Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
Just now, spidermike007 said:

The prime minister further suggested that cohesive governance was in the national interest, cautioning against questions that might incite division. 

 

In plain speak what she meant to say is I am the daughter of a billionaire, I am very privileged, typically I'm treated as high society, and now that I'm in the public realm I don't appreciate being questioned. All of you need to show a greater sense of fealty, and realize that we have no interest in engaging in and open and frank discussions here. These press conferences are window dressing meant to convince the most naive amongst the population, that Thailand is a functional democracy. 

Get over it spider. No means no!

Posted
1 hour ago, Aussie999 said:

If, as he said " infringing on the media's constitutional rights to report on governmental affairs<" is true, and he is a strong supporter of freedom of speak, then why so quiet now, with so many  breaches from the previous "government," there has not been such freedoms, for many years, this guy just does not like a female PM.

Who does he like?

Posted
32 minutes ago, bradiston said:

Who does he like?

 

I'm betting not even himself, anybody know if he has brought allegations against himself? 🤪Maybe someone should suggest it?

Posted
Just now, lordgrinz said:

 

I'm betting not even himself, anybody know if he has brought allegations against himself? 🤪Maybe someone should suggest it?

Maybe somebody should petition the courts to have him disbarred.

  • Agree 1
Posted
8 hours ago, Gottfrid said:

So, in other words he say exactly like every other time he file a petition. The modus operandi resembles a serial killer armed with paper.

There's a solution stop giving this guy media attention.   I swear most of these nuts just do it to see their name I'm print.

 

These guys are the reason nothing gets done and 112 is such a problem.

Posted
9 hours ago, webfact said:

The prime minister further suggested that cohesive governance was in the national interest, cautioning against questions that might incite division.

This is totally wrong.

It suggests that the governance should be absolute with no debate to ensure that decisions are both technically and legally correct and therefore acceptable to the electorate.

I think it's about time reporters were allowed to present alternative opinions based on what politicians tell them. 

The PM and the government should be accountable to the country and this cannot happen so long government decisions are kept secret.

  • Love It 1
Posted

All you need is a "Monkey" Petitioner around, you get free peanuts 🥜 spreading around......Who is going to speak for " media wrong" for a change....I think this guy is Sooöô cheap a idiot , who is "paid"  to split every little hair he can find....and all unnecessary narrative cause somebody is taking my boss Lunch away.....just like the low country US yearly big dirty budget....pay all journalist or media to run another country or competitive down...... Probably from his Stupid personality tell you all.....Scum....Dirt......

Posted
27 minutes ago, Aussie999 said:

himself

Maybe not. Maybe he's consumed by self loathing. Understandable if you think about it! He's certainly an odd ball. His behaviour has become totally irrational.

Posted
3 hours ago, kingstonkid said:

There's a solution stop giving this guy media attention.   I swear most of these nuts just do it to see their name I'm print.

 

Yeah, I don't know why they keep reporting on this clown's antics.

Posted
31 minutes ago, 0ffshore360 said:

But is he wrong?

Probably more right than wrong, but he would do better in fact searching and choosing the battles that he actually have a chance to win. As it is now, he is just grabbing on everything he can, without any foundation or chance.

Posted
9 hours ago, spidermike007 said:

As the daughter of a billionaire she was likely never questioned in the entire course of her life, she's experienced nothing but coddling and getting her butt kissed 24/7, so this level of scrutiny has to be very new for her, and extremely uncomfortable. And that is a good thing. 

You really just make this stuff up. Just a string of conjecture and nonsensical conclusions. You obviously hate this woman. Did she tell you to get lost at some earlier time in your life? Childish!

Posted
20 hours ago, Tropicalevo said:

The dinosaurs and their 'nominees' are getting desperate now.

What next - start a petition because she had her hair cut on a Wednesday?

Maybe you live in a bubble but the 'dinosaurs' are on the same team, else she wouldn't even be in power.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



×
×
  • Create New...