Just now, Cameroni said:

 

You're a bit clueless, when they say "videos of Epstein" they don't mean Epstein is in the videos. They mean videos of his, that were on his hard drive. Like any normal man Epstein viewed porn.

 

Very obviously Bondi can't release porn to the public, I mean the government is not Pornhub.

 

But....wait on..........let me get this straight......you have seen all these videos and all the other evidence.....you know what is in this truck load........again very impressive.

 

Oh....I get it.....but Bondi says.....bit like Simon says......the game the glue chewers used to play at school whilst the chess club was on.

3 hours ago, xylophone said:

Of course the trumpies will deny it because they really can't think of their hero as a "kiddie fiddler" and child rapist/paedophile, although there is so much information out about him regarding the above, that it should be pretty obvious that he is a despicable excuse for a human being, as well as being a felon and being convicted of sexual assault amongst other nasty things!.

After desperately censoring Ashley's diary containing EVIDENCE Biden was a incestual pedophile, the left are suddenly big on pedophilia again? Seriously? The level of mendacity required to 180 on this narrative is almost scary.

Just now, SunnyinBangrak said:

After desperately censoring Ashley's diary containing EVIDENCE Biden was a incestual pedophile, the left are suddenly big on pedophilia again? Seriously? The level of mendacity required to 180 on this narrative is almost scary.

 

 

As opposed to MAGA....who to be fair.....always seem to be quite big on pedophilia.

2 minutes ago, SunnyinBangrak said:

After desperately censoring Ashley's diary containing EVIDENCE Biden was a incestual pedophile, the left are suddenly big on pedophilia again? Seriously? The level of mendacity required to 180 on this narrative is almost scary.

 

The mendacity of xylophone in particular is breathtaking. I have repeatedly brought clear evidence to this attention that the Katie Johnson hoax was a hoax, and provided clear evidence for this. Yet he persists in repeating lies from an affidavit that was withdrawn and a case that was withdrawn because it was a tissue of lies. Again and again.

 

The worst case of misinformation on AN I have ever seen.

7 minutes ago, Will B Good said:

 

But....wait on..........let me get this straight......you have seen all these videos and all the other evidence.....you know what is in this truck load........again very impressive.

 

Oh....I get it.....but Bondi says.....bit like Simon says......the game the glue chewers used to play at school whilst the chess club was on.

 

Again, THERE ARE NO videos of any celebrities nailing Epstein's girls. These do not exist. This was a lie perpetuated by the liar Sarah Ransome. Ghislaine Maxwell has confirmed this. Ransome admitted it, before she again perpetuated the same lie.

 

Now, the videos you then referred to were obviously the porn videos Epstein liked to watch. I have no desire to watch child porn and am a bit surprised you suggest anyone watch these or the government should release porn. Which will of course never happen.

 

 

3 minutes ago, Cameroni said:

the Katie Johnson hoax was a hoax

 

 

If the hoax was a hoax.....does that mean it was true.???

26 minutes ago, Will B Good said:

 

 

Oh so Pam Bondi is also lying....you cannot trust the Trump followers....

 

 

Attorney General Pam Bondi as the Trump administration promises to release more files from its sex trafficking investigation of Jeffrey Epstein: The FBI, she said, was reviewing “tens of thousands of videos” of the wealthy financier “

 

 

https://www.nbcnewyork.com/news/national-international/epstein-files-pam-bondi-claims-new-video/6321968/

That's the most funny aspect of this issue. The same MAGAs who were touting the Epstein client list and other similar stuff (including some of our MAGA posters) in a lame attempt to smear Dems  are now claiming there is nothing to see. 

3 minutes ago, Cameroni said:

 

Again, THERE ARE NO videos of any celebrities nailing Epstein's girls. These do not exist. This was a lie perpetuated by the liar Sarah Ransome. Ghislaine Maxwell has confirmed this. Ransome admitted it, before she again perpetuated the same lie.

 

Now, the videos you then referred to were obviously the porn videos Epstein liked to watch. I have no desire to watch child porn and am a bit surprised you suggest anyone watch these or the government should release porn. Which will of course never happen.

 

 

 

 

......and yet you have absolutely no evidence.......you do surprise me.

 

 

 

1 minute ago, candide said:

That's the most funny aspect of this issue. The same MAGAs who were touting the Epstein client list and other similar stuff (including some of our MAGA posters) in a lame attempt to smear Dems  are now claiming there is nothing to see. 

 

 

Bondi, Patel, Bongino......Bongino in particular was apoplectic......RELEASE THE FILES, RELEASE THE FILES.....oh! There are no files????

 

Soz.

Just now, Will B Good said:

 

 

......and yet you have absolutely no evidence.......you do surprise me.

 

 

 

 

I do. I have already posted it:

 

"Ransome was another imperfect witness. In the fall of 2016, she had suggested to the New York Post that she had sex tapes of half a dozen prominent people, including Bill Clinton and Donald Trump—but couldn’t provide the tapes when asked. (Ransome told me that she had invented the tapes to draw attention to Epstein’s behavior, and to make him believe that she had “evidence that would come out if he harmed me.”)"

 

 

https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2019/08/05/alan-dershowitz-devils-advocate

 

This is a reporter from the New Yorker going on record that Sara Ransome admitted to him that she had invented claims about video evidence.. 

 

Do you not understand what this means? There is no video evidence. In your own link Ghislaine Maxwell said that she knows of no video evidence whatsoever. 

 

There is plenty of evidence that states that Epstein DID NOT film encounters, there is ZERO evidence to claim he did. Which is what you're doing.

 

Just now, Cameroni said:

 

I do. I have already posted it:

 

"Ransome was another imperfect witness. In the fall of 2016, she had suggested to the New York Post that she had sex tapes of half a dozen prominent people, including Bill Clinton and Donald Trump—but couldn’t provide the tapes when asked. (Ransome told me that she had invented the tapes to draw attention to Epstein’s behavior, and to make him believe that she had “evidence that would come out if he harmed me.”)"

 

 

https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2019/08/05/alan-dershowitz-devils-advocate

 

This is a reporter from the New Yorker going on record that Sara Ransome admitted to him that she had invented claims about video evidence.. 

 

Do you not understand what this means? There is no video evidence. In your own link Ghislaine Maxwell said that she knows of no video evidence whatsoever. 

 

There is plenty of evidence that states that Epstein DID NOT film encounters, there is ZERO evidence to claim he did. Which is what you're doing.

 

 

You have totally lost me now.

 

A person makes a false claim of possessing sex tapes........so you extrapolate from that............ there are no sex tapes at all?

 

Promise me you will never contemplate a career in criminal investigations.

For further evidence about how Sara Ransome is one of the most abject, shameless and voluminous liars the courts have ever seen, see this report here:

 

"No evidence of the tapes, which Ms Ransome claimed in the emails that her friend possessed and she had copied, has ever emerged.

Referring to the New Yorker report, a spokesperson for Sir Richard's Virgin Group said on Monday: "We can confirm that Sarah Ransome's claims are baseless and unfounded.""

 

https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-67918708

 

Remember, this Sara Ransome received a payment of millions by Jeffrey Epstein to just shut up. Ovbiously she got a taste for money and started to make up more and more lies, including that she slept with Alan Dershowitz, another very obvious lie.

3 minutes ago, Will B Good said:

A person makes a false claim of possessing sex tapes........so you extrapolate from that............ there are no sex tapes at all?

 

I'm afraid that's not how it works. If you claim there is such video evidence then it is YOU who is under the obligation to produce it. 

 

Good luck. Let me know when you have it.

 

Lol.

2 hours ago, EVENKEEL said:

Is this the rag that talks about aliens living among us?

That isn't even a discussion. Have you ever watched a video of Stephen Miller?

31 minutes ago, Cameroni said:

 

I'm afraid that's not how it works. If you claim there is such video evidence then it is YOU who is under the obligation to produce it. 

 

Good luck. Let me know when you have it.

 

Lol.

 

 

You do know it is for this that people on both sides of the aisle are clamouring?....The evidence to be released.*

 

The MAGA base has driven this demand for the evidence, egged on by the likes of Bongino et al.......of what are you so scared?

 

This could put the Dems out of power for generations. 

 

* If all the evidence has been released what is the DOJ delivering to congress today?

6 minutes ago, Will B Good said:

 

 

You do know it is for this that people on both sides of the aisle are clamouring?....The evidence to be released.*

 

The MAGA base has driven this demand for the evidence, egged on by the likes of Bongino et al.......of what are you so scared?

 

This could put the Dems out of power for generations. 

 

* If all the evidence has been released what is the DOJ delivering to congress today?

And of course, Biden's DOJ had the files for four years and protected Trump. 

 

What a hoot

11 minutes ago, BLMFem said:

That isn't even a discussion. Have you ever watched a video of Stephen Miller?

Hey, how you doing buddy?

17 minutes ago, Will B Good said:

 

 

You do know it is for this that people on both sides of the aisle are clamouring?....The evidence to be released.*

 

The MAGA base has driven this demand for the evidence, egged on by the likes of Bongino et al.......of what are you so scared?

 

This could put the Dems out of power for generations. 

 

* If all the evidence has been released what is the DOJ delivering to congress today?

 

Why would I be scared? There's nothing to be scared of. The vast majority of material has already been released as the judge recently found.

 

Congress has requested all documents and communications from the case files of Epstein and Maxwell. It also demanded records about communications between Democratic President Joe Biden’s administration and the Justice Department regarding Epstein, as well as documents related to an earlier federal investigation into Epstein in Florida that resulted in a non-prosecution agreement.

 

What Congress will not see is the testimony by Ghislaine Maxwell nor the Grand jury transcripts from the two actual Epstein cases.

 

So it's basically one giant regurgitation effort. Nothing new will come out.

 

The really interesting thing is the Ghislaine Maxwell transcript and the Grand Jury transcripts. None of which will be made available yet.

7 minutes ago, Cameroni said:

The vast majority of material has already been released as the judge recently found.

 

That was the Grand Jury......a drop in the ocean relative to the Epstein evidence that has yet to be uncovered.

I would not be surprised if they were saving the Epstein file a mid-term "October surprise".

11 hours ago, HappyExpat57 said:

No one hates 47 more than I.

 

Having said that, as @EVENKEEL pointed out in a previous similar thread, there have been no girls/women involved in this Epstein saga coming forth to claim they were assaulted by 47. Dontcha think they would have done so by now?

sorry to disappoint u man but you are second, I proudly hold first spot 555

34 minutes ago, Will B Good said:

 

That was the Grand Jury......a drop in the ocean relative to the Epstein evidence that has yet to be uncovered.

 

It will just be a pile of investigative interviews, many filled with lies, mostly redacted heavily so as not to identify anyone.

 

it's not going to be as exciting as everyone thinks.

54 minutes ago, EVENKEEL said:

Hey, how you doing buddy?

Pretty good, thanks for asking.👍

1 hour ago, Yellowtail said:

And of course, Biden's DOJ had the files for four years and protected Trump. 

 

What a hoot

The Biden administration had the Epstein files for four years. They chose not to release them. The conclusion that they wished to protect various people within their camp is inescapable.

 

The Trump administration now has the files. They campaigned on the grounds of releasing them, the most salient details, the list of Epstein's closest contacts and "players" were stated to "be on the Attorney General's desk", then she claims there are no lists, then we hear that a huge task force of 1,000 FBI agents has been assembled to ensure that references to Donald Trump are removed from these files/lists (which do not exist). Add to the mix Mr Trumps own chaotic, strident and persistent attempts to deny any involvement, and a multitude of very obvious and increasingly desperate deflection tactics, and it really is very difficult to avoid drawing the same conclusions!

 

The only way to solve the whole matter is to release all the evidence into the public domain. 

 

They won't - which leads to the inescapable conclusion that Trump is in it up to his neck.

14 minutes ago, JAG said:

The Biden administration the Epstein files for four years. They chose not to release them. The conclusion that they wished to protect various people within their camp is inescapable.

 

The Trump administration now has the files. They campaigned on the grounds of releasing them, the most salient details, the list of Epstein's closest contacts and "players" were stated to "be on the Attorney General's desk", then she claims there are no lists, then we hear that a huge task force of 1,000 FBI agents has been assembled to ensure that references to Donald Trump are removed from these files/lists (which do not exist). Add to the mix Mr Trumps own chaotic, strident and persistent attempts to deny any involvement, and a multitude of very obvious and increasingly desperate deflection tactics, and it really is very difficult to avoid drawing the same conclusions!

 

The only way to solve the whole matter is to release all the evidence into the public domain. 

 

They won't - which leads to the inescapable conclusion that Trump is in it up to his neck.

Trump is in to it up to his neck and the Biden DOJ did not prosecute him, did not release the files and did not even leak a few files before the election. 

 

 

 

 

10 hours ago, dinsdale said:

Clinton visited the island on several occasians. Does this make him guilty of anything?

Yes, guilty of visiting the island frequently and it would be inconceivable that he did not take advantage of the island's facilities.

10 hours ago, Tidal wave said:

Donald Trump's reputation took a hit after a New York civil trial jury found in favor of journalist E. Jean Carroll's claims that he battered and defamed her during the 1990s.

On Tuesday, May 12, 2023, the Manhattan jury of nine men and three women found the former president liable for sexually abusing and defaming Carroll and awarded Carroll $5 million in damages.

Not a "conviction"...and the case is nowhere near over.

10 hours ago, dinsdale said:

Guilt by association. This is the same for both Clinton and Trump

...and frequently confirmed that Trump did not use those flights to visit the island, unlike Clinton.

10 hours ago, spidermike007 said:

Trump is ass guilty as they come

Guilty of what, exactly?  

7 hours ago, armagetiton said:

Do you recall how many visits Trump made to Epsteins pedo island

Yes, zero times.