Charles 'told Prince Harry NOT to bring Meghan to Balmoral to see dying Queen'

[Rimmer]

File photo

 

King Charles 'told' Prince Harry not to bring wife Meghan Markle to Balmoral Castle as he and other senior royals rushed to the beside of the dying Queen, it was reported last night.

 

Amid the personal family tragedy on Thursday, when the Queen died at the age of 96, a small domestic drama was playing out involving the Duke and Duchess of Sussex.

 

It was a fortunate coincidence of sorts that Harry and Meghan were in the country when the prince's grandmother passed away, sparing him an emotional and undoubtedly traumatic transatlantic dash as the Queen's health failed.

 

Despite the rancour of the past few years, no one would begrudge him the chance to mourn his beloved 'Granny', with whom he had always enjoyed a warm and fun-loving relationship.

 

Read More:

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-11198885/King-Charles-told-Prince-Harry-not-bring-Meghan-Balmoral-dying-Queen.html

[transam]

I have visions of Oprah Winfrey when Harry is mentioned.....????

[petermik]

Reported news....true or not does it matter ????

[steven100]

I think King Charles suggestion was correct in this situation .......   but it's not news worthy imo.

[transam]

1 minute ago, steven100 said:

I think King Charles suggestion was correct in this situation .......   but it's not news worthy imo.

I think it is, it shows to me that the now King is not mollycoddling the bloke for stabbing his family in the back....????

[Old Croc]

Racist and petty even in the gravest times for this family.

 

I'm hoping the passing of this gracious lady will mark the beginning of the end of this anachronistic monarchy.  At the very least I can now hope that my country will become a republic without the new entitled toff remaining as our head of state.

I can't think about this lot without remembering how they became what they are, nor wonder why people in this modern world still kowtow to this hybrid German-Anglo bunch.

 

 

[transam]

15 minutes ago, Old Croc said:

Racist and petty even in the gravest times for this family.

 

I'm hoping the passing of this gracious lady will mark the beginning of the end of this anachronistic monarchy.  At the very least I can now hope that my country will become a republic without the new entitled toff remaining as our head of state.

I can't think about this lot without remembering how they became what they are, nor wonder why people in this modern world still kowtow to this hybrid German-Anglo bunch.

 

 

Russia awaits you, but you will have a different type of toff there....????...........????

[xylophone]

14 minutes ago, Old Croc said:

Racist and petty even in the gravest times for this family.

 

I'm hoping the passing of this gracious lady will mark the beginning of the end of this anachronistic monarchy.  At the very least I can now hope that my country will become a republic without the new entitled toff remaining as our head of state.

I can't think about this lot without remembering how they became what they are, nor wonder why people in this modern world still kowtow to this hybrid German-Anglo bunch.

 

 

It is certainly a strange world we live in, where a woman who commits adultery on her husband by having an affair with the then Prince Charles, who in turn commits adultery on his new wife, devastating her, and IMO was a huge insult to a naïve newcomer to that circle of royalty, then becomes Queen Consort, or Queen Camilla as she has also been referred to – – mediaeval stuff and certainly not worthy of the kowtowing to the new king or her.

 

On the other hand Queen Elizabeth was a product of her time, and did her duty as was her wont, and did it well, and I have all respect for her, but she is now gone and it's about time for a shakeup, and I certainly have no respect for Charles, the silly old duffer, and I can't get out of my mind his speech some 10 years ago, when he referred in public to the Queen as "mummy"!!! Speaks volumes.
 

[ChaiyaTH]

8 minutes ago, transam said:

Russia awaits you, but you will have a different type of toff there....????...........????

World Economic Forum awaits you, where Charles is a big player and now even exerts more control. Have zero respect for these peeps, all the wealth and power yet they did barely a thing to make things better, in fact, they keep it as it is with pleasure.

Edited September 10, 2022 by ChaiyaTH

[transam]

4 minutes ago, ChaiyaTH said:

World Economic Forum awaits you, where Charles is a big player and now even exerts more control. Have zero respect for these peeps, all the wealth and power yet they did barely a thing to make things better, in fact, they keep it as it is with pleasure.

Thank you, we will....

Where are you from, so I can compare...?  ????

[Rimmer]

Off topic removed

[Bluespunk]

Middleton wasn’t there either. 

[transam]

5 minutes ago, Bluespunk said:

Middleton wasn’t there either. 

The explanation....????

https://www.fatherly.com/news/kate-middleton-isnt-going-to-the-queens-side-the-reason-is-for-her-kids

[puchooay]

54 minutes ago, Old Croc said:

Racist and petty even in the gravest times for this family.

 

I'm hoping the passing of this gracious lady will mark the beginning of the end of this anachronistic monarchy.  At the very least I can now hope that my country will become a republic without the new entitled toff remaining as our head of state.

I can't think about this lot without remembering how they became what they are, nor wonder why people in this modern world still kowtow to this hybrid German-Anglo bunch.

 

 

Not forgetting the millions that tourists pay to visit the UK because of the fact there is a monarchy and its history. Not forgetting the millions profit the state receives from the crown each year (last year the crown handed over £300+ million. The government returned circa £125 million as the annual royal grant)

 

Yep. Let's scrap it all. We could then have a President. They are always top dollar, aren't they?

[Bluespunk]

27 minutes ago, transam said:

The explanation....????

https://www.fatherly.com/news/kate-middleton-isnt-going-to-the-queens-side-the-reason-is-for-her-kids

Read the whole daily mail article why don’t you…perhaps reflect upon posts from those of us who are not monarchists but keep those views private at this time of mourning, which are actually trying to debunk any conspiracy theories that this was based on a campaign against Markle. . 

Edited September 10, 2022 by Bluespunk
Less negative language

[transam]

1 minute ago, Bluespunk said:

Read the whole daily mail article why don’t you. 

No, thank you, I am responding to the thread title about Harry's Mrs........

I have read about Kate's day, which you brought up, for some reason......????

[Bluespunk]

6 minutes ago, transam said:

No, thank you, I am responding to the thread title about Harry's Mrs........

I have read about Kate's day, which you brought up, for some reason......????

Which was reported in the daily mail OP… and again

 

perhaps reflect upon posts from those of us who are not monarchists but keep those views private at this time of mourning, which are actually trying to debunk any conspiracy theories that this was based on a campaign against Markle.

Edited September 10, 2022 by Bluespunk
Word added and less negative language used

[jcmj]

Well this bait and switch hit a few notes. Carry on. 

[Sparktrader]

57 minutes ago, xylophone said:

is certainly a strange world we live in, where a woman who commits adultery on her husband by having an affair with the then Prince Charles, who in turn commits adultery on his new wife

At least 30% of folks do that

 

 

[Sparktrader]

25 minutes ago, puchooay said:

Not forgetting the millions that tourists pay to visit the UK because of the fact there is a monarchy and its history. Not forgetting the millions profit the state receives from the crown each year (last year the crown handed over £300+ million. The government returned circa £125 million as the annual royal grant)

 

Yep. Let's scrap it all. We could then have a President. They are always top dollar, aren't they?

France gets more tourists

[James105]

9 minutes ago, puchooay said:

Not forgetting the millions that tourists pay to visit the UK because of the fact there is a monarchy and its history. Not forgetting the millions profit the state receives from the crown each year (last year the crown handed over £300+ million. The government returned circa £125 million as the annual royal grant)

 

Yep. Let's scrap it all. We could then have a President. They are always top dollar, aren't they?

How many tourists actually got to even see the Queen, even from miles away?    They come to see the palaces and castles which do not require a monarchy to be present.   One of the most popular tourist destinations in France is still the Palace of Versailles and they haven't had a monarchy since 1792 so the tourist argument for retaining a monarchy is a non-starter.   

 

I've always been indifferent to the Royal family, and it grates when they occupy so much of the news agenda - I have no idea (for example) why I am supposed to be interested when someone does something as normal as saying hello to someone or waves out of a window or car which, quite frankly, any human is capable of doing.   

 

At least a "president" is selected by the people, which gives them significantly more credibility than an accident of birth.  If the monarchy was disbanded there would be nothing stopping King Charles III putting his name forward to be president and if that is what the people wanted then he could become head of state on merit, rather than based on who his mum was.   

[OneMoreFarang]

It can't be long before there will be some "news" from Meghan how difficult others make her life because that old woman died. Meghan is obviously the center of the universe - when will those people around her understand this and treat her with the respect she deserves? 

[roo860]

1 hour ago, Old Croc said:

Racist and petty even in the gravest times for this family.

 

I'm hoping the passing of this gracious lady will mark the beginning of the end of this anachronistic monarchy.  At the very least I can now hope that my country will become a republic without the new entitled toff remaining as our head of state.

I can't think about this lot without remembering how they became what they are, nor wonder why people in this modern world still kowtow to this hybrid German-Anglo bunch.

 

 

Deleted 

[vandeventer]

2 hours ago, steven100 said:

I think King Charles suggestion was correct in this situation .......   but it's not news worthy imo.

Between you and me I think Harry and Megan need to be removed from all Royal Family activity.

[KhunLA]

3 minutes ago, James105 said:

They come to see the palaces and castles which do not require a monarchy to be present.   One of the most popular tourist destinations in France is still the Palace of Versailles and they haven't had a monarchy since 1792 so the tourist argument for retaining a monarchy is a non-starter.

Would think many visit UK & EU simply for curiosity, or even to check out their 'roots'.  Afterwards, may realize why their ancestors left ????

 

USA having no royals for 2039 ish yrs, and in 2019 had 79 million tourist, more than UK population.  Must of visited to see Trump.

[billd766]

2 hours ago, petermik said:

Reported news....true or not does it matter ????

But it is from the Daily Wail, so you are correct, true or not does it matter

[Stocky]

Read meat for Daily Male readers.

[Sparktrader]

13 minutes ago, 2baht said:

The Poms just don't like the Yank!........But it sells them newspapers and feeds the simple minds that thrive on it and read it!

I know who Id rather have a beer with.

[koolkarl]

Obviously the Queen didn't approve of Meghan and didn't want anything to do

with her let alone see her when she was dying and I don't blame her.

[Sparktrader]

2 hours ago, transam said:

I have visions of Oprah Winfrey when Harry is mentioned.....????

G rated i hope