Foreign Election Interference in the US 2024 Election!

[Inderpland]

7 minutes ago, Yellowtail said:

Do you have anything that supports your claim?

 

No, you don't. 

Tell us, who are you really asking since you're answering your own question? Do you have a running conversation in your own head?

 

My claim; Never in the history of politics have so many top ranking administration members turned on a then sitting/now former head of state. I stand by it and anyone who's even semi-conscious knows it's true. No one else even comes close, and you know it. 

 

So, let the frantic diversions begin.

[G_Money]

6 minutes ago, Danderman123 said:

Trump teargassed protestors in Lafayette Park to clear the way for a photo op.

Where are the photos of this photo op?

[Inderpland]

2 minutes ago, Yellowtail said:

He did not specify in the U.S., nor did he provide a time range. 

 

Had he said in US recent history, fine. 

 

Just I you have claimed Trump took up the offer to have the square cleared of protestors, I would not have said anything. 

 

But both of you are dishonest. I am just using your tactics. 

 

 

 

 

Since yours is one of endless and lame diversions I think we can both agree that's not true.

[Inderpland]

2 minutes ago, G_Money said:

Where are the photos of this photo op?

More importantly, where are the cameras that were used during the event? And where are the lens caps??

[Yellowtail]

1 minute ago, Inderpland said:

Tell us, who are you really asking since you're answering your own question? Do you have a running conversation in your own head?

 

My claim; Never in the history of politics have so many top ranking administration members turned on a then sitting/now former head of state. I stand by it and anyone who's even semi-conscious knows it's true. No one else even comes close, and you know it. 

 

So, let the frantic diversions begin.

Ladies and Gentlemen, that's how you do it when you're dishonest and you can't support your false claims.  

[Inderpland]

4 minutes ago, Yellowtail said:

Ladies and Gentlemen, that's how you do it when you're dishonest and you can't support your false claims.  

QED.

[transam]

6 minutes ago, Yellowtail said:

Ladies and Gentlemen, that's how you do it when you're dishonest and you can't support your false claims.  

Describing your Trump, eh................

[Yellowtail]

1 minute ago, Inderpland said:

QED.

Ladies and Gentlemen, that's how you do it when you're dishonest and you know you've been caught out, you pretend. 

[transam]

3 minutes ago, Yellowtail said:

Ladies and Gentlemen, that's how you do it when you're dishonest and you know you've been caught out, you pretend. 

Another Trump attribute, well done............

[Inderpland]

3 minutes ago, Yellowtail said:

Ladies and Gentlemen, that's how you do it when you're dishonest and you know you've been caught out, you pretend. 

Ladies and gentlemen, that's how you do it when you got absolutely nothing to contribute and know the claim is the truth.

 

Again; Never in the history of politics have so many top ranking administration members turned on a then sitting/now former head of state as the number that have turned on Trump. It's not even remotely close, completely in a league of his own. In fact, it's not even the same sport.

[riclag]

Shoe on the other foot !Would the FBI be MOVING  mountains if this was another figure that was almost assassinated ?

 

”Thomas Matthew Crooks allegedly had encrypted messaging accounts in Germany, Belgium and New Zealand”

 

 

https://www.foxnews.com/us/trump-shooter-multiple-encrypted-accounts-overseas-germany-rep-waltz

 

[Fat is a type of crazy]

27 minutes ago, G_Money said:

Where are the photos of this photo op?

Geez G You don't remember that  when he held up the bible in front of Ashburton House after the park and roads were cleared. 

Edited October 24 by Fat is a type of crazy

[G_Money]

2 minutes ago, Fat is a type of crazy said:

Geez G You don't remember that  when he held up the bible in front of Ashburton House after the park and roads were cleared. 

I don’t. 
 

I’d love to see the so called tear gassing.

[Fat is a type of crazy]

1 minute ago, G_Money said:

I don’t. 
 

I’d love to see the so called tear gassing.

It was a big deal in Australia because an Australian reporter was attacked by a policeman. Picture in the link.

 

https://wjla.com/news/local/gallery/australian-journalist-attacked-live-on-abc7-during-clearing-of-lafayette-square-testifies?photo=1

[G_Money]

2 minutes ago, Fat is a type of crazy said:

It was a big deal in Australia because an Australian reporter was attacked by a policeman. Picture in the link.

 

https://wjla.com/news/local/gallery/australian-journalist-attacked-live-on-abc7-during-clearing-of-lafayette-square-testifies?photo=1

This is what comes up . Not much information 

 

 

[Yellowtail]

56 minutes ago, Fat is a type of crazy said:

It was a big deal in Australia because an Australian reporter was attacked by a policeman. Picture in the link.

 

https://wjla.com/news/local/gallery/australian-journalist-attacked-live-on-abc7-during-clearing-of-lafayette-square-testifies?photo=1

The Park Police do not report to the President. 

 

Was the reported seriously injured as a result of being gassed? 

[Fat is a type of crazy]

1 hour ago, G_Money said:

This is what comes up . Not much information 

 

 

There's text on the right. Lots of information here. 

 

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Donald_Trump_photo_op_at_St._John's_Church

[Fat is a type of crazy]

32 minutes ago, Yellowtail said:

The Park Police do not report to the President. 

 

Was the reported seriously injured as a result of being gassed? 

No but they were assaulted - not something we see often in Australia. Especially when protesters are basically peaceful. Discussion of use of tear gas here. 

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Donald_Trump_photo_op_at_St._John's_Church

[Yellowtail]

2 minutes ago, Fat is a type of crazy said:

No but they were assaulted - not something we see often in Australia. Especially when protesters are basically peaceful. Discussion of use of tear gas here. 

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Donald_Trump_photo_op_at_St._John's_Church

So not gassed like was claimed. 

 

Did the protestors have a permit? 

 

What were they protesting? 

[Fat is a type of crazy]

1 minute ago, Yellowtail said:

So not gassed like was claimed. 

 

Did the protestors have a permit? 

 

What were they protesting? 

If you are referring to my post I never said the reporter was gassed. The link talks about the use of tear gas on the day. For other information you require you can find out the details in the link. 

[Yellowtail]

1 minute ago, Fat is a type of crazy said:

If you are referring to my post I never said the reporter was gassed.

Had I been referring to your post, I would not have said: So not gassed like was claimed., I would have said: So not gassed like you claimed. 

 

1 minute ago, Fat is a type of crazy said:

 

The link talks about the use of tear gas on the day. For other information you require you can find out the details in the link. 

 

Do you think people should be allowed to block and or disrupt people not protesting? 

 

 

[G_Money]

19 minutes ago, Fat is a type of crazy said:

There's text on the right. Lots of information here. 

 

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Donald_Trump_photo_op_at_St._John's_Church

 No text shows when I downloaded.

 

Hard to believe gassing took place for a photo op.

 

There has to be more to the story that someone leaving out.

 

But then the left is infamous for make believe 

[theblether]

2 hours ago, Danderman123 said:

Trump teargassed protestors in Lafayette Park to clear the way for a photo op.

 

Debunked - yet another hoax. 

 

An internal government investigation has determined that the decision to forcibly clear racial justice protesters from an area in front of the White House last summer was not influenced by then-President Donald Trump’s plan to stage a Bible-toting photo opportunity at that spot.

 

https://apnews.com/article/donald-trump-george-floyd-government-and-politics-a9931785996ddfafcc42dcdde9f50df5

[riclag]

30 minutes ago, theblether said:

 

Debunked - yet another hoax. 

 

An internal government investigation has determined that the decision to forcibly clear racial justice protesters from an area in front of the White House last summer was not influenced by then-President Donald Trump’s plan to stage a Bible-toting photo opportunity at that spot.

 

https://apnews.com/article/donald-trump-george-floyd-government-and-politics-a9931785996ddfafcc42dcdde9f50df5

Wow You’re batting a 1000 !

You debunked the Kelly/ Hitler attempted hoax in another thread.

And this!

Great Investigative Research!

Thanks

[theblether]

25 minutes ago, riclag said:

Wow You’re batting a 1000 !

You debunked the Kelly/ Hitler attempted hoax in another thread.

And this!

Great Investigative Research!

Thanks

 

They don't want to know, they don't want to hear the truth. And the truth was out within days. 

 

[frank83628]

4 hours ago, Danderman123 said:

Trump teargassed protestors in Lafayette Park to clear the way for a photo op.

Oh dear, that seems to have blown up in your face.

[Fat is a type of crazy]

1 hour ago, theblether said:

 

They don't want to know, they don't want to hear the truth. And the truth was out within days. 

 

There's a lot more to it than simply saying that report came out and is correct. It seems odd that the actions happened before the curfew during a protest that was peaceful at the time and right at the time of Trump and friends walk. The two views is that it was cleared to complete fencing in daylight - even though it was completed mainly at night  - the second that it was done to protect Trump during his walk - the latter stated by the Justice Departments own lawyers. 

This Washington Post report is interesting https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/2021/06/24/trump-ig-report-lafayette-square/ - you'll need to provide your email to see it - as is the  Wikipedia page I have posted that has lots of detail beyond your report.

The broader issue is Trump's apparent opinions on what actions to take during such protests including the use of active troops by invocation of the Insurrection Act - the section on Law and Order on the  Wikipedia page is interesting. 

Though the report you provide is interesting it appears it is not appropriate to go on a victory lap of debunking such claims as some suggest based on that report alone . 

Edited October 24 by Fat is a type of crazy

[Yellowtail]

1 hour ago, theblether said:

 

They don't want to know, they don't want to hear the truth. And the truth was out within days. 

 

They know, but they lie, 

 

And any leftist protest the MSM describes with "peaceful" was a likely a full-on riot.

[Yellowtail]

It's hilarious that the left wants Trump convicted of treason for not calling out the troops to clear right-wing rioters fast enough on January 6th, yet also wants him convicted for the police taking upon themselves to clear a left-wing riot. 

 

DOJ OIG Releases Report on DOJ’s Response to Protest Activity and Civil Unrest in Washington, D.C. in Late May and Early June 2020, Including at Lafayette Park

[rasg]

18 minutes ago, Yellowtail said:

It's hilarious that the left wants Trump convicted of treason for not calling out the troops to clear right-wing rioters fast enough on January 6th, yet also wants him convicted for the police taking upon themselves to clear a left-wing riot. 

It's very well documented that Trump assigned 10,000 National Guard troops for Jan 6th and Pelosi and co deliberately chose not to use them.