Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
4 minutes ago, Bday Prang said:

Exactly   the police will have it all but are terrified of telling us the truth   remarkable? yes   surprising ? not at all.  Don't forget any cop above the rank of chief inspector is nothing more than a politician 

 

Really???

 

 

Legal and Privacy Constraints

 

- **Data Protection Laws**: CCTV footage is considered *personal data* under the **Data Protection Act 2018** and **UK GDPR** if it identifies individuals. Releasing it publicly could violate privacy rights unless specific legal conditions are met [A]
  **Ongoing Investigations**: Police often withhold footage to avoid compromising an active investigation or prejudicing future legal proceedings. This includes protecting the integrity of witness statements and ensuring fair trial rights.

- **Human Rights Considerations**: Under **Article 8 of the Human Rights Act**, individuals have a right to privacy—even in public spaces. Authorities must balance public interest with personal rights before releasing footage.

- **Risk of Defamation or Misidentification**: Public release could lead to misidentification or reputational harm, especially if the footage is interpreted out of context.

Unless the footage serves a clear public interest or is released through official channels (e.g. court proceedings or police appeals), it’s typically kept confidential. Would you like to explore how individuals can request access to such footage legally?

Posted
2 minutes ago, Will B Good said:

 

He could easily have avoided what you consider targeting......no need to perjure himself, no need to break his parole conditions, no need to beat up a policeman, no need to run away abroad......the only bad publicity is no publicity.

 

The authorities know he wants this attention, it keeps in the headlines, but they can't just turn a blind eye.........would we even be talking about him if he had behaved as a normal citizen?     NO.......he is not targeted, he is cleverly milking the system for free publicity.

I get where you are coming from, but I doubt he really wanted this to happen , I may be wrong as I said I am not really a "fan"  As far as a normal behaviour goes many normal people would react in a similar manner if sufficiently provoked but they would be judged so negatively by the press immediately.

All i'm saying is lets wait and see the CCTV it should then be clearer to us all

  • Agree 1
Posted
7 minutes ago, Will B Good said:

 

 

....and the current situation re: Manchester is....????

 

And that is ignoring......

 

The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) in England is facing unprecedented strain, with some prosecutors handling over 100 to 200 cases at a time—levels described as “never before seen” . The backlog in crown courts has surged to around 71,000 cases, and could hit 100,000 without radical intervention . This overload is compounded by a shortage of barristers, forcing officials to “ring around” for legal representation. Victims are increasingly  dropping out of cases due to delays, with rape trials now taking an average of 2.5 years to conclude . The system is overwhelmed, and experts warn that without structural reform, justice will continue to be delayed—and denied—for many.

I don't doubt it ,it all part of broken britain, but assaults of that nature should be fast tracked, even if at the expense of delivering justice to those guilty of hurty words

  • Like 1
  • Thumbs Up 1
  • Thumbs Down 1
  • Thanks 1
Posted
9 minutes ago, Will B Good said:

And that is ignoring......

 

200,000 illegal migrants, who are committing crimes left, right and centre.

 

Quote

A pair of Afghan "asylum seekers" have been charged with the rape and kidnap of a 12-year-old girl in Nuneaton.

Ahmad Mulakhil, 23, allegedly raped the child in the evening of July 22 on the town's Cheverel Street.

He was arrested on July 26 and charged the next day.

Mohammad Kabir, also 23, was arrested and charged with kidnap, strangulation and aiding and abetting rape of a girl under 13 on July 31.

 

 

 

  • Like 2
Posted
6 minutes ago, Will B Good said:

 

Really???

 

 

Legal and Privacy Constraints

 

- **Data Protection Laws**: CCTV footage is considered *personal data* under the **Data Protection Act 2018** and **UK GDPR** if it identifies individuals. Releasing it publicly could violate privacy rights unless specific legal conditions are met [A]
  **Ongoing Investigations**: Police often withhold footage to avoid compromising an active investigation or prejudicing future legal proceedings. This includes protecting the integrity of witness statements and ensuring fair trial rights.

- **Human Rights Considerations**: Under **Article 8 of the Human Rights Act**, individuals have a right to privacy—even in public spaces. Authorities must balance public interest with personal rights before releasing footage.

- **Risk of Defamation or Misidentification**: Public release could lead to misidentification or reputational harm, especially if the footage is interpreted out of context.

Unless the footage serves a clear public interest or is released through official channels (e.g. court proceedings or police appeals), it’s typically kept confidential. Would you like to explore how individuals can request access to such footage legally?

Like i said, i'm not that interested, i am prepared to wait and see. If he beat up a guy for no apparent reason then of course lock him up its no skin off my nose, but he deserves justice as much as the rest of us

  • Like 1
  • Thumbs Up 1
  • Thumbs Down 1
Posted
3 minutes ago, Bday Prang said:

I get where you are coming from, but I doubt he really wanted this to happen , I may be wrong as I said I am not really a "fan"  As far as a normal behaviour goes many normal people would react in a similar manner if sufficiently provoked but they would be judged so negatively by the press immediately.

All i'm saying is lets wait and see the CCTV it should then be clearer to us all

 

Could not agree more......and the CCTV evidence is obviously crucial or it comes down to he said/she said......lets hope there isn't a missing minute and the video hasn't been spliced.....5555

 

If the guy approached Tommy in a threatening manner (and I think you'll be able to tell from the CCTV plus witnesses) then Tommy is within his rights....I believe......... to hit him.

 

If that is the sum total of what happened I don't see how he can face charges......if he then gave him a good shoeing, which he didn't (just throwing that in), he would be in big trouble.

 

Could be wrong, but I think this will all go away once the evidence has been reviewed.

Posted
5 minutes ago, Bday Prang said:

I don't doubt it ,it all part of broken britain, but assaults of that nature should be fast tracked, even if at the expense of delivering justice to those guilty of hurty words

 

Don't do that please.........incitement to riot ,which can result in deaths, are not hurty words.....you are using escalator language and it is, to be honest, a little disappointing.

Posted
3 minutes ago, Bday Prang said:

Like i said, i'm not that interested, i am prepared to wait and see. If he beat up a guy for no apparent reason then of course lock him up its no skin off my nose, but he deserves justice as much as the rest of us

 

100%.......due process.....at least in the UK

Posted
5 minutes ago, The Cyclist said:

 

200,000 illegal migrants, who are committing crimes left, right and centre.

 

 

 

 

 

What in God's name are you doing?........totally childish response and absolutely nothing to with the conversation I was having.

 

Feel free to join in by all means......but please try to maintain certain intellectual level that warrants making a contribution.

Posted
2 minutes ago, Will B Good said:

 

Don't do that please.........incitement to riot ,which can result in deaths, are not hurty words.....you are using escalator language and it is, to be honest, a little disappointing.

did not mean to  escalate anything , just pointing out that if the system cannot cope, then things need to be prioritised, 

  • Thanks 2
Posted
3 minutes ago, Will B Good said:

What in God's name are you doing?........totally childish response and absolutely nothing to with the conversation I was having.

 

Perfectly reasonable to your response of 

 

Quote

And that is ignoring......

 

Every Government service, including the CPS is falling apart.

 

Because all those so called brainy people, so called leaders, are all ignoring the elephant in the room.

 

Mass migration, of both the legal and illegal variety.

  • Agree 1
  • Thumbs Down 1
Posted
On 8/2/2025 at 8:46 AM, roo860 said:

There's no actual evidence yet of him beating anyone up, CCTV  etc being made available to the public, only a bloke lying on the floor. I'm sure the police will have reviewed it.

Actual evidence and clips on YouTube, are light years away from each other

  • Haha 1
Posted
23 hours ago, BarraMarra said:

Well Elon Musk be one of his fans Brewster he offered to pay his Court fees. If you don't live in the UK all you will get to know is Tommy Robinson did this did that. For instance this last set up from the press was, he knocked out a man in a station and fled abroad with police hunting him down. Just a pack of lies spread through MSM. He didn't flee abroad he was on buisness the police knew where he was so they didn't have to go hunting. Then the press said the Guy was rushed to hospital with severe injuries must have been severe he was home a day or 2 later. A massive probably the biggest rally has been organised by Tommy Robinson in london in Sept where over a million are expected to fight for our pride and free speach. Starmer and Co will try to have Tommy to be kept away from speaking they know he will finally name names the Government are hiding in the grooming gangs etc so they try and silence him to prevent his appearence.

 

It's only alleged that he may have assaulted someone at the railway station. The British Transport Police wish to speak to a man who fits his description, so nobody is "hunting him down" apart from the press, who appear to have lucked out so far.

 

So why is he hiding?

  • Love It 1
Posted
On 8/2/2025 at 8:47 AM, Hamus Yaigh said:

He appeals to a certain UK demographic. For the rest of us he is just a massive bell end.

 

Is that the mostly English demographic that have oversized and rigid middle fingers?

Posted
43 minutes ago, GarryP said:

Watched his latest interview with Andrew Gold and found it very interesting: 

 

I'd trust him more than I would Farage.

he comes across quite well when interviewed, when he is allowed to speak that is

  • Agree 1
  • Thumbs Up 1
  • Thumbs Down 2
Posted
1 hour ago, Bday Prang said:

He may well have a colourful past but he's older and wiser now.

 

Citation needed on the latter please. Buying a last-minute ticket on a red-eye flight out of Stansted doesn't count.

  • Love It 1
  • Thumbs Down 2
Posted
40 minutes ago, The Cyclist said:

 

200,000 illegal migrants, who are committing crimes left, right and centre.

 

 

Correction, 200,000 illegal immigrants of which 2 have just been arrested and charged with committing a serious crime.

 

BTW, I thought it was more like 1.2 million illegals now.

  • Haha 1
Posted
2 minutes ago, NanLaew said:

 

Is that the mostly English demographic that have oversized and rigid middle fingers?

not at all, that seems to be the standard behaviour of the masked up leftists, check out the utube blogs of the recent manchester demonstrations. A large turnout from the british patriots who appeared to be simply walking albeit en masse  through the center of the city in well behaved manner, looking like normal people from what I could see . in total contrast  to the aggressive stance of many of the mask wearing  lefty activists. 

The wearing of face coverings needs to be banned immediately regardless of peoples religious beliefs, although most of the mask and balaclava wearers are  in no way religious by any stretch of the imagination 

Its a small  price they must pay if they want to  demonstrate  here

 

  • Agree 2
Posted
18 minutes ago, NanLaew said:

 

It's only alleged that he may have assaulted someone at the railway station. The British Transport Police wish to speak to a man who fits his description, so nobody is "hunting him down" apart from the press, who appear to have lucked out so far.

 

So why is he hiding?

who says he is?  if the police wanted to apprehend him they had plenty of time to do so before he boarded any flight

  • Like 2
Posted
14 minutes ago, NanLaew said:

Buying a last-minute ticket on a red-eye flight out of Stansted doesn't count.

not in itself an offence though

Posted
11 minutes ago, BarraMarra said:

If he  brings the police and all the grooming gangs to court and politicians who helped rape kids,  and 10.000 forighen prisoners on a plane yes why not after what he's had to put up with.

 

But he hasn't done/achieved any of that.......don't be so naive as to think that him, shouting into a megaphone to a load of braindead idiots, has had any impact on prosecutions, illegal immigration or deportations.

 

In fact, looking at the current situation, you would have to admit he's been an abject failure.

Posted
25 minutes ago, Rampant Rabbit said:

Sinn Fein comes to mind and that vile ferk Martin Mcguiness

he became minister for education I think     couldn't make it up really

Posted

anyway its one thing when a bunch of expats jump to conclusions on an internet forum. its a different matter when the mainstream media or the authorities  do the same

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



×
×
  • Create New...