Jump to content

House Speaker orders probe into bribery allegation ahead of no confidence vote


Recommended Posts

Posted
2 hours ago, webfact said:

Dr. Sukit Atthopakorn, an advisor to House Speaker Chuan Leekpai, told the media this morning (Friday) that Mr. Chuan feels that the alleged bribery has tarnished the image of the House of Representatives

NAHHHH that was done in 2014 and again after the last "election" in fact it is the only "QIM" which exceeds expectations (Quality Improvement Measure)

  • Like 1
Posted
38 minutes ago, Will B Good said:

They simply don't order investigations into anything that might result in them actually finding something out.....too much hassle.

They do it the result could be beneficial to the accuser and detrimental to the accused.

Posted

According to a front page article in yesterday's Bangkok Post, the leader of a small party has offered 10 million Baht to any Government MP who will vote against Prayut. If there are 20 takers Prayut will be gone by this time tomorrow.

What a nest of vipers.

  • Like 1
Posted
17 hours ago, Will B Good said:

I can only imagine he knows perfectly well that the alleged bribes never took place.

He'll make sure of that or he's toast.

  • Like 1
Posted

'...personally inspected the room...'   As my Dad used to say, that's rich.  What, pray tell, was he expecting to find?  Empty brown envelopes littering the floor?  Too funny.

  • Haha 2
Posted
5 minutes ago, HaoleBoy said:

tarnished the image of the House of Representatives and ordered the House secretary-general to investigate, after he had personally inspected the room in which the offence is alleged to have taken place yesterday

 

What does he expect to find after the fact?  Empty brown envelopes?

 

Why aren't they investigating the alleged 2 billion THB discrepancy in the Sinovac vaccine purchase?

Sorry.  Typed my post before I saw yours.

Posted
5 minutes ago, HaoleBoy said:

Why aren't they investigating the alleged 2 billion THB discrepancy in the Sinovac vaccine purchase?

Rather annoyingly they did have a good explanation for that.

 

The purchase was simply over budgeted and the money didn't "exist" as such, it simply wasn't allocated from central funds so there was nothing to return.

  • Like 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



×
×
  • Create New...