Just now, ThreeCardMonte said:

You waste your time.

 

 I asked criminally convicted 

 

You can’t produce 

Have you been civilly convicted of sexual assault? Have any friends who were?

 

It's not common.

 

Somehow you think because it is not a criminal conviction, it's okay. That says a lot about the morality, or lack thereof, of you rightist fascists.

 

Your defense of your messiah is almost as 'admirable' as the jihadis who won't let a Danish cartoonist off the hook for blaspheming their messiah.

 

Why not try some more Whataboutism? That's usually a return to Plan B for MAGAnistas when the supposed epithet of "leftists" fails to convince nor embarrass.

Vulgarity, and replies to it, were removed. Please debate politely, refraining from vulgarity and personal attacks. Thank you. 

6 hours ago, Bannoi said:

He can afford it he's made 3.5 billion since he became President

It's now up to 5.

Bottom line, when will she get her money?

1 minute ago, ThreeCardMonte said:

Once again, you failed to produce 

 

 

Only in the eyes of a lovesick MAGA fanboy.

 

I see with your 14 posts so far in this thread, you must be today's Defender of the Faith, a kind of Bernardo Gui running an Inquisition against the heretics and blasphemers.

 

Again, Trump is a civilly convicted sex offender. In a normal and moral world, that is not a good thing. Only in the immoral world of MAGAstan does it make the predator a victim.

 

By the way, Trump is also a convicted felon. What's the official MAGA excuse for that? Let me guess....a Southern Hemisphere marsupial is going to be brought to the floor.

More off topic quarrelling removed. If you can't hold a polite conversation, respecting other people's opinions might differ from yours, then warnings will follow. Thank you.

this is just one big laugh, she could not give a date or time when it was supposed to have happened, she couldnt even tell where in the store it happened, these facts alone showed it was total BS as he was not able to show he was not even there due to the total lack of genuine time & date. Also the fact she looks like a bag of <deleted> doesnt help, this is just another dem BS set up and dem judges making BS rulings with a jury of dem sycophants

Good now let’s hope we get the truth on the Epstein case and find out if trump  was diddeling children as well.

4 hours ago, ThreeCardMonte said:

He’s won much more than he’s lost.

 

Now go get your Kleenex.

Hahahaha. You might want to check your facts on that claim, both financially and politically. 

4 hours ago, ThreeCardMonte said:

Can you post his criminal convictions as a sexual predator?

 

 I didn’t think so.

No but you can list all the settlements he's paid to avoid losing in court along with his own admissions to the media.  Try to keep up with facts. Its easier than the twisted propaganda and lies he spins.

6 minutes ago, Dan O said:

No but you can list all the settlements he's paid to avoid losing in court along with his own admissions to the media.  Try to keep up with facts. Its easier than the twisted propaganda and lies he spins.

You will not change ThreeCardMontes feeling for his messiah as the grifter in cheif can do no wrong in his eyes. Even though deep down  he must know that Trump has to be the biggest loser ever to have stepped foot in to the white house.

5 hours ago, stevenl said:

Very much doubt the SC will hear it.

 

I'd be surprised if they didn't. Theres zero evidence to support her claim, other than "Errnge man bad"

Other than Chitecago I can't see any other court letting this even come before them, well, maybe the west coast. Should have never made it past the prosecutor let alone a judge. 

 

 

Is this winning?

6 hours ago, Slowhand225 said:

Good news, now it can go before the SC

 

On what grounds? You do know that appeals require a legal basis don't you? What was the error in law?

Troll posts, wishing harm on public figures, and quarelling were removed. Please debate sensibly and politely, or you will be removed from the conversation. Thank you.

 

10. You will not post troll messages. Trolling is the act of purposefully antagonizing forum members by posting controversial, inflammatory, irrelevant or off-topic messages with the primary intent of provoking other members into an emotional response or to generally disrupt normal on-topic discussion.

21 hours ago, Slowhand225 said:

 

I'd be surprised if they didn't. Theres zero evidence to support her claim, other than "Errnge man bad"

Other than Chitecago I can't see any other court letting this even come before them, well, maybe the west coast. Should have never made it past the prosecutor let alone a judge. 

Evidence is not the issue in a SC case,. The issue would be a legal error, which i don't see.

On 9/9/2025 at 8:44 AM, HappyExpat57 said:

Bottom line, when will she get her money?

I think never.