1 minute ago, Mike_Hunt said:

Oh FFS,  you lefties are not exactly pro rule of law and pro democracy.   You are pro the ends justify the means. 

 

The No Kings protest was attended by a bunch of dumb losers. 

Not about lefties.

6 hours ago, LosLobo said:

Sure, the EU has a migrant crisis — a problem mainly caused by the US — so let’s not pretend U.S. WMD 1.0 had nothing to do with lighting that fuse.

Iraq, Libya, Afghanistan, Syria — all left in ruins by U.S.-led intervention, all driving waves of refugees into Europe.
 

And now? Trump’s WMD 2.0 — and as always, those who can’t learn from history are doomed to repeat it.

 

This is a BS take on History. 

 

Libya - The 2011 overthrow of Muammar Gaddafi was led by NATO.

Afghanistan  has been a mess when the USSR invaded in 1980.

Syria - The USA did not start the civil war in Syria.  

 

5 minutes ago, Jingthing said:

Not about lefties.

Yes it is. 

6 minutes ago, cjinchiangrai said:

Mostly working for ICE.

This made sense in your head. 

2 minutes ago, Mike_Hunt said:

This made sense in your head. 

Made sense for anyone with a brain. Turn Fox up louder so you know your next post.

Just now, cjinchiangrai said:

Made sense for anyone with a brain. Turn Fox up louder so you know your next post.

This the typical brain dead leftie post. 

31 minutes ago, cjinchiangrai said:

Iran, along with NATO. Even Israel said they were complying with the terms. You must have heard about it, It was very well covered.

Did the Senate approve it? 

3 minutes ago, Mike_Hunt said:

This the typical brain dead leftie post. 

Yet another rude deflection from the Russian troll-bot.

36 minutes ago, cjinchiangrai said:

Iran, along with NATO. Even Israel said they were complying with the terms. You must have heard about it, It was very well covered.

NATO has not recently said that Iran is complying with the nuclear deal. 

 

While NATO as an organization didn't explicitly state that Iran was complying with the nuclear deal, they did call the deal a "historic breakthrough" that would strengthen global security. NATO did emphasize the importance of Iran implementing the agreement and fulfilling its obligations. 

 

No — Israel has not said that Iran is complying with the nuclear deal. In fact, the opposite has been among the core justifications for Israel’s recent strikes:

 

1 minute ago, TedG said:

NATO has not recently said that Iran is complying with the nuclear deal. 

 

While NATO as an organization didn't explicitly state that Iran was complying with the nuclear deal, they did call the deal a "historic breakthrough" that would strengthen global security. NATO did emphasize the importance of Iran implementing the agreement and fulfilling its obligations. 

 

No — Israel has not said that Iran is complying with the nuclear deal. In fact, the opposite has been among the core justifications for Israel’s recent strikes:

 

They were in compliance at the time that Trump walked away from it. Why would they keep it up in the absence of Western compliance?

1 minute ago, cjinchiangrai said:

They were in compliance at the time that Trump walked away from it. Why would they keep it up in the absence of Western compliance?

Post the links showing that NATO and Israel said Iran complied. 

1 minute ago, TedG said:

Post the links showing that NATO and Israel said Iran complied. 

Aren't you one of those do your own research idiots?

1 minute ago, cjinchiangrai said:

Aren't you one of those do your own research idiots?

I'm calling you out since you are making up your own version of events. 

A little history

https://www.vox.com/world/2017/10/12/16447436/trump-iran-deal-decertify-inara

2 hours ago, Tug said:

And then he taco ed didn’t want to face criticism pure and simple…..weak…

 

He was not facing criticism. The reality was that he did not want to be there, and saw little benefit to the USA. The Iran crisis was a good excuse to get out of there. He signed his agreement with the UK. He made nice with Carney, he said hello to other G7 leaders and said what he wanted to say. The G7 was a dog and pony show as far as he was concerned. It was more important for the other G7 members who need to get organized. and  get on the same page on tariffs. And as usual, the EU cannot.

8 hours ago, LosLobo said:

Sure, the EU has a migrant crisis — a problem mainly caused by the US — so let’s not pretend U.S. WMD 1.0 had nothing to do with lighting that fuse.

Iraq, Libya, Afghanistan, Syria — all left in ruins by U.S.-led intervention, all driving waves of refugees into Europe.
 

And now? Trump’s WMD 2.0 — and as always, those who can’t learn from history are doomed to repeat it.

 

The USA had nothing to do with the  Syrian civil war. Russia and Iran propped up  Assad and he created the 14 million refugees. Most of the migrants  coming into Europe now are from  Africa and the USA has nothing to do with that. They are economic migrants, especially the North African arabs.

1 hour ago, TedG said:

Post the links showing that NATO and Israel said Iran complied. 

That's irrelevant. They were not in charge of checking it. That's the job of the International Atomic Energy Agency. You know, the same agency which stated recently that Iran was not complying with its obligations regarding nuclear non-proliferation.

58 minutes ago, candide said:

That's irrelevant. They were not in charge of checking it. That's the job of the International Atomic Energy Agency. You know, the same agency which stated recently that Iran was not complying with its obligations regarding nuclear non-proliferation.

It's relevant that the OP was posing disinformation.. 

3 minutes ago, TedG said:

It's relevant that the OP was posing disinformation.. 

 

You mean your brother in arms, the OP, POSTED disinformation provided by your favourite news channel?

1 minute ago, CallumWK said:

 

You mean your brother in arms, the OP, POSTED disinformation provided by your favourite news channel?

What's my favourite news channel?

1 minute ago, TedG said:

What's my favourite news channel?

 

Is that even a question. Everyone knows which the favourite news channel is from the MAGA crowd, well actually it isn't a news channel, and it is mentioned in the OP

1 minute ago, CallumWK said:

 

Is that even a question. Everyone knows which the favourite news channel is from the MAGA crowd, well actually it isn't a news channel, and it is mentioned in the OP

Let me ask you again, what is my favorite news channel? 

9 hours ago, Jingthing said:

Not about lefties.

Sure it was... It was initially begun by LGBTQ+++ groups when they lost their agenda on being integrated and forced onto normal Americans to accept them as real women and several other groups who wanted to march against Trumps new policies that affected them... Then other groups joined changing it to be named NO Kings. The whole idea of the march was LEFTIES opposing Trumps stance on Trans and illegals getting deported and abortion laws enacted. This was a totally lefties movement.. They did it because they did not like Trump following through with the campaign promises that won him the election. 

this is same guy that kept blaming Biden and the democrats for the war in Ukraine, he kept mumbling that during his presidency that wouldn't had happened, the democrats were starting the WW3 and he wouldn't have  allowed the invasion of Ukraine and blablabla, he said maga don't want war and yet here he is getting involved in a war, what a double face the guy is. First he claimed he would finish the Ukraine war in 24 Hours, then he also would finish the Yemen war, then the Israel massacre of Palestinians, then the Pakistan India conflict.... for somebody who claimed not wanting any wars and would not allow any war to start in his presidency, the facts say otherwise, maybe he should visit his daily contradictions and said mea culpa

 

 

On 6/17/2025 at 7:06 AM, Yagoda said:

Fox News is reporting that President Trump will leave the G7 tonight to for a NSC meeting. He also told the people of Tehran to evacuate. 

 

"They want to talk. They should have done it before"

 

Iran is completely defenseless.

mass exit ,Indeed 

 

19 hours ago, CallumWK said:

 

Is that even a question. Everyone knows which the favourite news channel is from the MAGA crowd, well actually it isn't a news channel, and it is mentioned in the OP

Let’s get back to this topic.  What is my favorite news channel?

5 hours ago, Mavideol said:

this is same guy that kept blaming Biden and the democrats for the war in Ukraine, he kept mumbling that during his presidency that wouldn't had happened, the democrats were starting the WW3 and he wouldn't have  allowed the invasion of Ukraine and blablabla, he said maga don't want war and yet here he is getting involved in a war, what a double face the guy is. First he claimed he would finish the Ukraine war in 24 Hours, then he also would finish the Yemen war, then the Israel massacre of Palestinians, then the Pakistan India conflict.... for somebody who claimed not wanting any wars and would not allow any war to start in his presidency, the facts say otherwise, maybe he should visit his daily contradictions and said mea culpa

 

 

https://www.nbcnews.com/think/opinion/biden-isnt-blameless-russias-invasion-ukraine-rcna22111

 

How Biden's tunnel vision on oil and gas encouraged Putin's invasion of Ukraine

By moving the U.S. economy away from the domestic oil industry and strengthening foreign oil businesses, Biden played a part in emboldening Russia.

 

 

While the Afghanistan withdrawal didn't directly cause the war in Ukraine, some analysts suggest it may have emboldened Russia and influenced Putin's decision to invade. The chaotic withdrawal and perceived US weakness could have led Putin to believe he could successfully invade Ukraine with minimal Western interference.

 

 

9 minutes ago, TedG said:

Let’s get back to this topic.  What is my favorite news channel?

You mean "let's get back to off topic"?

4 minutes ago, TedG said:

https://www.nbcnews.com/think/opinion/biden-isnt-blameless-russias-invasion-ukraine-rcna22111

 

How Biden's tunnel vision on oil and gas encouraged Putin's invasion of Ukraine

By moving the U.S. economy away from the domestic oil industry and strengthening foreign oil businesses, Biden played a part in emboldening Russia.

 

 

While the Afghanistan withdrawal didn't directly cause the war in Ukraine, some analysts suggest it may have emboldened Russia and influenced Putin's decision to invade. The chaotic withdrawal and perceived US weakness could have led Putin to believe he could successfully invade Ukraine with minimal Western interference.

 

 

"...some analysts suggest..."

 

Well, I don't know about you guys but that convinced me - I'm all in now!

 

PS. You are linking to and quoting from an MSM source. So, based on what you MAGA guys have said countless times, it's fake news and all lies.

49 minutes ago, TedG said:

https://www.nbcnews.com/think/opinion/biden-isnt-blameless-russias-invasion-ukraine-rcna22111

 

How Biden's tunnel vision on oil and gas encouraged Putin's invasion of Ukraine

By moving the U.S. economy away from the domestic oil industry and strengthening foreign oil businesses, Biden played a part in emboldening Russia.

 

 

While the Afghanistan withdrawal didn't directly cause the war in Ukraine, some analysts suggest it may have emboldened Russia and influenced Putin's decision to invade. The chaotic withdrawal and perceived US weakness could have led Putin to believe he could successfully invade Ukraine with minimal Western interference.

 

 

Contrary to a popular MAGA story, oil production did not decrease under Biden. 

https://ycharts.com/indicators/us_crude_oil_field_production