Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

What about the president of China?   All war criminals, different degrees of magnitude.   If you win the war, the magnitude somehow drops.   Name the county….. all have secret horrible operations.    No clue how long Putin will last.   Could be way too long…..

  • Confused 1
Posted (edited)

Whale - thanks.

 

Iam - China - for sure guilty of human rights abuses. For Putin - one more second is too long . . . .

 

As for 'ourselves', (the West), as just one citizen, I would feel easier if the 2nd Iraq war had been avoided - Russia quickly invoked Blair and Bush as war criminals when Biden made his comment - and not wholly without justification.

 

But that was then - (hopefully we've learned) - and this is now.

 

Edited by TorquayFan
Posted

An couple of inflammatory posts also a post citing a link to a 2020 off topic article have been removed 

Posted
19 hours ago, Bkk Brian said:

The war crimes tribunal has a very good record in bringing people to justice, lets hope Putin is added to it.

Agree 100% - although it strikes me as highly unlikely that he would surrender quietly, just as Slobodan Milosevic did not 20 years ago:-

 

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Slobodan_Milošević

 

Thankfully Mother Nature eventually dispensed the appropriate punishment before a verdict could be delivered in Milosevic's case! Maybe Putin could suffer a similar fate if various rumours were to be believed???

 

Posted
5 minutes ago, cmarshall said:

Beyond ridiculous that Americans castigate Putin as a war criminal.  Putin is, in fact, a war criminal, but he is a piker by comparison with Pres. George W. Bush.  The only country since Pol Pot's Cambodia to kill upwards of one million innocent people is the USA in the Second Iraq War.  

Got a link? I don't disagree that the US should have pursued non military solutions to the 9/11 attacks but your numbers appear to be exaggerated.

Posted
9 hours ago, ozimoron said:

Got a link? I don't disagree that the US should have pursued non military solutions to the 9/11 attacks but your numbers appear to be exaggerated.

The October 2006 Lancet study by Gilbert Burnham (of Johns Hopkins University) and co-authors[32][33] estimated total excess deaths (civilian and non-civilian) related to the war of 654,965 excess deaths up to July 2006. The 2006 study was based on surveys conducted between May 20 and July 10, 2006. More households were surveyed than during the 2004 study, allowing for a 95% confidence interval of 392,979 to 942,636 excess Iraqi deaths. Those estimates were far higher than other available tallies at the time.[169]

Posted
2 minutes ago, cmarshall said:

The October 2006 Lancet study by Gilbert Burnham (of Johns Hopkins University) and co-authors[32][33] estimated total excess deaths (civilian and non-civilian) related to the war of 654,965 excess deaths up to July 2006. The 2006 study was based on surveys conducted between May 20 and July 10, 2006. More households were surveyed than during the 2004 study, allowing for a 95% confidence interval of 392,979 to 942,636 excess Iraqi deaths. Those estimates were far higher than other available tallies at the time.[169]

They included military deaths, hardly "innocent". As I said, your original claim was higher than other estimates but still less than your claim. This is why I asked for a link. References to facts always provide context. In this case, your original claim has to be seen as an exaggeration. I'm not downplaying that thousands of Iraqis died unnecessarily, just looking for the facts.

Posted
1 minute ago, ozimoron said:

Syria, Chechnya, Afghanistan and Georgia. Plus Ukraine. There is no small time about this criminal despot. You are using numbers to protect Putin? Are you suggesting that he's not a war criminal?

Plus threatening to use nuclear weapons and absolutely laying the groundwork to use biological weapons. (Which he has already used to kill opponents).

 

But….But…. But…… whatabout….?!

  • Like 1
Posted
2 minutes ago, Chomper Higgot said:

Let’s see if we can figure out which is the most urgent threat to world peace, possible escalation to nuclear war and very likely escalation to the use of biological weapons.

 

Then ask if this is what the President of the USA should be focussed on.

All of which could have been prevented if they actually started prosecuting war criminals who invade sovereign countries under the same pretense that Putin used to justify invading Ukraine.  Like Bush, Cheney, Blair...

 

If they were rotting away in prison, ya figure the next war criminal may think real hard before invading?  Because Bush, Cheney and Blair are out walking around, Putin thinks he can act with impunity.  He's right.

Posted
1 minute ago, impulse said:

All of which could have been prevented if they actually started prosecuting war criminals who invade sovereign countries under the same pretense that Putin used to justify invading Ukraine.  Like Bush, Cheney, Blair...

 

If they were rotting away in prison, ya figure the next war criminal may think real hard before invading?  Because Bush, Cheney and Blair are out walking around, Putin thinks he can act with impunity.  He's right.

It requires a great deal of nativity to believe that Putin is even the slightest bit worried about being prosecuted.

 

Putin has demonstrated his disdain for international law and he will never be tried in The Hague.

 

 

  • Thanks 1
Posted
4 minutes ago, Mac Mickmanus said:

War crimes are 

 

War crimes

Violations of the laws or customs of war, including:

  • Atrocities or offences against persons or property, constituting violations of the laws or customs of war
  • murder, ill treatment or deportation to slave labour or for any other purpose of the civilian population in occupied territory
  • murder or ill treatment of prisoners of war or persons on the seas
  • killing of hostages
  • torture or inhuman treatment, including biological experiments
  • plunder of public or private property
  • wanton destruction of cities, towns or villages
  • devastation not justified by military necessity

https://www.bbc.co.uk/ethics/war/overview/crimes_1.shtml

Putin has committed at least several of those offences. Right?

  • Like 2
Posted

According to Harvard Kennedy School's Kathryn Sikkink, Putin needs to be put on trial by a replacement government in Russia.

"If you've had leaders who've committed crimes, you want the new government to be able to put those leaders on trial and hold them criminally accountable using due process for crimes they've committed," she explained. "And if you find them guilty, to sentence them and imprison them."

 

https://www.rawstory.com/lindsey-graham-putin-2656991132/

  • Like 2
Posted (edited)
On 3/18/2022 at 2:21 PM, Bkk Brian said:

The war crimes tribunal has a very good record in bringing people to justice, lets hope Putin is added to it.

As long there is no one from the USA or Western European countries are involved.

Edited by FritsSikkink
Posted

It is a terrible price for Ukraine to pay for freedom.  If a gangster authoritarian tried to take over your country, that has an imperfect democracy,  what would you do. Rally the allies and fight or say best no one dies, historically we have done bad things at times, let the gangster take control.

It is hard to argue that Ukraine's move towards the west, similar to the Baltic states and other countries, is not because of the extreme bullying of Russia. Yes.. maybe there are weak parallels with Cuba but it's 2022 now.

Think what it means for Ukraine to move towards the West .. integration with other democracies, new standards to maintain, a better economy. The west in 2022 is not as bad as you may think. 

  • Like 2
Posted
2 minutes ago, Mac Mickmanus said:

No, Putin is just an alleged war criminal , it hasnt been proven and it has been denied by the Russians  . 

So you don't believe his actions amount to war crimes? I'm asking what you think, we all know that he won't face a court that he doesn't even recognise. I'm trying to flush out the Putin apologists here and make then declare their hand.

  • Thanks 1
Posted
Just now, Fat is a type of crazy said:

It is a terrible price for Ukraine to pay for freedom.  If a gangster authoritarian tried to take over your country, that has an imperfect democracy,  what would you do. Rally the allies and fight or say best no one dies, historically we have done bad things at times, let the gangster take control.

It is hard to argue that Ukraine's move towards the west, similar to the Baltic states and other countries, is because of the extreme bullying of Russia. Yes.. maybe there are parallels with Cuba but it's 2022 now.

Think what it means for Ukraine to move towards the West .. integration with other democracies, new standards to maintain, a better economy. The west in 2022 is not as bad as you may think. 

Ukraine's freedom is simply not available.  To arm them and encourage them to provoke the Russian bear is the height of cruel stupidity.  Like a lot of people who have seen too many movies, you think this is about morality, but it's not.  It's about great power politics.  The great powers, the US, Russia, and China all pursue their own interests ruthlessly without reference to morality.  

  • Confused 1
  • Sad 3
Posted
7 minutes ago, FritsSikkink said:

As long there is no one from the USA or Western European countries are involved.

I was referring to Putin which is what this topic is about and what is going on right now in the Ukraine

  • Like 1
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.




×
×
  • Create New...