US Supreme Court rules Colorado cannot ban Trump from presidential ballot

[candide]

5 minutes ago, TroubleandGrumpy said:

Whatever they were (and I think they were both instigators and protestors) and the protestors were dumb bast*** to walk inside and protest - the doors were opened for obvious reasons and they fell right into it.

B.S. (except the fact that Trump supporters are dumb! You said it! 😀)

[TroubleandGrumpy]

17 minutes ago, johnnybangkok said:

There is no debating you when you do not accept facts corroborated by the majority of the media. Instead you prefer to take the word of a pathological liar or the Twitter account of Kevin McCarthy.   

Only ignorant woke snowflake liberals believe the majority of the media.  People are realising that they are very much supporters of the Democrats and that they are biased - more and more people are turning away from the media. They see what happened to Trump, and when they compare that to what happens to Biden, with all the free passes and platitudes, they start to understand.  Just look at all the media hype about Trump being incompetent and unfit to be POTUS - and yet Biden is clearly showing mental incapacities and physical problems - not mentioned in media much at all.

 

Just to give you some wiggle room - one reason the media is not attacking Biden relentlessly like they did Trump, is because they have polarised themselves so much that their viewers only want to see positive things about Biden and negative about Trump. The vast majority of their viewers are left wing Democrat voters so they are focussed on doign what they want.  It was a miostake for them to take this approach, because they have lost at least half of their potential viewers.  The reason 'go woke go broke' is real as Bud Light and all the others are finding out, is that being obnoxious to one side of the political divide is bad business - that plus it is the right conservative side that spends more of their money on 'capitalistic' things. Sheer idiocy to align oneself as a business with that part of the political divide that hates capitalism and abhors product consumption as a means of wealth generation.

[TroubleandGrumpy]

6 minutes ago, candide said:

B.S. (except the fact that Trump supporters are dumb! You said it! 😀)

LOL - nice try. But your cognitive bias fails to see that I meant those that walked inside the Capitol. There were 10s of thousands who wisely stayed outside - many of them were calling to the others not to go inside.  Besides being wrong, it was obviously a trap - and it worked.  

[Eric Loh]

15 minutes ago, frank83628 said:

do you want clips of democrat maxine walters telling her audience to 'fight like hell' with regards ti the supreme court?

https://www.facebook.com/watch/?v=2726516057657653

She was not the President and leader of the Jan 6 insurrectionists. 

[candide]

4 minutes ago, TroubleandGrumpy said:

LOL - nice try. But your cognitive bias fails to see that I meant those that walked inside the Capitol. There were 10s of thousands who wisely stayed outside - many of them were calling to the others not to go inside.  Besides being wrong, it was obviously a trap - and it worked.  

Ok, if you wish, only those who assaulted the Capitol.

The rest if your post is the usual conspiracy theory deflection! 😀

It's not what has been shown in the Jan.6 rioters trials.

[candide]

7 minutes ago, Eric Loh said:

She was not the President and leader of the Jan 6 insurrectionists. 

That's the Trumpers' m.o. when they have no evidence: false equivalencies and conspiracy theories.

[G_Money]

4 hours ago, G_Money said:

An armed man does not equate to insurrectionist.  He’s an armed man and should be dealt with accordingly.

 

Did the officer do anything about it?
 

 

The officer did nothing because he was directed not to.

 

Pelosi needed to make sure her daughter had sufficient footage for Pelosi films Inc.

 

 

[frank83628]

30 minutes ago, candide said:

Deflection and lame false equivalence. She did not call protesters to march to the Capitol during election certification.

no, the point being, she used the same or very similar terminology.  if Trumps said go n smash the place up then fine, but he didn't, it was no different to hers, just a different setting.  as you are quick to do forget it...he actually said 'March peacefully'

[johnnybangkok]

28 minutes ago, TroubleandGrumpy said:

Only ignorant woke snowflake liberals believe the majority of the media.  People are realising that they are very much supporters of the Democrats and that they are biased - more and more people are turning away from the media. They see what happened to Trump, and when they compare that to what happens to Biden, with all the free passes and platitudes, they start to understand.  Just look at all the media hype about Trump being incompetent and unfit to be POTUS - and yet Biden is clearly showing mental incapacities and physical problems - not mentioned in media much at all.

 

Just to give you some wiggle room - one reason the media is not attacking Biden relentlessly like they did Trump, is because they have polarised themselves so much that their viewers only want to see positive things about Biden and negative about Trump. The vast majority of their viewers are left wing Democrat voters so they are focussed on doign what they want.  It was a miostake for them to take this approach, because they have lost at least half of their potential viewers.  The reason 'go woke go broke' is real as Bud Light and all the others are finding out, is that being obnoxious to one side of the political divide is bad business - that plus it is the right conservative side that spends more of their money on 'capitalistic' things. Sheer idiocy to align oneself as a business with that part of the political divide that hates capitalism and abhors product consumption as a means of wealth generation.

 

I don't respond to anyone who starts their rants with 'Only ignorant woke snowflake liberals...........'. There is no debating people like yourself. 

[frank83628]

2 minutes ago, johnnybangkok said:

 

I don't respond to anyone who starts their rants with 'Only ignorant woke snowflake liberals...........'. There is no debating people like yourself. 

similar to this one...

[candide]

6 minutes ago, frank83628 said:

no, the point being, she used the same or very similar terminology.  if Trumps said go n smash the place up then fine, but he didn't, it was no different to hers, just a different setting.  as you are quick to do forget it...he actually said 'March peacefully'

He just told them to stop the steal! 😀

 

Then how do you explain that he did not try to stop them after they started assaulting the Capitol, and waited for hours before telling them to go home?

 

If they had misunderstood him he could just have told them to stop assaulting the Capitol (instead of contacting congressmen to block the certification while watching it on TV).

 

 

[candide]

26 minutes ago, G_Money said:

The officer did nothing because he was directed not to.

 

Pelosi needed to make sure her daughter had sufficient footage for Pelosi films Inc.

 

 

Another B.S. conspiracy theory.

[heybruce]

3 hours ago, frank83628 said:

Trump offered Pelosi National Guard...she turned it down.

A post that could only come from a troll or someone who has actively sought to remain ignorant, and succeeded.

[heybruce]

1 hour ago, sirineou said:

I know right? 

and he swiftly put an end to it, and disassociate himself from them. 

 

I assume that's sarcasm.  Right?

 

You must be aware that Trump watched his supporters rampage through the Capitol for over three hours, ignoring all pleas to do something, then called them patriots, repeated the stolen election lie, and then asked them to go home.  You do know that, right?

[heybruce]

1 hour ago, frank83628 said:

do you want clips of democrat maxine walters telling her audience to 'fight like hell' with regards ti the supreme court?

https://www.facebook.com/watch/?v=2726516057657653

Did her followers storm the Supreme Court? 

 

No?  Perhaps her followers are smarter than Trump's.

[heybruce]

1 hour ago, G_Money said:

She had to make sure her daughter who was on standby, cameras ready to roll,  had footage to provide for the propaganda campaign to “get trump”.

Source?

[impulse]

1 hour ago, Eric Loh said:

Fox didn't aired that interview for a reason any person with an iota of a brain would figured out.  

The idea that any MSM would squelch an interview with the guy actually at the head of the Capitol Police that day probably has Walter Cronkite rolling over in his grave.  Disagree with the guy all you want.  Interview all the counter points and anyone who doesn't with agree his version.  Prove him wrong if you can.  But you'd better bring the receipts, because the guy kept copious notes and records from the day.

 

But why squelch it?  Unless, of course, it doesn't fit the narrative or it pisses off your sponsors.

 

[impulse]

2 minutes ago, heybruce said:

Did her followers storm the Supreme Court? 

 

No?  Perhaps her followers are smarter than Trump's.

 

Maybe not, but they did destroy quite a few city blocks during the Summer of Love and mostly peaceful store burnings.  Which probably went a long way to embolden stupid behavior on Jan 6.  After watching the other side get away with so much mayhem, not hard to believe some thought they could do stupid things and skate free, too.

 

[candide]

1 hour ago, impulse said:

 

If you've got an extra hour, here's a Tucker Carlson interview with Steven Sund, the Capitol Police Chief at the time of the Jan 6 protest.  The security failures on Jan 6 weren't failures as much as the plan.

 

https://tuckercarlson.com/the-tucker-carlson-encounter-steven-sund/

 

 

 

1 hour ago, frank83628 said:

thanks, i couldn't remember the dudes name. funny how these things are now only covered by independent journalists or outlets, msm & social media is totally corrupted and bought out. so much clear to see since 2016!

So where is it written in this interview transcript that "Trump offered Pelosi National Guard...she turned it down."? 😀

[impulse]

23 minutes ago, candide said:

Another B.S. conspiracy theory.

 

https://people.com/alexandra-pelosi-premieres-insurrectionist-next-door-documentary-8350462

 

[tomazbodner]

KFC and McDonald's are already setting up shops next to the White House...

[candide]

4 minutes ago, impulse said:

 

https://people.com/alexandra-pelosi-premieres-insurrectionist-next-door-documentary-8350462

 

So, where is it written that: 

Quote from your post:

"The officer did nothing because he was directed not to.

Pelosi needed to make sure her daughter had sufficient footage for Pelosi films Inc."

😀

B.S. conspiracy theory!

[G_Money]

16 minutes ago, heybruce said:

Source?

Scroll down a few posts.  

[candide]

4 minutes ago, G_Money said:

Scroll down a few posts.  

Where is it written in your source that: 

(Quote from your post):

"The officer did nothing because he was directed not to.

Pelosi needed to make sure her daughter had sufficient footage for Pelosi films Inc."

😀

[G_Money]

5 minutes ago, candide said:

Where is it written in your source that: 

(Quote from your post):

"The officer did nothing because he was directed not to.

Pelosi needed to make sure her daughter had sufficient footage for Pelosi films Inc."

😀

So, you are claiming Pelosi’s daughter was not there, cameras not ready for the propaganda campaign?

[xylophone]

1 hour ago, G_Money said:

She had to make sure her daughter who was on standby, cameras ready to roll,  had footage to provide for the propaganda campaign to “get trump”.

You are so funny with your nonsense!!!!! So funny in fact that you cannot be taken seriously.

[candide]

28 minutes ago, G_Money said:

So, you are claiming Pelosi’s daughter was not there, cameras not ready for the propaganda campaign?

Lame diversion! 😀

You wrote:

"The officer did nothing because he was directed not to.

Pelosi needed to make sure her daughter had sufficient footage for Pelosi films Inc."

 

Where is it written in your source that the officer was directed by Pelosi to do nothing?

[heybruce]

1 hour ago, impulse said:

 

Maybe not, but they did destroy quite a few city blocks during the Summer of Love and mostly peaceful store burnings.  Which probably went a long way to embolden stupid behavior on Jan 6.  After watching the other side get away with so much mayhem, not hard to believe some thought they could do stupid things and skate free, too.

 

If they thought the BLM protesters got away with it, they are truly stupid.  https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/factcheck/2022/02/22/fact-check-thousands-black-lives-matter-protesters-arrested-2020/6816074001/

[heybruce]

58 minutes ago, G_Money said:

Scroll down a few posts.  

I did.  Nothing supports your post "She had to make sure her daughter who was on standby, cameras ready to roll,  had footage to provide for the propaganda campaign to “get trump”. "

[impulse]

46 minutes ago, heybruce said:

If they thought the BLM protesters got away with it, they are truly stupid.  https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/factcheck/2022/02/22/fact-check-thousands-black-lives-matter-protesters-arrested-2020/6816074001/

Getting arrested in a Blue city is meaningless.  How many went to prison?  Not to jail for a few hours waiting on a bail hearing...  To prison? 

 

Edit:  And more to the point, how many BLM'ers went to prison for non-violent offenses like being in the wrong place?