October 24, 20241 yr Popular Post 7 minutes ago, Yellowtail said: Do you have anything that supports your claim? No, you don't. Tell us, who are you really asking since you're answering your own question? Do you have a running conversation in your own head? My claim; Never in the history of politics have so many top ranking administration members turned on a then sitting/now former head of state. I stand by it and anyone who's even semi-conscious knows it's true. No one else even comes close, and you know it. So, let the frantic diversions begin.
October 24, 20241 yr 6 minutes ago, Danderman123 said: Trump teargassed protestors in Lafayette Park to clear the way for a photo op. Where are the photos of this photo op?
October 24, 20241 yr 2 minutes ago, Yellowtail said: He did not specify in the U.S., nor did he provide a time range. Had he said in US recent history, fine. Just I you have claimed Trump took up the offer to have the square cleared of protestors, I would not have said anything. But both of you are dishonest. I am just using your tactics. Since yours is one of endless and lame diversions I think we can both agree that's not true.
October 24, 20241 yr Popular Post 2 minutes ago, G_Money said: Where are the photos of this photo op? More importantly, where are the cameras that were used during the event? And where are the lens caps??
October 24, 20241 yr 1 minute ago, Inderpland said: Tell us, who are you really asking since you're answering your own question? Do you have a running conversation in your own head? My claim; Never in the history of politics have so many top ranking administration members turned on a then sitting/now former head of state. I stand by it and anyone who's even semi-conscious knows it's true. No one else even comes close, and you know it. So, let the frantic diversions begin. Ladies and Gentlemen, that's how you do it when you're dishonest and you can't support your false claims.
October 24, 20241 yr 4 minutes ago, Yellowtail said: Ladies and Gentlemen, that's how you do it when you're dishonest and you can't support your false claims. QED.
October 24, 20241 yr 6 minutes ago, Yellowtail said: Ladies and Gentlemen, that's how you do it when you're dishonest and you can't support your false claims. Describing your Trump, eh................
October 24, 20241 yr 1 minute ago, Inderpland said: QED. Ladies and Gentlemen, that's how you do it when you're dishonest and you know you've been caught out, you pretend.
October 24, 20241 yr 3 minutes ago, Yellowtail said: Ladies and Gentlemen, that's how you do it when you're dishonest and you know you've been caught out, you pretend. Another Trump attribute, well done............
October 24, 20241 yr 3 minutes ago, Yellowtail said: Ladies and Gentlemen, that's how you do it when you're dishonest and you know you've been caught out, you pretend. Ladies and gentlemen, that's how you do it when you got absolutely nothing to contribute and know the claim is the truth. Again; Never in the history of politics have so many top ranking administration members turned on a then sitting/now former head of state as the number that have turned on Trump. It's not even remotely close, completely in a league of his own. In fact, it's not even the same sport.
October 24, 20241 yr Shoe on the other foot !Would the FBI be MOVING mountains if this was another figure that was almost assassinated ? ”Thomas Matthew Crooks allegedly had encrypted messaging accounts in Germany, Belgium and New Zealand” https://www.foxnews.com/us/trump-shooter-multiple-encrypted-accounts-overseas-germany-rep-waltz
October 24, 20241 yr 27 minutes ago, G_Money said: Where are the photos of this photo op? Geez G You don't remember that when he held up the bible in front of Ashburton House after the park and roads were cleared.
October 24, 20241 yr Popular Post 2 minutes ago, Fat is a type of crazy said: Geez G You don't remember that when he held up the bible in front of Ashburton House after the park and roads were cleared. I don’t. I’d love to see the so called tear gassing.
October 24, 20241 yr 1 minute ago, G_Money said: I don’t. I’d love to see the so called tear gassing. It was a big deal in Australia because an Australian reporter was attacked by a policeman. Picture in the link. https://wjla.com/news/local/gallery/australian-journalist-attacked-live-on-abc7-during-clearing-of-lafayette-square-testifies?photo=1
October 24, 20241 yr 2 minutes ago, Fat is a type of crazy said: It was a big deal in Australia because an Australian reporter was attacked by a policeman. Picture in the link. https://wjla.com/news/local/gallery/australian-journalist-attacked-live-on-abc7-during-clearing-of-lafayette-square-testifies?photo=1 This is what comes up . Not much information
October 24, 20241 yr 56 minutes ago, Fat is a type of crazy said: It was a big deal in Australia because an Australian reporter was attacked by a policeman. Picture in the link. https://wjla.com/news/local/gallery/australian-journalist-attacked-live-on-abc7-during-clearing-of-lafayette-square-testifies?photo=1 The Park Police do not report to the President. Was the reported seriously injured as a result of being gassed?
October 24, 20241 yr 1 hour ago, G_Money said: This is what comes up . Not much information There's text on the right. Lots of information here. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Donald_Trump_photo_op_at_St._John's_Church
October 24, 20241 yr 32 minutes ago, Yellowtail said: The Park Police do not report to the President. Was the reported seriously injured as a result of being gassed? No but they were assaulted - not something we see often in Australia. Especially when protesters are basically peaceful. Discussion of use of tear gas here. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Donald_Trump_photo_op_at_St._John's_Church
October 24, 20241 yr Popular Post 2 minutes ago, Fat is a type of crazy said: No but they were assaulted - not something we see often in Australia. Especially when protesters are basically peaceful. Discussion of use of tear gas here. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Donald_Trump_photo_op_at_St._John's_Church So not gassed like was claimed. Did the protestors have a permit? What were they protesting?
October 24, 20241 yr 1 minute ago, Yellowtail said: So not gassed like was claimed. Did the protestors have a permit? What were they protesting? If you are referring to my post I never said the reporter was gassed. The link talks about the use of tear gas on the day. For other information you require you can find out the details in the link.
October 24, 20241 yr 1 minute ago, Fat is a type of crazy said: If you are referring to my post I never said the reporter was gassed. Had I been referring to your post, I would not have said: So not gassed like was claimed., I would have said: So not gassed like you claimed. 1 minute ago, Fat is a type of crazy said: The link talks about the use of tear gas on the day. For other information you require you can find out the details in the link. Do you think people should be allowed to block and or disrupt people not protesting?
October 24, 20241 yr Popular Post 19 minutes ago, Fat is a type of crazy said: There's text on the right. Lots of information here. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Donald_Trump_photo_op_at_St._John's_Church No text shows when I downloaded. Hard to believe gassing took place for a photo op. There has to be more to the story that someone leaving out. But then the left is infamous for make believe
October 24, 20241 yr Popular Post 2 hours ago, Danderman123 said: Trump teargassed protestors in Lafayette Park to clear the way for a photo op. Debunked - yet another hoax. An internal government investigation has determined that the decision to forcibly clear racial justice protesters from an area in front of the White House last summer was not influenced by then-President Donald Trump’s plan to stage a Bible-toting photo opportunity at that spot. https://apnews.com/article/donald-trump-george-floyd-government-and-politics-a9931785996ddfafcc42dcdde9f50df5
October 24, 20241 yr 30 minutes ago, theblether said: Debunked - yet another hoax. An internal government investigation has determined that the decision to forcibly clear racial justice protesters from an area in front of the White House last summer was not influenced by then-President Donald Trump’s plan to stage a Bible-toting photo opportunity at that spot. https://apnews.com/article/donald-trump-george-floyd-government-and-politics-a9931785996ddfafcc42dcdde9f50df5 Wow You’re batting a 1000 ! You debunked the Kelly/ Hitler attempted hoax in another thread. And this! Great Investigative Research! Thanks
October 24, 20241 yr 25 minutes ago, riclag said: Wow You’re batting a 1000 ! You debunked the Kelly/ Hitler attempted hoax in another thread. And this! Great Investigative Research! Thanks They don't want to know, they don't want to hear the truth. And the truth was out within days.
October 24, 20241 yr 4 hours ago, Danderman123 said: Trump teargassed protestors in Lafayette Park to clear the way for a photo op. Oh dear, that seems to have blown up in your face.
October 24, 20241 yr 1 hour ago, theblether said: They don't want to know, they don't want to hear the truth. And the truth was out within days. There's a lot more to it than simply saying that report came out and is correct. It seems odd that the actions happened before the curfew during a protest that was peaceful at the time and right at the time of Trump and friends walk. The two views is that it was cleared to complete fencing in daylight - even though it was completed mainly at night - the second that it was done to protect Trump during his walk - the latter stated by the Justice Departments own lawyers. This Washington Post report is interesting https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/2021/06/24/trump-ig-report-lafayette-square/ - you'll need to provide your email to see it - as is the Wikipedia page I have posted that has lots of detail beyond your report. The broader issue is Trump's apparent opinions on what actions to take during such protests including the use of active troops by invocation of the Insurrection Act - the section on Law and Order on the Wikipedia page is interesting. Though the report you provide is interesting it appears it is not appropriate to go on a victory lap of debunking such claims as some suggest based on that report alone .
October 24, 20241 yr 1 hour ago, theblether said: They don't want to know, they don't want to hear the truth. And the truth was out within days. They know, but they lie, And any leftist protest the MSM describes with "peaceful" was a likely a full-on riot.
October 24, 20241 yr It's hilarious that the left wants Trump convicted of treason for not calling out the troops to clear right-wing rioters fast enough on January 6th, yet also wants him convicted for the police taking upon themselves to clear a left-wing riot. DOJ OIG Releases Report on DOJ’s Response to Protest Activity and Civil Unrest in Washington, D.C. in Late May and Early June 2020, Including at Lafayette Park
October 24, 20241 yr Popular Post 18 minutes ago, Yellowtail said: It's hilarious that the left wants Trump convicted of treason for not calling out the troops to clear right-wing rioters fast enough on January 6th, yet also wants him convicted for the police taking upon themselves to clear a left-wing riot. It's very well documented that Trump assigned 10,000 National Guard troops for Jan 6th and Pelosi and co deliberately chose not to use them.
Create an account or sign in to comment