4 hours ago, BritManToo said:

How is this a problem?

 

I don't think any feelings of love women display for sexual partners are real, beyond the first month/year. If they were, why does the sex in LTRs always stop after the 'honeymoon' period?

Just because they stopped for you does not mean it happens to everyone. I still have sex 5 days a week or more and I have been married 11 years to the same woman.. 

Not sure about bargirls, but I know a whole bunch of it-girls and professional girlfriends from back in the day that are very happily married, have children, and normal lives.  Quite a few are close friends.

They all had jobs, even careers. They were choosy but were game for "taxi fare" and a few drinks if they liked you and you were single, but unavailable when spoken for. Quite a few are still friends today, others I bump into occasionally. Most are now in their late 40s and still looking alright.  

This is pre-influencer OnlyFans days. That seems to have created a new variety of mercenary.  Maube just because I'm older now, but the whole scene seems very different now. A lot of women seem to be straight up ho's or completely  inaccessible. That delightful middle ground seems gone.

1 hour ago, spidermike007 said:

I don't think so. Been with alot of women way, way past 100 and they were totally well adjusted. It depends on alot of factors, but hundreds of millions have been with way, way beyond 100. Fake puritanism makes many men unable to handle that fact. 

 

I reckon it depends on how they select the men and how they treat each other.

 

2 hours ago, save the frogs said:

 

It's an interesting hypothesis, but where are you getting these numbers from?

 

Maybe a girl's heart hardens after being with 10 men. 

 

 

The guy is insane. He thinks 150 sex partners is normal.

3 minutes ago, captain_shane said:

The guy is insane. He thinks 150 sex partners is normal.

15 years is 180 months. Is less than one partner a month excessive? who are you to decide anyway?

I also have about 15 years where I was in a monogamous relationship (after not before).

I reckon I'm not quite at 150, but not that far off. 



  

11 hours ago, captain_shane said:

The guy is insane. He thinks 150 sex partners is normal.

 

Did you know that you might be a descendant of Genghis Khan?

 

10 minutes ago, madone said:

I reckon I'm not quite at 150, but not that far off. 

200+

I have a lot of DNA in my brain.

Women with zero or one premarital sex partners are far less likely to divorce their spouse within five years. The chances of divorce rise steadily as a woman’s body count does.

 

The difference between women with one premarital sex partner and those with more than seven is alarming. The latter group is roughly 12.5 times more likely to get divorced in that first sample.

 

 

 

https://medium.com/game-global/do-women-with-high-body-counts-become-bad-wives-f0f2519d6433

 

So, the magic number is SEVEN. A woman with more than SEVEN previous sex partners is far more likely to get divorced.

25 minutes ago, MalcolmB said:

200+

I have a lot of DNA in my brain.

That is obvious, Do Not 'Ave..........🤗

5 hours ago, thesetat said:

I don't know about that... My last trip to Pattaya is seemed most women there were in their late 30s to early 50s haha... Getting fat and old and ugly already.. 

That is because the bar scene is a holdover from the past.

Any woman under 30 worth her salt is online where she can be more particular and make more money without paying a cut to the house and entertaining geriatric chancers. 

Even a tramp who would sit on the street or on the steps of a 7-11 asked me to set up a TF profile for her. Of course I just moved right along. 

Online, they can misrepresent themselves. I err on the side of caution and avoid women of low repute.

 

11 hours ago, madone said:

That is because the bar scene is a holdover from the past.

Any woman under 30 worth her salt is online where she can be more particular and make more money without paying a cut to the house and entertaining geriatric chancers. 

 

Girls in bars are getting a cut from drinks. Which means they can earn income without having to sleep with anyone. Although they will make much more by sleeping with customers.

And the women seem to be enjoying themselves in the bars. Even if they don't like a particular customer, they are hanging out with their friends and it's a social atmosphere with a party vibe. And I think a lot of girls like it. 

 

12 minutes ago, save the frogs said:

 

Did you know that you might be a descendant of Genghis Khan?

 

No, I'm not related to khan. If genghis banged a bunch of Norwegian and Swedish women then maybe you'd have a point.

6 hours ago, Cameroni said:

 

Sleeping with a lot of men affects women much deeper than most people realise. 

 

Every time a woman has sex with a man she absorbs his DNA which enters her blood stream. Studies have shown that women have male DNA in their brains.

 

"Sexual intercourse involves the intimate physical union of

two individuals, and it is a means of reproduction in many

organisms, including humans. During this process, genetic

material can be exchanged between partners. The research

conducted at the University of Seattle has shed light on the

extent and significance of this genetic material transfer.

 

The study suggests that during sexual intercourse, small

amounts of DNA from one partner can be found in the 

bloodstream of the other partner. This phenomenon, known

as microchimerism, indicates that genetic material can cross

over from one individual to another. While this concept

is not entirely new, the research has provided a deeper

understanding of the extent of DNA transfer and its potential

implications (Chan et al., 2019).

 

The implications of DNA exchange through sexual intercourse

are profound. It challenges the traditional notion of genetic

individuality, as it suggests that individuals can carry traces

of DNA from their sexual partners within their own bodies.

 

The implications extend beyond individuals to their offspring as well.

        

The research suggests that the genetic material transferred during sexual intercourse could

have consequences for future generations. It opens up the possibility that DNA from previous

sexual partners may influence the genetic makeup of children conceived in subsequent

relationships."

 

https://www.researchgate.net/publication/378036105_Sexual_Intercourse_and_Genetic_Integration_A_Philosophical_Exploration_of_the_Mysteries_of_DNA

 

So if you have a bar girl who's slept with 20, 30, 40, or 50 men, she will have traces of their DNA in her brain, her blood and would pass on the DNA of these other men to your own children.

 

 

Bro speak twaddle

 

1 hour ago, transam said:

I thought you would have forgotten about getting a yellow book, best kept quiet, eh........😉

 

Again, my username is 'transam', in your case, you better write it down..........🙄

Hi Transman, i wish i could i forget about the yellow book...

5 hours ago, BritManToo said:

Women only have one womb, and impregnation leaves then with few choices for the next 9 months to 15 years.

Men have several choices for reproduction, so have more opportunities, and don't need to raise any of their children.

All these years and I thought you were a white man.

1 minute ago, PJ71 said:

Hi Transman, i wish i could i forget about the yellow book...

Ok, after much asking, if you will not call me by my correct username I will have to do something about it......🤨

12 hours ago, SMIAI said:

Any woman that accepts money in exchange for sexual favours, immediately drops down the value chart, regardless of looks. 

 

So who pays for what in your NON-P4P gf relationship?

She has her own separate apartment and pays all her expenses and you just meet up ?

Or is it 50-50?

Or is it 60-40? 

Or what is it? 

 

 

11 hours ago, transam said:

Ok, after much asking, if you will not call me by my correct username I will have to do something about it......🤨

By the way, your username doesn't imply you are a "trans", right? 

 

Will one of you trolls start a thread ...

 

... " Is it possible to rehabilitate AN members back into polite society ? " ... 

8 minutes ago, save the frogs said:

So who pays for what in your NON-P4P gf relationship?

She has her own separate apartment and pays all her expenses and you just meet up ?

Or is it 50-50?

Or is it 60-40? 

Or what is it? 

Living in his mom's basement, she pays for everything.

He's never had a relationship with another woman.

Just a guess.

9 minutes ago, save the frogs said:

By the way, your username doesn't imply you are a "trans", right? 

 

To the older, more worldly and far more mature members, no it doesn't. Never has either.

51 minutes ago, SMIAI said:

Online, they can misrepresent themselves.

 

They mispresent themselves online and offline. This is how women operate, by deception, lies, manipulation and dishonesty. It doesn't matter if it's online or offline.

 

If you meet a woman, the woman you meet in the first 6 months does not exist. It's an artistic representation of a person, designed to build an attachment with you. She's not real and you will only find out the real person after a year or two. And even then she will change thereafter.

9 hours ago, MalcolmB said:

Generally speaking of course, there are always exceptions.

Malcolm, the answer is most of the times no, but as you post there are exceptions.

3 minutes ago, Cameroni said:

 

They mispresent themselves online and offline. This is how women operate, by deception, lies, manipulation and dishonesty. It doesn't matter if it's online or offline.

 

If you meet a woman, the woman you meet in the first 6 months does not exist. It's an artistic representation of a person, designed to build an attachment with you. She's not real and you will only find out the real person after a year or two. And even then she will change thereafter.

I've also found this to be mainly true, but would change it a little ........

First 6 months living with a woman.

Some can only keep the false front for 3 months, some can last 9 months.

But if not living together, they can keep it up forever.

4 minutes ago, BritManToo said:

I've also found this to be mainly true, but would change it a little ........

First 6 months living with a woman.

Some can only keep the false front for 3 months, some can last 9 months.

But if not living together, they can keep it up forever.

 

Yes, fair point, I implied co-habitation as that's how I operate. Of course it does vary with the girl, some will last 3 months, some will last even 12 months. 

 

The really dangerous ones are the "mysterious" girls, who always try to hide everything. You never get a straight answer. They answer, but say nothiing. If she is like this, hiding things, there's a reason for it. She is most likely hiding things on purpose so you don't find out.

17 minutes ago, NanLaew said:

To the older, more worldly and far more mature members, no it doesn't. Never has either.

Honest guv - lol

1 hour ago, MalcolmB said:

200+

I have a lot of DNA in my brain.

 

There goes Malcy getting his brain and stomach mixed up...  

11 hours ago, Cameroni said:

She is most likely hiding things on purpose so you don't find out.

 

Men probably cheat on women more than the other way around.

Your arguments seem one-sided. 

 

8 minutes ago, BritManToo said:

I've also found this to be mainly true, but would change it a little ........

First 6 months living with a woman.

Some can only keep the false front for 3 months, some can last 9 months.

But if not living together, they can keep it up forever.

I found this to be the rule with house/roommates while at university regardless of gender.  I spent 9 years working through college and had an endless variety of living arrangements.  It generally took six months to find out what was really going on with a roommate vs the story presented in the beginning.  Rather than a bargirl/female thing, I have this filed under "Basic Human Nature" with the takeaway being almost everybody be fronting.