1 minute ago, Cameroni said:

 

‘He didn’t partake in any’ of — any sex with any of us

 

https://www.politico.com/story/2019/08/09/epstein-mar-a-lago-trump-1456221

 

Do you speak English at all? Do you not know what the words "with any of us"...mean?  She was not saying he didn't have sex with her, but she never saw him having sex with any of the Epstein girls she helped recruit and groom.

 

And don't tell me to do anything, much less research, when you're too thick to understand basic English, I've done more research than you.

 

Get a life instead of peddling demonstrably false lies on the internet.  Pathetic.

 

 

So you are saying she was present and witnessed every single incident of sexual abuse committed by Epstein?

 

Wow! That is some claim.

4 minutes ago, Will B Good said:

 

So you are saying she was present and witnessed every single incident of sexual abuse committed by Epstein?

 

Wow! That is some claim.

 

We have two witnesses now. Virginia Giuffre and Ghislaine Maxwell. They have BOTH said, in the clearest possible terms, that Trump never had sex with any of the Epstein girls.

 

And if it had happened, certainly Ghislaine his main girl, and Virginia Giuffre, his second girl, would have known about it. Both were involved in recruiting the girls for Epstein and both initiated the girls into what had to be done. So if that had happened with Trump they would certainly know about it.

 

Unfortuantely we can only go on evidence, not fantasy. Or even worse, as Xylophone was doing, made -up fabricated malicious lawsuits initiated by fraudsters that were shown to be a tissue of lies, meaning the Tiffany Doe pile of lies.

 

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2016/jul/07/donald-trump-sexual-assault-lawsuits-norm-lubow

 

https://www.newsweek.com/fact-check-do-papers-allege-trump-epstein-took-part-sexual-assault-1857863

3 minutes ago, Cameroni said:

 

We have two witnesses now. Virginia Giuffre and Ghislaine Maxwell. They have BOTH said, in the clearest possible terms, that Trump never had sex with any of the Epstein girls.

 

And if it had happened, certainly Ghislaine his main girl, and Virginia Giuffre, his second girl, would have known about it. Both were involved in recruiting the girls for Epstein and both initiated the girls into what had to be done. So if that had happened with Trump they would certainly know about it.

 

Unfortuantely we can only go on evidence, not fantasy.

 

 

And you've personally sifted through the truck loads (Bondi's words) of evidence seized from all of Epstein's properties.

 

Impressive.

1 minute ago, Will B Good said:

 

 

And you've personally sifted through the truck loads (Bondi's words) of evidence seized from all of Epstein's properties.

 

Impressive.

 

Everything publicly available. Knock yourself out:

 

https://vault.fbi.gov/jeffrey-epstein

 

 

1 minute ago, Cameroni said:

 

Everything publicly available. Knock yourself out:

 

https://vault.fbi.gov/jeffrey-epstein

 

 

 

 

555555....Publicly available.....and that's what your are hanging your hat on?

 

Get a new hat.......a pointy one.

 

 

 

2 minutes ago, Will B Good said:

 

 

555555....Publicly available.....and that's what your are hanging your hat on?

 

Get a new hat.......a pointy one.

 

 

 

 

Yes, I know you'd prefer to rely on the "affidavit" from the tissue of lie case, aka Tiffany Doe. Sadly, that case was dismissed.

 

I only go on real evidence. The lies and fantasy are all spouted by your camp. You lot should be wearing the pointy hats.

7 hours ago, gargamon said:

They all went to the national inquirer with their stories. They were paid off and the stories were buried.

Do try and keep up.

Is this the rag that talks about aliens living among us?

 

Show some factual proof to back up your claim.

11 minutes ago, EVENKEEL said:

Is this the rag that talks about aliens living among us?

 

Show some factual proof to back up your claim.

 

He can't. It's all lies. I looked into it. They actually fabricated a lawsuit! Lol:

 

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2016/jul/07/donald-trump-sexual-assault-lawsuits-norm-lubow

 

https://www.newsweek.com/fact-check-do-papers-allege-trump-epstein-took-part-sexual-assault-1857863

3 minutes ago, Cameroni said:

 

Yes, I know you'd prefer to rely on the "affidavit" from the tissue of lie case, aka Tiffany Doe. Sadly, that case was dismissed.

 

I only go on real evidence. The lies and fantasy are all spouted by your camp. You lot should be wearing the pointy hats.

 

......and do you know where the real evidence is and who is currently controlling its release........?

 

 

2 minutes ago, Will B Good said:

 

......and do you know where the real evidence is and who is currently controlling its release........?

 

 

Yes, here:

 

https://vault.fbi.gov/jeffrey-epstein

 

Before you keep clamoring "release the files" at least read what's already publicly available..lol...

1 minute ago, Cameroni said:

Yes, here:

 

https://vault.fbi.gov/jeffrey-epstein

 

Before you keep clamoring "release the files" at least read what's already publicly available..lol...

 

Utterly pointless.

1 minute ago, Will B Good said:

 

Utterly pointless.

 

Oh you know about other "real evidence"? Do post the link.

 

Lol.

1 minute ago, Will B Good said:

 

Utterly pointless.

There's a reason to put some on that ignore list. Trolls gonna troll and their point is to waste your time. They get off on it. Sad little trolls.

1 minute ago, HappyExpat57 said:

There's a reason to put some on that ignore list. Trolls gonna troll and their point is to waste your time. They get off on it. Sad little trolls.

 

Lol, you lot are the trolls, posting utterly fabricated lies.

 

Shameless.

9 minutes ago, Cameroni said:

 

Oh you know about other "real evidence"? Do post the link.

 

Lol.

 

 

I can only assume you don't read/watch the news other than Fox, which no longer even mentions the Epstein evidence (the truck loads).

2 minutes ago, Will B Good said:

 

 

I can only assume you don't read/watch the news other than Fox, which no longer even mentions the Epstein evidence (the truck loads).

 

I've read books on the Epstein case, and followed it ever since it first broke. I read afidavitst, FBI files and researched all the main newspapers on information about the case. 

 

I don't need to rely on Fox, and never do. However, if they don't mention the Epstein matter anymore, probably for the simple reason that the game is  plaaaaayyyyeeed,.,,,soooooo  plaaaaaayyyyyeeed,,,,

Just now, Cameroni said:

 

I've read books on the Epstein case, and followed it ever since it first broke. I read afidavitst, FBI files and researched all the main newspapers on information about the case. 

 

I don't need to rely on Fox, and never do. However, if they don't mention the Epstein matter anymore, probably for the simple reason that the game is  plaaaaayyyyeeed,.,,,soooooo  plaaaaaayyyyyeeed,,,,

 

But Bondi says "Oh!. There's nothing to see in the truck load of evidence" .......and that's it, you just believe her......that is so staggeringly naive it is hard to comprehend an adult would adopt that position.

 

Staggering.

2 minutes ago, Will B Good said:

 

But Bondi says "Oh!. There's nothing to see in the truck load of evidence" .......and that's it, you just believe her......that is so staggeringly naive it is hard to comprehend an adult would adopt that position.

 

Staggering.

Trolls don't behave like adults. Just a comment, not pointing fingers at anyone in particular.

9 minutes ago, Will B Good said:

 

But Bondi says "Oh!. There's nothing to see in the truck load of evidence" .......and that's it, you just believe her......that is so staggeringly naive it is hard to comprehend an adult would adopt that position.

 

Staggering.

 

Well, given that truckloads of evidence from Epstein's black book of contacts, to the FBI investigation files to court case materials have all been made publicly available and there is nothing that causes any concern whatsoever, what is rather staggering is that you seem so intent on there being "something" based on...well...no evidence at all.

 

Seems staggeringly naive, I would say.

 

Again, sensible people go on actual evidence. If you want to peddle lies and misinformation, speculation and fantasy, go for it. But don't expect anyone to believe you.

4 minutes ago, Cameroni said:

 

Well, given that truckloads of evidence from Epstein's black book of contacts, to the FBI investigation files to court case materials have all been made publicly available and there is nothing that causes any concern whatsoever, what is rather staggering is that you seem so intent on there being "something" based on...well...no evidence at all.

 

Seems staggeringly naive, I would say.

 

Again, sensible people go on actualy evidence. If you want to peddle lies and misinformation, speculation and fantasy, go for it. But don't expect anyone to believe you.

 

So you have also seen the 30GB of videos?

 

 

Pam Bondi claimed the FBI was reviewing “tens of thousands” of videos involving Epstein, ,,,,,,,,,,,,and you've seen these?

1 minute ago, Will B Good said:

 

So you have also seen the 30TB of videos?

 

 

 

Why is there a minute missing that was stolen by aliens?

2 minutes ago, Cameroni said:

 

Why is there a minute missing that was stolen by aliens?

 

You are a sad individual.

8 hours ago, EVENKEEL said:

Don't just keep complaining and name calling.

Ahhh... you mean to say: "Don't be another DJ Trump"?

1 hour ago, Cameroni said:

 

‘He didn’t partake in any’ of — any sex with any of us

 

https://www.politico.com/story/2019/08/09/epstein-mar-a-lago-trump-1456221

 

Do you speak English at all? Do you not know what the words "with any of us"...mean?  She was not saying he didn't have sex with her, but she never saw him having sex with any of the Epstein girls she helped recruit and groom.

 

And don't tell me to do anything, much less research, when you're too thick to understand basic English, I've done more research than you.

 

Get a life instead of peddling demonstrably false lies on the internet.  Pathetic.

 

cant seem to understand your own comments can you? Saying "any of us" does not exempt him from having sex with other just that she never saw it or did it with him.  She is not the only victim so learn to read and research the list is endless but you cant admit the truth can you. You like to cherry pick singular comment and apply them globally.  

6 minutes ago, gamb00ler said:

Ahhh... you mean to say: "Don't be another DJ Trump"?

Nope, not at all. 

9 minutes ago, Will B Good said:

 

You are a sad individual.

 

You do know that the whole "Epstein filmed his girls' encounters with celebrities" accusation was made by another habitual liar, Sara Ransome who made up stories to profit from the Epstein compensation fund? 

 

She made the allegation that Epstein filmed the encounters, but later admitted in her own book that she made the claim up. Then later reversed her stance again. She's a total liar.

 

Ransome was another imperfect witness. In the fall of 2016, she had suggested to the New York Post that she had sex tapes of half a dozen prominent people, including Bill Clinton and Donald Trump—but couldn’t provide the tapes when asked. (Ransome told me that she had invented the tapes to draw attention to Epstein’s behavior, and to make him believe that she had “evidence that would come out if he harmed me.”)

 

https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2019/08/05/alan-dershowitz-devils-advocate

 

There are no tapes. Epstein never filmed anything.

 

1 minute ago, Cameroni said:

 

You do know that the whole "Epstein filmed his girls' encounters with celebrities" accusation was made by another habitual liar, Sara Ransome who made up stories to profit from the Epstein compensation fund?

 

She made the allegation that Epstein filmed the encounters, but later admitted in her own book that she made the claim up. Then later reversed her stance again. She's a total liar.

 

Ransome was another imperfect witness. In the fall of 2016, she had suggested to the New York Post that she had sex tapes of half a dozen prominent people, including Bill Clinton and Donald Trump—but couldn’t provide the tapes when asked. (Ransome told me that she had invented the tapes to draw attention to Epstein’s behavior, and to make him believe that she had “evidence that would come out if he harmed me.”)

 

https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2019/08/05/alan-dershowitz-devils-advocate

 

 

Oh so Pam Bondi is also lying....you cannot trust the Trump followers....

 

 

Attorney General Pam Bondi as the Trump administration promises to release more files from its sex trafficking investigation of Jeffrey Epstein: The FBI, she said, was reviewing “tens of thousands of videos” of the wealthy financier “

 

 

https://www.nbcnewyork.com/news/national-international/epstein-files-pam-bondi-claims-new-video/6321968/

2 minutes ago, Will B Good said:

 

 

Oh so Pam Bondi is also lying....you cannot trust the Trump followers....

 

 

Attorney General Pam Bondi as the Trump administration promises to release more files from its sex trafficking investigation of Jeffrey Epstein: The FBI, she said, was reviewing “tens of thousands of videos” of the wealthy financier “

 

 

https://www.nbcnewyork.com/news/national-international/epstein-files-pam-bondi-claims-new-video/6321968/

 

Lol, obviously they meant porn that Epstein had on his hard drives. How can there be video of "Epstein with child porn"? Engage your brain.

 

From your own article: The Associated Press spoke with lawyers and law enforcement officials in criminal cases of Epstein and socialite former girlfriend Ghislaine Maxwell who said they hadn't seen and didn't know of a trove of recordings like what Bondi described.

Indictments and detention memos do not reference the existence of videos of Epstein with children, and neither was charged with possession of child sex abuse material even though that offense would have been much easier to prove than the sex trafficking counts they faced.

https://www.nbcnewyork.com/news/national-international/epstein-files-pam-bondi-claims-new-video/6321968/

 

So clearly what they found was Epstein's porn stash. You want them to release child porn? Guess why that won't happen. I know it's hard, but you can probably guess it.

5 minutes ago, Cameroni said:

ol, obviously they meant porn that Epstein had on his hard drives.

 

obviously they meant

 

What an amazing statement from someone who bases their comments only on the verifiable evidence.

 

 

You really are clueless as to how the Maxwell indictments were framed to protect the guilty. Of course these people never saw the evidence.......I tell you who has Bondi, Patel, Bongino........but they all had their spines surgically overnight.

Just now, Will B Good said:

 

obviously they meant

 

What an amazing statement from someone who bases their comments only on the verifiable evidence.

 

 

You really are clueless as to how the Maxwell indictments were framed to protect the guilty. Of course these people never saw the evidence.......I tell you who has Bondi, Patel, Bongino........but they all had their spines surgically overnight.

 

You're a bit clueless, when they say "videos of Epstein" they don't mean Epstein is in the videos. They mean videos of his, that were on his hard drive. Like any normal man Epstein viewed porn.

 

Very obviously Bondi can't release porn to the public, I mean the government is not Pornhub.