Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
8 minutes ago, ChicagoExpat said:

Well, Gweiloman, there was "no attack on a civilian beach".  It was an intercepted missile that unfortunately fell on civilians.  This is the problem when you rely on Eastern Axis media for your information -- they actually do exactly what you say above and when they do it's a lie.

 

So, this is YOUR chance to condemn Russia's war (no such thing as an SMO) as disgusting, sickening, despicable, etc.  Because all of these people you allegedly care about are dead because of the war (no such thing as an SMO) you "condone."

 

The difference is the Russians purposefully, regularly from the start of this war (no such thing as an SMO) target civilians.  See the difference?  Russia starts a war (no such thing as an SMO) and is responsible for ALL deaths overall in the war (no such thing as an SMO), in the same way Germany was for WW2. 

 

 

Ukrainian officials have defended the strike in the wake of the attack, calling Crimea a legitimate target. 

Mykhailo Podolyak - a top aide to President Volodymyr Zelensky - said the peninsula was in effect "a large military camp" which he said held "hundreds of direct military targets, which the Russians are cynically trying to hide and cover up with their own civilians".

 

Sounds suspiciously like something the IDF would say in killing hundreds of Palestinians.

 

And using cluster bombs? Aren’t these supposedly designed to kill rather than to destroy buildings?

  • Thumbs Up 1
  • Haha 1
Posted
4 hours ago, Bkk Brian said:

Russia the boy who cried wolf far too many times. 

 

Russia pins Dagestan attack on Ukraine, ignoring religious tensions

Mr Gadzhiev suggested that the intelligence services of Ukraine and Nato countries may have orchestrated the attacks. He provided no evidence to back up his accusation.

And when the pro-Kremlin news site Komsomolskaya Pravda reported on events in Dagestan, it accused the “collective West” of trying “to open a second front” against Russia.

The writer continued: “When it comes to unrest in this region traditionally it’s the ears of British intelligence that stick out.”

https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cj555p05yl4o

Yes -- the concert attack?  The United States and Jews!  The Dagestan attack?  The Brits (and likely Jews)!  And the funny thing is the people most likely to believe this are not Russians themselves but their fellow travelers who enjoy life in the West -- the Gweilomans, the BangkokBobs, etc.  Russians know what they're fed is BS but know that to question it leads to unfortunate results.  The useful idiots naive lap it up and ask for more.

  • Like 1
  • Confused 1
Posted
18 hours ago, Gweiloman said:

Tik tok about to be banned. DJI drones about to be banned. 100% tariffs on products we are unable to efficiently produce. If you don’t do as we tell you, you will be sanctioned. You are not allowed to sell your products to certain countries. The,police can’t guarantee your safety; after all, we kill 3 of you a day, on average.

 

Welcome to the free world! Errr… thanks but no thanks.

I agree these are issues worth debating.  But that's the thing -- in the West we can debate them -- in the countries you support debate isn't possible.  And, it's true, one of the advantages to dictatorships is low crime.

 

Now that I've commented on the substance of what you wrote (something you avoid every time) let's talk about your motive.  Is it freedom you really care about?  If so, you wouldn't support Iran/Russia/China/North Korea, the most repressive countries on earth.

  • Like 1
  • Thumbs Up 1
Posted
51 minutes ago, ChicagoExpat said:

I agree these are issues worth debating.  But that's the thing -- in the West we can debate them -- in the countries you support debate isn't possible.  And, it's true, one of the advantages to dictatorships is low crime.

 

Now that I've commented on the substance of what you wrote (something you avoid every time) let's talk about your motive.  Is it freedom you really care about?  If so, you wouldn't support Iran/Russia/China/North Korea, the most repressive countries on earth.

You keep on banging that drum that anyone not supporting western lies must be supporting Iran/Russia/China/North Korea, which is obviously garbage.

Perhaps we don't like that "our side" is not on the side of right, in our opinions.

  • Thumbs Up 2
Posted
4 hours ago, stevenl said:

The sad thing is that some of them don't even realize this 

The sad thing is that some posters believe western propaganda, that anyone not supporting the western story must be Russian stooges.

  • Thumbs Up 2
Posted
1 minute ago, thaibeachlovers said:

The sad thing is that some posters believe western propaganda, that anyone not supporting the western story must be Russian stooges.

Says a Russian stooge..................:coffee1:

  • Like 1
  • Confused 1
  • Sad 1
  • Thumbs Up 1
Posted
5 minutes ago, BobBKK said:

Don't be naive, this is a war,  50 million died in the last big one, WW2, that's what war does, people die, supposed innocents die, true innocents die.  War is a human condition,. it has been so ever since humans have roamed the Earth.  It will always be so.  Just hope that you and yours don't get caught up in one.  And If you do, well, its one of the prices of being human and sentient.   

  • Like 2
  • Confused 1
Posted
7 minutes ago, thaibeachlovers said:

You keep on banging that drum that anyone not supporting western lies must be supporting Iran/Russia/China/North Korea, which is obviously garbage.

Perhaps we don't like that "our side" is not on the side of right, in our opinions.

Here's 5 minutes' effort of looking at a small portion of your past comments.  They all reflect pro-Russian talking points: this war is the West's fault, it is hopeless and Ukraine should immediately surrender, if there is a nuclear war it's the West's fault, Ukraine has rejected all of Russia's reasonable efforts to avoid violence, Russia had no choice, glee over Ukrainian misfortune, etc.  Not a SINGLE comment that shows any substantive criticism of Russia for starting the war.  For someone who purports to be bothered by "western lies", Russian ones sure seem to agree with you.

 

Short of nuclear war, which would likely be triggered by western actions ( NATO troops in Ukraine etc )

Zelensky should have considered that going into a war without the home grown resources to continue it was not a good idea a couple years ago.

It's called "escalation" and will likely end up MAD. European leaders will be able to observe the blackened remains of their cities as they emerge from their shelters and be able to say, "we had to destroy the country to save it from Putin".

Pity about the Abrams, LOL.

Nah. Putin knows if he backs down on this the US and it's allies will seize on it to hurt Russia.

IMO it's simply a case of waiting for Zelensky to admit that sending more men to die is not going to change that and negotiating an end.

Perhaps if the rest of the ( western ) world didn't try to move nukes up to the Russian border Putin wouldn't start any wars.

Russia's red line as stated long ago was Ukraine in NATO.

I'm pretty sure that I know what the average Ukrainian man is thinking as they hope to not be sent to the front, but I have zero idea of what will be in the minds of the western leaders as they survey the likely end of their proxy war on terms not of their choosing. Do they feel any guilt for all the young men that died because of them, are they concerned for the ordinary Ukrainian shivering in the dark of winter, will they ever accept that it was a bad idea, or is it all someone else's fault?

Perhaps they should have thought about that before they rejected negotiations. Always a losing prospect depending on countries that may have domestic issues affecting public/ government support.

Given that no western country has a treaty with Ukraine, none are obligated to help.

Oh dear oh dear, is it all going wrong for Mr Zelensky ( and all the Ukrainians that will die in this proxy war )?

  • Like 1
  • Sad 1
Posted
6 minutes ago, ChicagoExpat said:

Here's 5 minutes' effort of looking at a small portion of your past comments. 

Pull the other one. That's way more than 5 minutes worth. Are you keeping a file on everyone that you have a problem with? You do know that stalking is against forum rules, don't you?

  • Love It 1
  • Haha 1
Posted
14 minutes ago, transam said:

Says a Russian stooge..................:coffee1:

 Can't you debate without insults constantly?  it's all AD HOMINEM  day in, day out

  • Sad 1
  • Thanks 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.




×
×
  • Create New...