Jump to content

Hefty fines for vans older than 10 years running passenger services


rooster59

Recommended Posts

51 minutes ago, watcharacters said:

 

Singapore has pretty good control over older vehicles they want off the road.

 

No reason Thailand couldn't manage the same program.

 

 

 

The Singapore government is smart.....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 92
  • Created
  • Last Reply

And nothing about almost all line buses that are mostly between 40 and 50 years old;
Gearbox has 4 sometimes 5 ratios;
never seen an electric relay or overdrive;
none of these vehicles is equipped with an electromagnetic retarder like a Telma, a French company that manufactures speed bumps functionat on the principle of currents Foucauld
https://www.telma.com/produits/fonctionnement;
When I drove my coach in 1971, almost 50 years ago, it was a 110 HP Chausson !! I had already a Telma on it ...

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Société_des_usines_Chausson

 

We can also see a lot of coaches with a Padane body, it's or was an Italian coachbuilder;
the problem of these bodies is that at the joints between scrap metal and windows, it is not waterproof and passengers are wet and even sometimes dipping down the bus after a violent storm.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is really a great joke, I saw in Thailand a lot of big buses for more than thirty people, songtaew, really old school buses, rusty with tires without profile and probably without any inspections that run undisturbed and full of passengers! A law valid for all means used for transporting people would be an improvement (provided that it is then enforced)!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Dumbastheycome said:

If that regulation extends  to school transport then my neighbor could have a problem. He uses an old Isuzu that has to be at  20 years old!!

Every vehicle (and I use the term loosely) ferrying school kids to school each day is older than 20 years in my town.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Nowisee said:

Amazing how they focus on the age of the van, as if that has played in any of the magnificent accidents that have occurred with the infamous "vans of death".


Deflecting blame has won out again over reality. 

 

 

Don't you know?  The brakes go out all the time on vans older than 10 years!  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I wonder who in the government made the decision to just target vans and not other commercial vehicles that carry passengers...and why?  Follow the logic to these decisions and there is usually a pile of money at the end for someone in the decision chain imho.

 

Then there is the question as to why smoke belching buses and trucks are not being forced off of the roads.  

 

The is all very peculiar.  ????
Vans - but not these?  Why?

images.jpeg.37107d6b8b0845f56dcfb80073329a78.jpeg

index2.jpg.917e6f2798f135c8b348ef50b23d34fc.jpg

index.thumb.jpg.9668933d2d73bb3510b01a548438d37c.jpg

images.jpeg.1bac76ee0bef78181d1d33531e70c7fc.jpeg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Now: what is a van and what is a minibus? I have (probably wrongly) always considered vans and minibuses to be the same. Is a Toyota Commuter a van or a minibus?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't understand this new rule.

If they have real drivers who don't drive 16h a day.

If maintenance is good, and if the van is really checked every year by the authorities, the age is not a problem.

The fare will be more expensive for people who need these vans 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Dario said:

Now: what is a van and what is a minibus? I have (probably wrongly) always considered vans and minibuses to be the same. Is a Toyota Commuter a van or a minibus?

Same same.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, ChrisY1 said:

The Singapore government is smart.....

Smart or "controlling"? the social divide in Singapore is huge, it is also very small! less area than great Bangkok.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

47 minutes ago, connda said:

Then there is the question as to why smoke belching buses and trucks are not being forced off of the roads.  

I have long wondered why also, appears that the "unions" that are responsible for "trucking" are very well connected and paying the right people, if anyone knows better please correct me?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, GBW said:

Now all they have to do is enforce the regulations. Hmmmmmmmmmm........

Exactly! More specifically:

  • What is the detailed, step by step planning behind the enforcement of this regulation?
  • Where are these plans kept and how are they to be distributed nationwide?
  • How is it to be implemented, carried out and enforced?
  • Is the plan to be implemented daily, on all roads, at all times, day and night and for how long?
  • Who are the enforcers of this plan going to be?
  • Do these enforcers know it is their job and responsibility to enforce these rules?
  • How are these enforced rules to be checked for compatibility nationwide?
  • Who is going to ensure that brown envelopes are not handed to the enforcers?
  • Who is going to check that this isn't the case?
  • Who, exactly, will be monitoring the enforcement?
  • What will happen to the vehicles found to be 'over' the age limit?
  • Have arrangements been made to ensure that these vans cannot be used again and again after enforcement?
  • What charges will be brought against those who continue to drive overage vans?
  • What punishment...…...
  • ………….

And so the planning stage, presumably already completed, is now to be launched against the public.

Hahahahahahahahahaha

Can't wait to see how many old vans pass me every morning and every evening of every day - over the next few days/weeks/months/years......

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Dario said:

Now: what is a van and what is a minibus? I have (probably wrongly) always considered vans and minibuses to be the same. Is a Toyota Commuter a van or a minibus?

By UK definition a minibus has passenger seats and windows, a van only has seats & windows at front and steel panels instead of windows on the sides with the interior empty for the carriage of goods. 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, watcharacters said:

 

Singapore has pretty good control over older vehicles they want off the road.

 

No reason Thailand couldn't manage the same program.

 

 

 

Plenty or reason why not. Singapore has highly educated,intelligent civil servants,government officials and a rule of law - Thailand has nothing even resembling that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Dumbastheycome said:

Yes. A very old  people  mover . He packs in about 15  small children.

The moral test of government is how that government treats those who are in the dawn of life, the children; those who are in the twilight of life, the elderly; those who are in the shadows of life, the sick, the needy and the handicapped.”

Shame on the drivers for this selfish act and the government for not seriously enforcing this long time implemented policy.  These vans should be off the road already.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Even a brand new van can suffer from the inevitable "my brakes failed" when the driver is driving too fast, not paying attention, texting on his mobile phone or falling asleep from driving too many hours. Yes, I am sure this regulation is going to reduce road deaths !!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, rooster59 said:

any violation by operators will result in 50,000 to 200,000 baht fines.

Why is the fine variable when the criteria 'older than 10 years' is fixed?

Maybe there's an operational reason

7 hours ago, rooster59 said:

limiting the maximum age of vans serving passengers on regular routes

  • If the van spends 50% miles serving regular routes and 50% miles serving irregular routes that the fine will be prorated to half the maximum fine accordingly?
  • Is the fine variable based on the operator's "connections" and/or ability to make some personal 'contribution' to the authorities?

Consistent law enforcement requires predictable punishments for violations. A fine spread in this case of up to 400% does not encourage consistent adherence to the law. If a fine is 'negotiable," the law is negotiable.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, connda said:

I wonder who in the government made the decision to just target vans and not other commercial vehicles that carry passengers...and why?  Follow the logic to these decisions and there is usually a pile of money at the end for someone in the decision chain imho.

 

Then there is the question as to why smoke belching buses and trucks are not being forced off of the roads.  

 

The is all very peculiar.  ????
Vans - but not these?  Why?

images.jpeg.37107d6b8b0845f56dcfb80073329a78.jpeg

index2.jpg.917e6f2798f135c8b348ef50b23d34fc.jpg

index.thumb.jpg.9668933d2d73bb3510b01a548438d37c.jpg

images.jpeg.1bac76ee0bef78181d1d33531e70c7fc.jpeg

Read the other day  EGAT  [Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand] are converting old Buses and Mini Buses to Electric power...   and opening 23 charging stations...    ??

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, sandrabbit said:

By UK definition a minibus has passenger seats and windows, a van only has seats & windows at front and steel panels instead of windows on the sides with the interior empty for the carriage of goods. 

 

 

Hmh, but here in Thailand the term "van" refers to what in the UK would be called a "minibus" - here the "minibus" they propose to use are actually small buses as opposed to vans...

 

I hope that makes it clear!????

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.





×
×
  • Create New...