Circumcision

[Mac Mickmanus]

3 minutes ago, Sparktrader said:

So leave the cord attached then?

That will naturally become detached 

[Sparktrader]

1 minute ago, Mac Mickmanus said:

That will naturally become detached 

So no dentists or doctors ever. Just be natural.

 

 

[Mac Mickmanus]

7 minutes ago, Sparktrader said:

So no dentists or doctors ever. Just be natural.

 

 

Dentists and Doctors carry out necessary work , chopping a bit of your knob off isn't necessary 

[MrMuddle]

44 minutes ago, BangkokReady said:

Well, with the greatest respect, you obviously had some sort of medical issue with your foreskin meaning that removal was preferable.  Not really applicable to the generality of the discussion at hand.  While you have my sympathy, of course.

I don't want or need your sympathy, there is nothing to be sympathetic about. For someone who has posted a lot on this subject, you seem to have no practical knowledge of the outcome of a circumcision, other than wild speculation that appears to be based on rumours and guesswork. What exactly are your qualifications, to back up your assumptions?

Edited October 10, 2022 by MrMuddle
better vocabulary added

[Sparktrader]

11 minutes ago, Mac Mickmanus said:

Dentists and Doctors carry out necessary work , chopping a bit of your knob off isn't necessary 

It's skin not knob.

[BangkokReady]

27 minutes ago, Sparktrader said:

Sounds gross. No thanks. 

Sexual sensation and a protected glans sounds gross to you?  Do you know what made you feel this way?

 

I can't think of any logical reason for a disgust response to basic, healthy human anatomy.

 

This is where suspicions of some sort of cognitive dissonance comes from.

[Why Me]

Why fix it if it ain't broke? Benign it may be but it's still mutilation so let the kid decide when he's old enough.

[Lacessit]

I can't remember being circumcised. I'm quite happy I was, no irritation and easy to keep clean. Nothing religious involved, it was probably just recommended by the doctors of that era.

 

Talk of it being a cruel genital mutilation is rubbish, I've never had a problem enjoying sex. Female circumcision, yes.

 

As for the claim intact people get more sensation, I am somewhat baffled how any scientific study could come up with an experimental design to support the assertion.

[BangkokReady]

2 minutes ago, Why Me said:

Benign it may be

It isn't just benign.  It has a function.

[BangkokReady]

16 minutes ago, MrMuddle said:

What exactly are your qualifications, to back up your assumptions?

A reasonable knowledge of the working and function of the penis and foreskin.  A logical brain capable of drawing sound conclusions.  A passing interest in the topic.

 

Boring stuff, but everything I say is pretty sensible.

[Why Me]

3 minutes ago, Lacessit said:

I've never had a problem enjoying sex.

Might be a bit late now but you would have enjoyed a lot more with foreskin intact.

[Why Me]

1 minute ago, BangkokReady said:

A passing interest in the topic.

More than that I would hazard, sir. No doubt you have skin in the game.

[Sparktrader]

5 minutes ago, BangkokReady said:

Sexual sensation and a protected glans sounds gross to you?  Do you know what made you feel this way?

 

I can't think of any logical reason for a disgust response to basic, healthy human anatomy.

 

This is where suspicions of some sort of cognitive dissonance comes from.

Foreskins look gross. Seen them in movies. No thanks. Plus unhygienic. Science says. 

[Sparktrader]

1 minute ago, Why Me said:

Might be a bit late now but you would have enjoyed a lot more with foreskin intact.

How would you know?

[Sparktrader]

4 minutes ago, BangkokReady said:

It isn't just benign.  It has a function.

When humans had no clothes. Serves no purpose now.

[Why Me]

1 minute ago, Sparktrader said:

How would you know?

It is known that an uncovered glans tends to lose sensitivity owing to constant friction with undergarments.

[BangkokReady]

1 minute ago, Sparktrader said:

Foreskins look gross.

That's subjective.  No woman is going to turn you down because you have foreskin.  Maybe if you don't wash.

 

1 minute ago, Sparktrader said:

Seen them in movies. No thanks.

So should someone cut off their child's foreskin while they are a baby based on this?

 

1 minute ago, Sparktrader said:

Plus unhygienic. Science says. 

Countries where circumcision is not at all common have no problems.  It simply isn't an issue.

[BangkokReady]

2 minutes ago, Sparktrader said:

When humans had no clothes. Serves no purpose now.

It provides sexual sensation and protects the glans.

[Sparktrader]

Just now, BangkokReady said:

That's subjective.  No woman is going to turn you down because you have foreskin.  Maybe if you don't wash.

 

So should someone cut off their child's foreskin while they are a baby based on this?

 

Countries where circumcision is not at all common have no problems.  It simply isn't an issue.

Science says you are wrong. You cannot make up your own science.

 

 

[BangkokReady]

Just now, Sparktrader said:

Science says you are wrong. You cannot make up your own science.

Nope.  Uncircumcised countries are just fine.  There is no medical need for circumcision.  Intact people are perfectly safe.

[Sparktrader]

1 minute ago, BangkokReady said:

Nope.  Uncircumcised countries are just fine.  There is no medical need for circumcision.  Intact people are perfectly safe.

 Circumcised men have a 25% lower risk of genital herpes and a 35% lower risk of HPV, the virus that causes genital warts and cancers.

 

https://www.webmd.com/men/news/20090325/circumcision-cuts-stds

Edited October 10, 2022 by Sparktrader

[BangkokReady]

It's fine.  Wash it and away you go with more sexual sensation.  No drawbacks (haha).

[Sparktrader]

1 minute ago, Why Me said:

Sir, you may have a pretty cock. But as I said above you're missing out on a lot of fun.

Nope. You wouldn't know.

[Sparktrader]

Just now, BangkokReady said:

It's fine.  Wash it and away you go with more sexual sensation.  No drawbacks (haha).

More diseases.

[BangkokReady]

Just now, Sparktrader said:

 Circumcised men have a 25% lower risk of genital herpes and a 35% lower risk of HPV, the virus that causes genital warts and cancers.

So much blah blah.  No uncircumcised countries are panicking and asking people to get circumcised to stop some kind of pandemic.

 

The reason people do it has nothing to do with cleanliness or safety.

[BangkokReady]

Just now, Sparktrader said:

More diseases.

Lol.  No.

[Sparktrader]

1 minute ago, BangkokReady said:

Lol.  No.

 https://www.medicalnewstoday.com/articles/uncircumcised-problems

[Sparktrader]

2 minutes ago, BangkokReady said:

So much blah blah.  No uncircumcised countries are panicking and asking people to get circumcised to stop some kind of pandemic.

 

The reason people do it has nothing to do with cleanliness or safety.

Science says you are wrong.

[BangkokReady]

Just now, Sparktrader said:

Science says you are wrong.

Science can prove that the reason that people favour circumcision is based on hygiene and not sexual control?

[In the jungle]

2 minutes ago, Sparktrader said:

More diseases.

Not convinced but certainly less cock.