Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
3 minutes ago, JonnyF said:

Another great decision from Trump.

 

Meanwhile in the UK Starmer is removing pictures of Thatcher,  and Rachel Reeves is hanging pictures of communist hero Ellen Wilkinson. 

Ellen Wilkinson who served in Churchill’s wartime coalition Government.

  • Haha 2
Posted (edited)

Now hears a radically perhaps dangerous idea. Why not busts of both Winston Churchill and Martin Luther King?

 

Both were great orators, great leaders and did great things for their countries. Their shades would probably appreciate them being together! Together they could take the piss out of Trump - worth listening to!

 

Incidentally, don't take too much notice of Rory Stewart - he talks vapid <deleted> much of the time!

Edited by herfiehandbag
  • Like 1
  • Haha 1
Posted

While I have no problem at all with this, The Imbecile surely has no idea who Winston Churchill is. Probably thinks it's the guy from The Kentucky Derby:coffee1:

  • Confused 2
  • Sad 1
  • Haha 1
Posted

Good news. Not only a reflection of the friendship of close allies, but also a reminder that Churchill's mum was an American.

Posted
36 minutes ago, herfiehandbag said:

Now hears a radically perhaps dangerous idea. Why not busts of both Winston Churchill and Martin Luther King?

There’s a MLK national memorial. 

  • Confused 1
Posted (edited)

Wiston Churchill would have considered Trump a buffoon. Trump would have labelled Churchill a RINO.

Churchill was a doer, with a strong sense of duty and a reliable moral compass. His moral code was "In War: Resolution, In Defeat: Defiance, In Victory: Magnanimity, In Peace: Good Will". He stood up for right against injustice and aggression, and the virtue of prudence.

Nowadays he would undoubtedly stand by Ukraine against Putin and his criminal war. He would have judged Putin for what the man is: a vicious criminal, who killed using Polonium, Novichok, who had Boris Nemtsov gunned down near the Kremlin, Anna Politkovskaya in her home, who poisoned Alexei Navalny, opposition leader and anti-corruption activist, and had him killed in prison four years later. 

Trump is the exact opposite of what Wiston Churchill was and stood for. Trump shines for being unresolved, sore loser, vindicative and braggard.

Edited by AndreasHG
  • Confused 2
  • Sad 1
  • Love It 1
Posted
9 minutes ago, James105 said:

 

Sounds like the left still have a lot of learning to do about why Trump won and the left spectacularly lost.  Maybe one day, probably after losing the next 2-3 elections, the left will learn that calling political opponents Hitler because they disagree with their political views is not a winning strategy.  

As far as I know there is nobody calling him Hitler. Do you know some?

  • Confused 4
  • Sad 1
Posted
9 minutes ago, newbee2022 said:

Another post from someone showing his average IQ (far below 100)

 

A brilliant riposte! :cheesy:

  • Thumbs Up 1
  • Haha 1
Posted
2 hours ago, nauseus said:

 

Another dumb comment from a sore loser.

They don't have to be a loser for a dumb remark.  Comes natural for the Leftist.  Has anyone seen Tug?  I hope he is OK.

  • Haha 1
Posted

Nice to see Trump replacing Biden’s George Floyd’s bust, “The Patron Saint of Fentanyl” with Churchill. 
 

Word is out Hunter will take possession and make a painting of George.

  • Haha 1
Posted
4 hours ago, PETERTHEEATER said:

I'm impressed. I expected that a man with his reputation would have Dolly Parton's bust on display.😀

Always been impressive and worthy of admiration...and absolutely worthy of the oral orifice😁

  • Sad 1
Posted

Perhaps Trump - or someone else - could commission a new bust of Churchill. Imo this one is bloody awful and should be melted down.

Posted

 

Yeah, Johnson also liked to identify with Churchill.

 

The old guy must be spinning in his grave. He was a man of great courage as well as his human flaws. Neither Johnson nor Trump have even a modicum of courage to compensate for their deeply flawed characters. Bullies are always cowards behind the bluster.

Posted
4 minutes ago, BusyB said:

 

Yeah, Johnson also liked to identify with Churchill.

 

The old guy must be spinning in his grave. He was a man of great courage as well as his human flaws. Neither Johnson nor Trump have even a modicum of courage to compensate for their deeply flawed characters. Bullies are always cowards behind the bluster.

 

   Since when was you nominated to speak on behalf of Winston Churchill ?

  • Agree 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



×
×
  • Create New...