Dem Sen.Whitehouse:

Is it appropriate for a prosecutor to

start with a name and look for a crime,its a prosecutor job to start with a crime and look for a name , correct?

 

Senator I think that is the whole problem with the weaponization that we have seen the last four years and whats been happening to Trump!

 

How Starlinistic of Whitehouse to mention the Dem  lawfare tactics  perpetrated by his party .

If the dems  are accusing you of something it means they are or have been using the tactics .
 

Story based on a report by Forbes 

Shocking lack of self awareness asking these dumb questions. Has he not been watching the clowns running on the "Get Trump" platform, then doing the most bonkers performative art in the courtroom dancing around the fact they couldnt name his crime(because there wasn't one)? Oh boy, democrats are strange folk

1 minute ago, SunnyinBangrak said:

Shocking lack of self awareness asking these dumb questions. Has he not been watching the clowns running on the "Get Trump" platform, then doing the most bonkers performative art in the courtroom dancing around the fact they couldnt name his crime(because there wasn't one)? Oh boy, democrats are strange folk

Toxicity ,comes to mind!

They are so worried about “what went around is gonna come around”.

 

6 minutes ago, riclag said:

Toxicity ,comes to mind!

They are so worried about “what went around is gonna come around”.

 

I so hope it is, but Trump is a moderate guy. I suspect he will not get Schiff, Schumer, Obama, Clinton, Sullivan, 51 lying spies, Merchan, Bragg, Colangelo, Smith and the rest of the lawfarists and bang them up in Florence supermax until their showtrials for treason start. I certainly would do just that.

 

We do need to make sure no other party tries jailing the opponent they know they can't beat in a free and fair election. Quite how that happens, not sure. Just lucky for Trump he had no skeletons in his closet so they had go use an unnamed pretend "crime" to go after him.

She will be confirmed for sure.

Not sure why my last comment got a laughter emoji. As sure as the sun rises tomorrow she will be confirmed.

Of course she will - she has made the requisite financial contributions, and made a few legal decisions, which rather benefited Mr Trump.

 

As for the laughter emoji, perhaps someone is expressing the view that the whole business around these nominees is a joke.

Just now, herfiehandbag said:

Of course she will - she has made the requisite financial contributions, and made a few legal decisions, which rather benefited Mr Trump.

 

As for the laughter emoji, perhaps someone is expressing the view that the whole business around these nominees is a joke.

Her hearings went off without a hitch, so there is that. The idiotic smiley is of no concern. I notice that people with nothing toi say use those. I wish we could see how left them like the old days. Because it is only like one or two people with the mindset of a five year old that does that.

It was quite entertaining watching the dems getting slapped around by Bondi, and once again the dems have proven that they are great at embarrassing themselves and making themselves look like the eyesore that they are.

1 hour ago, novacova said:

It was quite entertaining watching the dems getting slapped around by Bondi, and once again the dems have proven that they are great at embarrassing themselves and making themselves look like the eyesore that they are.

Exactly. She is  a great nominee. Obviously well qualified and has the temprament for the job.  

6 hours ago, novacova said:

It was quite entertaining watching the dems getting slapped around by Bondi, and once again the dems have proven that they are great at embarrassing themselves and making themselves look like the eyesore that they are.

Schiff was no match for Bondi, I like 

how she got in those truth bombs.

1.You leaked 

2. You were censored as a House Rep

1 minute ago, riclag said:

Schiff was no match for Bondi, I like 

how she got in those truth bombs.

1.You leaked 

2. You were censored as a House Rep

It was a wonderful moment. I suspect Schiff and his fellow fantasist lawfare merchants know they are in a whole world of trouble. Perfect.

25 minutes ago, riclag said:

Schiff was no match for Bondi, I like 

how she got in those truth bombs.

1.You leaked 

2. You were censored as a House Rep

She threw their predicates back at them without any reservations showing them that they are just as accountable as any other everyday person.

12 minutes ago, novacova said:

She threw their predicates back at them without any reservations showing them that they are just as accountable as any other everyday person.

 

44 minutes ago, SunnyinBangrak said:

It was a wonderful moment. I suspect Schiff and his fellow fantasist lawfare merchants know they are in a whole world of trouble. Perfect.

On to making the FBI ACCOUNTABLE.

 

Kash Patel next !He really got the establishments panties bunched up.

The Dream Team :Bondi, Patel, Hegseth,Noem, Radcliff and Holman ,who doesn’t require Senate confirmation. 

 

Make America Safe Again

 

 

 

17 hours ago, riclag said:

Dem Sen.Whitehouse:

Is it appropriate for a prosecutor to

start with a name and look for a crime,its a prosecutor job to start with a crime and look for a name , correct?

 

Senator I think that is the whole problem with the weaponization that we have seen the last four years and whats been happening to Trump!

 

How Starlinistic of Whitehouse to mention the Dem  lawfare tactics  perpetrated by his party .

If the dems  are accusing you of something it means they are or have been using the tactics .
 

Story based on a report by Forbes 

It’s refreshing to see these twisted democratics get their faces rubbed in their own feces and eat too. 

17 hours ago, SunnyinBangrak said:

I so hope it is, but Trump is a moderate guy. I suspect he will not get Schiff, Schumer, Obama, Clinton, Sullivan, 51 lying spies, Merchan, Bragg, Colangelo, Smith and the rest of the lawfarists and bang them up in Florence supermax until their showtrials for treason start. I certainly would do just that.

 

We do need to make sure no other party tries jailing the opponent they know they can't beat in a free and fair election. Quite how that happens, not sure. Just lucky for Trump he had no skeletons in his closet so they had go use an unnamed pretend "crime" to go after him.

Every single person who was involved in criminally using the law to go after political opponents should be prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law and hung out to dry.

17 hours ago, riclag said:

Starlinistic

 

A vicious type of authoritarian bird?

1 hour ago, 0james0 said:

Every single person who was involved in criminally using the law to go after political opponents should be prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law and hung out to dry.

 

A.Bragg L.James out of NY

https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/magazine-columnists/1446574/for-prosecutor-bragg-trump-indictment-is-campaign-promise-kept/

 

Fanni Willis out of GA

https://www.newsweek.com/fani-willis-fulton-county-disrict-attorney-result-1978623

 

Jack Smith former Prosecutor for ICC

and illegitimate hired special counsel .

https://www.foxnews.com/video/6358078340112

 

She got spunk!

Strong woman on my side Nancy & Pam

1 hour ago, Will B Good said:

 

A vicious type of authoritarian bird?

Only if the title  contained a g.

Otherwise is just an example of mistaken cleverdickness.

11 hours ago, Cryingdick said:

Her hearings went off without a hitch, so there is that. The idiotic smiley is of no concern. I notice that people with nothing toi say use those. I wish we could see how left them like the old days. Because it is only like one or two people with the mindset of a five year old that does that.

I agree. Her hearing went off without a hitch. She will be confirmed as the AG. As for the emojis maybe a poll should be run as to how many want to keep or get rid of the emoji anonymizer. I'll guarantee if the anonymizer goes the only laughing emojis you'll see is when someone has actually said something funny. The trolling emojis will disappear. I vote for get rid of the anonymizer.

The Dunning-Kruger syndrome is in epidemic display in the US  now !

In a Lemming response !

Trump is never going to understand his ignorance.

Just now, dinsdale said:

I agree. Her hearing went off without a hitch. She will be confirmed as the AG. As for the emojis maybe a poll should be run as to how many want to keep or get rid of the emoji anonymizer. I'll guarantee if the anonymizer goes the only laughing emojis you'll see is when someone has actually said something funny. The trolling emojis will disappear. I vote for get rid of the anonymizer.

huh?

7 minutes ago, 0ffshore360 said:

The Dunning-Kruger syndrome is in epidemic display in the US  now !

In a Lemming response !

Trump is never going to understand his ignorance.

Do you understand what the Dunning-Kruger effect even is?

 

Now we have the adults back in charge. People with the attitude, experience and qualifications for their roles. We are soooooo done with giving people like "admiral" Levine her high position because of how many woke boxes she ticked.

 

The democrat dog days of Dunning-Kruger are ovah.

2 minutes ago, 0ffshore360 said:

huh?

Attached emojis use to show who posted them. Obviously before your time on here. There are some on here that troll negative emojis. This would disappear if the anonymizer function was turned off. Those who troll the negative emojis are too gutless or too stupid to actually respond to contributor's posts. They hide behind the anonymizer. Hope this answer your "huh" question.

12 minutes ago, 0ffshore360 said:

The Dunning-Kruger syndrome is in epidemic display in the US  now !

In a Lemming response !

Trump is never going to understand his ignorance.

Please explain the Dunning Kruger Effect. 

9 minutes ago, dinsdale said:

Please explain the Dunning Kruger Effect. 

Sourced via "Siri" or "Alexa" ?

1 hour ago, SunnyinBangrak said:

Do you understand what the Dunning-Kruger effect even is?

 

Now we have the adults back in charge. People with the attitude, experience and qualifications for their roles. We are soooooo done with giving people like "admiral" Levine her high position because of how many woke boxes she ticked.

 

The democrat dog days of Dunning-Kruger are ovah.

I most certainly do understand the implications of the Dunning-Kruger effect .

Do you require a simplistic explanation or are you satisfied with acceptance of direction by those you have accepted as "adults in the room" when that implies admission that you have  adolescent status  by comparison to such as Trump?

Frightening !

 

 

14 hours ago, 0james0 said:

Every single person who was involved in criminally using the law to go after political opponents should be prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law and hung out to dry.

 

If there are no consequences, they'll just try it on again next time.

 

12 hours ago, dinsdale said:

Attached emojis use to show who posted them. Obviously before your time on here. There are some on here that troll negative emojis. This would disappear if the anonymizer function was turned off. Those who troll the negative emojis are too gutless or too stupid to actually respond to contributor's posts. They hide behind the anonymizer. Hope this answer your "huh" question.

 

I miss that.  I'd even support exposing the number of each emoji that each member has used.

 

And I wish they'd use AI to rate the positivity and negativity of each member and bin the ones that just bring down the appeal of the forums.  That would eliminate quite a few prolific posters, but I think it would result in an increase overall as more members post up without fear of being unjustly maligned.

 

And, I wish computers had breathalyzers that wouldn't allow you to post if you're over the limit.  But that's another topic for another forum.