Donald Trump says he expects to be arrested on Tuesday

[2baht]

1 hour ago, Yellowtail said:

After you...

Very little, that's why he is a one term loser! Oh, he did manage to be impeached on two occasions, though that's hardly and achievement!

[Yellowtail]

10 minutes ago, 2baht said:

Very little, that's why he is a one term loser! Oh, he did manage to be impeached on two occasions, though that's hardly and achievement!

The border? 

[2009]

1 minute ago, Yellowtail said:

The border? 

Yeah, he valued America's border. That was good.

 

Nothing like the feeling of your country having a secure border.

[2baht]

1 hour ago, Yellowtail said:

The border? 

????The wall, the big beautiful wall! Where is it? ????

[onthedarkside]

Unsubstantiated posts and replies reported/removed

[Eloquent pilgrim]

“I’ve seen him naked; there’s no way he could be any scarier with his clothes on” ????

 

Great line from Stormy Daniels when asked about the prospect of facing Donald Trump in court

 

Fake blonde with big hooters, pays hush money to fake blonde with big hooters …. only in America

[2009]

9 minutes ago, 2baht said:

????The wall, the big beautiful wall! Where is it? ????

Let's vote him back and we might see it.

[placeholder]

37 minutes ago, 2009 said:

Where's your link from a credible source on this? ????

Your question clearly establishes how fact-proof is the new bubble you inhabit. There's  a saying that attorneys in a court shouldn't ask questions they don't know already the answer to. Because it's very embarrassing. Maybe you're embarrassment-proof?

 

Here's something from the Marxists at Fox News:

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/hunter-biden-investigation-ag-garland-taking-hands-off-approach-leaves-charging-decisions-weiss

 

And from the Maoists at the Washington Times:

https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2023/mar/1/merrick-garland-says-delaware-us-attorney-david-we/

 

And here's a bit of general informatIon:

"On February 15, 2018, his nomination to be the United States Attorney was confirmed by voice vote. He was sworn in on February 22, 2018. Weiss has been in charge of the investigations into the financial dealings of Hunter Biden and was asked to stay on during the Biden administration.[4]"

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/David_C._Weiss#:~:text=He currently serves as the,Attorney from 2009 to 2011.

 

And now that I've complied with your request, I am confident that you will do the honorable thing and comply with mine, I await your response with eagerness. 

 

EDIT: Well, it looks like 2009 has fled the scene. What a crucifix is to a vampire, facts are to Trump supporters.

 

[2baht]

1 hour ago, 2009 said:

Let's vote him back and we might see it.

Oh, come on! That's already been tried, it failed miserably! ????

[pomchop]

50 minutes ago, Yellowtail said:

Even if he had "...tried overthrow a legitimate election via a coup...", which he did not, that still does not explain in any way "...the level of vitriol posted at Trump.".

 

 

 

So i guess trying to "find"  11780 more votes than "we have", putting together a plot of fake electors, trying to pressure pence into not doing his duty along with unleashing a violent mob to try and stop the electoral vote count and continuing to this day to tell the big lie that he won as well as calling the capitol thugs patriots and heroes is not trying to overthrow an election and is just another day at the office and everyone is just picking on him for no reason at all.    That is one of many reasons that there is a lot of vitriol directed at him...some of us don't much care for lying dictator wannabes who think they are above the law and want to toss the constitution when it suits him.

[Yellowtail]

9 minutes ago, 2baht said:

????The wall, the big beautiful wall! Where is it? ????

He did get quite a bit of wall built, and it would have been much more but for the left needing to keep the boarder open. 

 

The American people by a wide margin want a secure border, and wanted the wall built. The left does not. 

 

Trump does everything he can to secure the boarder and get the wall built, and the left does everything it can to stop him.

 

The left fights tooth and nail to stop the wall the American people want, and then the left blames Trump for the wall not being built.

 

 

 

 

 

[2baht]

15 hours ago, 2009 said:

He's getting done for an accounting error, because he didn't account for the hush money he allegedly paid.

Yes, it was only a mere $130,000, Cohen paid it and Trump paid him back, how could he be so absent minded? ????

 

[pomchop]

21 minutes ago, Yellowtail said:

The border? 

Yeah i don't know how we will be able to spend all the $$ that mexico provided to build a wall...maybe they did give it to trump and he spent it on himself.  He sure as hell did not build any significant wall...yet another in his multiple episodes of The Biggest Liar.

[Yellowtail]

5 minutes ago, pomchop said:

So i guess trying to "find"  11780 more votes than "we have", putting together a plot of fake electors, trying to pressure pence into not doing his duty along with unleashing a violent mob to try and stop the electoral vote count and continuing to this day to tell the big lie that he won as well as calling the capitol thugs patriots and heroes is not trying to overthrow an election and is just another day at the office and everyone is just picking on him for no reason at all.    That is one of many reasons that there is a lot of vitriol directed at him...some of us don't much care for lying dictator wannabes who think they are above the law and want to toss the constitution when it suits him.

Again, even if he had "...tried overthrow a legitimate election via a coup...", which he did not, that still does not explain in any way "...the level of vitriol posted at Trump.".

 

 

[2baht]

1 hour ago, Yellowtail said:

The American people by a wide margin want a secure border, and wanted the wall built. The left does not. 

 

Obviously the left are in the majority, is'nt democracy great!  

[placeholder]

10 minutes ago, Yellowtail said:

Again, even if he had "...tried overthrow a legitimate election via a coup...", which he did not, that still does not explain in any way "...the level of vitriol posted at Trump.".

 

 

Can you please share with us the objective measure that was used to calibrate "the level of vitriol posted at Trump."

And while you're at it, can you use that same measure to calibrate the level of vitriol that Trump has posted at various persons during and after his Presidency?

Obviously, your post here is just another B.S. piece of deflection.

[Will B Good]

15 hours ago, 2009 said:

He's getting done for an accounting error, because he didn't account for the hush money he allegedly paid.

It wasn't an accounting error..........he fraudulently used campaign funds to pay her off.............that is what the indictment is all about.

[heybruce]

2 hours ago, Yellowtail said:

Even if he had "...tried overthrow a legitimate election via a coup...", which he did not, that still does not explain in any way "...the level of vitriol posted at Trump.".

As a retired USAF officer who takes his oath to the US Constitution seriously and a real patriot (not a creepy flag fondling pretend patriot) I think your casual attitude towards insurrection is appalling.

[heybruce]

1 hour ago, 2009 said:

Yeah, he valued America's border. That was good.

 

Nothing like the feeling of your country having a secure border.

Then why didn't he increase security at legal points of entry, where most illegal immigrants and smuggling occurs?  Why didn't he crack down on people drawing illegal immigrants to this country by hiring them?

[heybruce]

1 hour ago, 2baht said:

????The wall, the big beautiful wall! Where is it? ????

Patience!  I'm sure they'll start on it as soon as the check from Mexico clears.  ????

[placeholder]

56 minutes ago, heybruce said:

Then why didn't he increase security at legal points of entry, where most illegal immigrants and smuggling occurs?  Why didn't he crack down on people drawing illegal immigrants to this country by hiring them?

This is the issue that supporters of the wall repeatedly avoid. If criminal penalties including imprisonment were to be legislated aganst employers who hire undocumented aliens, then we would see a sharp decline in undocumented immigrants entering the United States. But the dirty not-so-secret secret is that much of the US economy depends on undocumented aliens. And employers like it that way because undocumented workers are far less likely to seek legal recourse in case they are being mistreated or cheated by their employers. And when have Republicans ever gone after the ruling class of the business world?

[Yellowtail]

1 hour ago, heybruce said:

As a retired USAF officer who takes his oath to the US Constitution seriously and a real patriot (not a creepy flag fondling pretend patriot) I think your casual attitude towards insurrection is appalling.

I look at the US military today and I am appalled, as are (I think) a majority of other Americans. That you did not call for Mark Milley's resignation as well as all the other officers that were openly disparaging their Commander in Chief speaks to where your allegiance really lies.

 

I watch the available footage of the Capital riots and when I hear it referred to as an insurrection, I am appalled (albeit amused). Clearly when the left riots it's a protest, but when the right riots it's an insurrection. 

 

For at least a year the left was calling it an "armed insurrection", but they finally had to drop the "armed" part, so now it was just an "insurrection", how funny is that?  

[Yellowtail]

1 hour ago, heybruce said:

Then why didn't he increase security at legal points of entry, where most illegal immigrants and smuggling occurs?

Are you claiming he did not? 

1 hour ago, heybruce said:

Why didn't he crack down on people drawing illegal immigrants to this country by hiring them?

Are you claiming he did not? 

[Yellowtail]

52 minutes ago, placeholder said:

This is the issue that supporters of the wall repeatedly avoid. If criminal penalties including imprisonment were to be legislated aganst employers who hire undocumented aliens, then we would see a sharp decline in undocumented immigrants entering the United States. But the dirty not-so-secret secret is that much of the US economy depends on undocumented aliens. And employers like it that way because undocumented workers are far less likely to seek legal recourse in case they are being mistreated or cheated by their employers. And when have Republicans ever gone after the ruling class of the business world?

But were this true. 

[Chomper Higgot]

3 hours ago, Yellowtail said:

The border? 

Are suggesting Trump is headed for the border?

[Chomper Higgot]

3 hours ago, 2009 said:

Let's vote him back and we might see it.

Is that your fooled you once, fool you twice line?

[2baht]

1 hour ago, Yellowtail said:

Clearly when the left riots it's a protest, but when the right riots it's an insurrection. 

Your argument is so weak! Is this a protest???

 

[heybruce]

2 hours ago, Yellowtail said:

I look at the US military today and I am appalled, as are (I think) a majority of other Americans. That you did not call for Mark Milley's resignation as well as all the other officers that were openly disparaging their Commander in Chief speaks to where your allegiance really lies.

 

I watch the available footage of the Capital riots and when I hear it referred to as an insurrection, I am appalled (albeit amused). Clearly when the left riots it's a protest, but when the right riots it's an insurrection. 

 

For at least a year the left was calling it an "armed insurrection", but they finally had to drop the "armed" part, so now it was just an "insurrection", how funny is that?  

Ok, I know this is futile, but provide evidence of your claim "other officers that were openly disparaging their Commander in Chief speaks to where your allegiance really lies."  What officers in addition to General Mark Milley, and most important, what did they say and when?

 

However I can answer the question--The allegiance of all officers in the US Military is to the US Constitution.

[heybruce]

3 hours ago, placeholder said:

This is the issue that supporters of the wall repeatedly avoid. If criminal penalties including imprisonment were to be legislated aganst employers who hire undocumented aliens, then we would see a sharp decline in undocumented immigrants entering the United States. But the dirty not-so-secret secret is that much of the US economy depends on undocumented aliens. And employers like it that way because undocumented workers are far less likely to seek legal recourse in case they are being mistreated or cheated by their employers. And when have Republicans ever gone after the ruling class of the business world?

I agree.  The "problem" could be alleviated by acknowledging the obvious:  The best, brightest, most hard-working and ambitious all over the world want to live and work in America.  It is idiotic that they are not welcomed in large numbers.  Not open borders, but much easier long-term work visas and immigration rules in general for such people.

 

There is a self-serving strategic logic to this.  Great power contests are won often by economic power more than diplomatic policy or military strength.  Economic power greatly enhances diplomatic and military effectiveness.  Being more open to the world's "best and brightest" would be great for the economy.

[placeholder]

5 minutes ago, heybruce said:

I agree.  The "problem" could be alleviated by acknowledging the obvious:  The best, brightest, most hard-working and ambitious all over the world want to live and work in America.  It is idiotic that they are not welcomed in large numbers.  Not open borders, but much easier long-term work visas and immigration rules in general for such people.

 

There is a self-serving strategic logic to this.  Great power contests are won often by economic power more than diplomatic policy or military strength.  Economic power greatly enhances diplomatic and military effectiveness.  Being more open to the world's "best and brightest" would be great for the economy.

And if they were legal, then they would be working for at least minimum wage with overtime rules in effect. So less grounds for alleged displacement of workers. Although it's dubious that many native-born Americans would want to do the backbreaking work that constitutes so much a part of agriculture. And in slaughterhouses, too.