Jump to content

Bangkok ranked 13th among healthiest cities worldwide


Recommended Posts

Posted
3 minutes ago, Shuya said:

lol yes... no wonder they did not link the story. read the original here:  https://www.lenstore.co.uk/research/healthy-lifestyle-report/

Following that link, looks like Bangkok won 13th place based on sunshine hours, price of a bottle of water and obesity levels nationwide.

I see the figure for annual average hours worked was not available for Thailand.

 

The winner - Amsterdam - lost on all those three items for Bangkok, but won on life expectancy, pollution and happiness levels.

  • Like 2
Posted

A post containing a copyrighted photo from Bangkok Post and a reply has been removed:

 

26) The Bangkok Post and Phuketwan do not allow quotes from their news articles or other material to appear on Thaivisa.com. Neither do they allow links to their publications. Posts from members containing quotes from or links to Bangkok Post or Phuketwan publications will be deleted from the forum.
 

Posted
13 hours ago, Shuya said:

lol yes... no wonder they did not link the story. read the original here:  https://www.lenstore.co.uk/research/healthy-lifestyle-report/ 

 

"The team at Lenstore has analysed 44 cities across the globe to uncover where it’s easier to lead a well-rounded, healthy lifestyle. From obesity levels to pollution rates, each city has been scored across 10 healthy living metrics."

 

Thanks for doing the research.

In summary, this would be similar to TopCharoen opticians shop issuing a list of healthy cities. I.e completely and utterly worthless.

I am used to such press releases but object to the use of “UK Health authorities”.

Associating such reports with Her Majesty’s Government is a disgrace.

  • Like 1
Posted

Just for writing that, even if you copied it. You should consider yourself one of the stupidest people in Thailand according to anybody who reads your <deleted>.

Posted
15 hours ago, snoop1130 said:

By researching 44 major cities around the world, data was measured in 10 different ways: sunlight, happiness, average working time, outdoor activities, drinking water prices, obesity levels, average life expectancy, air and water quality, and number of restaurants

The above highlighted are questionable.

Posted
14 hours ago, Pilotman said:

exactly, some people are so gullible that they believe this kind of statistical BS.  Two or three days was always the maximum that my head, ears, eyes and throat could stand in Bangkok at any one time

 

Yes Bangkok is often polluted but most western cities are full of fat people and statistically being obese and metabolically unhealthy will kill you faster than low air quality.

  • Like 2
Posted (edited)
6 minutes ago, rcuthbert said:

Ahhhh - objective journalism.????

Are you questioning their methodology?

METHODOLOGY

We collected data across 10 metrics for 44 cities around the world (please see all metrics below). Each of these metrics were awarded a weighted score and these were combined to give each city a total score out of 100. This score was then used to rank the 44 cities to determine which were best for healthy living.

 

https://www.lenstore.co.uk/research/healthy-lifestyle-report/

Edited by brewsterbudgen
  • Like 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.




×
×
  • Create New...