The Economist Endorses Kamala Harris to Prevent a Second Trump Presidency

[proton]

22 minutes ago, Bday Prang said:

Blaming Trump for anything does not require any  evidence as such. Once his name has been mentioned anything negative  can be said and treated as fact.  It appears to be the latest  international internet forum protocol. developed , approved and initiated by the haters

 

Yeah I saw he is a threat to democracy, the constitution and is a big Hitler fan as well as wanting to get rid of the first amendment, scrap social security have people assassinated and his supporters are fascists like him who hold Nazi rallies like the 1930's. I reckon it's true as it's on Tik Tok   

[pattayasan]

3 minutes ago, proton said:

 

Yeah I saw he is a threat to democracy, the constitution and is a big Hitler fan as well as wanting to get rid of the first amendment, scrap social security have people assassinated and his supporters are fascists like him who hold Nazi rallies like the 1930's. I reckon it's true as it's on Tik Tok   

 

I reckon it';s True because I have heard Trump say it. All of it. "There are good people on both sides". This was just the latest call to violence. "If you don't fight you won't have a nation". "They are eating the dogs". "They are poisoning the blood of our country".  

[Walker88]

As Bill Maher said in his New Rules, “the economy is bigger and better than ever, and makes Arnold Palmer’s junk look like nothing. When we were coming out of the pandemic, every economist said we were in for a Recession, but like the felon’s girlfriends, it didn’t come.”

 

Per the Economist, everything that should be down and low, is…unemployment is low, Black unemployment is low, poverty levels are low, gas prices down (below $3 gallon nationwide average), and everything that should be up is up…..manufacturing, real wages, stock market, personal spending, personal savings, oil production (US now produces more energy than it uses).

 

Elsewhere Maher, he had a funny line in his monologue, dissing the notion that the felon is a Nazi. Fascist, yes, but “while all Nazis are fascist, not all fascists are Nazis. Take the Felon Bros….one difference between them and Nazis is that Hitler had a girlfriend”

[bubblegum]

@Liverpool Lou and @thaibeachlovers he's your link : look up !

[transam]

4 hours ago, thaibeachlovers said:

If Harris suffered half the attacks Trump does she would have never come out of her bunker till it was all over.

You're 'avin a larf......................Trumps gaffs are homemade, but you can't see it...............🤣

[transam]

Common sense from the Economist..........

They most definitely didn't want the future stigma of supported a nutter..........

[BruceWayne]

https://www.theguardian.com/media/2015/aug/15/economist-becomes-a-family-affair-agnellis

 

The Fiat family pwn the Economist - prolly cut a deal is all

[thecyclist]

8 hours ago, pattayasan said:

 

What you missed is that The Economist is probably one of the last publications which would ever have supported Harris. It's not like they were always biased in her direction, quite the opposite. This is huge.

What he also missed is the much more important fact that we have a retarded sociopathic fascist megalomaniac on the other side, a danger to the US and the world. 

Harris is indeed extremely underwhelming, but not because she is, according to the orange one, a radical Marxist, Communist, Socialist., but because she is the very opposite, a supporter of the  transnational neoliberal plutocracy that rules and exploits humanity. 

[thecyclist]

5 hours ago, Talon said:

 

21st century Leftist come from 3 camps:

. communists

. the intellectually dishonest

. Lenin's "useful idiots"

 

And there are hybrids of all three. 

 

It explains much.

Total crap. Did you pull that out of your butt. 

You are an extreme ignoramus. Dumb as s.. t. 

[thaipo7]

8 hours ago, Tug said:

They know what they are talking about,Harris will have a top knotch team advising her she’s going to do just fine!

In your dreams.  They will be the old Obama team that just completed Obama's 3rd term.  Look at how that turned out.

[frank83628]

8 hours ago, pattayasan said:

 

What you missed is that The Economist is probably one of the last publications which would ever have supported Harris. It's not like they were always biased in her direction, quite the opposite. This is huge.

guess you missed this sentence then?

 

11 hours ago, Social Media said:

The influential U.K.-based publication, which has a history of supporting Democratic candidates in U.S. elections since endorsing John Kerry in 2004

 

[BruceWayne]

5 hours ago, Talon said:

21st century Leftist come from 3 camps:

. communists

. the intellectually dishonest

. Lenin's "useful idiots"

 

And there are hybrids of all three. 

 

It explains much.

Starmer in the UK is textbook example of a hybrid - seems to be a true bleieve with his past editing a Trotskyite magazine in his late 20s

 

Harris is the ambitious useless idioyt archetype - her cultural influence / upbringing has left her money obsessed so very easy to manipulate thru $$$$.  Low integrity is also a deature of those types and, tbf, who can really blame them?  India is a dump with a fully functioning caste system - takes gens to shake that off

 

 

 

 

 

 

[hotchilli]

11 hours ago, Social Media said:

The Economist announced its endorsement of Vice President Kamala Harris on Thursday, citing concerns about the “unacceptable risk” that a second term for former President Donald Trump would pose to both America and the world.

The risk is if Kamala gets another 4 years USA is screwed.