nauseus Posted July 22 Posted July 22 3 minutes ago, candide said: He just blames them... 😀 Trump blames 'airports' gaffe on teleprompter https://www.bbc.com/news/48885319 Different day, different prompter, move along now. 1 1
nauseus Posted July 22 Posted July 22 8 minutes ago, tilaceer said: Please point out what you consider childish in my post. Your post. 1 1 1
tilaceer Posted July 22 Posted July 22 3 minutes ago, nauseus said: Your post. So as usual, you got nothing. 1
transam Posted July 22 Posted July 22 Just now, tilaceer said: So as usual, you got nothing. That's only your own opinion.......😉 2
Lacessit Posted July 22 Posted July 22 42 minutes ago, frank83628 said: clowns are like buses...none for ages, then 2 come along at the same time! A shame you get run over when you try to debate them.... 1 1
Popular Post nauseus Posted July 22 Popular Post Posted July 22 (edited) 11 minutes ago, tilaceer said: So as usual, you got nothing. I don't like wasting words. Your entire effort was insulting, childish and pathetic. Edited July 22 by nauseus 1 1 1 1
tilaceer Posted July 22 Posted July 22 29 minutes ago, nauseus said: I don't like wasting words. Your entire effort was insulting, childish and pathetic. Historically, your logorrheic tendencies on these forums would indicate otherwise, and rather than offer anything constructive, (or being unable to), you often elect to proffer responses that you hope come across as witty or mocking, (they don't). Hence, if you are not able to engage in anything other than that already stated, I have no desire to waste my time with you. 1 1 1
nauseus Posted July 22 Posted July 22 21 minutes ago, tilaceer said: Historically, your logorrheic tendencies on these forums would indicate otherwise, and rather than offer anything constructive, (or being unable to), you often elect to proffer responses that you hope come across as witty or mocking, (they don't). Hence, if you are not able to engage in anything other than that already stated, I have no desire to waste my time with you. Logorreic? Is that your word of the day? Well done. 1 1
connda Posted July 22 Posted July 22 4 hours ago, xylophone said: You really think that a bullet like this will cause a little graze???? Ya'll really don't know anything about guns and ammo do you? Do you know the difference between a 22 and a 5.56x45mm or the Remington .223? Big scary bullets huh? But the 22 has a .223" diameter bullet. That big scary looking 5.56x45mm that the dead would-be-assassin fired at Trump? It has a .224" diameter bullet. Yeah - a whole scary 0.001" difference. I mean, these would only cause "a little graze" right. The primary difference is the muzzle volatility, muzzle energy, and the weight of the bullet with a 22-LR about half the weight as the 5.56x45mm which is similar to a Remington .223 which are fired out of an AR-15. But as far as bullet size? They are essentially the same diameter kids. "But it's a big scary bullet and the 22 is a little bullet!" 😎 No - a .338 Lapua is a "big scary bullet." So is the (probably) .308 that the USSS sniper took the kid out with. Really scary. However, any of the above will turn your brains into "pink mist." 1 1
frank83628 Posted July 22 Posted July 22 (edited) 3 hours ago, Lacessit said: A shame you get run over when you try to debate them.... yeah right. certain ones i've come across just repeat themselves, even after being proved wrong. like they cannot retract or admit..but most of us here see them for what they are, gobby red nosed bell**ds Edited July 22 by frank83628 1
frank83628 Posted July 22 Posted July 22 15 hours ago, TroubleandGrumpy said: It has been 'weekend at Bernie's' for over 2 years mate he got told to drop out after the disastrous debate by those in charge, just like Bernie did in 2016, remember that bruise on his face, and after 30+ years campaigning about the same issues, in the blink of an eye he switches, endorses clinton. if anyone thinks biden was calling the shots you are gullible to say the least.. 1
Popular Post rabas Posted July 22 Popular Post Posted July 22 (edited) 4 hours ago, tilaceer said: and the bullet was photographed There is no proof that a bullet caused that air movement. There was plenty of debris flying through the air as my previous post discussed, it did not have to be a teleprompter. The old magical aliens disturbed the air conspiracy theory... As you reject both experts and fact checks, I will prove it's a bullet and calculate its rotation rate and barrel grove specifications matching it to an AR-15 type rifle. I use an enhanced image of the bullet's path that shows periodic bright spots of light reflected from the bullet's rifling marks. Barrels have rifling groves to spin bullets at a fixed number of rotations per inch. These leave flat groves in bullets which can reflect sunlight. AR-15 specs Muzzle velocity >3250 fps Velocity at podium ~3000 fps or slightly less. No. of rifling groves in barrel: 6 in 1 rotation or 360° Rotation rate: 1 rotation per 9 inches. So a bullet rotates once per 9 inches and a new grove can be seen every 9"/6 = 1.5" of flight or 6 groves every 9". If a camera's shutter speed is 1/3000, it will take 3000 frames/sec and a 3000 fps bullet will travel 1 foot or 12" in 1 frame. First image bullet path (click to zoom) Second image bullet rotational marks (click to zoom) Edited July 22 by rabas 2 1
Cryingdick Posted July 22 Posted July 22 This thread is like somebody poked a dried out turd with a stick and a huge swarm of flies came out. 2
BarraMarra Posted July 22 Posted July 22 6 hours ago, GammaGlobulin said: I, for one, do not care about a Biden Endorsement for Harris. In my view, this is just Sour Grapes. You see, Biden realizes, full well, that the Salad Woman is a disaster. Therefore, before withdrawing from the election, he Formally Endorsed the Salad Woman as his final act of Retribution. "If I can't run for Prez in 2024, then Nobody will!" he said. Yes, the Salad Woman is the Nobody who will run in 2024. Trump will be Re-Elected.... And, Everybody will live happily, ever after. So, it's Nobody against Everybody, it seems. And, Everybody despises Nobody, too. What the hell is this about ?
xylophone Posted July 22 Posted July 22 (edited) 1 hour ago, connda said: Ya'll really don't know anything about guns What language is "Ya'll".....ah another one of trumps favourite people as he likes the poorly educated. Don't worry as there are plenty of rednecks, Proud Boys and goobers willing to shoot another president or high ranking official as is the way in the "good ole" US of A! And this shooter was a Republican, well, well. I went to a rock concert in London a few decades ago and at the end of a fast paced version of "America" the following words were sung by a young boy.. “America is pregnant with promise and anticipation, but is murdered by the hand of the inevitable”. Make of it what you will, but it has echoes of the truth in it. Edited July 22 by xylophone
BarraMarra Posted July 22 Posted July 22 5 hours ago, illisdean said: as infantile as puddin brains Biden? LOL You lot voted for him illisdream cant moan now.
BarraMarra Posted July 22 Posted July 22 4 hours ago, rabas said: Yes. Proven by physics. To blow something up, a bullet must dump a lot of energy into it by slowing down. A small piece of soft tissue can't slow it down enough. Anyway, moot point. Fact-checking the shattering teleprompter conspiracy theory at Trump rally Fact Check: Hit with A Bullet: Glass from Teleprompter Did Not Injure Trump If you don't trust fact checkers: There was no shattered teleprompter. Teleprompters were far forward of the microphone and out of the shooter's line of site, and the bullet was photographed passing directly behind Trump's head as he turned right. [LINK] lol that could be a vapour trail from a jet passing overhead. Hands up can you see a bullet clearly ???
GammaGlobulin Posted July 22 Posted July 22 1 hour ago, connda said: Ya'll really don't know anything about guns and ammo do you? Do you know the difference between a 22 and a 5.56x45mm or the Remington .223? Big scary bullets huh? But the 22 has a .223" diameter bullet. That big scary looking 5.56x45mm that the dead would-be-assassin fired at Trump? It has a .224" diameter bullet. Yeah - a whole scary 0.001" difference. I mean, these would only cause "a little graze" right. The primary difference is the muzzle volatility, muzzle energy, and the weight of the bullet with a 22-LR about half the weight as the 5.56x45mm which is similar to a Remington .223 which are fired out of an AR-15. But as far as bullet size? They are essentially the same diameter kids. "But it's a big scary bullet and the 22 is a little bullet!" 😎 No - a .338 Lapua is a "big scary bullet." So is the (probably) .308 that the USSS sniper took the kid out with. Really scary. However, any of the above will turn your brains into "pink mist." It is important to note that the kinetic energy of a projectile, such as you have imaged here, is proportional to the SQUARE of the velocity of the projectile. This is key. The bullet that grazed Trump's ear was travelling at about 3000 fps. This is far faster than one of those .22 LR cartridges that you also imaged. And then, since the energy is rises with the SQUARE of the the velocity, this is why the AR15 is so dangerous and lethal. This is why I would have chosen the 460 Weatherby Magnum, if I were hunting an elephant. https://cdn.revolutionise.com.au/cups/ssaa/files/iqz0jttps0xnohgs.pdf When I was young, I had several books with ballistics tables. These days, you can find much more info just by clicking on your keyboard, if connected to the net. Very convenient, the internet. 1
BarraMarra Posted July 22 Posted July 22 3 hours ago, tilaceer said: Historically, your logorrheic tendencies on these forums would indicate otherwise, and rather than offer anything constructive, (or being unable to), you often elect to proffer responses that you hope come across as witty or mocking, (they don't). Hence, if you are not able to engage in anything other than that already stated, I have no desire to waste my time with you. what's a " proffer " and logorrheic ?
Cryingdick Posted July 22 Posted July 22 37 minutes ago, pedro01 said: So... errrr. where is Joe? he is behind the scenes dependably engaged on taking care of business on behalf of all of the American people. You should see that guy move. I am beginning to wonder if he is in a coma or something.
Lacessit Posted July 23 Posted July 23 9 hours ago, frank83628 said: yeah right. certain ones i've come across just repeat themselves, even after being proved wrong. like they cannot retract or admit..but most of us here see them for what they are, gobby red nosed bell**ds I still don't know what a bell**d is, so your attempted insult is an exercise in futility. Again. The significance of a red nose escapes me. Having said that, I am sure it is preferable to brown - nosing Trump. Checking the number of posts you've made on this thread. you do quite well in the gobby stakes yourself.
save the frogs Posted July 23 Posted July 23 On 7/21/2024 at 8:19 PM, Walker88 said: Isn't that Brit Hume, the guy into Latex Porn? nothing wrong with latex porn 1 1
JonnyF Posted July 23 Posted July 23 15 hours ago, xylophone said: You mean the Democracy that his supporters, at his urging, tried to destroy......that Democracy. Stop drinking the Kool Aid and watching Faux Fox News it is not good for you, petal. More lefty conspiracy theories.😃 You've tried to jail him and tried to shoot him. Failed at both. The left are specialists in failure. Stop watching CNN and reading The Guardian, sweetypie.
Chomper Higgot Posted July 23 Posted July 23 4 minutes ago, JonnyF said: More lefty conspiracy theories.😃 You've tried to jail him and tried to shoot him. Failed at both. The left are specialists in failure. Stop watching CNN and reading The Guardian, sweetypie. Criminals being indicted, prosecuted and sentenced to prison is nothing new. Although you yourself might be more used to members of certain social strata being above the law, NY’s successful prosecution of Trump is an affirmation that in the U.S. nobody is above the law. 1
JonnyF Posted July 23 Posted July 23 1 minute ago, Chomper Higgot said: Criminals being indicted, prosecuted and sentenced to prison is nothing new. It is for ex-Presidents. 1 minute ago, Chomper Higgot said: Although you yourself might be more used to members of certain social strata being above the law, NY’s successful prosecution of Trump is an affirmation that in the U.S. nobody is above the law. As crooked Joe will find out post November.
Chomper Higgot Posted July 23 Posted July 23 Just now, JonnyF said: It is for ex-Presidents. As crooked Joe will find out post November. Trump was convicted, in his first criminal trial, for crimes he committed before he was PresidenT on the basis of documents and testimony from his own businesses, his own associates and people he himself employed. The evidence against him came entirely from ‘Trump world’. Trump’s criminal conviction was indeed the first against a former President of the U.S., just one more point of shame in his sordid life. It won’t be he last conviction. There will be no prosecution of Biden as he hasn’t committed any crimes. 1 1
placeholder Posted July 23 Posted July 23 11 minutes ago, JonnyF said: More lefty conspiracy theories.😃 You've tried to jail him and tried to shoot him. Failed at both. The left are specialists in failure. Stop watching CNN and reading The Guardian, sweetypie. Please share with the us a credible link showing that "leftists" tried to shoot him. Actually, the loon who did manage to shoot Trump also was found to have done extensive research on Biden as well. Failed assassin Thomas Matthew Crooks researched Trump and Biden, and even a UK royal, before shooting Investigators detailed Crooks’ search history to lawmakers on Wednesday, sharing how the 20-year-old searched for the dates of Trump’s appearances and the Democratic National Convention — and also looked up info to help his own “major depressive disorder,” people on the call told the New York Times. The gunman also had images of Trump and Biden saved to his cellphone, law enforcement sources previously told The Post.... Crooks’ search history revealed a broad interest in high-profile people and celebrities, regardless of their political affiliation, FBI officials reportedly said — further hindering their hunt for a motive. https://nypost.com/2024/07/18/us-news/thomas-crooks-researched-trump-and-biden-and-a-uk-royal/
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now