Democrats vow to insulate impeachment inquiry from 'sham investigations'

[Tippaporn]

19 minutes ago, bristolboy said:

How stupid do you have to be to believe that his staff wouldn't understand the issues at stake and wouldn't insulate their boss from this knowledge?

Remember we're talking about Adam Schiff.  Given that it's Adam Schiff it simply isn't plausible.

[Sujo]

Just now, Tippaporn said:

Remember we're talking about Adam Schiff.  Given that it's Adam Schiff it simply isn't plausible.

Remember its irrelevant as the hearing is on what trump did.

 

i see another witness is defying trump. The guy that signed the hold on the funds being released. Evidence will be piling up over the next week.

 

truthful don must be going crazy.

[bristolboy]

1 minute ago, Tippaporn said:

Remember we're talking about Adam Schiff.  Given that it's Adam Schiff it simply isn't plausible.

I think it's more diagnostic to note that it's you talking about Adam Schiff.

[Tippaporn]

16 minutes ago, Skallywag said:

Is there any other reason he would withhold the military aid?  Prey tell

All the top brass "fools" from the Pentagon want to know also.

Given that much of U.S. assistance to Ukraine disappeared into a black hole due to corruption wouldn't it be plausible that he withheld aid from a newly elected Ukrainian government, which ran on an anti-corruption agenda, until he was satisfied that the new government was true to it's agenda?  If you don't know it Trump does have that responsibility.  Or do you expect him to simply willy-nilly hand over tax payer funds to another possibly corrupt government?

 

I don't know about you but that seems to be sensical to me.

 

Remember, too, that Ukraine played a part in the Russia hoax origins.  Whether you acknowledge that fact or not is up to you.  The entire Russia hoax was a set up.  Ukraine holds some of the answers.  If you were set up wouldn't you want to find out who the perps were?  Of course.  So don't deny Trump.

[Tippaporn]

25 minutes ago, Sujo said:

So you are happy to think schiff guilty with no evidence . . .  <snip>

Schiff is a known and proven liar.  That's my evidence.

[bristolboy]

1 minute ago, Tippaporn said:

Remember, too, that Ukraine played a part in the Russia hoax origins.  Whether you acknowledge that fact or not is up to you.  The entire Russia hoax was a set up.  Ukraine holds some of the answers.  If you were set up wouldn't you want to find out who the perps were?  Of course.  So don't deny Trump.

You're asking people to remember something that not even the bipartisan report of the Senate, where Republicans have a majority, says is a real thing. False memory syndrome much?

[Tippaporn]

10 minutes ago, Sujo said:

Remember its irrelevant as the hearing is on what trump did.

 

i see another witness is defying trump. The guy that signed the hold on the funds being released. Evidence will be piling up over the next week.

 

truthful don must be going crazy.

LOL.  Yes, I'm looking very much forward to the continuing, slow motion train wreck that the Dems have placed themselves in.

[Sujo]

3 minutes ago, Tippaporn said:

Schiff is a known and proven liar.  That's my evidence.

Coming from a trump supporter. Priceless.

[bristolboy]

2 minutes ago, Tippaporn said:

Schiff is a known and proven liar.  That's my evidence.

If that's your idea of evidence, it applies a thousandfold to Trump. Therefore he did attempt to extort Ukraine in exchange for aid. 

[Tippaporn]

Just now, bristolboy said:

You're asking people to remember something that not even the bipartisan report of the Senate, where Republicans have a majority, says is a real thing. False memory syndrome much?

Wait for Horowitz, Barr, and Durham.  We can argue about it then.  If there's anything to argue about once those facts come out.

[Sujo]

7 minutes ago, Tippaporn said:

Given that much of U.S. assistance to Ukraine disappeared into a black hole due to corruption wouldn't it be plausible that he withheld aid from a newly elected Ukrainian government, which ran on an anti-corruption agenda, until he was satisfied that the new government was true to it's agenda?  If you don't know it Trump does have that responsibility.  Or do you expect him to simply willy-nilly hand over tax payer funds to another possibly corrupt government?

 

I don't know about you but that seems to be sensical to me. 

Im sure it makes sense to you. But its also wrong.

 

congress approved the funds. Even repubs where calling asking why its not been released.

 

For all the corruption going on in ukraine its strange the only one trump wanted investigated was biden.

 

why did the whitehouse lie about why the funds were held up when questioned.

[Sujo]

4 minutes ago, Tippaporn said:

Wait for Horowitz, Barr, and Durham.  We can argue about it then.  If there's anything to argue about once those facts come out.

So you are stating something that you dont know to be true, not only that, facts prove it to be wrong.

 

doesnt surprise me.

[bristolboy]

10 minutes ago, Tippaporn said:

Wait for Horowitz, Barr, and Durham.  We can argue about it then.  If there's anything to argue about once those facts come out.

"The sun will come out tomorrow, better bet your bottom dollar..."

[Tug]

32 minutes ago, Tippaporn said:

Schiff is a known and proven liar.  That's my evidence.

How many times has your Donald lied in the last 3 years? Somewhere north of 12,000 don’t be so funny I might split a gut lol

[Tippaporn]

16 minutes ago, Sujo said:

Im sure it makes sense to you. But its also wrong.

 

congress approved the funds. Even repubs where calling asking why its not been released.

 

For all the corruption going on in ukraine its strange the only one trump wanted investigated was biden.

 

why did the whitehouse lie about why the funds were held up when questioned.

I have no idea how you can interpret it to be wrong.  Care to point out specifically what is wrong about it?  Easy enough to say, "Well, I just think it's wrong," and leave it at that without providing any rationale as to how you reached your conclusion.

 

In any case, Congress has the power to approve funds.  The President has the ultimate authority to release funds or not.  Nothing wrong there.

 

As to your misinformation that Trump was interested only in Biden I suggest you go back and reread the call transcript.  From the top of page 3:

 

The President: I would like you to do us a favor though
because our country has been through a lot and Ukraine knows a
lot about it. I would like you to find out what happened with
this whole situation with Ukraine, they say Crowdstrike ... I guess
you have one of your wealthy people... The server, they say
Ukraine has it. There are a lot of things that went on, the
whole situation .. I think you're surrounding yourself with some
of the same people.  I would like to have the Attorney General
call you or your people and I would like you to get to the
bottom of it. As you saw yesterday, that whole nonsense ended
with a very poor performance by a man named Robert Mueler, an
incompetent performance, but they say a lot of it started with
Ukraine. Whatever you can do, it's very important that you do it
if that's possible.

 

Show me where they are discussing Biden.

 

Don't know what you're talking about as to the WH lying about the funds being tied up.  Do you have a link?

[Tippaporn]

31 minutes ago, Sujo said:

So you are stating something that you dont know to be true, not only that, facts prove it to be wrong.

 

doesnt surprise me.

Please, please provide the facts that prove it to be wrong.  I dare ya.  Double dare ya.  Triple dare ya.

 

Since the Russia hoax is related but not the topic I will not provide links that show many of the facts so far uncovered and readily available within the public domain for anyone who cares to do some research for themselves rather than relying solely on the MSM, who abjectly do not want you to know about it (very little reporting to date, and no serious reporting at all - wonder why??).

 

If you will allow I will PM you the links.

[Sujo]

4 minutes ago, Tippaporn said:

Please, please provide the facts that prove it to be wrong.  I dare ya.  Double dare ya.  Triple dare ya.

 

Since the Russia hoax is related but not the topic I will not provide links that show many of the facts so far uncovered and readily available within the public domain for anyone who cares to do some research for themselves rather than relying solely on the MSM, who abjectly do not want you to know about it (very little reporting to date, and no serious reporting at all - wonder why??).

 

If you will allow I will PM you the links.

Every US agency agreed russia did it and that ukraine did not.

 

That you dont know something so well kniwn doesnt surprise me.

[Sujo]

13 minutes ago, Tippaporn said:

I have no idea how you can interpret it to be wrong.  Care to point out specifically what is wrong about it?  Easy enough to say, "Well, I just think it's wrong," and leave it at that without providing any rationale as to how you reached your conclusion.

 

In any case, Congress has the power to approve funds.  The President has the ultimate authority to release funds or not.  Nothing wrong there.

 

As to your misinformation that Trump was interested only in Biden I suggest you go back and reread the call transcript.  From the top of page 3:

 

The President: I would like you to do us a favor though
because our country has been through a lot and Ukraine knows a
lot about it. I would like you to find out what happened with
this whole situation with Ukraine, they say Crowdstrike ... I guess
you have one of your wealthy people... The server, they say
Ukraine has it. There are a lot of things that went on, the
whole situation .. I think you're surrounding yourself with some
of the same people.  I would like to have the Attorney General
call you or your people and I would like you to get to the
bottom of it. As you saw yesterday, that whole nonsense ended
with a very poor performance by a man named Robert Mueler, an
incompetent performance, but they say a lot of it started with
Ukraine. Whatever you can do, it's very important that you do it
if that's possible.

 

Show me where they are discussing Biden.

 

Don't know what you're talking about as to the WH lying about the funds being tied up.  Do you have a link?

The evidence from sondland says otherwise.

[Tippaporn]

What's this?  Leaked bank documents from the Ukrainian General Prosecutor’s office showing complex money transfers?  Involving AS PrivatBank in Latvia?  Funneled through Busima Holding Limited (Cyprus)?  A slush fund owned and operated by Devon Archer, John Kerry Senior, John Kerry Junior, Heinz Jr, and Hunter Biden?

 

Say it ain't so, Joe!

 

Oh, and documents implicating Joe Biden, George Soros, Hillary Clinton and Joseph Misfud's collusion and possible criminal activity in Ukraine?

 

Is undeniable truth being exposed?  Heads will explode!

 

(One of many, many documents released.)

 

 

 

 

[Tippaporn]

10 minutes ago, Sujo said:

Every US agency agreed russia did it and that ukraine did not.

 

That you dont know something so well kniwn doesnt surprise me.

Do you want me to PM you the links?  If not, then you're simply choosing denial and ignorance.

 

I thought you people dealt with facts?

[Tippaporn]

11 minutes ago, Sujo said:

The evidence from sondland says otherwise.

And what does the evidence from Sondland say, Sujo?  Care to do some real work and post it verbatim?  I mean, convince us with more than blanket statements.

[Eric Loh]

2 minutes ago, Tippaporn said:

What's this?  Leaked bank documents from the Ukrainian General Prosecutor’s office showing complex money transfers?  Involving AS PrivatBank in Latvia?  Funneled through Busima Holding Limited (Cyprus)?  A slush fund owned and operated by Devon Archer, John Kerry Senior, John Kerry Junior, Heinz Jr, and Hunter Biden?

 

Say it ain't so, Joe!

 

Oh, and documents implicating Joe Biden, George Soros, Hillary Clinton and Joseph Misfud's collusion and possible criminal activity in Ukraine?

 

Is undeniable truth being exposed?  Heads will explode!

 

(One of many, many documents released.)

 

 

 

 

All peaceful on the western front. Don’t get yourself into a fit. If there are any truth to your allegations, Trump’s surrogate AG Barr will be all over it. 

[Tippaporn]

Just now, Eric Loh said:

All peaceful on the western front. Don’t get yourself into a fit. If there are any truth to your allegations, Trump’s surrogate AG Barr will be all over it. 

But I thought there was no evidence of Biden corruption?  You guys have been swearing to it for over a month.  Why, you guys would even link to MSM pieces that called it a conspiracy theory.  Don't tell me you guys are giving up on the "no evidence" claim so easily.

[Jingthing]

2 minutes ago, Eric Loh said:

All peaceful on the western front. Don’t get yourself into a fit. If there are any truth to your allegations, Trump’s surrogate AG Barr will be all over it. 

Note no links given, Why? It's from garbage far right wing conspiracy theory sites such as infowars. People, if you're going to post  deflection garbage, post your garbage links. 

[bristolboy]

9 minutes ago, Tippaporn said:

What's this?  Leaked bank documents from the Ukrainian General Prosecutor’s office showing complex money transfers?  Involving AS PrivatBank in Latvia?  Funneled through Busima Holding Limited (Cyprus)?  A slush fund owned and operated by Devon Archer, John Kerry Senior, John Kerry Junior, Heinz Jr, and Hunter Biden?

 

Say it ain't so, Joe!

 

Oh, and documents implicating Joe Biden, George Soros, Hillary Clinton and Joseph Misfud's collusion and possible criminal activity in Ukraine?

 

Is undeniable truth being exposed?  Heads will explode!

 

(One of many, many documents released.)

 

 

 

 

Once again, no link provided for the source of this document. Why is it so hard for you to understand the necessity of this?

[johnnybangkok]

3 minutes ago, Tippaporn said:

But I thought there was no evidence of Biden corruption?  You guys have been swearing to it for over a month.  Why, you guys would even link to MSM pieces that called it a conspiracy theory.  Don't tell me you guys are giving up on the "no evidence" claim so easily.

You providing a random bank statement does NOT constitute evidence. As has been requested , please provide a link for this before you get yourself too excited.

 

[Jingthing]

2 minutes ago, bristolboy said:

Once again, no link provided for the source of this document. Why is it so hard for you to understand the necessity of this?

Yes of course. So I'm here to help. You can find it on infowars. 

Quote

InfoWars is a far-right American conspiracy theory and fake news website owned by Alex Jones

 

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/InfoWars

[Jingthing]

4 minutes ago, johnnybangkok said:

You providing a random bank statement does NOT constitute evidence. As has been requested , please provide a link for this before you get yourself too excited.

 

I don't know that he's excited. Business as usual really. What the 45 propaganda machine is doing is fighting a facts based and constitutionally protected impeachment process with deflections, conspiracy theories, fake process objections, and gaslighting. Putin would be proud!

 

They can't possibly defend 45's behavior with facts. His behavior is indefensible. So expect this to get even worse.

Edited November 15, 2019 by Jingthing

[Tippaporn]

13 minutes ago, Jingthing said:

Note no links given, Why? It's from garbage far right wing conspiracy theory sites such as infowars. People, if you're going to post  deflection garbage, post your garbage links. 

Ask and you shall receive, Jingthing.  I'm sure you were hoping I was just bluffing.

 

https://www.scribd.com/user/259237201/JohnSolomon

[Eric Loh]

8 minutes ago, Tippaporn said:

But I thought there was no evidence of Biden corruption?  You guys have been swearing to it for over a month.  Why, you guys would even link to MSM pieces that called it a conspiracy theory.  Don't tell me you guys are giving up on the "no evidence" claim so easily.

Affirmative no evidence there were corruption. Ukraine top prosecutor said so. Your allegation is a nothing burger but credit you for trying to pull a John Kennedy stunt.