Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
1 minute ago, Mike_Hunt said:

Oh FFS,  you lefties are not exactly pro rule of law and pro democracy.   You are pro the ends justify the means. 

 

The No Kings protest was attended by a bunch of dumb losers. 

Not about lefties.

  • Thumbs Up 2
Posted
6 hours ago, LosLobo said:


Sure, the EU has a migrant crisis — a problem mainly caused by the US — so let’s not pretend U.S. WMD 1.0 had nothing to do with lighting that fuse.

Iraq, Libya, Afghanistan, Syria — all left in ruins by U.S.-led intervention, all driving waves of refugees into Europe.
 

And now? Trump’s WMD 2.0 — and as always, those who can’t learn from history are doomed to repeat it.

 

This is a BS take on History. 

 

Libya - The 2011 overthrow of Muammar Gaddafi was led by NATO.

Afghanistan  has been a mess when the USSR invaded in 1980.

Syria - The USA did not start the civil war in Syria.  

 

Posted
2 minutes ago, Mike_Hunt said:

This made sense in your head. 

Made sense for anyone with a brain. Turn Fox up louder so you know your next post.

  • Like 1
Posted
Just now, cjinchiangrai said:

Made sense for anyone with a brain. Turn Fox up louder so you know your next post.

This the typical brain dead leftie post. 

  • Thumbs Down 1
Posted
31 minutes ago, cjinchiangrai said:

Iran, along with NATO. Even Israel said they were complying with the terms. You must have heard about it, It was very well covered.

Did the Senate approve it? 

Posted
36 minutes ago, cjinchiangrai said:

Iran, along with NATO. Even Israel said they were complying with the terms. You must have heard about it, It was very well covered.

NATO has not recently said that Iran is complying with the nuclear deal. 

 

While NATO as an organization didn't explicitly state that Iran was complying with the nuclear deal, they did call the deal a "historic breakthrough" that would strengthen global security. NATO did emphasize the importance of Iran implementing the agreement and fulfilling its obligations. 

 

No — Israel has not said that Iran is complying with the nuclear deal. In fact, the opposite has been among the core justifications for Israel’s recent strikes:

 

Posted
1 minute ago, TedG said:

NATO has not recently said that Iran is complying with the nuclear deal. 

 

While NATO as an organization didn't explicitly state that Iran was complying with the nuclear deal, they did call the deal a "historic breakthrough" that would strengthen global security. NATO did emphasize the importance of Iran implementing the agreement and fulfilling its obligations. 

 

No — Israel has not said that Iran is complying with the nuclear deal. In fact, the opposite has been among the core justifications for Israel’s recent strikes:

 

They were in compliance at the time that Trump walked away from it. Why would they keep it up in the absence of Western compliance?

  • Thumbs Up 1
Posted
1 minute ago, cjinchiangrai said:

They were in compliance at the time that Trump walked away from it. Why would they keep it up in the absence of Western compliance?

Post the links showing that NATO and Israel said Iran complied. 

Posted
1 minute ago, TedG said:

Post the links showing that NATO and Israel said Iran complied. 

Aren't you one of those do your own research idiots?

Posted
1 minute ago, cjinchiangrai said:

Aren't you one of those do your own research idiots?

I'm calling you out since you are making up your own version of events. 

  • Thumbs Down 1
Posted
2 hours ago, Tug said:

And then he taco ed didn’t want to face criticism pure and simple…..weak…

 

He was not facing criticism. The reality was that he did not want to be there, and saw little benefit to the USA. The Iran crisis was a good excuse to get out of there. He signed his agreement with the UK. He made nice with Carney, he said hello to other G7 leaders and said what he wanted to say. The G7 was a dog and pony show as far as he was concerned. It was more important for the other G7 members who need to get organized. and  get on the same page on tariffs. And as usual, the EU cannot.

Posted
8 hours ago, LosLobo said:


Sure, the EU has a migrant crisis — a problem mainly caused by the US — so let’s not pretend U.S. WMD 1.0 had nothing to do with lighting that fuse.

Iraq, Libya, Afghanistan, Syria — all left in ruins by U.S.-led intervention, all driving waves of refugees into Europe.
 

And now? Trump’s WMD 2.0 — and as always, those who can’t learn from history are doomed to repeat it.

 

The USA had nothing to do with the  Syrian civil war. Russia and Iran propped up  Assad and he created the 14 million refugees. Most of the migrants  coming into Europe now are from  Africa and the USA has nothing to do with that. They are economic migrants, especially the North African arabs.

  • Thanks 1
Posted
1 hour ago, TedG said:

Post the links showing that NATO and Israel said Iran complied. 

That's irrelevant. They were not in charge of checking it. That's the job of the International Atomic Energy Agency. You know, the same agency which stated recently that Iran was not complying with its obligations regarding nuclear non-proliferation.

Posted
58 minutes ago, candide said:

That's irrelevant. They were not in charge of checking it. That's the job of the International Atomic Energy Agency. You know, the same agency which stated recently that Iran was not complying with its obligations regarding nuclear non-proliferation.

It's relevant that the OP was posing disinformation.. 

Posted
3 minutes ago, TedG said:

It's relevant that the OP was posing disinformation.. 

 

You mean your brother in arms, the OP, POSTED disinformation provided by your favourite news channel?

Posted
1 minute ago, CallumWK said:

 

You mean your brother in arms, the OP, POSTED disinformation provided by your favourite news channel?

What's my favourite news channel?

Posted
1 minute ago, TedG said:

What's my favourite news channel?

 

Is that even a question. Everyone knows which the favourite news channel is from the MAGA crowd, well actually it isn't a news channel, and it is mentioned in the OP

Posted
1 minute ago, CallumWK said:

 

Is that even a question. Everyone knows which the favourite news channel is from the MAGA crowd, well actually it isn't a news channel, and it is mentioned in the OP

Let me ask you again, what is my favorite news channel? 

  • Thumbs Down 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



×
×
  • Create New...