.png.3b3332cc2256ad0edbc2fe9404feeef0.png.8488ab72b8bb2e508209bfe3211b6e08.png)
Epstein -- Trump connection. No smoking gun but definitely hot embers
-
Recently Browsing 0 members
- No registered users viewing this page.
Announcements
-
Topics
-
-
Latest posts...
-
921
-
-
84
Let The Fraud Begin
You are beyond delusional mate - you have a hatred towards a politician you have never met that is now living in your head rent free. -
18
New affordable EVs at the Nov 2024 Bangkok Motor Show
To be honest... If the marketing said... 620kms... but real world range of 450kms with AC on at motorway speeds etc... I'd find that more 'honest'... but I also get the point made about ICE consumption also being somewhat of a marketing fiddle. I also wholly agree that for the 'average driver' a range if 450kms is hardly needed... then there is the psychological aspect of allowing the battery to drop below say 30%, while in an ICE we have no issues driving on fumes !!! - its a different mental space until we get used to it. On a recent road trip we stopped off for an ice-cream and had a 15 min charge (which added about 30% think)... then on another day we stopped off for lunch and topped up from about 50% to 99% in about 30mins (with an 88 kWh batter) I've just looked and the WLTP (Worldwide Harmonised Light Vehicle Test Procedure) range is 500 kms... (so thats closer to to reality than the manufacture marketing). IMO - anothing more than 100 kms for our daily use is a non-issue anyway... but that doesn't get us very far on road trips so is nice to know we have a real world range of about 450 kms (from my own experience). Lots of good info from KhunLA on EV's helped my decision to get one - although his overwhelming hardon for MG is sometimes amusing. -
82
Phuket Taxi Mafia Confronts Tourists Over App-Based Ride
I wonder why they bothered to engage in an argument. Drive off, drag him along for a bit then he falls flat on his face. So easy. -
84
Let The Fraud Begin
Obviously you need educating. Blatant means - done openly and unashamedly. It does not mean that the votes can all be checked legally months later - the court cases were 'lost' because there was no serious 'proof' of massive voter fraud, and/or the process was followed, and/or where it was not followed, there was no proof to say that it would have changed the result. Lack of proof is not lack of guilt. You are right - No - it is not easy to prove. How would you prove that in an election there was illegal votes accepted and counted. People's votes are anonymous, so impossible to verify that way. Likewise, the process in many States allowed mailed-in ballots and those deposited in ballot boxes to be accepted without serious verification. The thing you lefties are not realising/seeing is that the claims are not made against the Officials (mostly - there were some very dubious behaviours). The claims are against random people lodging lots of fake votes that were accepted and counted, as per the then current processes that were made 'flexible' due to Covid. There is a reason why nearly every State has passed laws changing how votes can be accepted and counted since 2020. They are not saying officially this means that the 2020 election should be redone, but it clearly shows that the laws were far to weak and the concern was that some people took advantage of that. There is no doubt those relaxed laws and rules allowed more people to vote, but the question will always remain - were all of that massive increase in total votes legitimate (27 million more than in 2016). -
185
Over 50 and Feeling the Frustration
Freds expertise was in demolishing...not erecting -
-
-
Popular in The Pub
-
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now