Jump to content


Constitutional Court Presses OAG to Proceed with Thaksin Lawsuit


webfact

Recommended Posts

21 hours ago, webfact said:

The Constitutional Court has urged the Office of the Attorney-General (OAG) to take prompt action on a lawsuit filed against Thaksin Shinawatra, the influential figure behind the Pheu Thai Party. This legal action, which accuses the former PM and the ruling party of wrongdoing, has stalled, prompting the court's intervention.

Stalled, I wonder why...

Hot potatoes are not a thing in Thailand?

  • Like 1
  • Thumbs Up 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 10/23/2024 at 7:19 AM, webfact said:

resize_567000007792701.webp

Picture courtesy: MGR online

 

The Constitutional Court has urged the Office of the Attorney-General (OAG) to take prompt action on a lawsuit filed against Thaksin Shinawatra, the influential figure behind the Pheu Thai Party. This legal action, which accuses the former PM and the ruling party of wrongdoing, has stalled, prompting the court's intervention.

 

The court has given the OAG a 15-day deadline to gather necessary witness statements and evidence and submit them for further judicial review.

 

This appeal comes after activist lawyer Thirayut Suwankesorn lodged the complaint with the OAG last month, only to see little movement within the initial period. Frustrated, he brought the case to the Constitutional Court earlier in the month.

 

Key allegations include Thaksin's undue influence over the Pheu Thai Party, allegedly orchestrating its activities behind the scenes.

 

Thirayut's complaint highlights a clandestine meeting at Thaksin's house in Bangkok, following former PM Srettha Thavisin's dismissal, where Thaksin purportedly guided coalition leaders to quickly identify a successor.

 

Further accusations involve Thaksin's alleged manipulation of Pheu Thai's exclusion of the Palang Pracharath Party, led by Prawit Wongsuwan, from the coalition.

 

It's claimed Thaksin used televised speeches to mould government policies, notably those regarding natural resource development around Koh Koot islands, leveraging a historic relationship with Cambodia's former PM Hun Sen.

 

Additionally, Thaksin is accused of exploiting his influence to avoid imprisonment, benefiting from a royal pardon and evading actual prison time under the guise of requiring medical treatment, reported Thai Newsroom.

 

Should the court find Thaksin guilty, potential consequences include imprisonment for Thaksin and the dissolution of the Pheu Thai Party, which would temporarily bar its executive board members, including his daughter Paetongtarn Shinawatra, from holding political office.

 

news-logo-btm.jpg

-- 2024-10-23

 

news-footer-3.png

 

image.png

it all sounds like music to my ears!

  • Agree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, Mad Mustang said:

The circus goes on, the headlines will keep popping up and nobody will be held to account EVER

Agree.  The only political parties and political figures punished are the ones the public overwhelming wants and supports.  

  • Like 1
  • Agree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, dinsdale said:

Rubbish. See my above post. It's optics. The only reason the PTP would be "toast" would be to create such turmoil that the military would move in. As it is this is not necessary because the PTP are needed to maintain the coalition and as such maintain the royalist military establishment's influence within government.

Nonsense. The 'royalist military establishment' in no way depends on Thaksin to maintain it's influence within government. They want Thaksin gone, period.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

28 minutes ago, Thingamabob said:

Nonsense. The 'royalist military establishment' in no way depends on Thaksin to maintain it's influence within government. They want Thaksin gone, period.

Would they be in a coalition government WITHOUT PTP????? The quote I was responding to posted "The current government is toast." PTP=Thaksin and Thaksin=PTP.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, dinsdale said:

Would they be in a coalition government WITHOUT PTP????? The quote I was responding to posted "The current government is toast." PTP=Thaksin and Thaksin=PTP.

I wonder how long have you have lived in Thailand.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, dinsdale said:

Rubbish. See my above post. It's optics. The only reason the PTP would be "toast" would be to create such turmoil that the military would move in. As it is this is not necessary because the PTP are needed to maintain the coalition and as such maintain the royalist military establishment's influence within government.

It's not rubbish but another opinion.

I ask you to be more polite and respect other people.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, newbee2022 said:

It's not rubbish but another opinion.

I ask you to be more polite and respect other people.

Ok then it's an incorrect opinion and IMO rubbish. The PTP and Thaksin are safe as long as they serve their purpose which is to maintain the status quo vis-à-vis the power and wealth of the royalist military establishment. Why do you think Thaksin was brought back and why do you think he jumped into bed with the sworn enemy of his party and party base something he said he'd never do?  It was all part of the deal. Again I say this whole CC thing is pure optics.

Edited by dinsdale
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, dinsdale said:

Ok then it's an incorrect opinion and IMO rubbish. The PTP and Thaksin are safe as long as they serve their purpose which is to maintain the status quo vis-à-vis the power and wealth of the royalist military establishment. Why do you think Thaksin was brought back and why do you think he jumped into bed with the sworn enemy of his party and party base something he said he'd never do?  It was all part of the deal. Again I say this whole CC thing is pure optics.

Without consent of the crown Thaksin wouldn't be here and ruling as a proxy PM, supported by the Army.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 10/23/2024 at 7:19 AM, webfact said:

The Constitutional Court has urged the Office of the Attorney-General (OAG) to take prompt action on a lawsuit filed against Thaksin Shinawatra, the influential figure behind the Pheu Thai Party.

 

They come across as unusually trigger-happy, I wonder what's the urgency?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now