out about 10% of the global population.

 

Oh my!  For the (apparently) very few of us with a university education, and the inclination to read, watch and learn real science programs, a WW3 fought with nuclear weapons would result in the complete extermination of the human race, as a matter of fact.

 

This is not to say that everybody would die from the bombs, but the radiation moving around the planet, the blackout effect from the sun killing all plant life, etc. will do that job quite effectively.

[stoner]

24 minutes ago, Brewster67 said:

The tinfoil hat belongs squarely on the heads of those who deny the actual science of nuclear fission and fusion.

 

Even David Icke your king admits nukes axist.

 

Conspiracy theories gone completely MAD.

 

i think he was actually knighted the alien king. 

[John Drake]

1 hour ago, theblether said:

They developed a gigantic Achilles Heel with the Three Gorges Dam, and a single cruise missile would wipe out around 80% of China's military capability.

 

Quite some time ago, I seem to remember a Taiwanese military statement that in the event of a PRC invasion, Three Gorges would certainly be in play.

[nobodysfriend]

A nuclear war is always possible as long as mad leaders like Putin , Kim Yong Un are in power and control of their autocratic regimes ,

Can happen anytime that one ignores the deadly consequences and decides to press the button .... for whatever reason ...

 

But , I think that , after the Coronavirus , Scientists in isolated underground laboratories somewhere are busy creating a  more lethal version of it that will be released when they think the time has come . The vaccine against that only available for the ' chosen few ' . It would be a cruel , but relatively clean way to get rid of the human overpopulation without destroying too much of the biosphere and keep the planet in a livable condition .

 

Only that would mean that the present capitalistic , profit based system can be replaced by a system where robotic workforce and AI take care for the wellbeing of the survivors ...

 

But , in the moment , a nuclear war is more probable .

 

Thailand won't have a choice  , just as any other country ..

[Brewster67]

1 hour ago, theblether said:

 

Dropping the bombs was the best thing that ever happened to Japan. It saved millions of Japanese lives. 

 

As for the OP, get a grip on yourself. We're nowhere near nuclear war and even Putin has said it won't happen. The only way a nuke will be used is by a minor state, the major players have far too much to lose. Nixon was one of the first to mention the minor player risk. 

 

As for China. China cannot win any type of war against the USA and allies and they know it. They developed a gigantic Achilles Heel with the Three Gorges Dam, and a single cruise missile would wipe out around 80% of China's military capability. It would also kill 50 million Chinese and render around 400 million homeless. 

 

Some of your need to get off Twitter and actually read history and genuine world political analysis. 

The American exceptionalist has spoken.