If you haven't seen it yet, this is Elon Musk's worst nightmare, and the reason you should dump Tesla stock as quick as you can. The specs on the "Max" version are astonishing.

 

 

1 hour ago, Pib said:

the video is on the right side of the road...like maybe in a right hand drive country. 

 

The car is a Neta U which is not sold in Thailand.

 

So yet another  post from the illiterate FFFF (Fossil Fuel Fanatics) 

 

The title of this discussion is "EVs in Thailand"

 

 

 

1 hour ago, josephbloggs said:

So there you go EOW - it's a Vinfast and it is in Laos.

That is correct.  You and @Pib got it right.

It is a Vinfast that scraped the curb  in Laos and there is no indication it is registered in Thailand,  so it will not join our little list.

Here is a longer version of the same fire.

2 hours ago, Buffy Frobisher said:

If you haven't seen it yet, this is Elon Musk's worst nightmare, and the reason you should dump Tesla stock as quick as you can. The specs on the "Max" version are astonishing.

 

 

It comes with free superglue.

2 hours ago, Bandersnatch said:

 

The car is a Neta U which is not sold in Thailand.

 

So yet another  post from the illiterate FFFF (Fossil Fuel Fanatics) 

 

The title of this discussion is "EVs in Thailand"

 

 

 

Yeap....it does match Neta U images vs a Vinfast when googling...plus we hear a guy say Neta in the video.

2 hours ago, Bandersnatch said:

So yet another  post from the illiterate FFFF (Fossil Fuel Fanatics) 

When some ghastly EV gets released by an air filtration company in China 🇨🇳 we are all supposed to bend over backwards in awe, but when an EV explode in a giant fireball in a neighboring country to Thailand 🇹🇭 it is off topic?

I see the cherry 🍒 harvest is still in full swing.

Why the fourth F in FFFF?

1 hour ago, ExpatOilWorker said:

It comes with free superglue.

Let's be more accurate...it comes with free "shoe glue" as it works better on plastics than super glue.  😀

 

Unfortunately plastics/fibers are covering more & more new vehicles now days especially the front and rear ends...expect it's cheaper than metal and definitely lighter.

5 minutes ago, ExpatOilWorker said:

When some ghastly EV gets released by an air filtration company in China 🇨🇳 we are all supposed to bend over backwards in awe, but when an EV explode in a giant fireball in a neighboring country to Thailand 🇹🇭 it is off topic?

I see the cherry 🍒 harvest is still in full swing.

Why the fourth F in FFFF?

It's hardly ghastly. It's a great looking car and extremely well specced (23 speaker Dolby Atmos system anyone?). Design was led by Chris Bangle with a team of other ex MB and BMW designers. It's true they are having teething problems with initial build quality but I am 100% sure these will be quickly ironed out. The rest of the car is light years ahead of any FFF car.

Perhaps you think it's ghastly because it isn't covered in stickers or go faster stripes?

 

https://insideevs.com/reviews/720158/xiaomi-su7-wheelsboy-review-china/

47 minutes ago, ExpatOilWorker said:

When some ghastly EV gets released by an air filtration company in China 🇨🇳 we are all supposed to bend over backwards in awe, but when an EV explode in a giant fireball in a neighboring country to Thailand 🇹🇭 it is off topic?

I see the cherry 🍒 harvest is still in full swing.

Why the fourth F in FFFF?

Dude, you're letting your ignorance show.   And you didn't watch the vids, (especially Buffy's) as Xiaomi is first an foremost, a smartphone company. 

In honor of yesterday's Neta U fire, we will skip today's EV fire 🔥 and sacrifice a Neta V on the EV altar.

Apart from from being on its back and not on fire, do you notice anything unique EV about this accident?

Happy to report that the driver only sustained minor injuries. 

 

10 minutes ago, ExpatOilWorker said:

In honor of yesterday's Neta U fire, we will skip today's EV fire 🔥 and sacrifice a Neta V on the EV altar.

Apart from from being on its back and not on fire, do you notice anything unique EV about this accident?

Happy to report that the driver only sustained minor injuries. 

 

 

 

Clearly another lady minor parking mishap

50 minutes ago, ExpatOilWorker said:

In honor of yesterday's Neta U fire, we will skip today's EV fire 🔥 and sacrifice a Neta V on the EV altar.

Apart from from being on its back and not on fire, do you notice anything unique EV about this accident?

Happy to report that the driver only sustained minor injuries. 

 

 

I would suggest that not all batteries from electric vehicles involved in accidents are damaged. I wonder if these could be purchased, as they probably would be great for a solar project for a house?

3 hours ago, ExpatOilWorker said:

In honor of yesterday's Neta U fire, we will skip today's EV fire 🔥 and sacrifice a Neta V on the EV altar.

Apart from from being on its back and not on fire, do you notice anything unique EV about this accident?

Happy to report that the driver only sustained minor injuries. 

 

I'm trying to figure out how the four evening spaced punctures/indents circled below occurred.

 

1 hour ago, Pib said:

 

I'm trying to figure out how the four evening spaced punctures/indents circled below occurred.

 

Good observation. He probably scraped the concrete curb before landing in the ditch. 

What is also worth noticing is that the front wheels are still spinning, making the rescue scene very dangerous. 

 

On 5/20/2024 at 12:16 PM, ExpatOilWorker said:

That is correct.  You and @Pib got it right.

It is a Vinfast that scraped the curb  in Laos and there is no indication it is registered in Thailand,  so it will not join our little list.

Here is a longer version of the same fire.

 

Doesn't matter the make or where it was, the guy standing close to the erupting EV was Bandersnatch.  "This can't be happening ..."

1 minute ago, Lee65 said:

 

Doesn't matter the make or where it was, the guy standing close to the erupting EV was Bandersnatch.  "This can't be happening ..."

Rupture your fuel tank on your ICEV and the result isn't much different.

7 hours ago, Lee65 said:

 

Doesn't matter the make or where it was, the guy standing close to the erupting EV was Bandersnatch.  "This can't be happening ..."

You’re right can’t be happening as my EV and house batteries are Lithium Iron Phosphate not Lithium Ternary.

 

 

 

15 hours ago, Bandersnatch said:

You’re right can’t be happening as my EV and house batteries are Lithium Iron Phosphate

 

As I have pointed out before, lithium iron phosphate batteries can and do experience thermal runaway.

 

Here are some scientific studies for you to educate yourself:

 

https://duckduckgo.com/?q=can+Lithium+Iron+Phosphate+batteries+experiencee+thermal+runaway%3F&t=ffab&ia=web

2 hours ago, Lee65 said:

As I have pointed out before, lithium iron phosphate batteries can and do experience thermal runaway.

 

 

If BYD's testing of their LFP blade battery (as installed in the Seal) is to be believed, the chances of thermal runaway are low compared to conventional LFP batteries and NMC batteries.

 

"While undergoing nail penetration tests, the blade battery emitted neither smoke nor fire after being penetrated, and its surface temperature reached only 30 to 60°C. Under the same conditions, the NMC battery exceeded 500° C and violently burned, and while a conventional LFP block battery did not openly emit flames or smoke, its surface temperature reached dangerous temperatures of 200 to 400 degrees celsius. This suggests that EVs equipped with the LFP blade battery should be far less susceptible to catching fire, even when severely damaged."

35 minutes ago, macahoom said:

 

If BYD's testing of their LFP blade battery (as installed in the Seal) is to be believed, the chances of thermal runaway are low compared to conventional LFP batteries and NMC batteries.

 

"While undergoing nail penetration tests, the blade battery emitted neither smoke nor fire after being penetrated, and its surface temperature reached only 30 to 60°C. Under the same conditions, the NMC battery exceeded 500° C and violently burned, and while a conventional LFP block battery did not openly emit flames or smoke, its surface temperature reached dangerous temperatures of 200 to 400 degrees celsius. This suggests that EVs equipped with the LFP blade battery should be far less susceptible to catching fire, even when severely damaged."

Unfortunately Lee 65 is not interested in real world evidence. He keeps quoting a couple of Chinese studies, so best to ignore him.
 

The recent video of a BYD Seal being rolled at high speed into a concrete post did not result in a thermal runaway event or even any injuries and that’s good enough for me. 

An off-topic troll post and subsequent replies have been removed as they were in violation of our Community Standards.

 

From the OP... "This is a discussion about EVs available or coming to Thailand. Not private imports but cars supported here with a dealer network."

On 5/21/2024 at 1:38 PM, KhunLA said:

Rupture your fuel tank on your ICEV and the result isn't much different.

Are you sure, I was caught in the middle of a motorway accident, must be over 40 years back, I could see inside the fuel tank of the car in front, the area had his petrol on the road, it did not ignite, it evaporated........😂

 

An EV would have probably exploded, with gases nobody wants to breathe filling the area.........😋

https://www.theguardian.com/world/article/2024/may/21/electric-cars-more-likely-to-hit-pedestrians-than-petrol-vehicles-study-finds

 

"Hybrid and electric cars are more likely to strike pedestrians than petrol or diesel vehicles, particularly in towns and cities, according to an analysis of British road traffic accidents.

 

Data from 32bn miles of battery-powered car travel and 3tn miles of petrol and diesel car trips showed that mile-for-mile electric and hybrid cars were twice as likely to hit pedestrians than fossil fuel-powered cars, and three times more likely to do so in urban areas."

1 minute ago, In the jungle said:

https://www.theguardian.com/world/article/2024/may/21/electric-cars-more-likely-to-hit-pedestrians-than-petrol-vehicles-study-finds

 

"Hybrid and electric cars are more likely to strike pedestrians than petrol or diesel vehicles, particularly in towns and cities, according to an analysis of British road traffic accidents.

 

Data from 32bn miles of battery-powered car travel and 3tn miles of petrol and diesel car trips showed that mile-for-mile electric and hybrid cars were twice as likely to hit pedestrians than fossil fuel-powered cars, and three times more likely to do so in urban areas."

That old saying.."Loud pipes save lives".......😋

You guys are really reaching, and still way off topic.  One of the only threads I enjoy coming on AN to read, and really is ruined by you trolls. 

 

ICE vs EV ... COULD YOU PLEASE START USING IT, or back to the ignore list with you all.

4 hours ago, In the jungle said:

https://www.theguardian.com/world/article/2024/may/21/electric-cars-more-likely-to-hit-pedestrians-than-petrol-vehicles-study-finds

 

"Hybrid and electric cars are more likely to strike pedestrians than petrol or diesel vehicles, particularly in towns and cities, according to an analysis of British road traffic accidents.

 

Data from 32bn miles of battery-powered car travel and 3tn miles of petrol and diesel car trips showed that mile-for-mile electric and hybrid cars were twice as likely to hit pedestrians than fossil fuel-powered cars, and three times more likely to do so in urban areas."

Or, to rephrase, petrol and diesel cars are really noisy.

12 hours ago, In the jungle said:

https://www.theguardian.com/world/article/2024/may/21/electric-cars-more-likely-to-hit-pedestrians-than-petrol-vehicles-study-finds

 

"Hybrid and electric cars are more likely to strike pedestrians than petrol or diesel vehicles, particularly in towns and cities, according to an analysis of British road traffic accidents.

 

Data from 32bn miles of battery-powered car travel and 3tn miles of petrol and diesel car trips showed that mile-for-mile electric and hybrid cars were twice as likely to hit pedestrians than fossil fuel-powered cars, and three times more likely to do so in urban areas."

 

Or to rephrase

 

Pedestrians are twice as likely to step out in front of a quiet car and cause an accident (like an EV for example).

13 hours ago, In the jungle said:

https://www.theguardian.com/world/article/2024/may/21/electric-cars-more-likely-to-hit-pedestrians-than-petrol-vehicles-study-finds

 

"Hybrid and electric cars are more likely to strike pedestrians than petrol or diesel vehicles, particularly in towns and cities, according to an analysis of British road traffic accidents.

 

Data from 32bn miles of battery-powered car travel and 3tn miles of petrol and diesel car trips showed that mile-for-mile electric and hybrid cars were twice as likely to hit pedestrians than fossil fuel-powered cars, and three times more likely to do so in urban areas."

I didn’t realise that hybrids and EVs have a mind of their own. Are they rundown anti-EVers for fun?

EOW,

   Maybe you should bow-out of this tread if you want to continue to sidetrack & troll the thread.

 

21 hours ago, Bandersnatch said:

Unfortunately Lee 65 is not interested in real world evidence. He keeps quoting a couple of Chinese studies, so best to ignore him.

 

Ignoring me won't change that you've still got several potentially explosive batteries inside and parked next to your house.  And anyway, what do the Chinese know about EV batteries?  🤣

 

The cope!