3 minutes ago, boganJoe said:

ts altered. deal with it, or cry a little harder for your embarrassed and ignorant pal for his and your lack of "logic"

It is not altered, obviously there were multiple photographers who made pictures at the event.

This are 3 credible sources who have posted the exact same picture that you claim to be fake.

Now give it a rest Illis.

Why the Epstein case looms large in MAGA world

A subset of Trump supporters are passionate about the case - and angry at the president.

https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2025/7/18/how-well-did-trump-and-epstein-really-know-each-other-a-timeline

https://www.pbs.org/newshour/politics/read-jeffrey-epsteins-newly-released-emails-about-trump

14 minutes ago, boganJoe said:

still fake, altered, not original.

Is that you again, ThreeCardMonte? 😅

12 minutes ago, boganJoe said:

its altered. deal with it, or cry a little harder for your embarrassed and ignorant pal for his and your lack of "logic"

Genuine photos of Trump with Epstein and/or Maxwell do exist from social events in the late 1990s–early 2000s (e.g., Mar-a-Lago parties, fashion shows), often including Melania or others, and some appeared in verified archives or file releases. But this particular version—with this grouping, poses, attire, dim lighting, and alleged Bloomberg tie—is not real; it's a manipulated or fabricated edit circulating without credible backing.

AND, it proves nothing more than them being photographed together at a social event in 2000, amid a documented but limited acquaintance that ended years before Epstein's convictions. Any further implications are speculative and not supported by the image or verified records.

Still in MagaWorld, where assertions count as evidence and insults count as argument.

13 minutes ago, CallumWK said:

It is not altered, obviously there were multiple photographers who made pictures at the event.

This are 3 credible sources who have posted the exact same picture that you claim to be fake.

Now give it a rest Illhttps://www.aljazeera.com/news/2025/7/18/how-well-did-trump-and-epstein-really-know-each-other-a-timeline

https://www.pbs.org/newshour/politics/read-jeffrey-epsteins-newly-released-emails-about-trump

7 minutes ago, LosLobo said:

Still in MagaWorld, where assertions count as evidence and insults count as argument.

Here's some (and authentic) of pedo Bill recently released in the Epstein-Clinton pedo files.

Photos of pedophile Clinton with Epstein girls bear no resemblance and are in stark contract to Trump's "socializing" photos pre-Epstein sex trafficking conviction.

4 minutes ago, boganJoe said:

Here's some (and authentic) of pedo Bill recently released in the Epstein-Clinton pedo files.

Photos of Bill the pedo bears no resemblance Trumps social photos pre-Epstein sex trafficking conviction from 1990's.

And this has what to do with your claim that the Trump picture was fake?

Getting desperate?

1 hour ago, Hawaiian said:

You need to quit talking in circles

You need to quit talking in circles. That seems to be your forte'.

Then answer the question, should be easy if what you claim is true.

17 hours ago, TedG said:

This sort of blows up the left's narrative of fascism, kings, etc.

You wish the left blows up! When you have people in the White House like Stephen Miller who froth at the mouth even thinking about allowing an opposition to exist let alone have an opinion, weaponizing the authorities to sensor opposition speech and media, they are the definition of a totalitarian regime as a current Executive Offfice. Roll on the mid terms.

Trump has been barking for 9 years about "Russia Russia Russia" and "The Russian Hoax", yet within ten minutes of the SC decision, he spoke in his presser about "foreign influence" on SC judges. He claimed to know what foreigners are influencing the judges, and called them "some real sleazeballs".

The Foreigner Hoax? The Sleazeball Hoax?

1 hour ago, CallumWK said:

The difference is that those who have 100 most likely don't have more than that, and now get less for their 100 than before the tariffs, but you're too slow to comprehend that.

Insults are against the rules, right ?

You can't understand that the same thing has happened to each of them.

The fact that one has an extra 100 is not relevant because its nobody's business.

If you need more you can certainly go get it just like the other guy though. Cause I'll bet 200 man goes and gets another hundred so he's got 2 again. Thats why he had 2 in the first place.
That same opportunity is available to 100 man should he choose to help himself

2 hours ago, JerryM said:

From President Trump on Truth Social:

"The Good News is that there are methods, practices, Statutes, and other Authorities, as recognized by the entire Court and Congress, that are even stronger than the IEEPA TARIFFS"

Further to the above from Justice Gorsuch concurring opinion:

The President claims that Congress delegated to him an

extraordinary power in the International Emergency Eco

nomic Powers Act (IEEPA)—the power to impose tariffs on

practically any products he wants, from any countries he

chooses, in any amounts he selects. (my bold)

So how is what President Trump has now even stronger than that?

5 hours ago, Hawaiian said:

I regret voting for him and I am far from being a racist.

So, did you feel him Birthering the President was not proof he sought the racist voter?

1 hour ago, JerryM said:

Further to the above from Justice Gorsuch concurring opinion:

The President claims that Congress delegated to him an

extraordinary power in the International Emergency Eco

nomic Powers Act (IEEPA)—the power to impose tariffs on

practically any products he wants, from any countries he

chooses, in any amounts he selects. (my bold)

So how is what President Trump has now even stronger than that?

There is a small problem with the new tariffs,they will also be illegal.

7 minutes ago, sharot724 said:

So, did you feel him Birthering the President was not proof he sought the racist voter?

Well, just because Trump did some things to appeal to racists, that doesn't mean that everyone who voted for him is a racist.

5 hours ago, jvs said:

You never did and you never will have to.

Fabulous. That should save some money. Bet ya the Finns will lease us a base. Or hell, we will just take Greenland that should work LOL.

6 hours ago, marin said:

Interesting that when Trump melts down many of his minions follow right along.

I dont think observations are "melting down" as opposed to repetitive echo Chamber topics like "Trump Has Poopy Pant" or The French hate trump" Or "Trump was Mentioned by Clinton on Lolita Express" or "Trump is Paid for by Jews". I would submit those are better examples of melt downs/

The Mooch, as usual, is good value.

6 hours ago, mikebike said:

The EU is investing in their own defence as the USA becomes an international joke

The word International Joke and European military in the same sentence is quite appropriate.

You guys cant pay for it and you are unable to present a unified front. You dont even speech the same language (except the smart ones that speak English). Good luck.

The word International Joke and European military in the same sentence is quite appropriate.

2 hours ago, Yagoda said:

You guys cant pay for it and you are unable to present a unified front. You dont even speech the same language (except the smart ones that speak English). Good luck.

Who are "you guys"?

Oh, wait, I get it. You're dense enough to think I'm European 😂😂😂

Y'all know what they say... When you assume...

President Donald Trump on Saturday said he would increase global tariffs to 15% from 10%, one day after the Supreme Court struck down his “reciprocal” tariffs.

The new tariffs will be “effective immediately,” Trump said in a Truth Social post.

“I, as President of the United States of America, will be, effective immediately, raising the 10% Worldwide Tariff on Countries, many of which have been “ripping” the U.S. off for decades, without retribution (until I came along!), to the fully allowed, and legally tested, 15% level,” he wrote.

https://www.cnbc.com/2026/02/21/trump-tariffs.html

Guess that means tariff dividend checks are back on the menu!

1 hour ago, mikebike said:

Oh, wait, I get it. You're dense enough to think I'm European

Well you sure babble the same nonsense they do

Na na na na na. I used to like the Supreme Court, I thought they were conservative but I don't like them anymore, because it would appear that they are no longer my lap dog, and are no longer doing my bidding every single time, and you know how I feel about people that don't obey me! It's terrible when they don't pay fealty to the king, nobody can get away with that.

I hate those guys now, they are terrible terrible people. Independence. I hate that. Free thinkers? Awful. Rule of law? Even worse.

US President Donald Trump lashed out in unusually personal terms against the six Supreme Court justices who handed him one of the biggest setbacks of his second term in office by striking down the administration's global tariffs.

The court's Friday ruling was "deeply disappointing". The justices who joined the majority opinion should be "absolutely ashamed" and lacked the courage to "do the right thing", Trump said, turning his response into a sweeping attack against a co-equal branch of government.

The broadside was remarkable even for a president known for blowing past political norms and publicly berating those who challenge his authority. "I'm ashamed of certain members of the court. Absolutely ashamed for not having the courage to do what's right for our country," Trump said at the start of a press conference at the White House, which was held a few hours after the decision was released.

"The Supreme Court said [Trump] went too far," he added. "President Trump took that as an affront. It's not a surprise."

Note to Don. Most Americans are ashamed of you. You are a junk president and an imbecile.

58 minutes ago, spidermike007 said:

Na na na na na. I used to like the Supreme Court, I thought they were conservative but I don't like them anymore, because it would appear that they are no longer my lap dog, and are no longer doing my bidding every single time, and you know how I feel about people that don't obey me! It's terrible when they don't pay fealty to the king, nobody can get away with that.

I hate those guys now, they are terrible terrible people. Independence. I hate that. Free thinkers? Awful. Rule of law? Even worse.

US President Donald Trump lashed out in unusually personal terms against the six Supreme Court justices who handed him one of the biggest setbacks of his second term in office by striking down the administration's global tariffs.

The court's Friday ruling was "deeply disappointing". The justices who joined the majority opinion should be "absolutely ashamed" and lacked the courage to "do the right thing", Trump said, turning his response into a sweeping attack against a co-equal branch of government.

The broadside was remarkable even for a president known for blowing past political norms and publicly berating those who challenge his authority. "I'm ashamed of certain members of the court. Absolutely ashamed for not having the courage to do what's right for our country," Trump said at the start of a press conference at the White House, which was held a few hours after the decision was released.

"The Supreme Court said [Trump] went too far," he added. "President Trump took that as an affront. It's not a surprise."

Note to Don. Most Americans are ashamed of you. You are a junk president and an imbecile.

Many GOP members of Congress are among those Americans who are ashamed of Donald Trump. They refrain from voicing their true feelings for fear of reprisals. They know Trump has a long history of vengeance against anyone who even thinks of disagreeing with him.

From DJT Truth Social:

"I'd like to thank and congratulate Justices Thomas, Alito, and Kavanaugh for their strength and wisdom and love of our country, which is, right now, very proud of those justices," Trump said. "When you read the dissenting opinions, there's no way that anyone can argue against them."

https://www.japantimes.co.jp/business/2026/02/21/economy/trump-tariffs-supreme-court-tirade/

NB Can also be read as ""I'd like to thank and congratulate Justices Thomas, Alito, and Kavanaugh for their love of ME."

When you have a rogue type of president who has delusions that he's emperor of the world and he responds to a SCOTUS ruling that his tariffs are illegal and he responds to that with a new flavor of illegal tariffs, what exists to enforce the law on him? The Department of Justice? Run by his puppet Bondi. Really it's up to congress to impeach him the third time and this time finally convict him. Will they do that? Specifically will enough republicans do that? In their eternal shame, clearly not.

It certainly led to an epic, quite outstanding, brainfart/meltdown on live TV.

It is difficult to imagine that memorable performance could ever be trumped!

Mind you, isn't the State of The Union Adress coming up soon? Such a pity that it is Lent and I am off the booze for the duration - maybe a one bottle of wine exception?

13 hours ago, jvs said:

There is a small problem with the new tariffs,they will also be illegal.

They expire in 150 days anyway, not enough time for the legal system.

And he now increased the global tariffs from 10% to 15%

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2026/feb/21/trump-tariffs-15-percent

Trump raises tariffs to 15% on imports from all countries

Donald Trump announced on Saturday that he would raise a temporary tariff rate on US imports from all countries from 10% to 15%, less than 24 hours after the US supreme court ruled against the legality of his flagship trade policy.

On 2/20/2026 at 10:41 PM, NoDisplayName said:

Does this mean all the foreign governments that were paying the tariffs will get refunds?

I'm sure that every country due a refund will be paid in full.... aren't you?

Trump's follow up spanking is already scheduled for November...... Maybe Stormy will be on hand!

14 hours ago, Alan Zweibel said:

Well, just because Trump did some things to appeal to racists, that doesn't mean that everyone who voted for him is a racist.

Thanks, very well put. Personally, having a multi racial family I never experienced racism in CA during my 50 years there. Systemic racism is not a thing for me so far.