Jump to content

Thailand’s submarine plan torpedoed again as govt takes flak for COVID battle


Recommended Posts

Posted
9 minutes ago, club said:

It just goes to show you how much they will do ANYTHING for the China. Why would a small  country like Thailand want to buy 2 submarines in the middle of a pandemic? When there is no military threat. When Thailand needs to use their money on vaccines . It makes no sense

But the generals and friends need to top up their coffers; that is what is behind it!

  • Like 2
Posted
7 hours ago, RotBenz8888 said:

Get a Baht-Class sub for each general to command. 

images (45).jpeg

Do you do that in a unifying yellow and red colour scheme by any chance?

Posted

The government did purchase two new jet fighters though:

From Janes 20 July, 2021

 

20 JULY 2021

Thailand confirms plan to buy additional T-50TH aircraft

by Jon Grevatt

 

The Royal Thai Air Force's (RTAF's) Directorate of Operations has announced that it will procure an additional two T-50TH Golden Eagle lead-in fighter trainer aircraft from Korea Aerospace Industries (KAI).

The Royal Thai Air Force has outlined a plan to purchase two additional T-50TH aircraft – a version of the T-50 Golden Eagle (pictured) – for around USD72 million. (KAI)

The Royal Thai Air Force has outlined a plan to purchase two additional T-50TH aircraft – a version of the T-50 Golden Eagle (pictured) – for around USD72 million. (KAI)

The planned procurement, which will increase the size of the RTAF's T-50TH fleet to 14, is budgeted at THB2.36 billion (USD72 million) and will include spare parts, and related equipment and tools. Janes understands that a contract to acquire the aircraft is expected to be signed later this year.

 

Posted

Why the He** thailand needs subs??????????

 

They better starts to buy vaccines for their peoples

Posted
6 hours ago, club said:

It just goes to show you how much they will do ANYTHING for the China. Why would a small  country like Thailand want to buy 2 submarines in the middle of a pandemic? When there is no military threat. When Thailand needs to use their money on vaccines . It makes no sense

 

You dont build your armed forces DURING conflict, you plan ahead.

Why does an even smaller country like the UK need subs ?

But I get your gist.

 

  • Confused 1
  • Sad 1
Posted
20 hours ago, Chelseafan said:

 

You dont build your armed forces DURING conflict, you plan ahead.

Why does an even smaller country like the UK need subs ?

But I get your gist.

 

Easy answer, the UK is an island. 

 

History tells us, from WWII in particular, that having naval superiority for the UK as an island nation was one of the most important and decisive factors.

 

In addition, the UK has, and arguably requires a nuclear deterrent, which is submarine delivered.

  • Like 2
Posted
7 hours ago, Mr Meeseeks said:

Easy answer, the UK is an island. 

 

History tells us, from WWII in particular, that having naval superiority for the UK as an island nation was one of the most important and decisive factors.

 

In addition, the UK has, and arguably requires a nuclear deterrent, which is submarine delivered.


Just to play devils advocate, why does Thailand NOT require a deterrent after all they were heavily involved in WWII and the last time I looked, they had a fairly large coastline? The UK has submarines to protect our interests so on that basis why wouldn't Thailand want the same ? There seems to be a misconception that submarines are used for warfare, that's true to a degree but most of the time they are used for intelligence gathering.

 

Personally, I don't think they should have subs, its a waste of money and bad timing what with everything that's going on but their is part of me that wants to scream out how hypocritical we all are when our own countries have submarines, nuclear or otherwise

 

 

  • Haha 1
Posted
11 minutes ago, Chelseafan said:

they were heavily involved in WWII

Not by any stretch of the imagination; being occupied is not "being involved" in a sense that requires military hardware.

Posted
25 minutes ago, Salerno said:

Not by any stretch of the imagination; being occupied is not "being involved" in a sense that requires military hardware.

 

Whilst the offical military deaths amounted to around 5000+, you don't think the Thai people weren't starved, raped and murdered by the Japanese ?

 

Anyhow we're moving off topic somewhat.

 

 

Posted
6 minutes ago, Chelseafan said:

Whilst the offical military deaths amounted to around 5000+, you don't think the Thai people weren't starved, raped and murdered by the Japanese ?

My post in no way downplayed the price paid by the population, it was purely in regard to using WWII as some sort of justification for "needing" submarines which I thought was quite clear.

Posted
7 minutes ago, Salerno said:

My post in no way downplayed the price paid by the population, it was purely in regard to using WWII as some sort of justification for "needing" submarines which I thought was quite clear.

I never mentioned WWII and submarines until another poster bought it into the equation.

As I said, I was playing Devils advoate and just feel there is a whiff of hypocrisy when most of the "first world" countries have large submarine fleets but hey ho. ????

 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



×
×
  • Create New...