Jump to content

Trump's Legal Battles and Their Unintended Legacy of Backfiring


Recommended Posts

Posted

image.png

 

The extensive efforts to prosecute Donald Trump have paradoxically reinforced his position of legal immunity, setting a concerning precedent for future presidents. Despite the unprecedented volume of legal challenges Trump faced, these actions have ultimately fortified his protections, effectively placing him—and his successors—further beyond the reach of the law.  

 

As Trump prepares for his second term, the pursuit of justice for his alleged misconduct during his first presidency appears to have stalled. This pause has only emboldened the notion that holding a sitting or former president accountable is an extraordinary challenge.

 

In a striking development, Special Counsel Jack Smith recently moved to dismiss two pivotal cases against Trump. These included charges related to attempts to overturn the 2020 election results and mishandling classified documents. Meanwhile, the sentencing for Trump’s conviction on 34 fraud-related charges tied to the New York hush money case has been indefinitely postponed, with the possibility of the case being dismissed altogether. Although the election interference case in Georgia technically remains unresolved, its progress appears uncertain at best.  

 

The most consequential outcome of these prosecutions, however, lies in the Supreme Court's ruling that former presidents enjoy immunity from prosecution for their "official acts." This landmark decision leaves the interpretation of "official acts" deliberately vague, awaiting further clarification only if and when another former president faces indictment. For now, the court’s definition is broad enough to grant Trump—and future presidents—ample confidence that their actions while in office are unlikely to lead to legal consequences.  

 

Critics, particularly among Democrats and progressive legal scholars, argue that the Justice Department’s delay in initiating prosecutions significantly hampered these efforts. They contend that a swifter approach following President Biden’s inauguration might have yielded different results. Jack Smith, for instance, was only appointed in late 2022, and his first indictment came more than six months later. A faster process, some suggest, could have allowed sufficient time to challenge and refine the Supreme Court's interpretation of "official acts," potentially salvaging parts of the January 6 indictment.  

 

While Trump now holds the dubious distinction of being the first former president convicted of a felony, the broader implications of his legal battles overshadow this milestone. After facing four trials and numerous charges, he returns to the presidency more legally insulated than ever before. This outcome not only redefines the boundaries of presidential accountability but also raises pressing questions about the future integrity of the office itself.  

 

Based on a report by AXIOS 2024-11-28

 

news-logo-btm.jpg

 

news-footer-4.png

 

image.png

  • Sad 1
  • Agree 1
Posted
4 hours ago, thaibeachlovers said:

Apparently we have much to thank the Dems incompetence for . Had they been more diligent we might have that diabolical woman as president in waiting.

 

Thank you Mr Biden, good job!

"...diabolical..." and likely drunk as a pig too. Have a listen and you be the judge. 

 

 

  • Like 1
  • Sad 2
Posted

The constant legal persecution of Trump pre election was not seen as  justified by American voters. 

Thankfully his election will put a stop to the biased non stop legal proceedings against him. 

  • Like 1
Posted
58 minutes ago, thaibeachlovers said:

The weasel better run while he can. Trump's a comin' for him. If he thinks dismissing the cases will save him all it does is prove he built his case on nothing but BS and hate.

Same will happen to all the other BS political persecution cases that were brought by the dark side to try and eliminate him from contention.There have to be a lot of weasels out there sweating now. We know who they are.

Quite so, they all thought that Trump couldn't win with all the skullduggery going on, boy are they in  for a shock!:biggrin:

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Posted
14 minutes ago, Paul Henry said:

Don't forget Biden and his top administration people are now imune from all of Trumps threats. The imunity handed down by SCOTUS covers  both parties not just republicans. So more empty threats from the KING of tariffs and inflation.

Trump only has to expose all the skullduggery in the Biden camp to make them pariah, even if they don't see the inside of a court. Got to be more bad stuff of Hunter's just waiting to be discovered.

  • Agree 1
Posted
1 hour ago, thaibeachlovers said:

Trump only has to expose all the skullduggery in the Biden camp to make them pariah, even if they don't see the inside of a court. Got to be more bad stuff of Hunter's just waiting to be discovered.

You mean like the GOP Senate Committee which ridiculously failed after two years of fishing? 😀

  • Like 1
  • Sad 1
Posted
3 hours ago, thaibeachlovers said:

The weasel better run while he can. Trump's a comin' for him. If he thinks dismissing the cases will save him all it does is prove he built his case on nothing but BS and hate.

Same will happen to all the other BS political persecution cases that were brought by the dark side to try and eliminate him from contention.There have to be a lot of weasels out there sweating now. We know who they are.

It looks like it's your post built on B.S. and hate. 😀

The cases were good enough to convince judges and grand juries...

  • Like 1
  • Sad 1
Posted
5 hours ago, WDSmart said:

These charges have only been postponed, not dismissed. In the worst case, they will have to sit dormant for four years until a new president is inaugurated. After that, these charges can be reopened, and the trials and sentencing can continue.

Dream on........

 

3 hours ago, Thingamabob said:

As a Brit I can only say, from a considerable distance,  that these prosecutions appear to have been more politics driven than justice driven.

I see you like euphemisms, which I do too when appropriate but in this case the DOJ weaponized the law against Trump, purely for political reason to try and stop him running again.........It didn't work, obviously

I you look at the bigger picture the Dems have been after Trump for over 10 years, with investigations, inquiries (mueller), Impeachments, court cases, and finally assassination attempts, one of which was deadly. But he still came back and won!:clap2:

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Posted
7 hours ago, WDSmart said:

These charges have only been postponed, not dismissed. In the worst case, they will have to sit dormant for four years until a new president is inaugurated. After that, these charges can be reopened, and the trials and sentencing can continue.

Just keep hoping.  You have gotten up every day for the last 9 years knowing today is the day they were going to get Trump.  Give it up.  Lawfare is now dead.  We have real material against democrats.  Hope Trump gets an AG that can punish them.

  • Agree 1
Posted (edited)
23 hours ago, Social Media said:

 

The extensive efforts to prosecute Donald Trump have paradoxically reinforced his position of legal immunity, setting a concerning precedent for future presidents. Despite the unprecedented volume of legal challenges Trump faced, these actions have ultimately fortified his protections, effectively placing him—and his successors—further beyond the reach of the law.  

Its unAmerican and unprecedented to

use weaponized lawfare to pursue 

a innocent figurehead such as Donald Trump, America’s 45th and soon to be 47th POTUS.

This is a Axios article so its bias against Trump to begin with! Jack Smith was ruled illegitimate by a federal judge!


The left leaning lawfare article below on Presidential Immunity , ends its article sighting the dem Jacksons dissenting  opinion , instead of the Majority’s decision which I find rather odd.

 

What all this says is the Arbitrator of the Constitution ,the SCOTUS got it right ! And that justice Jackson who couldn’t describe what a woman is during confirmation hearings got it wrong!

 

 

https://www.lawfaremedia.org/article/the-supreme-court-s-presidential-immunity-decision

Edited by riclag
  • Haha 1
Posted (edited)
14 hours ago, RichardColeman said:

Another story brought to you by a left leaning organisation

Agree. If a political bias was run on articles on here regarding US politics the needle would IMHO be showing left. A bit like this

image.png.e62cfdc71e35cfd5427384be7757b1ee.png

Case in point AXIOUS political bias is

image.png.8be93af9cb69610685754563896f0f8e.png

https://www.allsides.com/news-source/axios

Edited by dinsdale
Posted

Just another example of the how to incompetence of Biden and its crew. Allow your top donors to determine who your most important cabinet secretaries are and these things happen. 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   1 member




×
×
  • Create New...