Skip to content
View in the app

A better way to browse. Learn more.

Thailand News and Discussion Forum | ASEANNOW

A full-screen app on your home screen with push notifications, badges and more.

To install this app on iOS and iPadOS
  1. Tap the Share icon in Safari
  2. Scroll the menu and tap Add to Home Screen.
  3. Tap Add in the top-right corner.
To install this app on Android
  1. Tap the 3-dot menu (⋮) in the top-right corner of the browser.
  2. Tap Add to Home screen or Install app.
  3. Confirm by tapping Install.

Covid-19 mRNA Vaccines Win Nobel Prize for Medicine 2023

Featured Replies

  • Popular Post
16 hours ago, TallGuyJohninBKK said:

He was correct in the general sense, in that as has been almost universally acknowledged by numerous experts around the world -- excluding some random anti-vaxers here with no credible sources....

You mean the credible sources that they've tried so hard to sweep from view?

 

Edit:  Great to see there's a court case making its way up the appeals process, discussing limits on gub'ment behavior when it comes to violating 1st Amendment rights to discuss things like Covid.

 

  • Replies 261
  • Views 9.6k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Most Popular Posts

  • So if these vaccines are so wonderful, why are people still suffering from Covid? What are the point of all these articles? Do you want more people to get vaccinated, do you want to go back to lo

  • TallGuyJohninBKK
    TallGuyJohninBKK

    First, because some portion of the population (20-30% depending on the location) has refused to get vaccinated since the beginning because of bogus misinformation like that that's been posted above...

Posted Images

59 minutes ago, xylophone said:

And yet more good news re the MRNA vaccines......

 

What's Next? The Future of mRNA Vaccines for “Every Imaginable Infectious Disease”

The mRNA platform created at Penn Medicine ignited a global renaissance in RNA biology research. Scientists in industry and at universities worldwide are finding new and innovative ways to use mRNA technology to prevent and treat disease.

“We're working on every imaginable infectious disease."

 

Drew Weissman, MD, PhD, Roberts Family Professor in Vaccine Research

mRNA Vaccines for Infectious Diseases

 

Before COVID-19 erupted, a Penn-developed mRNA influenza (flu) vaccine was already in clinical trials. This existing work directly contributed to the speed at which drug makers could produce the mRNA COVID-19 vaccines.

With fast development and production times, mRNA vaccines are ideal for protection against new infectious diseases and variants of existing ones. Our researchers are at the forefront of mRNA vaccines for numerous infectious disease vaccines.

 

mRNA Vaccines for Cancer

While the mRNA vaccines for COVID-19 and other infectious diseases prevent disease, mRNA technology can also help treat existing diseases like cancer. The platform's flexibility allows researchers to create mRNA cancer vaccines that activate the immune system to attack cancer cells.

 

Much, much more good news on this website….

 

https://www.pennmedicine.org/mrna

 

Finally back on topic!!

 

Promising news for Malaria vaccines too

 

Scientific breakthrough harnesses mRNA technology to develop powerful malaria vaccine
A new mRNA vaccine targeting immune cells in the liver could be the key to tackling malaria, a disease that causes over half a million deaths each year according to the World Health Organization, yet has no effective long-lasting vaccine.

Trans-Tasman research collaborators from Te Herenga Waka— Victoria University of Wellington’s Ferrier Research Institute and the Malaghan Institute of Medical Research in New Zealand, and the Peter Doherty Institute for Infection and Immunity in Australia have developed an mRNA-based vaccine that can effectively target and stimulate protective immune cell responses against the malaria-causing parasite Plasmodium in preclinical models.

https://www.doherty.edu.au/news-events/news/mrna-technology-to-develop-powerful-malaria-vaccine

18 hours ago, Keep Right said:

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9876036/

 

I will take my chances rather than put an exploratory drug in my body. But the lemmings want the fix to make them feel better. The problem is that no one knows the long term effects of this drug, even scientists.

Well, the mRNA aspect of the vaccine has been worked on and studied since the 1960s, but there was a problem in finding a way to get it delivered into the cells, however this was overcome when a method was found in the 1970s when nanotechnology advances were made.

 

More tests were carried out in the 1990s so when Covid hit, scientists and the medical profession were prepared.

 

Huge increases in funding for this research was spurred by the Covid 19 pandemic and allowed a huge increase in research into the area.

 

So it's hardly an exploratory drug (the research into it was being carried out over 60 years ago) and the same could be said for many other drugs and vaccines in use today (did the medical establishment know the potential long-term effects of the polio vaccine, for example, and the same goes for many others) so scaremongering is high on the list of the anti-brigade.

 

I put my trust in the medical profession rather than social media websites and the rubbish that gets posted on them.

 

https://publichealth.jhu.edu/2021/the-long-history-of-mrna-vaccines 

  • Popular Post
1 hour ago, xylophone said:

Well, the mRNA aspect of the vaccine has been worked on and studied since the 1960s, but there was a problem in finding a way to get it delivered into the cells, however this was overcome when a method was found in the 1970s when nanotechnology advances were made.

 

More tests were carried out in the 1990s so when Covid hit, scientists and the medical profession were prepared.

They were prepared with everything but real tests on real people, because that would have been considered unethical.   Covid was a perfect reason to unleash the experiment.

 

Bottom line, we don't know what the long term effects will be simply because it hasn't been a long term.


Realizing that I'm speaking from a database of one, I'd give just about anything to go back and undo my 2nd Pfizer and get my health back.

 

19 minutes ago, impulse said:

They were prepared with everything but real tests on real people, because that would have been considered unethical.   Covid was a perfect reason to unleash the experiment.

 

Bottom line, we don't know what the long term effects will be simply because it hasn't been a long term.


Realizing that I'm speaking from a database of one, I'd give just about anything to go back and undo my 2nd Pfizer and get my health back.

 

What B.S. Read the link in the post your replying to rather than making those claims.

18 minutes ago, impulse said:

They were prepared with everything but real tests on real people, because that would have been considered unethical.   Covid was a perfect reason to unleash the experiment.

 

Bottom line, we don't know what the long term effects will be simply because it hasn't been a long term.


Realizing that I'm speaking from a database of one, I'd give just about anything to go back and undo my 2nd Pfizer and get my health back.

 

I hope you do get your health back from whatever caused it. However the virus itself does cause some health problems and a mild form of it can still be caught despite the vaccine, but this is very rare.

 

The Pfizer and Moderna vaccines are strongly recommended as safe and effective at preventing serious illness or death from COVID-19.

 

From December 2020 to December 2021, about 470 million doses of COVID-19 vaccine have been given in the U.S.

 

Roughly 12 months of data, including data from tens of thousands of participants in clinical trials, show that the vaccines are safe and effective at preventing serious disease or death due to COVID-19.

 

mRNA technology used in the Pfizer and Moderna vaccines has been in development for over 15 years.

24 minutes ago, Bkk Brian said:

What B.S. Read the link in the post your replying to rather than making those claims.

So, which of my claims are you disagreeing with?  That the mRNA vaccines weren't put through long term human trials before they were released to the public, or that my health stinks since I got my 2nd Pfizer?

 

I specifically remember conversations from the period where the talking heads said that testing such technology on humans would have been unethical unless they identified a benefit to offset any (yet unquantified) risk.   

 

BTW, when you're talking about dinking about with RNA or DNA, "long term" means a lot longer than a few months.

 

I have no doubt that vaccines saved many lives, and were very appropriate for some segments of the population.  I've never been anti-vax.  Just anti-mandate, and very much in favor of full disclosure, allowing informed decisions. 

 

Just now, impulse said:

So, which of my claims are you disagreeing with?  That the mRNA vaccines weren't put through long term human trials before they were released to the public, or that my health stinks since I got my 2nd Pfizer?

 

I specifically remember conversations from the period where the talking heads said that testing such technology on humans would have been unethical unless they identified a benefit to offset any (yet unquantified) risk.   

 

BTW, when you're talking about dinking about with RNA or DNA, "long term" means a lot longer than a few months.

 

I have no doubt that vaccines saved many lives, and were very appropriate for some segments of the population.  I've never been anti-vax.  Just anti-mandate, and very much in favor of full disclosure, allowing informed decisions. 

 

The claims below are completely false and had you read the link rather than edit it out you would already know that

 

57 minutes ago, impulse said:

They were prepared with everything but real tests on real people, because that would have been considered unethical.   Covid was a perfect reason to unleash the experiment.

There was no experiment. 30,000 People went through full clinical trials with Moderna and around 43,000 with Pfizer before they were submitted for emergency approval in the US. More trials carried out in other countries on thousands of people to. They are now all fully FDA approved.

 

  • Popular Post
3 hours ago, xylophone said:

Well, the mRNA aspect of the vaccine has been worked on and studied since the 1960s, but there was a problem in finding a way to get it delivered into the cells, however this was overcome when a method was found in the 1970s when nanotechnology advances were made.

 

More tests were carried out in the 1990s so when Covid hit, scientists and the medical profession were prepared.

 

Huge increases in funding for this research was spurred by the Covid 19 pandemic and allowed a huge increase in research into the area.

 

So it's hardly an exploratory drug (the research into it was being carried out over 60 years ago) and the same could be said for many other drugs and vaccines in use today (did the medical establishment know the potential long-term effects of the polio vaccine, for example, and the same goes for many others) so scaremongering is high on the list of the anti-brigade.

 

I put my trust in the medical profession rather than social media websites and the rubbish that gets posted on them.

 

https://publichealth.jhu.edu/2021/the-long-history-of-mrna-vaccines 

Albert Bourla, Pfizer CEO, does not share that view:

 

“mRNA was a technology, but we had less experience, only two years working on this, and actually, mRNA was a technology that never delivered a single product until that day, not vaccine, not any other medicine. So it was very counterintuitive, and I was surprised when they suggested to me that this is the way to go, and I questioned it. And I asked them to justify how can you say something like that, but they came, and they were very, very convinced that this is the right way to go.”

 

https://www.washingtonpost.com/washington-post-live/2022/03/10/transcript-wp-subscriber-exclusive-albert-bourla-author-moonshot-inside-pfizers-nine-month-race-make-impossible-possible/

  • Author

Nobel prize awarded for 'groundbreaking findings' that made mRNA vaccines possible

...

“Through their fundamental discoveries of the importance of base modifications in mRNA, this year's Nobel laureates critically contributed to this transformative development during one of the biggest health crises of our time,” according to the release.

 

Alongside the other vaccines against SARS-CoV-2, more than 13 billion COVID-19 vaccine doses have been administered around the world, saving the lives of millions and preventing severe disease in many more, as well as allowing society to return to relatively normal conditions, according to the release."

 

https://www.healio.com/news/primary-care/20231002/nobel-prize-awarded-for-groundbreaking-findings-that-made-mrna-vaccines-possible

 

  • Popular Post
10 minutes ago, Eleftheros said:

I can't get enough of those peer-reviewed Substack blogs .... it makes such a refreshing change from regurgitated government declarations.

And just like that… Substack becomes an approved, reliable source.

2 hours ago, impulse said:

They were prepared with everything but real tests on real people, because that would have been considered unethical.   Covid was a perfect reason to unleash the experiment.

 

Bottom line, we don't know what the long term effects will be simply because it hasn't been a long term.


Realizing that I'm speaking from a database of one, I'd give just about anything to go back and undo my 2nd Pfizer and get my health back.

 

There are ways to detox the body post-Covid jab, which have worked for some people. Feel free to PM me if uou are interested.

1 hour ago, impulse said:

I have no doubt that vaccines saved many lives, and were very appropriate for some segments of the population.  I've never been anti-vax.  Just anti-mandate, and very much in favor of full disclosure, allowing informed decisions.

This is a statement of your opinion. Nowt wrong with that.

 

I con't agree with your first-line sentiment. What segments of the population would that be?

 

But I do agree with the second line. the west's MSM have gradually turned the screw on opposing views. One of my major beefs, is with the compromised MSM. In the UK, we now have OFCOM saying what can and cannot be said on the www.

 

The BBC, was caught out many times during covid. Not heard them retract much.

  • Author
  • Popular Post
8 minutes ago, Eleftheros said:

The other guys quoted in support, a group called Healio are even funnier.

Again, I realize you have little to no familiarity with the concept of credible sources... so let me give you an example:

 

PRO-SCIENCE

Overall, we rate Healio Pro-Science based on well-sourced peer-reviewed research and low biased and factual news. We also rate them High for factual reporting due to proper sources and a clean fact-check record.

 

https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/healio/

 

8 hours ago, TallGuyJohninBKK said:

Again, I realize you have little to no familiarity with the concept of credible sources... so let me give you an example:

 

PRO-SCIENCE

Overall, we rate Healio Pro-Science based on well-sourced peer-reviewed research and low biased and factual news. We also rate them High for factual reporting due to proper sources and a clean fact-check record.

 

https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/healio/

 

Ah, the fabulous self-styled "fact-checkers" again. As they have earned no right to credibility, nor do the people they recommend.

 

They are not "credible" sources, but rather sources for the credulous.

 

 

13 minutes ago, Eleftheros said:

Ah, the fabulous self-styled "fact-checkers" again. As they have earned no right to credibility, nor do the people they recommend.

 

They are not "credible" sources, but rather sources for the credulous.

Facts and well-sourced peer-reviewed research as provided by the Pro-Science Healio seems to be a problem for you.

9 hours ago, rattlesnake said:

Albert Bourla, Pfizer CEO, does not share that view:

 

“mRNA was a technology, but we had less experience, only two years working on this, and actually, mRNA was a technology that never delivered a single product until that day, not vaccine, not any other medicine. So it was very counterintuitive, and I was surprised when they suggested to me that this is the way to go, and I questioned it. And I asked them to justify how can you say something like that, but they came, and they were very, very convinced that this is the right way to go.”

 

https://www.washingtonpost.com/washington-post-live/2022/03/10/transcript-wp-subscriber-exclusive-albert-bourla-author-moonshot-inside-pfizers-nine-month-race-make-impossible-possible/

In what way are you claiming Albert Bourla did not share that view? Nobody claimed human trialed vaccines or medicines had been delivered before via mRNA. He was also not involved in the decades of previous research and development  working on this technology. 

 

No one woke up on a morning in December and decided that an mRNA vaccine was the way to go without any prior knowledge of the science.

7 minutes ago, Bkk Brian said:

Facts and well-sourced peer-reviewed research as provided by the Pro-Science Healio seems to be a problem for you.

Let's say that I have a healthy and well-earned skepticism about large medical companies spruiking their own products.

2 minutes ago, Eleftheros said:

Let's say that I have a healthy and well-earned skepticism about large medical companies spruiking their own products.

Yes don't let facts get in the way of that skepticism

43 minutes ago, Bkk Brian said:

Yes don't let facts get in the way of that skepticism

Facts are what the skepticism is based on.

 

There's an important difference between "facts", and what "fact-checkers" say.

6 minutes ago, Eleftheros said:

Facts are what the skepticism is based on.

 

There's an important difference between "facts", and what "fact-checkers" say.

Really. Can you find some facts to support your claim in that link on Healio? 

2 hours ago, Bkk Brian said:

Yes don't let facts get in the way of that skepticism

What facts? Interesting to look at where these 'fact-checkers' get their funding.

 

In my opinion the medical, and sections of science peer reviewed papers are compromised nonsense. A well, researched and documented paper will not get 'peer reviewed' if it does not adhere to the main line. What is the main line? Simply follow the money.

 

Can't get a article in Lancet or Nature if it asks uncomfortable questions.. Just a big boy's club.

Just now, owl sees all said:

What facts? Interesting to look at where these 'fact-checkers' get their funding.

 

In my opinion the medical, and sections of science peer reviewed papers are compromised nonsense. A well, researched and documented paper will not get 'peer reviewed' if it does not adhere to the main line. What is the main line? Simply follow the money.

 

Can't get a article in Lancet or Nature if it asks uncomfortable questions.. Just a big boy's club.

"What facts?"

 

Show me some examples of where they got their facts wrong.

8 minutes ago, Bkk Brian said:

"What facts?"

 

Show me some examples of where they got their facts wrong.

Most fact-checkers regarding medical matters are, in my opinion, compromised. Look at who funds them. Don't bite the hand that feed you. As well as being compromised, they are starting from an unproven source. Going against nature.

 

If one builds a skyscraper in a swamp; sooner or later it will fail.

Just now, owl sees all said:

Most fact-checkers regarding medical matters are in my opinion compromised. Look at who funds them. Don't bite the hand that feed you. As well as being compromised, they are starting from an unproven source. Going against nature.

 

If one builds a skyscraper in a swamp; sooner or later it will fail.

Ok, so an opinion not based on facts, rather than real facts from the the fact checkers, thanks for the clarification

12 hours ago, rattlesnake said:

Albert Bourla, Pfizer CEO, does not share that view:

 

“mRNA was a technology, but we had less experience, only two years working on this, and actually, mRNA was a technology that never delivered a single product until that day, not vaccine, not any other medicine. So it was very counterintuitive, and I was surprised when they suggested to me that this is the way to go, and I questioned it. And I asked them to justify how can you say something like that, but they came, and they were very, very convinced that this is the right way to go.”

 

https://www.washingtonpost.com/washington-post-live/2022/03/10/transcript-wp-subscriber-exclusive-albert-bourla-author-moonshot-inside-pfizers-nine-month-race-make-impossible-possible/

You "cherry-picked" the above from an article thereby taking it out of context. mRNA was being worked on by other companies and the technology was known in the 1960s. There were other companies working with this technology, albeit much later on, such as: Moderna (who had a development pipeline of 21 programs), BioNTech, Sanofi, Translate Bio and Curevac.

 

The saving of millions of lives with the potential to wipe out many other diseases means this was a breakthrough of epic proportions.

7 minutes ago, Bkk Brian said:

Ok, so an opinion not based on facts, rather than real facts from the the fact checkers, thanks for the clarification

You have it completely the wrong way round.

 

Your position/stance is not based on any proven science or 'fact' or 'truth'. Evidence even!

 

Nature has the answers. It's been around for a lot longer than us. Nature shows us the way. Try to learn from it Brian.

 

Just now, owl sees all said:

You have it completely the wrong way round.

 

Your position/stance is not based on any proven science or 'fact' or 'truth'.

 

Nature has the answers. It's been around for a lot longer than us. Nature shows us the way. Try to learn from it Brian.

 

Nope, I keep it the right way round.

 

"Any alleged factual claims must be supported by a valid link to an approved credible source"

 

Do you have anything to discuss on the actual topic?

 

Covid-19 mRNA Vaccines Win Nobel Prize for Medicine 2023

 

 

8 minutes ago, Bkk Brian said:

Ok, so an opinion not based on facts, rather than real facts from the the fact checkers, thanks for the clarification

Don't forget that you are "talking" to a rabid anti-vaxxer, so nothing you post, even from the most reliable of sources, will sink in...........they are on the same wavelength as "the election was stolen" mob.

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.

Recently Browsing 0

  • No registered users viewing this page.

Account

Navigation

Search

Search

Configure browser push notifications

Chrome (Android)
  1. Tap the lock icon next to the address bar.
  2. Tap Permissions → Notifications.
  3. Adjust your preference.
Chrome (Desktop)
  1. Click the padlock icon in the address bar.
  2. Select Site settings.
  3. Find Notifications and adjust your preference.