Nearly half of Americans think Trump should suspend 2024 campaign after indictment: poll

[Mac Mickmanus]

9 minutes ago, placeholder said:

You know, you've really got to do better with your ploys than this pathetic attempt..  Whether or not it's a good morning is an entirely subjective opinion.

Well yes, and those sort of things were classified as lies 

[placeholder]

10 minutes ago, Mac Mickmanus said:

Well yes, and those sort of things were classified as lies 

They were? Please share some examples with links.

[ozimoron]

47 minutes ago, Mac Mickmanus said:

Yes : "Good Morning"

That's a lie, its a terrible morning 

*That's the first lie he has told today , its NOT a Good morning at all* 

Mornings have been a lot better since January 21, 2000.

[billd766]

6 hours ago, vandeventer said:

Just for you!

https://www.nbcnews.com/news/asian-america/chinese-migrants-are-coming-us-foot-officials-say-rcna77244

Thank you.

 

quote "The U.S. Customs and Border Protection reported that, in the past five months, at least 4,300 Chinese undocumented migrants have been apprehended crossing the southern border, which amounts to more than double the number for all of the previous year."

 

How many legal Chinese immigrants were there during the same period?

 

 

[billd766]

8 hours ago, thaibeachlovers said:

As your side have repeated sooooooo many times.

One can ignore the reason why a liar is popular, but one can't change it just by saying liar liar pants on fire at every opportunity.

 

 

And I will keep repeating it.

 

How can you ignore and elect a congenital liar as POTUS?

 

The best way to change it is to jail him and ban him for life from trying again.

[Mac Mickmanus]

31 minutes ago, placeholder said:

No, you can't go through with it because the washington post list does not have the sort of statements that you claim it does. You've been caught out.

I have never mentioned the Washington post and I have never claimed that they have made any statements , you are lying about that 

[placeholder]

1 minute ago, Mac Mickmanus said:

I have never mentioned the Washington post and I have never claimed that they have made any statements , you are lying about that 

Well I assumed that it was the post since 30,000 plus lies was invoked. And a lie is an intentional misstatement of fact.

[DudleySquat]

On 4/13/2023 at 9:17 AM, 2009 said:

So, Trump runs for president, they indict him, and half the people think he should stop running. ????

 

Sad day for democracy. ????

 

I wonder if those people are democrats, by any chance?

Don't wonder for too long.

[still kicking]

On 4/13/2023 at 10:38 AM, Tug said:

He won’t withdraw its his most lucrative grift and a easy way to get the attention he craves

And money 

[spidermike007]

He is likely nearly broke, and sees the campaign as a way to grift another $100 million or so, from his faithful devotees. 

[Colki]

I am not American but also not any fan of Trump. One only has to listen to people such as Bolton who served Trump to get an insight to his ability to be a POA.

 

This pending court case is only the first of many possible charges that Trump may face prior to the next elections and given the slow pace at which justice moves these all could be interpreted as interference in his election bid. From my limited knowledge these could include a possible rape charge and I am certain that I have read the company behind the machine that was used to count votes in only one state at the last presidential elections has legal action pending.. They have already begun action against Fox.

 

To those that slander Biden and question his ability one should then ask why he was able to legitimately  beat Trump. I say legitimately as there has never been any successful legal action to show otherwise that I am aware of. It is my thought that it was vote for anyone else other than Trump.

 

As a non american but member of this universe I have never witnessed such a destructive character on the international front. As I have little knowledge of internal american internal matters and policies other than the blatant mistruths and his atrocious vitriol that was certainly not becoming of any person holding that office

 

[newnative]

1 hour ago, placeholder said:

It's funny. I'm in this forum way too much, and I don't recall even seeing one of the "numerous times"  or "weekly" times Mac MickManus has provided evidence to this effect.

Ditto!

[onthedarkside]

Post and replies removed. If you make any factual claims and are asked for a credible link, please provide them:

 

"Any alleged factual claims must be supported by a valid link to an approved credible source."

 

[thaibeachlovers]

On 4/15/2023 at 8:13 PM, Colki said:

As a non american but member of this universe I have never witnessed such a destructive character on the international front. As I have little knowledge of internal american internal matters and policies other than the blatant mistruths and his atrocious vitriol that was certainly not becoming of any person holding that office

Seriously? I can think of a few other former presidents that IMO were more destructive on the international front.

If nothing else, Trump started no wars, and started the process to remove America from Afghanistan. Both good things IMO.

Edited April 16, 2023 by thaibeachlovers

[thaibeachlovers]

On 4/15/2023 at 6:59 PM, billd766 said:

 

 

And I will keep repeating it.

 

How can you ignore and elect a congenital liar as POTUS?

 

The best way to change it is to jail him and ban him for life from trying again.

and I will keep repeating because he was seen as the better of the two realistic options that were given on election day.

I would have preferred Bernie to either of them, and I said it at the time, but he wasn't on the ballot.

 

If and when the US voters are given a choice of a good candidate, of either party or perhaps an independent, IMO they will vote FOR that person, rather than AGAINST a bad candidate.

In the US, voting for the POTUS isn't the same as voting for a party, so one can elect a president that isn't part of the house parties.

[placeholder]

18 hours ago, thaibeachlovers said:

and I will keep repeating because he was seen as the better of the two realistic options that were given on election day.

I would have preferred Bernie to either of them, and I said it at the time, but he wasn't on the ballot.

 

Didn't you enthusiastically approve of Trump's choices for Supreme Court Justices? How do you reconcile that with supporting Bernie?