4 minutes ago, SenorTashi said:

I'm not crying about it. I'm just stating facts.

 

Yes, there are more non white people in the world than white people. Hold the front page!!

How the hell did this conversation become just stating the world's most obvious stats? Did you know there are more ants than horses in the world? Did you also know that water is wet?

How many times have you been persecuted today? It's 12.15pm and I haven't been persecuted once yet, what a day!

9 minutes ago, SenorTashi said:

I'm not crying about it. I'm just stating facts.

Looks more like you have an opinion, and have looked for the facts to backup that opinion.

15 minutes ago, josephbloggs said:

 

Yes, there are more non white people in the world than white people.

How the hell did this conversation become just stating the world's most obvious stats?

Oh I don't know. Maybe it was because I was replying to you saying this earlier.

 

"you have to dream up scenarios in which the white man is persecuted. It's quite pathetic."

52 minutes ago, proton said:

 

According to the BBC they were at the battle of Hastings and Henry the 8th had them as aristocrats in his court, not forgetting the claim that blacks built Stonehenge then rebuilt Britain after WW2, all lies. They have gone from collecting tickets on trains to mass stabbings. 

Blacks have gone from being ticket collectors to leader of the Conservative Party plus a Foreign Minister in the Labour Party. 

And let's not forget Reform where one of the top positions is held by a man of South Asian heritage.

6 minutes ago, bannork said:

 plus a Foreign Minister in the Labour Party. 

 

 

   David Lammy was incompetent , although not on the same scale of incompetence as Diane Abbot

20 minutes ago, SenorTashi said:

Oh I don't know. Maybe it was because I was replying to you saying this earlier.

 

"you have to dream up scenarios in which the white man is persecuted. It's quite pathetic."

Yes, and in reply to that you said there are more non whites in the world than whites. And?? That's persecution? Being outnumbered in the world? 

Do you perceive horses as persecuted by ants?

1 minute ago, josephbloggs said:

Yes, and in reply to that you said there are more non whites in the world than whites. And?? That's persecution? Being outnumbered in the world? 

Do you horses as persecuted by ants?

I've met 100s of NPCs just like you, on Reddit, X and Farcebook. 

 

I'm sure you've decided what kind of person I am, based purely on this conversation

You're no doubt completely wrong.

I couldn't care less anyway. 

Leaving this thread now.

 

So, he saved lives and got seriously wounded doing that, but many AN commentators only want to make stuff up because of his skin color and ethnicity. 

Just now, Purdey said:

So, he saved lives and got seriously wounded doing that, but many AN commentators only want to make stuff up because of his skin color and ethnicity. 

No, we make stuff up because of his religion.

And being from the UK, I know Albanians run most of the drugs and prostitution in London.

5 minutes ago, BritManToo said:

No, we make stuff up because of his religion.

And being from the UK, I know Albanians run most of the drugs and prostitution in London.

Please explain what his religion has to do with saving lives. Don't mention the religious group, just him saving lives.

22 hours ago, Chomper Higgot said:

The assailant wasn’t an immigrant.

 

He wasn't a first generation immigrant. 

 

It's well documented that the second and third generation immigrants are more problematic since they lack the gratitude of the first generation and mistakenly romanticize whichever third world hole their ancestors hailed from, despite never having lived there. 

1 hour ago, Nick Carter icp said:

 

   David Lammy was incompetent , although not on the same scale of incompetence as Diane Abbot

 

Give him time.

 

Lammy's stupidity will be much clearer to see in his new position. 

Just now, JonnyF said:

 

Give him time.

 

Lammy's stupidity will be much clearer to see in his new position. 

 

 

Like a ticking timebomb...

1 hour ago, SenorTashi said:

I've met 100s of NPCs just like you, on Reddit, X and Farcebook. 

 

I'm sure you've decided what kind of person I am, based purely on this conversation

You're no doubt completely wrong.

I couldn't care less anyway. 

Leaving this thread now.

 

Excellent flounce!

7 hours ago, thesetat said:

Heres another fact. If he was a white male then this probably never would have gotten into the news. I think the OP posted it not because he is prejudice. But because the BBC news uses reverse prejudism to make the immigrants look better. 

 

No, as @josephbloggs has pointed out it is not a fact; it is your opinion and an uninformed one at that.

 

You must have missed this example of 'reverse prejudice' on the BBC

 

https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cvgvvg337x8o

3 hours ago, FlorC said:

Second gen immigrant.

Backs are not indigenous in britain.

 

Neither were the Romans, Vikings, Normans and countless other white tribes but the overwhelming majority of Brits will have a few ancestors from those tribes.

 

What to do, eh? Send them (me included) back to Italy, Scandinavia, Normandy, etc. At least, it should solve the housing problem in England.

8 minutes ago, RayC said:

 

Neither were the Romans, Vikings, Normans and countless other white tribes but the overwhelming majority of Brits will have a few ancestors from those tribes.

 

What to do, eh? Send them (me included) back to Italy, Scandinavia, Normandy, etc. At least, it should solve the housing problem in England.

 

 

No, just the ones arriving illegally since the introduction of an immigration policy.................raping, looting, pillaging, Empire building all preceded that.

1 hour ago, JonnyF said:

 

He wasn't a first generation immigrant. 

 

It's well documented that the second and third generation immigrants are more problematic since they lack the gratitude of the first generation and mistakenly romanticize whichever third world hole their ancestors hailed from, despite never having lived there. 

 

Says the British bloke who lives in Thailand, vows never to return to his homeland permanently and romanticises a UK free of immigrants.

 

The irony must have got lost on the flight somewhere between London and Bangkok.

2 minutes ago, hotandsticky said:

 

 

No, just the ones arriving illegally since the introduction of an immigration policy.................raping, looting, pillaging, Empire building all preceded that.

 

I agree.

 

However, that's not what it is being implied by some of the other posters as i'm sure you're aware. In many cases, their comments are nothing more than thinly disguised racism.

5 minutes ago, RayC said:

 

Says the British bloke who lives in Thailand, vows never to return to his homeland permanently and romanticises a UK free of immigrants.

 

Incorrect Raymond.

 

As I have told you at least 5 times, I support immigration in limited numbers. I would like a points based system where specific requirements need to be met based on what the UK needs at that particular time. For example, if we need surgeons, x amount of surgeons could be allowed over a 24 month period.

 

I don't support boatloads of undocumented illegals of unknown background and limited skills who are then put up in hotels at taxpayer expense and sexually assault local children.

 

Hope that clarified things for you again Ray, I know your memory isn't the best these days.

21 hours ago, bubblegum said:

Wow this topic really shows us the racists on this forum.

Indeed.

Unfortunately other news items fuel the rhetoric.

 

Reacting to our investigation, Home Secretary Shabana Mahmood, said: "Illegal working and linked organised criminality creates an incentive for people to come here illegally. We will not stand for it."

https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c0mx99ple17o

12 minutes ago, JonnyF said:

I don't support boatloads of undocumented illegals of unknown background and limited skills who are then put up in hotels at taxpayer expense and sexually assault local children.

 

 

Well then you should also be anti-Brexit as Brexit took us out of the Dublin Agreement which in turn increased the 'boatloads of undocumented illegals' as under the Dublin Agreement, anyone seeking asylum had to make their claim in the first country they found themselves in, which was invariable NOT the UK.

 

Or is that just an inconvenient truth all of you lot like to sweep under the carpet?
 

On 11/5/2025 at 2:17 PM, Will B Good said:

 

 

Oh I see how this works now.....

 

If there were no guns, no one would get shot.....got it.....cheers.

 

Interesting that you would compare immigrants to guns, but I guess there is some logic there even though I would have worded it more kindly.

 

The logic the OP is using is strange though. It is like witnessing an XL Bully run into a park and attack a child, ripping it's face off. Another XL Bully charges in and attacks the first XL Bully to stop it biting the child, forcing the first XL Bully to move on and attack 5 more different children in the park, which it does, ruthlessly. 

 

And the conclusion of the OP appears to be "See I told you, what we really need in this park is more XL Bully's".  😄

2 minutes ago, JonnyF said:

 

Interesting that you would compare immigrants to guns, but I guess there is some logic there even though I would have worded it more kindly.

 

The logic the OP is using is strange though. It is like witnessing an XL Bully run into a park and attack a child, ripping it's face off. Another XL Bully charges in and attacks the first XL Bully to stop it biting the child, forcing the first XL Bully to move on and attack 5 more different children in the park, which it does, ruthlessly. 

 

And the conclusion of the OP appears to be "See I told you, what we really need in this park is more XL Bully's".  😄

 

Classic "good guy with a gun"......even though the evidence suggests the good guy  always seems to do a runner.

8 minutes ago, johnnybangkok said:

Well then you should also be anti-Brexit as Brexit took us out of the Dublin Agreement which in turn increased the 'boatloads of undocumented illegals' as under the Dublin Agreement, anyone seeking asylum had to make their claim in the first country they found themselves in, which was invariable NOT the UK.

 

Or is that just an inconvenient truth all of you lot like to sweep under the carpet?
 

 

Oh yes, it's going great in Dublin re. the immigrants. Great point. They are clearly delighted with the EU and the immigrants. We really missed out on all this. 😄

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Looks like Dublin on a normal Saturday night in the 80 's-!

10 minutes ago, JonnyF said:

 

Interesting that you would compare immigrants to guns, but I guess there is some logic there even though I would have worded it more kindly.

 

The logic the OP is using is strange though. It is like witnessing an XL Bully run into a park and attack a child, ripping it's face off. Another XL Bully charges in and attacks the first XL Bully to stop it biting the child, forcing the first XL Bully to move on and attack 5 more different children in the park, which it does, ruthlessly. 

 

And the conclusion of the OP appears to be "See I told you, what we really need in this park is more XL Bully's".  😄

haha great analogy

 

the OP is clueless

 

desperate 

2 minutes ago, JonnyF said:

 

Oh yes, it's going great in Dublin re. the immigrants. Great point. They are clearly delighted with the EU and the immigrants. We really missed out on all this. 😄

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Not sure what this has to do with what I am saying.

 

The point (which you have completely missed of course) is that coming out of the Dublin Agreement (and surprise, surprise, that agreement is NOT actually about Dublin) through Brexit actually INCREASED the number of asylum seekers arriving in the UK. So when you 'don't support boatloads of undocumented illegals' then by definition you should be asking for the UK to rejoin the EU? But are you? Are you anti-Farage? Anti-remain? Pushing for reintegration with the EU?

 

Of course you're not.

 

   

20 minutes ago, JonnyF said:

 

Incorrect Raymond.

 

As I have told you at least 5 times, I support immigration in limited numbers. I would like a points based system where specific requirements need to be met based on what the UK needs at that particular time. For example, if we need surgeons, x amount of surgeons could be allowed over a 24 month period.

 

I don't support boatloads of undocumented illegals of unknown background and limited skills who are then put up in hotels at taxpayer expense and sexually assault local children.

 

Hope that clarified things for you again Ray, I know your memory isn't the best these days.

 

 

35 minutes ago, RayC said:

 

Says the British bloke who lives in Thailand, vows never to return to his homeland permanently and romanticises a UK free of immigrants.

 

The irony must have got lost on the flight somewhere between London and Bangkok.

 

Incorrect? When can we expect you back from Thailand then, Jonathan?

 

I'll amend the last phrase in the first paragraph "(who) romanticises a UK with as few immigrants as possible" Better?

 

As for your policy. I'm afraid that has little chance of working. Let's say the UK, US and EU countries all want some brain surgeons. (1) The UK says we'll offer you a salary of X for 2 years and then you go back home. We may extend your contract but no guarantees and we'll decide nearer the time. You can't bring any dependents with you unless you cover all the costs e.g. health, education, etc (I'm making an assumption here that you wouldn't want people sponging off of the state). (2) The US says 2-year contract; no guarantee of extension; 4x salary; health and welfare benefits covered by company (not an unreasonable scenario given that health care is in large part a commercial operation in the US). (3) An EU country says 2 year contract; salary X; no guarantee of extension but likely; dependents welcome; health and welfare benefits provided by the state; after 5 years permanent residency granted with the possibility of citizenship available. Now, Jonny, which option is our brain surgeon likely to pick? Highly unlikely it will be the UK one, don't you agree.

 

Very few people - myself included - support illegal economic migrants being allowed into the country. Asylum for genuine refugees is another matter.

 

However, I'll end on a note of agreement. You're right: My memory isn't what it was 10 years however, fortunately my ability to see through thinly disguised rhetoric and overly simplistic solutions to complex problems remains largely unimpaired.

5 hours ago, SenorTashi said:

I saw a post somewhere yesterday which said all the recent attacks have been by 2nd generation immigrants.

 

And illegals .