39 minutes ago, FrankieGoesToHolly said:

Of course Cammy's girl is different..

 Cammy is definitely having a mid-life crisis .   Confusion reigns supreme .  Delusion comes in second.   Refusion (new word) to accept reality, third.  

 

Not dissimilar to the aging ballplayer ...... who can not admit that he is not what he used to be .  And is too lazy or just unable to find a new way forward .  

46 minutes ago, FrankieGoesToHolly said:

looking for a new sugar daddy. Bottom shelf.

 

Yes yes yes, sugar daddies are the lowest of the low.

 

Most people do not understand anything about the country they are living in.

 

Why do you think there are so many girls in the bar trade to begin with?

Because there ain't enough good decent jobs out there. 

 

But Pope John Paul Leo the Vth farang with his Judeo-Christian preaching is going to fix it. 

 

7 hours ago, SAFETY FIRST said:

This is something I thought about over the years. 

 

I'd like get some input from members, possible things we could enforce, enter into a contract between boyfriend and girlfriend. 

 

Probably, should start a new thread 🤔

 

I used to just tack a bus ticket to the wall and say...... If ya ain't happy ,   there's your ticket.      It has now been proven, scientifically,  that "men" today are not the same as days gone by .   (less testosterone and sperm counts) .

 

***also much more use of the phrase ,  yes dear .***

 

9 minutes ago, rumak said:

Not dissimilar to the aging ballplayer ...... who can not admit that he is not what he used to be . 

 

Yeah, watch the Wrestler with Mickey Rourke. That's a great mid-life crisis saga. Who doesn't feel washed up? 

 

If you ever seen a one-legged dawg, then you seen me.

I'm an old broken down piece of meat. 

 

 

7 minutes ago, save the frogs said:

Why do you think there are so many girls in the bar trade to begin with?

 

first of all ...... half of them are now old and fat .  a quarter of them, young and fat .

and there are "so many"  to accomodate the desperate men flocking from all corners of the world .    Hey,  i do not look down on these "girls".   They are providing a needed service for otherwise lovestarved men.

 

as are the internet "girls"  that Cammy procures .

17 hours ago, richard_smith237 said:

Let’s be clear: she’s not entering a legitimate relationship - you're a million miles away from that... 

She’s entering into an arrangement with the express intention of requesting financial compensation for her companionship and sex.

Same as a wife then ........ shame that lots of wives limit the sex after a year or two.

1 minute ago, BritManToo said:

Same as a wife then ........ shame that lots of wives limit the sex after a year or two.

Breach of marriage contract !!

Number of sex sessions should be put in there.

Then you go to the judge with videotape proving she is withholding sex. 

 

Never a dull moment with this girl.

 

So during a bout of grape feeding BKK girl texts me on Messenger. Phuket Girl sees it. She says she wants to see my phone. Now. I refuse. She says she is so hurt. Wants to grab my phone, we wrestle. "You have secrets!" "I don't, I want only you". "Tell me!". She's very upset for 30 minutes.

 

This clearly is a good sign. If she didn't care for me and didn't love me why would she care who writes to me? Obviously she was jealous. I tell her so. "So now I know you love me" "I don't, I never say". "Yes, but you're so jealous, you don't have to say, now I know" "I don't love you".

 

She finally calms down about this, I didn't show the phone of course and stood my ground. Then she says "I think I'm pregnant. Seriously. Let's go to 711 I have to get a test". So at 11 pm we up and go to 711, get tests. She does the test. It's negative, she's not pregnant. "Just had to make sure". Because she has no period now, obviously the mountain air and Cameroni loving is healing and nurturing. Nothing to do with pregnancy.

 

Then she says she wants to go shower together. Another first, no girl ever out of herself suggested showering together. She did. She said she wants me to shave her. So I shave her. It feels very natural to be naked with her and showering. She's beautiful naked, it's enjoyable actually.  Then we move to the bedroom. I give her so much pleasure until she can't take it anymore.

 

This morning I asked her to go to the coffee bar to meet my friends. She says no, "I'm lazeeee. I don't like to talk people". So I go meet my friends. My Thai coffee bar owner friend has some wise advice. I get a text "Sukiyaki. Pleeeeasse...???".  I  come home. The house is spic and spam. She's been cleaning every floor, doing dishes, did my laundry. I ask her to go eat Sukiyaki. She said no, I don't want to go out. I say I'll get it for her. She's enjoying Sukiyaki now.

14 hours ago, richard_smith237 said:

You mean financially independent women with the own careers started dating my friends because they thought they'd get paid for it ???? - interesting take.

 

No, I don't mean that at all. Unlike you, I know that women do not choose based on money alone, unless they are real whores. So your friends would have been chosen for other reasons. However, after they were chosen undoubtedly material exchange of resources began, as you well know.

 

14 hours ago, richard_smith237 said:

a 'girl on the game' vs a regular female who'll enter a relationship out of genuine attraction rather than hunting financial gain.

 

Here we go again, imputing this financial primary criteria on females, when in fact this is a total fallacy. No girl ever said "He wears a Gucci shirt, I want to have sex with him". This doesn't happen. Like us, women are multi-facetted and want other things besides money (sex in our case). Phuket girl is attracted to me. The fact that a demand for resources comes, is only natural.

 

14 hours ago, richard_smith237 said:

It seems to work for you - just having money... she figured you might have more money than the last cheapskate she was with, thats all. 

 

No, I have a lot more than money. I'm attractive, I have the face, I am kind and considerate, I'm intelligent, I make her laugh. I don't lead with money at all. You will recall when she came I did not pay her, the first date with CM girl I spent not one baht. And her Austrian ex owned a condo in Phuket, he was loaded. 

 

14 hours ago, richard_smith237 said:

I are partially right - if a person is extremely grotesque a financially destitute female who's looking for a financial return when entering a relationship may chose an alternative customer person to sleep-with live with.

 

Again, you have all these lonely, false ideas in your head, just theories. But they do not correspond with the facts. She did not end the relationship. The Austrian guy had another Thai girl, So she wwanted out for considerations whollly unrelated to money.

 

14 hours ago, richard_smith237 said:

Why is she asking for money then ? - thats her only purpose - she's not there because she loves you.

 

Because she bought a motorcycle for her mother and needs to send her mother 6000 baht every month. So she has an expense. And she's not working. How is she supposed to meet her expense otherwise?

 

Just because she has expenses and needs help you can't make any conclusion about her emotional life.

 

14 hours ago, richard_smith237 said:

The money stops, she moves on - and she will as soon as she's found her next potentail source of income.

 

Very normal, try to stop paying your gf's mortgage, rent, holidays, gifts, food, dinners...she''ll be gone quickly as well. Relationships are transactional. Almost all romantic relationships are. If they dont' want something from you, why would they be with you?

 

14 hours ago, richard_smith237 said:

I know she wouldn't consider it - otherwise she wouldn't be with me - she'd be with one of the wealthy guys who propositioned her !!...   I can't speak for my friends Wives - but they will have had options and chose with the heart not the calculator. 

 

No you don't know, perhaps there wasn't anyone rich enough or seriously interested enough. it could always happen. You just don't know. Of course they choose with their heart initially, so did Phuket girl. They all do. And then material exchange happens. All very normal.

 

14 hours ago, richard_smith237 said:

Again, that comparison you keep clinging to is pure self-delusion. Normal relationships don’t begin with a financial agreement.

 

The delusion is complete your own, because you actually believe your own relationship and those of your friends do not involve an exchange of resources. We both know that's not true, but you keep refusing to accept this obvious fact. It's cute. You have an idealist delusion. But you are lying to yourself of course, like so many others here. Indeed few real relationships begin with financial agreements, but ithey always comes, dont they ?

 

14 hours ago, richard_smith237 said:

What you’re describing is entirely different. You are paying for her presence and that was her plan from day one,

 

No. I'm not paying for her pressence. I'm paying so she can meet her obligations to her mother, so she's happy and does not have to worry. It's incidental. A real need that has to be meet, but it's not a primary consideration. She did not have a plan. She wanted to meet me and see. And if she likes it she'd stay. And yes, she needs help to meet her obligations. But this is incidental. It's not a primary motive, as you imply  with an idee fix and real obsession.

 

14 hours ago, richard_smith237 said:

Yet you’re still trying to whitewash the blatantly mercenary nature of the arrangement, pretending it’s something deeper.

It isn’t a relationship. It’s a business deal - payment for services rendered.

 

No, this is a just some kind of mental fixation you have, this relationship is much more complex than you would like to imagine in your limited world view, where there are "hookers" and "good, legitimate girls". The world is not like that. It's more complex. Of course it's a relationship. To some degree all relationships are transactional, of course, but these exchanges fo resources are incidental and not primary motives, and certainly not for "services rendered". I never asked her to clean the house today. She did so out of herself. I never asked her to shower with me or have sex yesterday. All her choice. And I did not pay for any of it, as you think.

 

14 hours ago, richard_smith237 said:

CM girl is still messaging you ?...    She's long gone because you are of no financial value to her.

 

CM girl was messaging me whilst she was in Pattaya. I chose not to reply to her anymore. Indeed she chose based on material advantage, and a trip to a top hotel, to see the fireworks in Pattaya and Omakase, all this was more important to her. So she's of no interest to me now. But she did not ghost me when you said she would, she actually wrote that she wanted to meet. It just ended because she was actually dating a guy for 2 years, who brought her to Pattaya. I was the attractive bit on the side, but had to make way when the real boyfriend stepped up. It happens.

14 hours ago, richard_smith237 said:

Neither do you - you are not dating - you are picking up poor and desperate women who are looking for money in exchange for 'company'... 

 

No, I'm responding to attractive dating profiles. I have no idea what financial situation these girls are in, or even what their socio-economic background is.

 

We're in asia, those girls are in their 20s, obviously theyr'e not wealthy in most cases, not all, but usually. This has no bearing on the initial phases of the relationship.

14 hours ago, richard_smith237 said:

 

Again - quite wrong... 

 

Examples:

a) Couple meet at Uni or in the work place, both work, date, get married, have kids, she stops working to bring the kids up, he supports the 'household' while she does not work.

 

b) Couple meet online, date, she asks for money to stay dating.

 

If you are unable to identity the stark difference between the two then you really are quite as foolish as you appear in this thread.

 

 

 

 

 

You look at the superficial modality of the payment. In reality in both examples the man pays. This is the key fact. Not whether payment starts early or later.

14 hours ago, richard_smith237 said:

 

Far from it - it highlights he's not wildly deluded and has standards - but, the eye of the beholder and all that... 

... If you see physical beauty no one can take that away from you...   Well, apart from the next guy willing to part with 20,000 baht for a a bipolar rubber dingy... 

 

 

 

No, he's obviously deluded or just trash talking. I've shown her pic to a guy who only dates beautiful women and he was very impressed. Everyone I sent her pics to thought she was a real beauty.

 

She is of course. She may not be a full 10 like BKK girl, but she's a solid 8 and her character puts her in the vicinity of 10.

 

she doesn't just have the face, she has a great body, better breasts than BKK girl, and real curves. She's very hot and beautiful. The pictures don't do her justice.

 

13 hours ago, richard_smith237 said:

When a “relationship” exists because of a financial agreement, or even the expectation of one, the materialism involved isn’t romantic, cultural, or circumstantial - it’s purely mercenary

 

See, the thing is, you only assume a relationship exists solely because of a "financial arrangement". You impute that this girl's primary motive was money. In reality however, it s much, much too early to make that determination.

 

It may or may not be the case. We have to wait and see. Neither me and especially not you, can know if that is the case.

 

13 hours ago, richard_smith237 said:

If you 'have to steer' the relationship in a direction away from being 'just about money' - then its not a genuine relationship.

 

Not true at all, you could be in a real relationship with a girl who asks a lot for money, and you can guide her and teach her that this is not normal and acceptable. She may change her behaviour. Your black and white drawer thinking is not applicable in the real world.

 

13 hours ago, richard_smith237 said:

but its not an expression of her love for you, its an expression of her need for money.

 

And yet, she can still express her love for you, despite this. Imagine. Your world crumbling again in the face of reality?

 

13 hours ago, richard_smith237 said:

In pay-for-play dynamics, there is no “deserving” woman to carefully select in the first place.

 

Okay, you have this notion of nefarious "pay for play" women, and "deserving" "legitimate" women. I reality this is a fantasy. A delusion. In reality all women are "pay for play". If you stopped paying mortgage, holidays, gifts, food, dinners tomorrow, your girlfriend would be gone quickly. We both know this. You just don't want to admit it. So there are either no "deserving" women, or all are deserving, from the financial perspective.

13 hours ago, richard_smith237 said:

When the foundation of the arrangement is financial, you’re not “investing your resources in the wrong woman” - you’re simply paying the going rate for a transactional role...

 

You are rather missing the point, that all relationships are transactional, and that financial considerations are almost NEVER primary in real relationships, only with outright sex workers and material hos.

 

13 hours ago, richard_smith237 said:

The risk isn’t choosing someone who “doesn’t deserve it”...
The risk is believing you’re making a meaningful choice at all... 

In a mercenary setup, deserve doesn’t enter the equation - only price does and thats why Cameroni has found himself in negotiations.

 

 

The reason Phuket girl negotiated is because a) she has a few expenses b) she has no job and c) her Thai ex of five years and her Austrian ex both paid her an allowance, this is normal for her. Indeed in all of Thailand it is normal for the man to provide for the woman, as indeed it is normal in almost corner of the world today. It is very normal. Sometimes the negotiations are up front, other times they are more covert, but you better believe your girlfriend look at the material aspect, she may just not have negotiated because she knew your financial situation full well and you already gave freely to her. So negotiation was not required.

 

13 hours ago, richard_smith237 said:

With women who demand financial compensation for attention or sex

 

Phuket girl has not demanded money for attention or sex, again this is all in your head. Almost no women, apart from whores and full on material girls do that.

 

13 hours ago, richard_smith237 said:

It’s a calculated system: affection, company, or sex is offered only in exchange for payment.

 

Again, only in your head, Richard. These girls just have expenses and need to meet them. They have no "calculated system"to exchange sex or company for money. They just see it as normal way to meet expenses, to ask for an allowance. Which is not related to sex or company. That's given already.

 

13 hours ago, richard_smith237 said:

It’s a transactional setup - a business deal disguised as intimacy, not a genuine relationship.

 

Every relationship is transactional. Including yours. Again, you're just deluding yourself.

 

13 hours ago, richard_smith237 said:

And notice the word I used: demand. That’s the crucial difference. In some arrangements with regular monetary exchanges, the financial expectation is implicit, and affection or company isn’t withheld. But if services are withheld until payment is made, then the monetary demand defines the interaction, and the relationship is mercenary, plain and simple.

 

An explicit demand is not a crucial difference, it's just a difference in modality of the arrangement. Whether a girl asks for a 10000 baht allowance, or a guy gives her 10000 out of himself, makes no difference to the fact that the relationship is transactional in each and every case. All relationships are mercenary to some degree, with few exceptions.

9 hours ago, SAFETY FIRST said:

This is something I thought about over the years. 

 

I'd like get some input from members, possible things we could enforce, enter into a contract between boyfriend and girlfriend. 

 

Probably, should start a new thread 🤔

 

I actually thought about this, naturally, since I'm a lawyer. I've even considered giving money solely based on a contractual basis, with the implied term that if you break up or cheat you have to repay the money.

 

However, in Thailand these contracts could not be enforced, because the girls don't have the resources to pay in the first place. Leaving aside if such contracts be legally valid.

 

With one Filipina I had a relationship contract drawn up purely for form, specifying such things, but it is useless. These girls no more keep to a contract than a racoon. And you can't enforce them anyway.

2 hours ago, FrankieGoesToHolly said:

Not even naturally attractive, in any way.

 

Total nonsense of course. Every experienced man I sent her pics to was impressed with her beauty. Even more so in real life, you haven't even met her and can't call her attractiveness in real life. She's extremely attractive, at least an 8.

 

3 hours ago, FrankieGoesToHolly said:

Seemingly just useful for sex

 

No, she's very useful for a lot of things apart from sex.

 

3 hours ago, FrankieGoesToHolly said:

His ego cannot accept that there are women who actually like/love/respect their men.

 

No, I know there are women who like/love/respect their man, I've had a women like this many times before, and was married to one for over 20 years. Unfortunately, those women tend to be over the age of 24 in most cases, and do not age well. So I chose to get out and find a more attractive option. I already HAD what all these "likeable" guys who claim they have a woman for life cling to. They are usually with a  woman approaching 50 and that doesn't do it for me, sorry to say.

 

3 hours ago, FrankieGoesToHolly said:

Of course Cammy's girl is different

 

She is completely different, and you have no idea what she's like as you don't know her.

2 hours ago, josephbloggs said:

Now come on - that's not nice, she has a name. What is her name actually @Cameroni?

 

She has one of the most beautiful Thai names I ever heard, and a very cute nickname too. But of course, I won't divulge that here. Though I suppose Phuket girl has earned a name now. Phuket girl is fine though.

2 hours ago, rumak said:

Cammy is definitely having a mid-life crisis

 

There's no such thing as a "mid-life crisis" it's a myth.

 

https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/edmonton/mid-life-crisis-a-myth-university-of-alberta-study-concludes-1.3399494

5 minutes ago, Cameroni said:

 

There's no such thing as a "mid-life crisis" it's a myth.

 

https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/edmonton/mid-life-crisis-a-myth-university-of-alberta-study-concludes-1.3399494

A midlife crisis occurs between the ages of 40 and 60.    The paper only followed people up until the age of 43. 

 

The team followed two groups: Canadian high-school seniors from ages 18 to 43 and university seniors from ages 23 to 37. Happiness for both groups increased into the 30s, the study says. There was a drop by age 43 in the high-school sample, but both studies showed a rise in happiness as people aged.

10 minutes ago, TedG said:

A midlife crisis occurs between the ages of 40 and 60.    The paper only followed people up until the age of 43. 

 

The team followed two groups: Canadian high-school seniors from ages 18 to 43 and university seniors from ages 23 to 37. Happiness for both groups increased into the 30s, the study says. There was a drop by age 43 in the high-school sample, but both studies showed a rise in happiness as people aged.

 

No, it's widely accepted in Psychology now that "mid-life crisis" is a myth and does not exist.

 

That study is just one of many that confirms this.

 

"Is a midlife crisis a real thing?

 

Nope, it's a unicorn...as in "a mythical creature in psychology," says Susan Krauss Whitborne, PhD, Professor Emerita in the Psychological and Brain Sciences department at University of Massachusetts Amherst. In fact, she adds, "We [people who do research in this area] really don't find evidence that age is associated with any distinct changes in personality that would constitute what is popularly called a 'midlife crisis.'"

 

https://www.womenshealthmag.com/life/a64643894/midlife-crisis-myth-feel-better/

 

9 minutes ago, Cameroni said:

 

No, it's widely accepted in Psychology now that "mid-life crisis" is a myth and does not exist.

 

That study is just one of many that confrims this.

 

"Is a midlife crisis a real thing?

 

Nope, it's a unicorn...as in "a mythical creature in psychology," says Susan Krauss Whitborne, PhD, Professor Emerita in the Psychological and Brain Sciences department at University of Massachusetts Amherst. In fact, she adds, "We [people who do research in this area] really don't find evidence that age is associated with any distinct changes in personality that would constitute what is popularly called a 'midlife crisis.'"

 

https://www.womenshealthmag.com/life/a64643894/midlife-crisis-myth-feel-better/

 

We can play dueling studies all day long. 

 

The ‘mid-life crisis' is more than just a theory, new study finds

 

People in their midlife are disproportionately more likely to suffer from clinical depression, take their own lives, become dependent on alcohol, have trouble sleeping, and exhibit other extreme-stress ailments.

In the CAGE working paper, ‘The Mid-life Crisis’, Osea Giuntella, Sally McManus, Redzo Mujcic, Andrew J. Oswald, Nattavudh Powdthavee and Ahmed Tohamy use a wide array of population-level health data across all ages to prove that midlife crises are real and affect a high number of people in developed countries.

 

https://warwick.ac.uk/fac/soc/economics/news/2023/2/the_mid_life_crisis_is_more_than_just_a_theory_new_study_finds/

 

At least this study has a population size of 500,000. 

Forget The Red Sports Car. The Midlife Crisis Is A Myth

 

"...over the past 20 years, researchers have tried to find evidence of a widespread midlife crisis — and failed."

 

What most people refer to as a "midlife crisis" is really a crisis or setback that occurs in midlife, such as losing a spouse, a parent, a job, or experiencing a health scare. Most people recover from these setbacks.

 

Andrew Oswald at the University of Warwick and other researchers have detected a "U-shaped" happiness curve that seems to afflict people across the globe. (The low point in the U.S. is the mid-40s.) However, almost inevitably you become cheerier in your 50s and continue to grow happier through your 70s. 

 

https://www.npr.org/2016/03/14/469813659/forget-the-red-sports-car-the-midlife-crisis-is-a-myth

 

So actually research shows that we get happier as we enter our 50s, and that's the case for me as well.

Not necessarily, says David Almeida, professor of human development and family studies. "Research suggests the mid-life crisis is largely a myth," Almeida explains. "Very few people report having some definable crisis that's due to their age."

 

While there are certainly plenty of aging people looking to relive their youth, Almeida says his own research shows that people in mid-life are actually happier and more satisfied with their daily life than young people. "Typically by middle age, people have found their way in life," he says. "They know what job they're doing. Their kids are older. On average, mid-life is a happy time."

 

https://www.psu.edu/news/research/story/probing-question-mid-life-crisis-myth

The Midlife Crisis Is a Total Myth

 

In the 1960s, a psychologist named Elliott Jaques coined the term "midlife crisis" based on his studies of clinical patients and artists, who were dealing with depression and angst about getting older.

The term "midlife crisis" caught on like wildfire, because everyone knows someone who fits the mold, Freund told LiveScience. But what about all the people we know who don't fit the mold?

Freund, Lachman and most modern psychologists dismiss Jaques' case studies as not representative of the average Joe. "Artists are known to dramatize their lives; it is their job almost," Freund points out, and the more neurotic among us are more prone to crises in any life stage.

 

Despite decades of research debunking it, the concept lingers in Western culture, particularly in its application to men. The original promoters of the midlife crisis theory painted a picture of men as "late bloomers," Freund said, who bumbled along without thinking until they heard a wake-up call in midlife. More recent research, Freund said, has shown that men are just as self-reflective as women, and that neither gender is prone to life-changing crises based on age.

 

https://www.livescience.com/12930-midlife-crisis-total-myth.html

Why the ‘midlife crisis’ is a myth

 

Consider personality change, for example. One longitudinal study that followed thousands of Americans from age 41 to 50 found they became less neurotic and self-conscious with age. These personality changes were unrelated to the adults’ experience of life adversity: resilience, not crisis, was the norm.

 

Other research tells a similar story. In general, psychological changes during midlife are positive. Personality becomes more steady and self-accepting, while positive emotion, on average, gradually rises through the lifespan.

 

https://edition.cnn.com/2019/10/14/health/midlife-crisis-the-conversation-wellness

Science Debunks Midlife Myths

 

The John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation Research Network on Successful Midlife Development, a Harvard University–based interdisciplinary project run by 13 scholars, surveyed more than 7,000 people in the U.S. between the ages of 25 and 74 on aspects of middle age. The results, which have spawned multiple books and scores of research papers, reveal midlife to be largely a period of calm and stability: most relationships hold together, most people stay healthy and many enjoy financial security.

 

https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/science-debunks-midlife-myths/

Midlife crisis? It’s a myth. Why life gets better after 50

 

Other things being equal – that is, once conditions such as income, employment, health and marriage are factored out of the equation – life satisfaction declines from our early 20s until we hit our 50s. Then it turns around and rises, right through late adulthood. This pattern has been found in countries and cultures around the world; a version of it has even been detected in chimpanzees and orangutans.

 

https://www.theguardian.com/society/2018/jul/21/midlife-crisis-myth-life-gets-better-after-50

 

The bottom line is simple no matter what these types of blokes pretend or lie about ,what they are saying is not true. 

 

Young beautiful women anywhere in the world do not fancy old blokes, they fancy their money.

 

The blokes may lie and tell us otherwise but that is all make believe.

 

I do not blame the young girls with old blokes as the girl gets the money and the old bloke get to have sex with a young girl, but in many cases he also thinks he has impressed other guys, when quite the opposite is true.

 

So carry on with this storytelling but do not expect any of us believe they fancy you, they only fancy your money.

 

What I do not understand is why have such a girl full time when you could pay for a new one every week without the hassle ?

 

And before the standard reply of we are envious, we are not as any one of us could buy a young good looking girl anytime we wanted to.

 

And another standard reply from these types of guys is we all pay for our women one way or the other.

 

There are many women out there who have made their own money, some more successful than many men, we have moved on since the 1950's where women stayed at home, I know as I have been with a woman who is self made for the last twenty years.

 

Has it every crossed my mind to replace her with a younger one, of course it passed my mind for a second and then I realise a fling with a young woman just after my money can not compare to what I have, no thanks, I say to myself.

 

Right back to the real world now, my iPhone apps under development will not write their own software. 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

42 minutes ago, Cameroni said:

 

She has one of the most beautiful Thai names I ever heard, and a very cute nickname too. But of course, I won't divulge that here. Though I suppose Phuket girl has earned a name now. Phuket girl is fine though.

I bet her name is at least an 8, right? You've sent it to all your friends who only date people with exceptional names and they all agree hers is amazing. 

Funny you don't feel it's right to divulge a name or nickname but you're happy to plaster her photos all over the internet and tell everyone what she (allegedly) does sexually.

 

You're quite something.

1 minute ago, JamesPhuket10 said:

Young beautiful women anywhere in the world do not fancy old blokes, they fancy their money.

 

Just an idee fixe. Not true at all. There are plenty of cases even in the West, where an attractive young woman falls for an older man. Of course it happens.

 

Life is too complex to conform to these rules and fixed ideas.

 

2 minutes ago, JamesPhuket10 said:

they fancy you, they only fancy your money.

 

Too early to say, really. But the current indications are good.

 

3 minutes ago, JamesPhuket10 said:

What I do not understand is why have such a girl full time when you could pay for a new one every week without the hassle ?

 

Well, I also of course considered this. This new girl in Chiang Rai is tempting me strongly, for instance. However, it's a bit like travelling all over Asia and staying in Airbnb's. It's fun for a while, a year or so, but then you get bored of the travel, packing, the hassle. 

 

It's the same with constant dating. It has it's pros and cons. I for one would like to focus on one girl. Besides there's the practical aspect. Even a man blessed with good genetics like me will not escape the ravages of time, so when I'm 62 or 65 I really will be an old man without a chance in the normal dating market. So time is of the essence for me. I need to lock down an attractive partner now. The sooner the better. I'm  realistic.

 

 

19 minutes ago, josephbloggs said:

I bet her name is at least an 8, right? You've sent it to all your friends who only date people with exceptional names and they all agree hers is amazing. 

Funny you don't feel it's right to divulge a name or nickname but you're happy to plaster her photos all over the internet and tell everyone what she (allegedly) does sexually.

 

You're quite something.

 

At leat an 8.

 

Oh I haven't told all she does sexually. The best parts have not been told...believe me. Even if I wanted to, most of the good parts are too x-rated for this site. Like everyone else I have to keep to the rules. A shame as some of the real sexual material is incredibly funny and cute. But it's just too x-rated.