Skip to content
View in the app

A better way to browse. Learn more.

Thailand News and Discussion Forum | ASEANNOW

A full-screen app on your home screen with push notifications, badges and more.

To install this app on iOS and iPadOS
  1. Tap the Share icon in Safari
  2. Scroll the menu and tap Add to Home Screen.
  3. Tap Add in the top-right corner.
To install this app on Android
  1. Tap the 3-dot menu (⋮) in the top-right corner of the browser.
  2. Tap Add to Home screen or Install app.
  3. Confirm by tapping Install.

Trump surrenders for historic fourth arrest

Featured Replies

1 minute ago, nauseus said:

Nothing to explain. My reply was to your first line. You don't know what I think.

Now you're being deliberately obtuse. You know very well I alluded to your unsupported and unexplained claim of irregularities. Why don't you abide by forum rules for once?

  • Replies 806
  • Views 27.8k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Most Popular Posts

  • Funny, in Thailand I recall martial law, curfews, soldiers on the streets, military roadblocks, rule by decree (section 44 interim constitution), rewriting the constitution, banning the novel "1984",

  • Reminds me of Thaksin when the Junta went after him politically.   The only difference being, Trump is staying to defend himself instead of Thaksin who fled the country.   Lots of

  • Were are the protesters Donnie were are the crying court employees and blubbering state troopers?seems like things went nice and quietly not as much drama as he expected now let’s get him convicted an

Posted Images

6 hours ago, SunnyinBangrak said:

Pure tyranny. I wonder whether anyone cheering the weaponization of the justice sytem is basing their sheer loathing of the man - and justification for this unprecedented coordinated attack on an ex Pres - on facts, rather than a well crafted narrative that paints him as an immoral and corrupt psychopath? Somehow I doubt it. 

 

15 minutes ago, HappyExpat57 said:

As I said, that's EXACTLY the problem! It looks like a racist, walks like a racist, quacks like a racist, but you just don't WANT it to be a racist so, as 45 has been so fond of saying, "Don't believe your eyes, believe what I tell you."

I was referring to you last line: I could go on, but I grow bored with wasting my time.

 

1 hour ago, Neeranam said:

How is he racist? 

Nationalistic, I agree, nothing wrong with that. 

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/the-fix/wp/2017/06/16/theyre-rapists-presidents-trump-campaign-launch-speech-two-years-later-annotated/

 

"When Mexico sends its people, they're not sending their best. They're not sending you. They're not sending you. They're sending people that have lots of problems, and they're bringing those problems with us. They're bringing drugs. They're bringing crime. They're rapists. And some, I assume, are good people."

1 minute ago, ozimoron said:

Now you're being deliberately obtuse. You know very well I alluded to your unsupported and unexplained claim of irregularities. Why don't you abide by forum rules for once?

And now you know what I was referring to. 

 

If you are so keen on forum rules, stop making thinks up.

Just now, Danderman123 said:

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/the-fix/wp/2017/06/16/theyre-rapists-presidents-trump-campaign-launch-speech-two-years-later-annotated/

 

"When Mexico sends its people, they're not sending their best. They're not sending you. They're not sending you. They're sending people that have lots of problems, and they're bringing those problems with us. They're bringing drugs. They're bringing crime. They're rapists. And some, I assume, are good people."

How many white supremacist hate groups have arisen since Obama and during Trump's time? How is it that every member to a man love Trump? Did Trump not call them good people when they chanted "Jews will not replace us" at a rally where one of their ilk killed a woman protesting? Were Trump's people not in close contact with these filth before the Jan insurrection? Did many of them go to jail for decades for trying to keep Trump in power? On what planet is Trump not racist?

2 minutes ago, nauseus said:

And now you know what I was referring to. 

 

If you are so keen on forum rules, stop making thinks up.

What part of asking you to explain what irregularities occurred during the Fulton county election was making stuff up?

5 hours ago, Neeranam said:

Some here seem intent on him being jailed due to their personal political view rather than whether he is guilty or not. ???? 

Who are you referring to Trump or Mr T?

Your post could apply to either.

 

At least with people they see as a threat they don't blow their brains out on the these days, as in 1963!

12 minutes ago, ozimoron said:

What part of asking you to explain what irregularities occurred during the Fulton county election was making stuff up?

You didn't ask me to explain anything.

 

Read back, preferably in English.

6 minutes ago, nauseus said:

You didn't ask me to explain anything.

 

Read back, preferably in English.

This was what I asked you to explain and which you have still yet to do.

 

All this back and forth could have been avoided if you could just sum up a modicum of respect for forum rules.

 

Quote

I think it was targeted after so many reported irregularities during the election itself.

 

5 hours ago, Danderman123 said:

Please advise which of the 91 charges against Trump are false.

Daft question without discovery (unless you're part of his legal team, of course).  It'll come out in court.

5 hours ago, Danderman123 said:

So  you can't argue the law or the facts, apparently.

No one outside of the legal teams have the facts of the case so you cannot argue anything, either!

  • Popular Post
4 minutes ago, Liverpool Lou said:

No one outside of the legal teams have the facts of the case so you cannot argue anything, either!

I think that's a pretty shallow interpretation of the facts of this case. For example, we've all heard the perfect phone call. Several times.

5 minutes ago, Liverpool Lou said:

Daft question without discovery (unless you're part of his legal team, of course).  It'll come out in court.

What you are saying is that you personally are unaware of anything false in the 91 charges against Trump (because you haven't seen the discovery material yet).

 

 

1 minute ago, Liverpool Lou said:

They are!

But you are personally unaware if any of the 91 charges against Trump are false.

 

Right?

5 hours ago, jerrymahoney said:

And another likely older legal maxim:

 

Ei incumbit probatio qui dicit, non qui negat.

 

The burden of the proof lies upon him who affirms, not he who denies. 

 

 

Oh, no, the rabble here won't like that!

3 minutes ago, Liverpool Lou said:

Hyperbole.  Did he lock her up?  How could you know what his intent was?

Provide my full quote next time if you want a reply

3 minutes ago, Liverpool Lou said:

Hyperbole.  Did he lock her up?  How could you know what his intent was?

Are you saying that Trump was lying when he said he would put Hillary Clinton in jail?

5 hours ago, Danderman123 said:

Hundreds of pages of indictments are a pretty decent affirmation.

No, they are allegations, not affirmations.

5 hours ago, Sing_Sling said:

He is guilty to anyone who has a shred of decency and knowledge of the laws he has broken. 

At this stage that is b0llocks, he is innocent of these charges until proven otherwise.

  • Popular Post
7 minutes ago, Liverpool Lou said:

No one outside of the legal teams have the facts of the case so you cannot argue anything, either!

I take it you've no read the prosecution indictments, a formal written accusation of crime.

 

In the United States, where a grand jury indictment is required by the Fifth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution for federal prosecutions, the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure (1946), applicable to federal district courts, provide that the indictment “shall be a plain, concise, and definite written statement of the essential facts constituting the offense charged.” 

https://www.britannica.com/topic/indictment

 

 

Just now, Danderman123 said:
Just now, Liverpool Lou said:

Hyperbole.  Did he lock her up?  How could you know what his intent was?

Are you saying that Trump was lying when he said he would put Hillary Clinton in jail?

No, I said it was hyperbole...but what if he was lying?

6 minutes ago, Danderman123 said:

Are you saying that Trump was lying when he said he would put Hillary Clinton in jail?

That was political banter during a debate , rather than a direct threat of intention 

 

 

8 hours ago, webfact said:

image.jpeg

 

This is the official mugshot of Donald Trump released by the Fulton County Sheriff's Office

 

Source: BBC

Sing to the tune of bad boys bad boys what ya gunna do;

 

'Rat boy rat boy what ya gunna do when they come for you

Rat boy rat boy what ya gunna do'

4 hours ago, SunnyinBangrak said:

To be fair, persecuting your chief political opponent...

Twittler is being prosecuted, not persecuted.

 

Who is doing this? Thought it is DoJ.

Just now, Nick Carter icp said:

That was political banter during a debate , rather than a direct threat of intention

Are you implying that it was the only time he said it and took no actions to effect her indictment?

Create an account or sign in to comment

Recently Browsing 0

  • No registered users viewing this page.

Account

Navigation

Search

Search

Configure browser push notifications

Chrome (Android)
  1. Tap the lock icon next to the address bar.
  2. Tap Permissions → Notifications.
  3. Adjust your preference.
Chrome (Desktop)
  1. Click the padlock icon in the address bar.
  2. Select Site settings.
  3. Find Notifications and adjust your preference.