Jump to content

Yes she should or not  

91 members have voted

  1. 1. If Harris wins.

    • No
      67
    • Yes
      10

This poll is closed to new votes

  • Please sign in or register to vote in this poll.
  • Poll closed on 09/22/2024 at 06:30 PM

Recommended Posts

Posted
4 minutes ago, Lacessit said:

That's nice in theory.

 

In practice, very few people trained in critical thinking, or how to evaluate data. How to ask the right questions.

 

Climate change and global warming are good examples.

 

95% of scientists know the two are caused by human activity. The other 5% have a vested interest in denial, much like scientists who work in the tobacco and alcohol industry.


When only 0.5% of the world's population are scientists, it's very easy to outnumber them on social media with scientifically illiterate posters.

What are you going on about :cheesy:

  • Thanks 1
Posted
1 hour ago, KhunLA said:

Fool me once ... fool me twice is on me.

 

fool me once..shame on.... shame on you....fool me...you can't get fooled again. 

  • Agree 1
Posted
3 hours ago, KhunLA said:

What are you going on about :cheesy:

The data part has been confirmed for fifty years. The only thing missing is the solutions part which is a problem for Exxon and the Koch family.

  • Like 1
  • Agree 1
Posted
13 hours ago, KhunLA said:

Why would Trump need a pardon, or even a commutation of sentence (jail) since not sentences for anything yet, and doubtful jail time will be in any sentence.  If so, on indefinite appeal till it gets to the SCOTUS.

 

Just another bash Trump thread ...  :coffee1:

 

If there was only a safe & effective vaccine for that syndrome :cheesy:

So you don't think that Harris should pardon Trump.

  • Like 2
Posted
56 minutes ago, Danderman123 said:

So you don't think that Harris should pardon Trump.

I can't even comment on such a silly 'what if' scenario.

 

Who even thinks of this sh!t :cheesy:

 

What if, that big A$$ rock headed toward earth in 2036, is guaranteed to hit earth, should we let all the criminals in jail out a few hours before ? :coffee1:

Posted (edited)
4 minutes ago, KhunLA said:

I can't even comment on such a silly 'what if' scenario.

 

Who even thinks of this sh!t :cheesy:

 

What if, that big A$$ rock headed toward earth in 2036, is guaranteed to hit earth, should we let all the criminals in jail out a few hours before ? :coffee1:

You can bet that Trump is thinking about it.

 

If he loses badly, he might cut a deal to not contest the election in exchange for a pardon.

Edited by Danderman123
  • Like 1
Posted
1 minute ago, Danderman123 said:

You can bet that Trump is thinking about it.

 

If he loses badly, he might cut a deal to not contest the election in exchange for a pardon.

Seriously

When has any loser, contested and won afterwards ?  Are y'all nuts :coffee1:

Posted
1 minute ago, Danderman123 said:

Trump gave it a try in 2020. Is he nuts?

Like I said, never will happen ... you forgot Gore

5 minutes ago, KhunLA said:

Seriously

When has any loser, contested and won afterwards ?  Are y'all nuts :coffee1:

 

Posted
3 minutes ago, Danderman123 said:

Trump gave it a try in 2020. Is he nuts?

And Pence as the VP said it was illegal. What is Harris going to say about the same BS?

  • Like 1
Posted

Too many posters here get ALL their information about Trump from ABC, CNN, MSNBC, etc. You probably even believe that he's Hitler as they say. LOL!

  • Haha 1
  • Agree 1
Posted
21 hours ago, Lacessit said:

The Jan 6 insurrection, fake electors, and theft of top secret documents are all serious criminal matters.

 

I suppose you are confirming how screwed up the American legal system is. In many countries, Trump would be in jail already.

I saw charges

related to top secret documents was thrown out yesterday..

  • Thanks 1
Posted
18 hours ago, impulse said:

 

Every president in my lifetime has gotten into a kerfuffle about taking their personal papers when they left the White House.  Trump's the only one that's been prosecuted for it.  Dismissing the case was the only way the American legal system could work properly.

He did not take only personal papers is the problem with your thesis. Top secret US documents do not fit that description in any way, shape, or form.

  • Like 1
  • Agree 1
Posted
7 hours ago, KhunLA said:

I can't even comment on such a silly 'what if' scenario.

 

Who even thinks of this sh!t :cheesy:

 

What if, that big A$$ rock headed toward earth in 2036, is guaranteed to hit earth, should we let all the criminals in jail out a few hours before ? :coffee1:

"I can't even comment on such a silly 'what if' scenario."

Then why post in this thread? After all what you can't comment about is the thread topic.

  • Like 1
Posted
21 minutes ago, stevenl said:

"I can't even comment on such a silly 'what if' scenario."

Then why post in this thread? After all what you can't comment about is the thread topic.

First post in thread was relative to topic.  The rest were replies to silly replies to me, such as.

Posted

Presidential pardons are a travesty of justice. Who get pardoned? The rich, the famous, the related, and most perniciously, politicians.

  • Agree 1
Posted
23 hours ago, Will B Good said:

Personally no.......rich people all over the world literally get away with murder because their position and wealth.

 

However, it might be a smart move to pardon him in the interests of the US generally.

 

 

 

You are suggesting pardoning him as you think his more extreme followers would cause mass civil unrest but how about pardoning him because the charges against him were all politically motivated?

  • Confused 1
  • Sad 1
  • Agree 2

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.




×
×
  • Create New...