Jump to content

Thailand Debates Costly Move to Relocate Capital from Bangkok


Recommended Posts

Posted

^^^ Well, this is a Thai forum after all. Hardly relative. Thais probably care as much about what happens in Cajun country as the latter do Thais.

Not a biggie, many places have tiny nominal capitals... just shift government house and irrelevant politicians (all of them), albeit Bkk will still need saving. It was always a lost cause when what's his name relocated to a river delta from Ayuthaya in the 1700s. Guess they never envisaged such expansion.   

 

  • Thumbs Up 1
Posted

They don’t have any choice ,one day in the future the condos will become high level chiken  farms and it will be too late to move

  • Thumbs Up 1
Posted
5 hours ago, daveAustin said:

^^^ Well, this is a Thai forum after all. Hardly relative. Thais probably care as much about what happens in Cajun country as the latter do Thais.

Not a biggie, many places have tiny nominal capitals... just shift government house and irrelevant politicians (all of them), albeit Bkk will still need saving. It was always a lost cause when what's his name relocated to a river delta from Ayuthaya in the 1700s. Guess they never envisaged such expansion.   

 

 

Clearly none of you know the hip.

 

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=LAZUsCONjIQ&pp=ygUlbmV3IG9ybGVhbnMgaXMgc2lua2luZyB0cmFnaWNhbGx5IGhpcA%3D%3D

 

 

  • Confused 4
Posted
12 hours ago, snoop1130 said:

 

 

bkkflooding.png

Flooding in Bangkok | Photo via Bangkok Post/Somchai Poomlard

 

A proposal to move Thailand's capital from Bangkok to Nakhon Ratchasima has sparked debate, as a government study highlights the high costs and complexity of such a project. The Interior Ministry reported that relocating the capital would require a significant budget and a public referendum. This suggestion came from Patchara Jantararuangtong, a member of the Pheu Thai Party, during a parliamentary session on October 12, 2023.

 

Opposition to the move points at strengthening infrastructure in Bangkok and nearby areas, which are at risk of sinking. On November 28, 2023, the Cabinet tasked the Interior Ministry with exploring two options: moving the capital or building a barrier to protect Bangkok.

 

The Cabinet reviewed these findings on February 4, 2024. Experts agree that any decision would need a comprehensive impact assessment, considering how businesses, jobs, and daily life might be affected.

 

 

 

The study recommends building a sea barrier or setting up regional centers to reduce the pressure on Bangkok's central agencies. It also evaluated infrastructure in Nakhon Ratchasima, focusing on its roads and high-speed rail links to other regions.

 

Further research on water resources is crucial for sustainable and eco-friendly development. The study also suggests examining capital relocations in other countries for more insights.

 

State officials are seeking funding to assess the impact of sea level rise on the Chao Phraya River and explore long-term solutions.

 

news-logo-btm.jpg

-- 2025-02-10

 

image.png

 

image.png

 

THis is usually  the choice of militaristic governments and dictatorships....

  • Confused 2
  • Sad 1
  • Agree 1
Posted
12 hours ago, snoop1130 said:

the Cabinet tasked the Interior Ministry with exploring two options: moving the capital or building a barrier to protect Bangkok.

They will opt for option two which will prove utterly useless

Posted
12 minutes ago, kwilco said:

 

THis is usually  the choice of militaristic governments and dictatorships....

This is not like in Myanmar as the problem is that Bangkok is sinking, while the sea level is rising... and if you are right, then look at the US that have had 9 cities serve as capitals...

Posted
40 minutes ago, save the frogs said:

are you from canada?

no one outside canada has ever heard of that band. 

there was a canadian guy on here who was constantly referencing this band and got offended when i told him that. 

 

I am. Yes I know. The song still rocks pretty hard.

 

Did he tell you he was sorry ? 

  • Confused 1
  • Haha 2
Posted
3 hours ago, SingAPorn said:

Let them move it anyplace it will still remain cheaper and better then Hua Hin where foreigners get cheated on a 24 hour basis either by workers, contractors, restaurants...you name it. Most bank staff are very rude with foreigners lately and this feeling was never there before.

 

Foreigners are really not considered in Hua Hin compared to other cities in Thailand with amazing  and wonderful services, prices and people.  The general feeling in Hua Hin is that a foreigner is mainly wanted for their money. Of course never can generalise but if you have a house, and you have to deal with those contractors, workers, sub contractors...... you'll get lied, cheated like no other place on earth or even in Thailand. Prices are getting close to those in the west and that too for work so poorly done that even a 15 year old would do better in Bangkok or Pattaya area.

 

So move the capital if you must, but definately not to Hua Hin.

My daughter has just backed out of a pool villa housing project in Hua Hin. The project increased the house's price by 500,000 baht at the contract-signing stage. We said "No, thank you. Bye, bye!"

Posted
3 hours ago, SingAPorn said:

Let them move it anyplace it will still remain cheaper and better then Hua Hin where foreigners get cheated on a 24 hour basis either by workers, contractors, restaurants...you name it. Most bank staff are very rude with foreigners lately and this feeling was never there before.

 

Foreigners are really not considered in Hua Hin compared to other cities in Thailand with amazing  and wonderful services, prices and people.  The general feeling in Hua Hin is that a foreigner is mainly wanted for their money. Of course never can generalise but if you have a house, and you have to deal with those contractors, workers, sub contractors...... you'll get lied, cheated like no other place on earth or even in Thailand. Prices are getting close to those in the west and that too for work so poorly done that even a 15 year old would do better in Bangkok or Pattaya area.

 

So move the capital if you must, but definately not to Hua Hin.

You should leave Hua Hin and go to one of the cities with amazing and wonderful service, prices and people. All bitter and twisted up.

  • Haha 1
Posted
1 hour ago, save the frogs said:

are you from canada?

no one outside canada has ever heard of that band. 

there was a canadian guy on here who was constantly referencing this band and got offended when i told him that. 

They were popular soon after they came out all over the US. Americans are very much into Canadian music, as Rush,April Wine, Triumph, BTO, Loverboy, Guess Who, Steppenwolf, Helix, Mahogany Rush, Red Rider, The Kings and many others can attest. Of course that might have been sarcasm on your part.

  • Thanks 2
Posted
1 hour ago, Kasset Tak said:

This is not like in Myanmar as the problem is that Bangkok is sinking, while the sea level is rising... and if you are right, then look at the US that have had 9 cities serve as capitals...

Excuses - the Dutch can live below sea level  - if they wanted to extend the whole city then that would be different - but they want to build a capital and military head.

 

This was an idea that came from the military - it is trying to extract the government machine from the chaos of an open city to a place where it can be more powerful.

Posted

Any move to alleviate congestion in Bangkok would be a good thing. Getting rid of those obnoxious 7 car convoys would be too. And a Bangkok without the political creeps would be more pleasant. 

 

Sounds like a great plan to me. 

  • Thumbs Up 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now




×
×
  • Create New...