Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
1 hour ago, mdr224 said:

The tariffs were kept by biden, and only concerns small minded people. The issue is inflation. Hopefully Trump can follow Ron Pauls advice on how to decrease the deficit and keep inflation at a non insane level like the last four years

 

This time around Trump wants a broad imposition of tariffs, an across the board general levy of 10%. Previous tariffs were on select industries.  The conservative positioned  Tax Foundation states that  Trump has proposed significant tariff hikes as part of his presidential campaign; we estimate that if imposed, his proposed tariff increases would hike taxes by another $524 billion annually and shrink GDP by at least 0.8 percent, the capital stock by 0.7 percent, and employment by 684,000 full-time equivalent jobs. 

 

  • Like 2
Posted
30 minutes ago, EveryG said:

This is what MAGAs resort to when they can't actually discuss the issues. This isn't about ideology. YOU have been exposed here. Please keep trying to deflect, but it's obvious that YOU have no grasp of the issues. YOU make claims to be something you are not. YOU make inconsistent arguments. YOU, not your ideology, but YOU are individually sad. 

I am sad, yet you had to create a new account to hide your shame, Danderman

  • Confused 1
  • Haha 1
Posted
4 minutes ago, EveryG said:

Now you are even sadder.  I have equal disregard for liberal idealogues as MAGA trailer trash posing as libertarians. 

Why did you feel the need to create a new account? Couldnt face random internet strangers after being exposed as a nutcase?

  • Confused 1
  • Haha 1
Posted
40 minutes ago, mogandave said:

I was only pointing out that you were lying when you said no jobs were created. 

 

You have no credibility 

Where did I say no jobs were created? Seems to me you have a vivid imagination. Also you never had any credibility. Why ? Because like a snake you twist and twirl trying to get out of a hole you, yourself created.

  • Like 1
  • Agree 1
Posted
3 minutes ago, mdr224 said:

Why did you feel the need to create a new account? Couldnt face random internet strangers after being exposed as a nutcase?

You don't need to share your wild imagination here you know. Better you do it with a schrink.

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Posted
On 11/21/2024 at 9:51 AM, simple1 said:

 

Cost the Australian economy $billions for supporting trump ideology regards PRC

So, he cost your economy  billion, while bringing billions to his? 

  • Confused 1
Posted
On 11/21/2024 at 9:51 AM, simple1 said:

 

Cost the Australian economy $billions for supporting trump ideology regards PRC

i don't seem to remember his campaign slogan being Make Australia Great Again

  • Confused 1
Posted
54 minutes ago, bubblegum said:

Where did I say no jobs were created? Seems to me you have a vivid imagination. Also you never had any credibility. Why ? Because like a snake you twist and twirl trying to get out of a hole you, yourself created.

Right here. You have zero credibility 

 

IMG_2283.thumb.jpeg.dbe66e90185b66c267f5e3160c01039f.jpeg

  • Confused 2
Posted
9 minutes ago, mogandave said:

Right here. You have zero credibility 

 

The MAGAs on this forum have reading challenges :cheesy:

Also, challenges in logic, consistency, critical thinking, broad understanding, complexity, and general meaning.

 

Every time I think I've seen the bottom limit of American depravity, I am unpleasantly surprised :crazy:

  • Agree 2
Posted
52 minutes ago, mogandave said:

Right here. You have zero credibility 

 

IMG_2283.thumb.jpeg.dbe66e90185b66c267f5e3160c01039f.jpeg

I saw it. It said they created jobs, you lied and said they didn’t. 

 

You have zero credibility. 

 

Just like you know higher corporate income taxes costs jobs and drives prices up, but you can’t admit it. 

  • Confused 1
Posted
6 hours ago, spidermike007 said:

I think that calling it a plan is a bit of a stretch. I would say it was an effective campaign slogan and it's actually a good concept, but it's incredibly complicated, and he's trying to pretend as if it is very simple, which is very typical of his somewhat simple-minded thought process. 

 

For big companies changing manufacturing locations requires years, and is not something that can be done overnight without  becoming a huge tax hike (tariffs) on the American population. 

Agreed it is complicated BUT at least it is a place to start and a plan that can be actioned.  The Biden/Obama plan really did nothing to help the average American.  If the U.S. started this and carried it on for a decade it could get back to a viable self sustaining country.  However selling farm land to Chinese or Japanese copanies is not going to do it.  Having things made outside the country is not going to help the country.

 

Considering that most military equipment requires computer chips, how long do you think the U.S. would last in a war if China cut them off?

Posted
1 hour ago, frank83628 said:

So, he cost your economy  billion, while bringing billions to his? 

Actually billions, perhaps good idea to charge the equivalents back to US for basing military and secret spying facilities in Australia. But I suppose you know nothing...

  • Thumbs Up 1
Posted
3 hours ago, Patong2021 said:

 

This time around Trump wants a broad imposition of tariffs, an across the board general levy of 10%. Previous tariffs were on select industries.  The conservative positioned  Tax Foundation states that  Trump has proposed significant tariff hikes as part of his presidential campaign; we estimate that if imposed, his proposed tariff increases would hike taxes by another $524 billion annually and shrink GDP by at least 0.8 percent, the capital stock by 0.7 percent, and employment by 684,000 full-time equivalent jobs. 

 

Trump has only spewed rhetoric, he has not submitted any kind of proposal. 

Posted
1 hour ago, simple1 said:

Actually billions, perhaps good idea to charge the equivalents back to US for basing military and secret spying facilities in Australia. But I suppose you know nothing...

Go for it, that's what your politicians are there for right? So if Aus got a shat deal who's to blame?

Posted
3 hours ago, frank83628 said:

Go for it, that's what your politicians are there for right? So if Aus got a shat deal who's to blame?

 

Caught between a rock and a hard place as Australia is reliant on trade with both PRC and US. US had threatened to place tariffs on Australian imports (an US  ally for 70+ years and fought alongside US in WW1 and WW11, Korea, Vietnam, and ME).

  • Confused 1
  • Haha 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.




×
×
  • Create New...