Whilst I agree with your sentiments, I get the impression that you think both the victim and the perpetrator ended up dead. Not so. The perp was subjected to a failed lynching, the cops intervened and saved him.
Makes sense.
But at least that would prove there was no intention of evasion.
At this point I would almost prefer that it be treated as fully accessible pension income even if costs me some tax because at least I wouldn't be worried about maybe having to fight with TR over a complex matter I have little confidence about.
I wonder how many months or years it will take to reach clarify about this
Ah, so now pre 2024 income, to be non assessable per Por 162 -- doesn't just have to be from a savings account -- but can also be from a Roth IRA. Good catch.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now