Harris husband sexcapades

[riclag]

He screwed around on His first wife and got the Nanny Pg!

Wow , its like the dirt bags all of a sudden got holes! 

https://nypost.com/2024/08/03/us-news/harris-husband-cheated-on-first-wife-with-nanny-and-got-her-pregnant-report/

 

 

 

 

[susanlea]

6 hours ago, riclag said:

He screwed around on His first wife and got the Nanny Pg!

Wow , its like the dirt bags all of a sudden got holes! 

https://nypost.com/2024/08/03/us-news/harris-husband-cheated-on-first-wife-with-nanny-and-got-her-pregnant-report/

 

 

 

 

Trash married to trash

[susanlea]

Is he from Canada as well?

[jerrymahoney]

The NY Post article linked above refers to breaking news here:

 

"Naylor did not keep the baby, a close friend with direct knowledge of the affair and pregnancy told The Daily Mail. It’s unclear what, exactly, the friend meant." So here it is:

 

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-13703933/Kamala-Harris-Doug-Emhoff-cheated-nanny-Najen-Nayler.html

[Hanaguma]

Oooops. After digging through Trump's personal life for years, the chickens are coming home to roost.

 

So Mr. Kamala got his kids' elementary school teacher pregnant while still married to their mother? Interesting.

[2baht]

 

47 minutes ago, susanlea said:

Trash married to trash

WGAF!!! Always carry condoms, susanlea!

[herfiehandbag]

One phrase: felonies, committed by fraudulently using campaign funds to pay off a porn star he shagged.

[stevenl]

10 minutes ago, Hanaguma said:

Oooops. After digging through Trump's personal life for years, the chickens are coming home to roost.

 

So Mr. Kamala got his kids' elementary school teacher pregnant while still married to their mother? Interesting.

Trump's personal life versus the personal life of the husband of Kamala. See the difference?

[susanlea]

11 minutes ago, Hanaguma said:

Oooops. After digging through Trump's personal life for years, the chickens are coming home to roost.

 

So Mr. Kamala got his kids' elementary school teacher pregnant while still married to their mother? Interesting.

Indian Canadian woman too 

[susanlea]

1 minute ago, stevenl said:

Trump's personal life versus the personal life of the husband of Kamala. See the difference?

Nope.

[jerrymahoney]

The NY Times article on the topic mentions The Daily Mail article but no reference to any pregnancy, or baby delivered.

 

However, for those so inclined, reference the Richard Dreyfuss character in The American President movie singing:

 

It's beginning to look a lot like Christmas.

Edited August 4 by jerrymahoney

[Chwooly]

With all the problems around the world and this is what our feckless media focus's on. More bull<deleted> for braindead people to read about to keep them entertained. 

[susanlea]

3 minutes ago, Chwooly said:

With all the problems around the world and this is what our feckless media focus's on. More bull<deleted> for braindead people to read about to keep them entertained. 

Harris creates problems.

[Galong]

Kamala is running for president, not her husband. Name one policy that Kamala's husband will implement that will hurt or help the country.  Now look at Project 2025. Look at policies instead of personalities.  In other words, try to act educated whereby policy is what matters. 

I'd say nice try, but it wasn't.  The GOP is grasping at straws because they don't have anyone of substance on Kamala. Even if they did, she should be president because SHE'S NOT TRUMP. She's also not a convicted felon who tried to overthrow the government, period.

[bubblegum]

19 minutes ago, susanlea said:

Harris creates problems.

Sound bites without depth like the shallow house republicans. 

[susanlea]

8 minutes ago, Galong said:

Kamala is running for president, not her husband. Name one policy that Kamala's husband will implement that will hurt or help the country.  Now look at Project 2025. Look at policies instead of personalities.  In other words, try to act educated whereby policy is what matters. 

I'd say nice try, but it wasn't.  The GOP is grasping at straws because they don't have anyone of substance on Kamala. Even if they did, she should be president because SHE'S NOT TRUMP. She's also not a convicted felon who tried to overthrow the government, period.

Kamala choose to marry him. Project 25 has nothing to do with Trump. Harris is pro war pro open borders.

 

She is not Trump is just a dumb comment

 

 

[susanlea]

10 minutes ago, bubblegum said:

Sound bites without depth like the shallow house republicans. 

You can't handle facts. All fluff.

[Captain Flack]

A reported post and replies, referring to an imaginary disease has been removed, as against forum rules.

[Yellowtail]

57 minutes ago, herfiehandbag said:

One phrase: felonies, committed by fraudulently using campaign funds to pay off a porn star he shagged.

That's hilarious. The court's position seems to be that had it been paid with campaign funds it would have been okay.

[Yellowtail]

49 minutes ago, jerrymahoney said:

The NY Times article on the topic mentions The Daily Mail article but no reference to any pregnancy, or baby delivered.

 

However, for those so inclined, reference the Richard Dreyfuss character in The American President movie singing:

 

It's beginning to look a lot like Christmas.

No one voting for Harris cares about illicit affairs or what happened to the baby. The can't kill them fast enough. 

[cdemundo]

2 hours ago, stevenl said:

Trump's personal life versus the personal life of the husband of Kamala. See the difference?

Correct.

And don't forget, you can still attack Hunter Biden, please do that.

Don't forget Hilary's emails.

And of course President Biden is still old.

Don't forget to question how Ms. Harris was chosen as candidate, I know you are sincere about protecting the democratic process.

 

Gotta go, I just threw up in my mouth a bit thinking about the hypocrisy of Republicans.

Edited August 4 by cdemundo

[susanlea]

8 minutes ago, cdemundo said:

Correct.

And don't forget, you can still attack Hunter Biden, please do that.

Don't forget Hilary's emails.

And of course President Biden is still old.

Don't forget to question how Ms. Harris was chosen as candidate, I know you are sincere about protecting the democratic process.

 

Gotta go, I just threw up in my mouth a bit thinking about the hypocrisy of Republicans.

Drink water

[jerrymahoney]

2 hours ago, Yellowtail said:

No one voting for Harris cares about illicit affairs or what happened to the baby. The can't kill them fast enough. 

To note again that the NY Times article on the topic references The Daily Mail as the source but NYT makes no mention of a pregnancy or baby.

 

One of the NYT article authors:

 

Ken Bensinger covers right wing media and national political campaigns for The Times.

 

 

[Yellowtail]

3 minutes ago, jerrymahoney said:

To note again that the NY Times article on the topic references The Daily Mail as the source but NYT makes no mention of a pregnancy or baby.

 

One of the NYT article authors:

 

Ken Bensinger covers right wing media and national political campaigns for The Times.

 

 

No on voting for Harris cares that the NYT plays fast and loose with the facts either, they depend on it. 

[jerrymahoney]

3 minutes ago, Yellowtail said:

No on voting for Harris cares that the NYT plays fast and loose with the facts either, they depend on it. 

I think it is maybe quite the opposite: The NYT notes that the extra-marital affair by Emhoff prior to his marriage to Harris was noted in the vetting process for  Harris as Biden's VP in 2020. If the affair was disclosed but NOT the pregnancy or baby, that would be no small deal.

[CallumWK]

12 minutes ago, jerrymahoney said:

One of the NYT article authors:

 

Ken Bensinger covers right wing media and national political campaigns for The Times.

 

Of course, because you would never hear anything about this from a left wing journalist

[jerrymahoney]

4 minutes ago, CallumWK said:

 

Of course, because you would never hear anything about this from a left wing journalist

You fellas aren't getting it:

 

What the Times is implying is that, while the extra-marital affair was disclosed to the 2020 Biden VP vetting committee but NOT the baby, it is possible and I say POSSIBLE, that Harris misled the committee.

[riclag]

2 hours ago, Galong said:

Kamala is running for president, not her husband. Name one policy that Kamala's husband will implement that will hurt or help the country.  Now look at Project 2025. Look at policies instead of personalities.  In other words, try to act educated whereby policy is what matters. 

I'd say nice try, but it wasn't.  The GOP is grasping at straws because they don't have anyone of substance on Kamala. Even if they did, she should be president because SHE'S NOT TRUMP. She's also not a convicted felon who tried to overthrow the government, period.

What country you from?

My country suffered through a dem administration  that had Cocaine 

in the WH,People exposing their chests at a WH event! First son exposing his prostitute friends , crack cocaine, illegal gun possession and other weird tax crimes! 
enough of the progressive culture , in the WH!

Edited August 4 by riclag

[simple1]

11 hours ago, riclag said:

He screwed around on His first wife and got the Nanny Pg!

Wow , its like the dirt bags all of a sudden got holes! 

https://nypost.com/2024/08/03/us-news/harris-husband-cheated-on-first-wife-with-nanny-and-got-her-pregnant-report/

 

 

 

 

 

Same old low life personal attack. Like to compare to trump's ethical and moral track record?  e.g. when trump had sex with someone else when his wife was pregnant. This stuff occurred 15 years ago and was disclosed to Biden Admin when Harris was being vetted.

 

Currently looking good for Harris, trump repeatedly making mistakes, foot in mouth, own worst enemy....

Edited August 4 by simple1

[Yellowtail]

10 minutes ago, jerrymahoney said:

You fellas aren't getting it:

 

What the Times is implying is that, while the extra-marital affair was disclosed to the 2020 Biden VP vetting committee but NOT the baby, it is possible and I say POSSIBLE, that Harris misled the committee.

I was not getting it, but I still do not see how it makes any difference. Again, anyone voting for her does not care.