Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)
39 minutes ago, Cameroni said:

 

You can watch the polls if you want, but sadly they are useless to determine the outcome of the election. Undecided voters in the swing states will determine the election. And they are not reflected in the polls.

 

On the matter of polls, even democrat pollsters have sounded a warning bell:

 

Democratic pollsters have spent nearly four years trying to fix what went wrong last time. But, they warn, there might still be some other issues. The polls could again underestimate Trump this year — though it might be for some other, unknown reasons.

“Every year, we’ve had different curveballs. This is a difficult industry,” said John Anzalone, who was the lead pollster on Biden’s 2020 campaign. “Something’s gonna happen in 2024. You and I, right now, don’t know what that is.”

 

https://www.politico.com/news/2024/08/22/democrat-pollsters-kamala-harris-00176065

 

Funny how professional pollsters are a lot less confident than professional Democrat cheerleaders like you, Irish.

I've seen you make this point before but I don't get it. If you ask a 1000 people - you will get Democrat, Republican, Other, Undecided, - the ratio will change over time changing the results. I don't disagree that polling is tricky - and mistakes have and will be made - but I don't see why a change in those ratios in say a swing state is not somewhat of a guide to who will win because  - your point - undecided's are not reflected in polls. 

Edited by Fat is a type of crazy
Posted
2 minutes ago, luckymitchell said:

Well played, I was going to use that joke too.  

 

...but you were too busy w.......?

  • Like 1
Posted
6 minutes ago, TedG said:

 

First off you make a comment that the 1% do not pay any taxes.   According to the tax foundation the 1% pay 45% of all federal income taxes. 

Wow why aren’t you voting Harris she just wants 28%

  • Haha 1
Posted
3 minutes ago, Fat is a type of crazy said:

I've seen you make this point before but I don't get it. If you ask a 1000 people - you will get Democrat, Republican, Other, Undecided, - the ratio will change over time changing the results. I don't disagree that polling is tricky and mistakes have and will be made but I don't see why a change in those ratios in say a swing state is not a somewhat of a guide to who will win because  - your point - undecided's are not reflected in polls. 

If your still undecided, your not voting 

Posted
2 minutes ago, Irish star said:

Google it , do I have to do everything 

The dems in the House wrote the PPE bill. 

Posted
3 minutes ago, Irish star said:

Wow why aren’t you voting Harris she just wants 28%

Harris wants 28% of what? 

Posted
19 minutes ago, Irish star said:

Nothing like the traitors trying to overturn a fair election, no rigging whatsoever, but keep playing that to The Cult of Lunatics 

Fair.... yea, fairest, safest since records began, 

Posted
1 minute ago, maesariang said:

I just look at 4 polls that average out well. On those polls it is close.

 

Thought we were not allowed to look at polls, discuss polls or think about polls?

  • Like 1
  • Sad 1
  • Love It 1
Posted

Inflammatory posts and replies have been removed:

  • Please be polite and respectful to others
  • Do not flame, troll or stalk other members

Some posts  and replies containing unattributed content have been removed as per the following comment from the Political Soapbox forum header:

  • Stay on topic and back up any claims with credible sources.
Posted
3 minutes ago, Fat is a type of crazy said:

Maybe - with months to go who knows - but his point seems to be that undecided's are somehow invisible in polls or something.

Well you will need to register by Oct 1 I believe 

Posted
1 minute ago, Will B Good said:

 

Thought we were not allowed to look at polls, discuss polls or think about polls?

Send me a message first and I may let you.

  • Sad 1
Posted
Just now, maesariang said:

Send me a message first and I may let you.

 

5555.....I am going to wait now for the Nov 5th poll.....Bolli is on ice.

  • Like 1
Posted
2 minutes ago, luckymitchell said:

Fair.... yea, fairest, safest since records began, 

Democrats outnumber Republicans, we don’t need to rig just get people if their Butts 

  • Agree 1
Posted
6 minutes ago, Irish star said:

Taxes Geezus IMG_3050.thumb.png.fd9fafd04127b6509eadf28636d1f25a.png

IMG_3049.png

IMG_3051.png

IMG_3052.png

 

Nice screen capture.  What is your point? 

 

 

 

  • Confused 1
Posted
1 minute ago, TedG said:

 

Nice screen capture.  What is your point? 

 

 

 

Try to get you to read , instead of listening to Qanon or Faux entertainment 

  • Haha 1
Posted
Just now, maesariang said:

So no goals before then? 

 

Premiership is up to full speed now...... so plenty of goals I guess.

  • Thumbs Up 1
  • Haha 1
Posted
2 minutes ago, simple1 said:

 

Warren had her DNA test in 2012.She apologised around three months after her test results were released in 2019 for causing any angst, hardly a federal crime such as trump who has lied and cheated countless times- as I said a storm in a tea cup, like nearly all BS stirred by trump , then amplified to the nth degree by MAGA. For those interested factcheck info...

 

 when she ran for Senate in Massachusetts. Critics questioned whether she received any advantages from claiming Native American ancestry — an idea we’ve addressed before (there’s no evidence she benefited).

 

https://www.factcheck.org/2018/10/the-facts-on-elizabeth-warrens-dna-test/

 

You may like to take note of the tribe's press release, When has trump apologised for his appalling behaviour - never?

 

"Senator Warren has reached out to us and has apologized to the tribe," Hubbard said in a statement. "We are encouraged by this dialogue and understanding that being a Cherokee Nation tribal citizen is rooted in centuries of culture and laws not through DNA tests. We are encouraged by her action and hope that the slurs and mockery of tribal citizens and Indian history and heritage will now come to an end."

I was told I had Cherokee blood , it was BS on DNA  

Posted
Just now, Irish star said:

Try to get you to read , instead of listening to Qanon or Faux entertainment 

 

 You are posting screen captures that you don’t understand.  

  • Thanks 2
Posted (edited)
6 minutes ago, luckymitchell said:

Have you just necked a litre of M150?

Yeah high blood pressure and M150 lol , you seem like an expert tell us the advantages of this elixir  

Edited by Irish star

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.




×
×
  • Create New...