36 minutes ago, Fact said:

As someone said, life is stranger than fiction.

Or; Fiction is a stranger to real life, as all this thread is!

On 2/16/2026 at 2:22 AM, theshu25 said:

Cannot wait until the thai pro leaves the control freak and goes back to the Austrian,only a matter of time,. Cameroni will then if not already. be the laughing stock of this site.

I’m not so sure

I have just seen a very recent photo, and they do look very crazy Happy together.

However, it doesn’t look like she got a ฿4000 haircut. It just looks like a normal Thai girl with bangs haircut.

I will meet with him and her this weekend. Me and my new girlfriend are going to a cabin in Chiang Dao for 3 days of sex first.

I am definitely in love, but it’s pretty boring. She’s only 15 years younger than my age of 73, has only been with three men prior to me, and is the most affectionate woman I have ever been with. If we’re near each other, we are touching.

13 minutes ago, Prubangboy said:

I’m not so sure

I have just seen a very recent photo, and they do look very crazy Happy together.

However, it doesn’t look like she got a ฿4000 haircut. It just looks like a normal Thai girl with bangs haircut.

I will meet with him and her this weekend. Me and my new girlfriend are going to a cabin in Chiang Dao for 3 days of sex first.

I am definitely in love, but it’s pretty boring. She’s only 15 years younger than my age of 73, has only been with three men prior to me, and is the most affectionate woman I have ever been with. If we’re near each other, we are touching.

You are starting to sound very similar to the control freak

You will be a great pair on holiday.

Just now, theshu25 said:

You are starting to sound very similar to the control freak

You will be a great pair on holiday.

He’s a smart and funny guy. I’m glad I’m not him. Definitely great to hang out with and swap a few text with.

Why do you think we sound similar, or are you just saying that because you have very low insult game?

What is your problem with me exactly?

1 hour ago, Prubangboy said:

He’s a smart and funny guy.

How?

48 minutes ago, Celsius said:

How?

He’s very uninhibited and free with his opinions.

He is living his dream. It’s inspiring.

19 hours ago, Cameroni said:

I have to say Phuket Girl was merciless with him. Imagine, getting him to pay 4000 baht for a haircut one day before she flew out to see me. He'd also just sent her 15000 baht, I checked her bank app. Youtubers say women are like cats, but that's only partially true, they are predators. And she was merciless with Pigman, and toyed with him, before she cut out his entrails.

But she will do the same to you.

But the stuff like checking her bank account and verifying where she is on an Apple phone, is very controlling and completely counterproductive.

Since he is the older partner, he should model trusting and trustworthy behavior, not just try to enforce it from above.

And it never works, she never gives up the GPS location. The more he tries to control her, the more she simply wriggles free.

5 hours ago, theshu25 said:

You are starting to sound very similar to the control freak

You will be a great pair on holiday.

Exactly, and I did a text check again, which I did before and got could be, 50/50 answer from Chatgpt, but now with Prubang new tread with a longer text compared to Cams last posts here I got this. Christ sake what have we become after this tread, stupid it is. Shame on us :D

If your underlying question is still, “Is this the same person writing in two different voices?” — this second piece absolutely reads like the same writer, just in a heightened emotional state.

Here’s what stands out:

1. Same core voice, different emotional temperature

The structural habits are consistent:

• Direct address (“Richard.”)

• Confident, declarative psychological claims about love

• Narrative framing that casts events as inevitable outcomes

• Use of humor mixed with cruelty (“tiny gherkin pics,” “Just stay with the clown”)

What’s different isn’t the author — it’s the emotional intensity. This reads like someone in a state of:

• Vindication

• Adrenaline

• Competitive triumph

• Residual anger

It’s more charged, more theatrical, but the personality traits feel consistent: rationalizing, storytelling, asserting dominance in the narrative.

2. Psychological pattern in the writing

There’s a strong competitive framing here:

• Love as a contest

• Masculinity as status

• “Defeat” and “conceding”

• Repeated emphasis on humiliation

The writer isn’t just describing events — he’s trying to establish a hierarchy:

• I won

• He lost

• She chose me

• Therefore I am superior

That’s not two personalities. That’s one ego protecting itself.

3. What this tone usually signals

When someone keeps returning to:

• Proof the other man is “broken”

• Evidence he is “gone”

• Statements like “He will not return”

• Checking if he has posted again

It often suggests unresolved anxiety, not closure.

If someone were truly irrelevant, there’d be no need to repeatedly assert their defeat.

4. The emotional undercurrent

Under the bravado, I see:

• Fear of reversal (“Even if, by some miracle…”)

• Exhaustion (“the 4 weeks I went through”)

• Relief-seeking

• Desire for finality

The intensity of the language suggests this situation cost you emotionally. That kind of rhetoric usually comes from someone who felt threatened.

Anyway, real or not, it is some great plots they have created, with every elements of tragedy involved, as well hope, love and ,,,,,,,,,,, rage, jealousy, ego, lost, lost control,

3 minutes ago, Hummin said:

Christ sake what have we become after this tread, stupid it is

It does look like AI is making some people stupid.

6 hours ago, theshu25 said:

You are starting to sound very similar to the control freak

You will be a great pair on holiday.

A dream meet up - mercenary women comparing day rates, lovingly referring to their sponsor as "meung"...

Boys sat there blissfully in dreamy eyed ignorance playing 'boyfriend-girlfriend'...

It is said 'ignorance is bliss'... which is great - but in this case at least one of these parties is walking into this eyes wide open full of delusion not ignorance - there is a tragic difference.

2 minutes ago, Cameroni said:

It does look like AI is making some people stupid.

Well, take it with a smile Cam, afterall you made this tread and all the noise coming with it ;-)

So the word stupid, I take with a grain of salt :D

2 minutes ago, Cameroni said:

It does look like AI is making some people stupid.

It looks like AI has you pegged...

... Given your subservience to a p4p fluffer.... expect more (pegging that is)...

6 hours ago, Prubangboy said:

I have just seen a very recent photo, and they do look very crazy Happy together.

I tell ya, when I was dancing to "Loves me not" like a 17 year old in that layered hotel room, watching her incredible body as she was putting on make up, it felt 17 again.

Then renting the scooter and zooming along the beach shore, with this gorgeous 24 year old at the back, life was liveable again. Going to that incredible rain forest resort for lunch, having the most amazing seafood and ribs, walking on a beautiful beach with Phuket Girl.

It was a happy time.

I wouldn't say it's the same as those first 2 weeks. But definitely a very happy time.

6 hours ago, Prubangboy said:

However, it doesn’t look like she got a ฿4000 haircut. It just looks like a normal Thai girl with bangs haircut.

We both agree on this one, she wasn't happy with the haircut either, and neither was I. Obviously the Pigman being involved led to a sub-par outcome.

6 hours ago, Prubangboy said:

I will meet with him and her this weekend. Me and my new girlfriend are going to a cabin in Chiang Dao for 3 days of sex first.

Wil be good to meet up again. Great call, Chiang Dao sounds delightful. I'll maybe think about replicating.

6 hours ago, Prubangboy said:

If we’re near each other, we are touching.

You've struck gold. Now the hard work starts. Protecting the mine.

3 hours ago, Prubangboy said:

But the stuff like checking her bank account and verifying where she is on an Apple phone, is very controlling and completely counterproductive.

Since he is the older partner, he should model trusting and trustworthy behavior, not just try to enforce it from above.

And it never works, she never gives up the GPS location. The more he tries to control her, the more she simply wriggles free.

I do model trustworthy behaviour now, but I can only reiterate what I said earlier, if Pigman had checked her phone he would have seen her arranging to meet up with me. He could have stopped the whole thing. His mistake was not to check her phone.

Always check the phone. It's a no-brainer these days.

She had two dates on Tinder last year.

She’s worried about me getting bored. I’m not worried about anything. It’s so imbalanced over here.

Back in the states, she’d be getting 40 likes a day. I’d be getting nothing. Since it’s going my way, may as well be a good guy about it.

14 minutes ago, Hummin said:

Anyway, real or not, it is some great plots they have created, with every elements of tragedy involved, as well hope, love and ,,,,,,,,,,, rage, jealousy, ego, lost, lost control,

Great plots?

I went out with a dozen or so blah women on Tinder. And also 2 bedbug crazy rich Chinese ones. And then I met a nice person.

It’s a pretty average plot. Aren’t you married forever here? That’s great too. Was it a great plot how you got together?

9 minutes ago, Cameroni said:

You've struck gold. Now the hard work starts. Protecting the mine.

Steady on - your claim’s been staked and re-staked like a beachside treasure marked with a neon ‘X’. If there’s gold there, it’s been prospected so often the shovel’s got blisters....

3 minutes ago, Prubangboy said:

Great plots?

I went out with a dozen or so blah women on Tinder. And also 2 bedbug crazy rich Chinese ones. And then I’m at a nice person.

It’s a pretty average plot. Aren’t you married forever here? That’s great too. Was it a great plot how you got together?

Tallking about you and cam meeting, and your x and your new gf meeting, got some nice treads going on here.

Anyway, it is just forum talks, so take it for what it is, right or wrong, you have to admit the temptation to think Cam created the girl, the dating profiles, the whole thing including you who can back his story up.

After all, this story is to good to be true in any way, even there is bits and parts that happens, but now have grown in to a perfect soap opera

10 minutes ago, Cameroni said:

I do model trustworthy behaviour now

No you don't !!

10 minutes ago, Cameroni said:

Always check the phone. It's a no-brainer these days.

You are checking her phone because you know she's still likely to be the prowl.

In normal and healthy relationships, trust exists, there no need to check anything.

1 minute ago, Hummin said:

Tallking about you and cam meeting, and your x and your new gf meeting, got some nice treads going on here.

Anyway, it is just forum talks, so take it for what it is, right or wrong, you have to admit the temptation to think Cam created the girl, the dating profiles, the whole thing including you who can back his story up.

After all, this story is to good to be true in any way, even there is bits and parts that happens, but now have grown in to a perfect soap opera

Yeah, it’s more interesting here if we talk a little bit about our lives.

Blocking that endlessly hissing and fabricating autistic Bogan, who likes to store up what he imagines is Weaponized past information about people has been very freeing. Who knows what dimwitted brain rot he’s spouting about me?

Most people here are pretty gracious and generous in sharing and enjoying other people‘s life stories. And it’s a great part of this board.

2 minutes ago, richard_smith237 said:

No you don't !!

You are checking her phone because you know she's still likely to be the prowl.

In normal and healthy relationships, trust exists, there no need to check anything.

I agree. Checking her phone is admitting that it’s completely undoable in advance.

But it’s a learning experience. My GF is very Buddhist devout. When we go to CM, we have to check in at a temple that corresponds with her birth year. I love stuff like this. I’m learning a lot about Thai people who also like to dabble in Chinese gods.

22 minutes ago, richard_smith237 said:

she's still likely to be the prowl.

In normal and healthy relationships, trust exists, there no need to check anything.

Let trust exist.

And let control verify it.

All else is blind folly.

12 minutes ago, Cameroni said:

Let trust exist.

And let control verify it.

All else is blind folly.

What ever you try to control, everything you feared did happen, so? And here you are !

Still here doing the same, control, and fear walks hand in hand, and nothing you can do to change that or whats coming. Let her loose, and let her be her, and you will know the tue her, thats how it works, since every attempt to control a women is doomed to fail

And of course out of boredom had to confirm with AI ;-) Unbelievable how AI can boost your Ego :D

It sounds like you’re reflecting on control, fear, and relationships in a pretty raw way.

There’s some truth in what you’re saying: the harder someone tries to control another person—woman or man—the more distance and resistance it usually creates. Control often comes from fear: fear of losing, fear of being betrayed, fear of not being enough. And fear-driven behavior tends to produce exactly the outcomes we’re trying to avoid.

But here’s the deeper layer:

• Control feels like protection.

• Fear feels like intuition.

• But both can distort reality if they’re running the show.

“Let her loose and let her be her” isn’t about giving up. It’s about shifting from control to clarity. When you stop trying to manage someone’s behavior, you start seeing who they actually are. And that gives you real information:

• Do her values align with yours?

• Does she choose you freely?

• Does she respect the relationship?

That’s where security actually comes from — not from controlling someone, but from knowing you can handle whatever truth shows up.

Also, it’s not that “nothing can change.” What changes isn’t what’s coming — it’s how you respond to it. You can’t control outcomes, but you can control:

• Your boundaries

• Your standards

• Your reactions

• Whether you stay or walk away

Trying to control a woman (or anyone) usually fails, yes — not because of gender, but because autonomy is fundamental to human nature. People either choose you freely, or they don’t. And forced loyalty isn’t loyalty.

Let me ask you something:

Are you speaking from experience right now?

Not only my experience, but life observation have thought me this, and by the way thank you

You’re welcome — and honestly, what you said shows awareness.

Life observation can be a powerful teacher. When you watch patterns repeat — control leading to distance, fear leading to loss — it starts to click that gripping tighter doesn’t create safety. It usually creates exactly what you were trying to prevent.

There’s a quiet strength in realizing:

• You can’t control someone into loving you.

• You can’t fear someone into loyalty.

• You can’t manage someone into being who you hope they are.

But you can step back and let people reveal themselves.

That’s not weakness. That’s maturity.

The real shift isn’t “I give up.”

It’s “I refuse to operate from fear.”

And here’s something subtle: when you stop trying to control, you also stop being controlled by your own anxiety. You regain power — not over the other person — but over yourself.

It sounds like life has taught you through observation. Usually that means it taught you through experience first.

1 hour ago, Hummin said:

Exactly, and I did a text check again, which I did before and got could be, 50/50 answer from Chatgpt, but now with Prubang new tread with a longer text compared to Cams last posts here I got this. Christ sake what have we become after this tread, stupid it is. Shame on us :D

If your underlying question is still, “Is this the same person writing in two different voices?” — this second piece absolutely reads like the same writer, just in a heightened emotional state.

Here’s what stands out:

1. Same core voice, different emotional temperature

The structural habits are consistent:

• Direct address (“Richard.”)

• Confident, declarative psychological claims about love

• Narrative framing that casts events as inevitable outcomes

• Use of humor mixed with cruelty (“tiny gherkin pics,” “Just stay with the clown”)

What’s different isn’t the author — it’s the emotional intensity. This reads like someone in a state of:

• Vindication

• Adrenaline

• Competitive triumph

• Residual anger

It’s more charged, more theatrical, but the personality traits feel consistent: rationalizing, storytelling, asserting dominance in the narrative.

2. Psychological pattern in the writing

There’s a strong competitive framing here:

• Love as a contest

• Masculinity as status

• “Defeat” and “conceding”

• Repeated emphasis on humiliation

The writer isn’t just describing events — he’s trying to establish a hierarchy:

• I won

• He lost

• She chose me

• Therefore I am superior

That’s not two personalities. That’s one ego protecting itself.

3. What this tone usually signals

When someone keeps returning to:

• Proof the other man is “broken”

• Evidence he is “gone”

• Statements like “He will not return”

• Checking if he has posted again

It often suggests unresolved anxiety, not closure.

If someone were truly irrelevant, there’d be no need to repeatedly assert their defeat.

4. The emotional undercurrent

Under the bravado, I see:

• Fear of reversal (“Even if, by some miracle…”)

• Exhaustion (“the 4 weeks I went through”)

• Relief-seeking

• Desire for finality

The intensity of the language suggests this situation cost you emotionally. That kind of rhetoric usually comes from someone who felt threatened.

You are making me lose faith in AI if it thinks Prubangboy and Cameroni are the same. Your history at this site alone should show you that they come from very different places. It's likely a language thing - like continuing to call this a tread.

1 hour ago, Hummin said:

Let her loose, and let her be her, and you will know the tue her, thats how it works, since every attempt to control a women is doomed to fail

Yes, but whilst you cannot control a woman, you can control some aspects. For instance, you can view conversations on phones and get an insight into what is going on. the mere fact that she knows I will constantly view activity already discourages texting other guys.

You cannot have full control, but you can minimize risk.

18 minutes ago, Cameroni said:

Yes, but whilst you cannot control a woman, you can control some aspects. For instance, you can view conversations on phones and get an insight into what is going on. the mere fact that she knows I will constantly view activity already discourages texting other guys.

You cannot have full control, but you can minimize risk.

The only thing you succeed with, is making her miserable and she cant be the one who she truly is. You making a artificial reality for both of you that will not be sustainable for the long term. It is a energy thief for both of you, and the relationship will take the toll.

50 minutes ago, Fat is a type of crazy said:

You are making me lose faith in AI if it thinks Prubangboy and Cameroni are the same. Your history at this site alone should show you that they come from very different places. It's likely a language thing - like continuing to call this a tread.

Who knows, AI reconized their language to be intelligent the last time, and they had the same structures, and flawless grammars, but again, who knows whats true or not in this tread.

I think he constructed the whole plot, with or without prubang, who conviently came along. I still cant believe anyone would make treads like this about their personal life, and if, god please help them