Just now, candide said:

What is the distribution of RW vs LW over time you have tabulated? 

75 to 78% left wing

3 minutes ago, Harrisfan said:

That's 1 poll though. Could be a rogue. I found 15 polls is best sample. 

You found that according to which imaginary mathematical calculation? 

1 minute ago, Harrisfan said:

75 to 78% left wing

You claimed there were more RW polls at the beginning. Which proportion over which period?

4 minutes ago, candide said:

You found according to which imaginary mathematical calculation? 

No I tested it on the 2016 and 2020 elections. 15 was best. More than 15 meant too many old polls. Less than 15 not big enough to filter out errors.

Just now, candide said:

You claimed there were more RW polls at the beginning. Which proportion over which period?

That's over 8 years. 

24 minutes ago, Harrisfan said:

That's over 8 years. 

The graph I posted starts in 2025, not 8 years ago. 

On 3/27/2025 at 10:51 AM, JonnyF said:

 

I think they had no choice.

 

If you keep pumping out lies, insults and race baiting, people will switch off. The people have spoken and they love what Trump is doing. 

you just contradicted yourself, you said pumping out lies.etc people will switch off then you say theylove what Trump is doing.  Mae up you mind please.

2 hours ago, TheAppletons said:

https://news.gallup.com/poll/203198/presidential-approval-ratings-donald-trump.aspx

 

 

 

Here's a graph from Real Clear Politics. It's actually quite naive since it gives equal weight to all pollsters regardless of the size of the sample, their track records, recency of the poll and other factors.

https://www.realclearpolling.com/polls/approval/donald-trump/approval-rating

 

Here's a graph from natesilver.net which does take into account those factors

https://www.natesilver.net/p/trump-approval-ratings-nate-silver-bulletin

 

 

4 hours ago, Harrisfan said:

It's funny you can't work through the logic. Judge 1 most US biased. Judge 12 most China biased. 3 are US biased. 9 are China biased.

 

Which judges should you look at? It's the same as opinion polls 

Stop your lame deflection. I never made any claim about it and did not discuss it with you. 🤣

From another aggregator with a different methodology. Note that all the best rated pollsters (including Fox News) show a higher disapproval rate than approval rate.

https://www.racetothewh.com/

On 3/27/2025 at 2:22 PM, Yagoda said:

Well if English was your first language, you would know:

 

"CNN is loving". Thats the subject.

"Trumps Poll Numbers" Thats the object.

 

Glad to have helped. 

I'm still getting a chuckle out of his piece of nonsense of yours. You don't seem to understand how irrelevant your comment is. "Subject' has two meanings. One is it technical meaning signifying a substantive's grammatical function in a sentence or sentence fragment. Another meaning of "subject"is what some verbal expression or expressions are about.  The gist.  Somehow, you've managed to confuse one for the other.

Let me make it clear to you another way. If your definition of subject was actually relevant then the topic would be simply "CNN". After all, CNN is, grammatically speaking, the subject of your heading.  Therefore anything that pertains to CNN, would be relevant. Anything. Such as, who's your favorite anchor or the design of the sets. You really want to run with that? It is to laugh.

3 hours ago, placeholder said:

I'm still getting a chuckle out of his piece of nonsense of yours. You don't seem to understand how irrelevant your comment is. "Subject' has two meanings. One is it technical meaning signifying a substantive's grammatical function in a sentence or sentence fragment. Another meaning of "subject"is what some verbal expression or expressions are about.  The gist.  Somehow, you've managed to confuse one for the other.

Let me make it clear to you another way. If your definition of subject was actually relevant then the topic would be simply "CNN". After all, CNN is, grammatically speaking, the subject of your heading.  Therefore anything that pertains to CNN, would be relevant. Anything. Such as, who's your favorite anchor or the design of the sets. You really want to run with that? It is to laugh.

So now that you've silly dithered with your nonsense, tell us about the subject of this topic. Do you see CNN as moving to the center? Do you think the reporting of things favorable to Donald Trump indicates that? Like the poll in question, do you think they would have shown the results of the poll before? Especially in the way they promoted it? After all, it was CNN claiming it was an important poll, wasn't it?

 

I doubt you'll answer, you don't likeinconvenient questions that pierce your bubble. I tried to make the questions easy for you

8 hours ago, Yagoda said:

So now that you've silly dithered with your nonsense, tell us about the subject of this topic. Do you see CNN as moving to the center? Do you think the reporting of things favorable to Donald Trump indicates that? Like the poll in question, do you think they would have shown the results of the poll before? Especially in the way they promoted it? After all, it was CNN claiming it was an important poll, wasn't it?

 

I doubt you'll answer, you don't likeinconvenient questions that pierce your bubble. I tried to make the questions easy for you

This is completely nuts? Do you have any evidence that CNN has hidden the results of its polls in the past? What their pollster guy is saying is that Trump's numbers, while negative, are better than they were in the past. And it's just one person. Does he speak for CNN? You think that because Fox News fires analysts when they actually get it right, that CNN would fire an analyst because they might not like what he says?

Let's see what gets said a month from now in the wake of Trump's latest bombshells.

The trendlines don't look good for Trump

https://www.realclearpolling.com/polls/approval/donald-trump/approval-rating

7 minutes ago, placeholder said:

This is completely nuts? Do you have any evidence that CNN has hidden the results of its polls in the past? What their pollster guy is saying is that Trump's numbers, while negative, are better than they were in the past. And it's just one person. Does he speak for CNN? You think that because Fox News fires analysts when they actually get it right, that CNN would fire an analyst because they might not like what he says?

Let's see what gets said a month from now in the wake of Trump's latest bombshells.

The trendlines don't look good for Trump

https://www.realclearpolling.com/polls/approval/donald-trump/approval-rating

Better, at least you tried. No one cares about the daily poll than you.

 

So you dont think CNN is trying to save itself? You dont think them harping on a single poll means anything? You think Scott Jennings is an accident?

 

Got it. 

 

You can toss a flame, or another poll, or some spittlefroth nonsense and sad emojis now. 

6 minutes ago, Yagoda said:

Better, at least you tried. No one cares about the daily poll than you.

 

So you dont think CNN is trying to save itself? You dont think them harping on a single poll means anything? You think Scott Jennings is an accident?

 

Got it. 

 

You can toss a flame, or another poll, or some spittlefroth nonsense and sad emojis now. 

Anything is possible. But what exactly is CNN trying to save itself from? 

On 3/27/2025 at 10:26 AM, hotsun said:

I had a gym i was going to for free because of my health insurance but they had a TV with CNN on all the time so i stopped going. Support sensible businesses

 

But if it was free, how were you supporting it prior to your boycott?

11 minutes ago, BangkokReady said:

 

But if it was free, how were you supporting it prior to your boycott?

Did you skip over that mention of health insurance?

7 minutes ago, BangkokReady said:

 

But if it was free, how were you supporting it prior to your boycott?

Technically i didnt change anything, but the point is gyms are not the correct place for politics

59 minutes ago, placeholder said:

Anything is possible. But what exactly is CNN trying to save itself from? 

Wow, following me around to argue. You are kidding, right?

What approval rating do the Democrats have, 29% ? According to CNN it is, but probably lower than that 😆

8 minutes ago, Yagoda said:

Wow, following me around to argue. You are kidding, right?

If you were the sole object of my attentions, you might have a point. In other words, get over yourself.

2 hours ago, placeholder said:

Did you skip over that mention of health insurance?

 

How Is that relevant?

17 minutes ago, BangkokReady said:

 

How Is that relevant?

I assumed that since the member mentioned he had health insurance, it was relevant to the conversation. And the only way I can see it being relevant is if health insurance covered at least some of the cost.

On 3/27/2025 at 10:29 AM, Yagoda said:

Deflection and off topic and just a typical Trump obsessed frothing at the mouth spittlespewing America hating comment. When the numbers or trends please them, they cite them like the Gospels. When the numbers or trends displease them, its fake MAGA propaganda. 

 

However:

 

The topic is CNN. CNN slowly but surely coming back to normalcy to save their network. So you can save your poll number hypocrisy for somewhere else.

Maybe we should actually ask who is trump obsessed? Might it be you, that are starting thread after thread about the guy, or is it the people trying to correct your faulty facts and blind one-sided beliefs?

1 minute ago, Gottfrid said:

Maybe we should actually ask who is trump obsessed? Might it be you, that are starting thread after thread about the guy, or is it the people trying to correct your faulty facts and blind one-sided beliefs?

Please compare the number of Pro Trump threads I have started to the daily chicken Little anti Trump threads.

 

You lose.

 

THis topic is CNN, not Trump.

2 hours ago, Yagoda said:

Wow, following me around to argue. You are kidding, right?

 

It's funny how these left-wing types (who claim to have the moral highground) often just end up trolling and harassing people.

 

They seem to think that because anyone who thinks differently to them is the bad guy, they can behave however they want and still be the good guy.

1 hour ago, placeholder said:

I assumed that since the member mentioned he had health insurance, it was relevant to the conversation. And the only way I can see it being relevant is if health insurance covered at least some of the cost.

 

I made it perfectly clear that the boycott would not have any effect because the gym membership comes with the insurance (I said it was free). If he stops going, the gym doesn't lose money. The only person who loses out is him.

51 minutes ago, Yagoda said:

Please compare the number of Pro Trump threads I have started to the daily chicken Little anti Trump threads.

 

You lose.

 

THis topic is CNN, not Trump.

No the topic is not CNN. The topic is "CNN is Loving Trumps Poll Numbers"

Which raises this question: Do you read what you write? Trump is explicitly mentioned in your headline. You're not trying to revive that grammatical explanation again, are you?

5 minutes ago, BangkokReady said:

 

I made it perfectly clear that the boycott would not have any effect because the gym membership comes with the insurance (I said it was free). If he stops going, the gym doesn't lose money. The only person who loses out is him.

Well, hotsun said it was free because of his health insurance. Does that mean that the health insurance only applies to that gym? I guess we'll have to await his clarification. But thanks for pointing out the possibility that I may have gotten it wrong.

15 minutes ago, placeholder said:

But thanks for pointing out the possibility that I may have gotten it wrong.

 

Happy to help. 🫡