BREAKING NEWS! Iran potentially triggers World War 3

[Nick Carter icp]

1 hour ago, Neeranam said:

 

 

Can we talk about the lack of Muslims in the Senate/Congress?

 

   Not in this thread no , this thread is about Iran attacking Israel 

[sirineou]

1 hour ago, Nick Carter icp said:

 Could you expand a bit more on the Iranian citizens killed in the consulate strike ?

If I need to explain that then we have nothing to talk about. Read the news . 7  iranians killed. 

 

1 hour ago, Nick Carter icp said:

Were they just ordinary citizens visiting the consulate to get their passports renewed or where they there for some other reason ?

Employees of an embassy are legitimate targets? Are you for reel?

1 hour ago, Nick Carter icp said:

Like organising terror attacks ? 

The bomb's stopped and asked. "Are you organising terror attacks? "

" Why no sir" " " Oh ok carry on" 

" How about you? Are you organising terror attacks?" 

" Why no sir" " " Oh ok carry on" 

"OK !! How about you? Are you organising terror attacks? "

" "Well a little bit.  ohh crap "  " Boom!!"

I love these targeted munitions! 

[transam]

1 hour ago, Neeranam said:

Another one weaponizing antisemitism. 

There is absolutely nothing wrong with pointing out that Biden's administration has more Jews that any other religion. 

 

Can we talk about the lack of Muslims in the Senate/Congress?

 

Of course the US falsify the number of Muslims in the country. Inaccurate representation of Muslim communities in the Census has significant implications for political representation.

Isn't there a voting system for that in the USA......?  🤔

 

So it would seem not only are you anti-Jew, you are Pro-Muslim, the reason why you make excuses for terrorists, and lambast Thai folk talking to you in English........🤔

[rabas]

9 minutes ago, Bangkok Barry said:

A question for those leaders protesting in the strongest possible terms about Iran attacking Israel - what would you do if a country attacked and destroyed one of your consulates, killing many inside? Hmm?

You need to ask Jimmy Carter.  

 

BTW the 'many killed' inside the ancillary consulate annex were mostly non consulate  IRGC global terrorist senior officers up to illegal activity.  This  included general Mohammad Reza Zahedil who helped plan the unconscionable October 7 massacre of women and children in Israel.

 

Reference [here]. Reliability of the reference. [here]

 

I would like to ask you up front, do any of these facts make any difference to you?

 

If not, why not?

[Nick Carter icp]

1 minute ago, sirineou said:

If I need to explain that then we have nothing to talk about. Read the news . 7  iranians killed. 

 

Employees of an embassy are legitimate targets? Are you for reel?

The bomb's stopped and asked. "Are you organising terror attacks? "

" Why no sir" " " Oh ok carry on" 

" How about you? Are you organising terror attacks?" 

" Why no sir" " " Oh ok carry on" 

"OK !! How about you? Are you organising terror attacks? "

" "Well a little bit.  ohh crap "  " Boom!!"

I love these targeted munitions! 

 

   The people killed by Israel in the consulate attack were members of Iranian terror groups , Hezbollah and............................well heres the full list :

  The 16 killed were 

 

• 7 Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps soldiers
• 5 Iran-backed militiamen
• 1 Hezbollah fighter
• 1 Iranian advisor
• 2 civilians

 

 

 

[Brickleberry]

41 minutes ago, transam said:

You missed out one word, "terrorists", that goes in between many and inside....😉

In which case, probably............

 

This is just childish. Calling a country's army 'terrorists'.

[Yellowtail]

18 hours ago, Brickleberry said:

 

You do not understand. Here is what the US says about annexes:

 

https://diplomacy.state.gov/what-is-a-u-s-embassy/#:~:text=The U.S. Embassy Building,often architectural works of art.

 

"As the public faces of the United States in host countries, embassies are often architectural works of art."

 

Indeed:

 

[Nick Carter icp]

4 minutes ago, Brickleberry said:

 

This is just childish. Calling a country's army 'terrorists'.

 

  They are actually a terror group and terrorists from our perspective  , although you would refer to them as heroes and freedom fighters .

   Hezbollah are also not Lebanon's army , they are a militant group

[transam]

8 minutes ago, Brickleberry said:

 

This is just childish. Calling a country's army 'terrorists'.

😂............I had a good laugh at that..........😂

[The Theory]

World War III has just begun by asiannow members.,🤔🤨😄😆😂🤣

[Brickleberry]

31 minutes ago, rabas said:

You need to ask Jimmy Carter.  

 

BTW the 'many killed' inside the ancillary consulate annex were mostly non consulate  IRGC global terrorist senior officers up to illegal activity.  This  included general Mohammad Reza Zahedil who helped plan the unconscionable October 7 massacre of women and children in Israel.

 

Reference [here]. Reliability of the reference. [here]

 

I would like to ask you up front, do any of these facts make any difference to you?

 

If not, why not?

 

No, they do not make any difference at all.

 

Firstly, you assume that because the staff killed were non-consulate, then it's OK. Unfortunately, you are wrong. The buildings themselves are inviolable , and must be protected under international law. This was a massive attack, completely flouting diplomatic norms and international law. How do you not get this? 

 

It is illegal to bomb an embassy building, consulate building, annex, whatever you want to use to try and worm your way around the vocabulary, it is illegal. Period.

 

Secondly, you mistakenly labelled the IRGC as a terrorist group. It is not. IRGC is the elite wing of the regular standing army. You may wish to call them terrorists, but they are not.

 

Thirdly, you are wrong about him helping to plan the Oct 7 attack. This is Israeli propaganda and lies. Even if you were right, this still does not make it a legal action. Could you imagine if America bombed Ecuador's embassy in the UK to get Julian Assange? Do you think that would be OK? Of course not. We must all follow the law, or we shall all become beasts.

 

 

[Brickleberry]

2 minutes ago, transam said:

😂............I had a good laugh at that..........😂

It is ridiculous. It's like calling the SAS a bunch of clowns. Or the Marines a bunch of P*ssies. Grow up and contribute something to the conversation, or just leave.

[transam]

1 minute ago, Brickleberry said:

 

No, they do not make any difference at all.

 

Firstly, you assume that because the staff killed were non-consulate, then it's OK. Unfortunately, you are wrong. The buildings themselves are inviolable , and must be protected under international law. This was a massive attack, completely flouting diplomatic norms and international law. How do you not get this? 

 

It is illegal to bomb an embassy building, consulate building, annex, whatever you want to use to try and worm your way around the vocabulary, it is illegal. Period.

 

Secondly, you mistakenly labelled the IRGC as a terrorist group. It is not. IRGC is the elite wing of the regular standing army. You may wish to call them terrorists, but they are not.

 

Thirdly, you are wrong about him helping to plan the Oct 7 attack. This is Israeli propaganda and lies. Even if you were right, this still does not make it a legal action. Could you imagine if America bombed Ecuador's embassy in the UK to get Julian Assange? Do you think that would be OK? Of course not. We must all follow the law, or we shall all become beasts.

 

 

Nice try, no cigar though...........

[sirineou]

31 minutes ago, Nick Carter icp said:

 The people killed by Israel in the consulate attack were members of Iranian terror groups , Hezbollah and............................well heres the full list :

So the soverntry of a n embassy is conditional to the opinion of the opposition. 

Would you suppose there are any millinery personal and or spooks in the American embassy? And if so does that make them a legitimate target for a military attack? 

By the way, could you please provide a link to your source of who was killed in the attack. It seems you forgot to do so. 

[transam]

Just now, Brickleberry said:

It is ridiculous. It's like calling the SAS a bunch of clowns. Or the Marines a bunch of P*ssies. Grow up and contribute something to the conversation, or just leave.

😂....So you want a one-way street, eh, not from me...................😂 

[transam]

Just now, sirineou said:

So the soverntry of a n embassy is conditional to the opinion of the opposition. 

Would you suppose there are any millinery personal and or spooks in the American embassy? And if so does that make them a legitimate target for a military attack? 

By the way, could you please provide a link to your source of who was killed in the attack. It seems you forgot to do so. 

A Consulate is not an Embassy..........😉

[AustinRacing]

On 4/14/2024 at 9:38 AM, JackGats said:

A decade and a half ago Jimmy Carter said Israel had about 123 nuclear warheads in its arsenal. Best thing for Israel could be to nuke Iran before it's too late. A small country like Israel can only have a first-strike nuclear doctrine unless it equips itself with a submarine deterrent.

So bombing an embassy killing officials of a sovereign state is ok, right? Iran’s reaction was in accordance with international laws. Isreal is on the way out unless they get rid of Stone Age politicians. 

[Bkk Brian]

4 minutes ago, Brickleberry said:

 

No, they do not make any difference at all.

 

Firstly, you assume that because the staff killed were non-consulate, then it's OK. Unfortunately, you are wrong. The buildings themselves are inviolable , and must be protected under international law. This was a massive attack, completely flouting diplomatic norms and international law. How do you not get this? 

 

It is illegal to bomb an embassy building, consulate building, annex, whatever you want to use to try and worm your way around the vocabulary, it is illegal. Period.

 

Secondly, you mistakenly labelled the IRGC as a terrorist group. It is not. IRGC is the elite wing of the regular standing army. You may wish to call them terrorists, but they are not.

 

Thirdly, you are wrong about him helping to plan the Oct 7 attack. This is Israeli propaganda and lies. Even if you were right, this still does not make it a legal action. Could you imagine if America bombed Ecuador's embassy in the UK to get Julian Assange? Do you think that would be OK? Of course not. We must all follow the law, or we shall all become beasts.

 

 

Secondly, you mistakenly labelled the IRGC as a terrorist group. It is not. IRGC is the elite wing of the regular standing army. You may wish to call them terrorists, but they are not.

 

Yes they are

 

The US State Department designated the IRGC as a whole as a foreign terrorist organization (FTO) in April 2019

[Nick Carter icp]

2 minutes ago, Brickleberry said:

 

No, they do not make any difference at all.

 

Firstly, you assume that because the staff killed were non-consulate, then it's OK. Unfortunately, you are wrong. The buildings themselves are inviolable , and must be protected under international law. This was a massive attack, completely flouting diplomatic norms and international law. How do you not get this? 

 

It is illegal to bomb an embassy building, consulate building, annex, whatever you want to use to try and worm your way around the vocabulary, it is illegal. Period.

 

Secondly, you mistakenly labelled the IRGC as a terrorist group. It is not. IRGC is the elite wing of the regular standing army. You may wish to call them terrorists, but they are not.

 

Thirdly, you are wrong about him helping to plan the Oct 7 attack. This is Israeli propaganda and lies. Even if you were right, this still does not make it a legal action. Could you imagine if America bombed Ecuador's embassy in the UK to get Julian Assange? Do you think that would be OK? Of course not. We must all follow the law, or we shall all become beasts.

 

 

 

   You are completely wrong .

Embassies only have those protections from their host Country .

Isreal could not bomb any Embassy on Israeli soil .

But any Embassies abroad can be bombed .

Embassy's only have protection from the Countries where they are situated .

Like, Syria couldn't bomb the Embassy , but Israel can 

[ezzra]

As I said already in numerous posts, Iran is the head of a snake that sponsor, finance and facilitate world-wide 

terrorism and OPENLY calls and acts for the inhalations and destruction of another country, something that unheard of

among civilised countries, and as such, they should be dealt severely and by full force, no punishment is too much

and just the US restrain Israel from using its ultimate weapons of judgement day that Israel is not using them...

[Nick Carter icp]

5 minutes ago, sirineou said:

So the soverntry of a n embassy is conditional to the opinion of the opposition. 

Would you suppose there are any millinery personal and or spooks in the American embassy? And if so does that make them a legitimate target for a military attack? 

By the way, could you please provide a link to your source of who was killed in the attack. It seems you forgot to do so. 

 

   I haver no idea about any USA Embassy .

I will go and do a websearch for the list and post it.........................   and here it is

 

 

 

 

 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Israeli_bombing_of_the_Iranian_embassy_in_Damascus

 

Casualties	16 killed[4][5] 7 Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps soldiers 5 Iran-backed militiamen 1 Hezbollah fighter 1 Iranian advisor 2 civilians

 

 

 

[Brickleberry]

6 minutes ago, transam said:

A Consulate is not an Embassy..........😉

 

But as you participated in the discussion yesterday, you already know this is irrelevant. Consulates, embassies and any buildings on an embassy's or consulate's compound (an annex) are inviolable under international law.

[Nick Carter icp]

1 minute ago, Brickleberry said:

 

But as you participated in the discussion yesterday, you already know this is irrelevant. Consulates, embassies and any buildings on an embassy's or consulate's compound (an annex) are inviolable under international law.

 

  No they are not .

Embassies/Consulates  only have legal protection from the country where they are located 

[transam]

3 minutes ago, ezzra said:

As I said already in numerous posts, Iran is the head of a snake that sponsor, finance and facilitate world-wide 

terrorism and OPENLY calls and acts for the inhalations and destruction of another country, something that unheard of

among civilised countries, and as such, they should be dealt severely and by full force, no punishment is too much

and just the US restrain Israel from using its ultimate weapons of judgement day that Israel is not using them...

Your first para, I find it strange that some here don't understand that.

But then again, it is probably that they don't want to understand it, because of their own personal agenda......

[transam]

4 minutes ago, Brickleberry said:

 

But as you participated in the discussion yesterday, you already know this is irrelevant. Consulates, embassies and any buildings on an embassy's or consulate's compound (an annex) are inviolable under international law.

Do consulates run as private enterprise, can they do what they like, hide/shield who they like. I don't know, but I am sure you will clarify for me......😉

[ezzra]

Israel posses the ultimate weapons of mess destruction to deal with such murderous regimes who calls

for the total distraction of the state of Israel and no matter what, and if it wasn't for the US, they

would have paid dearly for their direct attack on Israel...

[2baht]

Run for the hills, Pikey!

[Bkk Brian]

8 minutes ago, 2baht said:

Run for the hills, Pikey!

We all know you meant Kikey the ethnic slur for a Jew. Outed yourself

[Bkk Brian]

Significant events leading to the attack on Israel:

 

1. HAMAS ATTACKS ISRAEL

2. HEZBOLLAH JOINS THE WAR, AT A LOW LEVEL

3. HOUTHIS STAGE ATTACKS

4. ISRAEL WIDELY BLAMED FOR DAMASCUS STRIKE

5. IRAN LAUNCHES MAJOR AERIAL ASSAULT ON ISRAEL

 

More in article below

 

Iran and Israel have a history of enmity. What key recent events led to Iran’s assault on Israel?

https://apnews.com/article/iran-israel-attack-missile-drone-2df3508a73e8919050baf29b60855210

[billd766]

On 4/14/2024 at 9:38 AM, JackGats said:

A decade and a half ago Jimmy Carter said Israel had about 123 nuclear warheads in its arsenal. Best thing for Israel could be to nuke Iran before it's too late. A small country like Israel can only have a first-strike nuclear doctrine unless it equips itself with a submarine deterrent.

Great plan.

 

Murder 80 million people and don't care where the nuclear radiation fallout goes afterwards.

 

 

On 4/14/2024 at 10:38 AM, Ben Zioner said:

 

Posted in error.