Bank Savings Interest Rates 2023

[webfact]

Picture courtesy: Springnews

 

Prime Minister Paetongtarn Shinawatra has found herself under scrutiny following a petition filed by Ruangkrai Leekitwattana, a frequent petitioner, accusing her of breaching media freedoms. Mr Ruangkrai has claimed that her recent interactions with the press could result in her removal from office.

 

On Monday, Mr Ruangkrai submitted a formal request to the Election Commission (EC), urging an investigation into Ms Paetongtarn's response to a journalist during a press interaction. He argues that her remarks were not befitting a public officeholder, potentially breaching Section 184 of Thailand's Constitution. If verified, this could lead to the prime minister losing her position as dictated by Section 170.

 

The controversy began during a media engagement at Government House. A particular interaction, featured on the ch3plus.com website, captured the prime minister's dissatisfaction with reporting related to the government's stance on constitutional amendments. This stemmed from a query about disagreements with coalition parties regarding proposed amendments perceived as a policy reversal.

Ms Paetongtarn expressed her preference that such questions be avoided, reiterating that coalition consultations on key issues occur regularly. She also noted that current government priorities were focused on flood relief efforts, pushing amendments to a lower priority.

 

The prime minister further suggested that cohesive governance was in the national interest, cautioning against questions that might incite division. Mr Ruangkrai, however, contends that her responses could be seen as infringing on the media's constitutional rights to report on governmental affairs.

 

This is Mr Ruangkrai's second petition against Ms Paetongtarn, the first being an accusation of ethical misconduct related to appointing advisors with criminal records. The EC's findings will dictate whether the matter escalates to the Constitutional Court for a conclusive ruling, reported Bangkok Post.

 

-- 2024-10-15

 

 

[Gottfrid]

35 minutes ago, webfact said:

Prime Minister Paetongtarn Shinawatra has found herself under scrutiny following a petition filed by Ruangkrai Leekitwattana, a frequent petitioner, accusing her of breaching media freedoms. Mr Ruangkrai has claimed that her recent interactions with the press could result in her removal from office.

So, in other words he say exactly like every other time he file a petition. The modus operandi resembles a serial killer armed with paper.

[dinsdale]

2 hours ago, webfact said:

On Monday, Mr Ruangkrai submitted a formal request to the Election Commission (EC), urging an investigation into Ms Paetongtarn's response to a journalist during a press interaction. He argues that her remarks were not befitting a public officeholder, potentially breaching Section 184 of Thailand's Constitution. If verified, this could lead to the prime minister losing her position as dictated by Section 170.

 

Edited 5 hours ago by dinsdale

[Aussie999]

If, as he said " infringing on the media's constitutional rights to report on governmental affairs<" is true, and he is a strong supporter of freedom of speak, then why so quiet now, with so many  breaches from the previous "government," there has not been such freedoms, for many years, this guy just does not like a female PM.

[Tropicalevo]

The dinosaurs and their 'nominees' are getting desperate now.

What next - start a petition because she had her hair cut on a Wednesday?

[cnx101]

Don’t worry dad”ll sort it.

[spidermike007]

The prime minister further suggested that cohesive governance was in the national interest, cautioning against questions that might incite division. 

 

In plain speak what she meant to say is I am the daughter of a billionaire, I am very privileged, typically I'm treated as high society, and now that I'm in the public realm I don't appreciate being questioned. All of you need to show a greater sense of fealty, and realize that we have no interest in engaging in and open and frank discussions here. These press conferences are window dressing meant to convince the most naive amongst the population, that Thailand is a functional democracy. 

[bradiston]

4 hours ago, Gottfrid said:

So, in other words he say exactly like every other time he file a petition. The modus operandi resembles a serial killer armed with paper.

Exactly. His profile is that of a stalker. Obsessive and dangerous. I would get a restraining order if I was Ung. Her dad should intervene. His daughter's being harassed by a mentally unstable old man.

[bradiston]

Just now, spidermike007 said:

The prime minister further suggested that cohesive governance was in the national interest, cautioning against questions that might incite division. 

 

In plain speak what she meant to say is I am the daughter of a billionaire, I am very privileged, typically I'm treated as high society, and now that I'm in the public realm I don't appreciate being questioned. All of you need to show a greater sense of fealty, and realize that we have no interest in engaging in and open and frank discussions here. These press conferences are window dressing meant to convince the most naive amongst the population, that Thailand is a functional democracy. 

Get over it spider. No means no!

[bradiston]

1 hour ago, Aussie999 said:

If, as he said " infringing on the media's constitutional rights to report on governmental affairs<" is true, and he is a strong supporter of freedom of speak, then why so quiet now, with so many  breaches from the previous "government," there has not been such freedoms, for many years, this guy just does not like a female PM.

Who does he like?

[bradiston]

2 hours ago, dinsdale said:

 

Well remembered. And many other rudenesses. And what about Moo Wit? Lashing out with a flipper?

[RamblingOn]

2 hours ago, dinsdale said:

 

1984, some are more equal then the others!!

[lordgrinz]

32 minutes ago, bradiston said:

Who does he like?

 

I'm betting not even himself, anybody know if he has brought allegations against himself? 🤪Maybe someone should suggest it?

[bradiston]

Just now, lordgrinz said:

 

I'm betting not even himself, anybody know if he has brought allegations against himself? 🤪Maybe someone should suggest it?

Maybe somebody should petition the courts to have him disbarred.

[hotchilli]

Welcome to the hot seat, where all your actions, words will be scrutinsed...

get used to it.

[scorecard]

55 minutes ago, cnx101 said:

Don’t worry dad”ll sort it.

 

That's if you can get him out of the family swimming pool along with his grand kids. 

[harryviking]

Another removal of a politician!? YEAH, bring it on! Next please!🤣

Edited 16 minutes ago by harryviking