Jump to content

Allegations Against the Biden Family: A Web of Accusations and Controversy


Recommended Posts

Posted

Post removed @placeholder

 

17. ASEAN NOW news team collects news articles from various recognised and reputable news sources. The articles  may be consolidated from different sources and rewritten with AI assistance These news items are shared in our forums for members to stay informed and engaged. Our dedicated news team puts in the effort to deliver quality content, and we ask for your respect in return. Any disrespectful comments about our news articles or the content itself, such as calling it "clickbait" or “slow news day”, and criticising grammatical errors, will not be tolerated and appropriate action will be taken. Please note that republished articles may contain errors or opinions that do not reflect the views of ASEAN NOW.

If you'd like to help us, and you see an error with an article, then please use the report function so that we can attend to it promptly.

  • Thumbs Up 1
Posted
4 hours ago, impulse said:

Joe thought he'd stop the investigations with those pardons. 

 

Instead, he just piqued the curiosity of even more Americans.  On his way to going into the history books as the most corrupt, worst president ever when it all comes out.  Most of it is already out in the Hur Report and the House Report on the Biden Crime Family.  With the receipts in both reports.

 

 

The issue that Joe created is interesting.  Because all these people are pardoned for everything they did they no longer can take the 5th.  If they are caught in a ly or mislead or fail to respond to a subpeona then they leave themselves open to new charges not covered by the pardon.

 

If Congress wants they can hang Joe High.  

 

however the interesting catch is that Joe has done enough damage that it might be better to talk about what they think he did but not go to court.

  • Confused 1
  • Sad 1
Posted
8 hours ago, JonnyF said:

How were these gangsters ever allowed to run the US?

 

Good riddance to this crime family and their pre emptive pardons.

 

Did Joe manage to pardon himself?

Posted
7 minutes ago, xylophone said:

Jeez........trying to cover up his payment to a hooker by "cooking the books/accounting fraud" is SO much more than a mere "misstep". Reality please...........

"Reality, please", indeed!   You recall his sentence?

  • Sad 1
Posted
36 minutes ago, xylophone said:

Jeez........trying to cover up his payment to a hooker by "cooking the books/accounting fraud" is SO much more than a mere "misstep". Reality please...........

 

You mean when one of his corporate flunkies recorded a payment to his attorney as a legal expense?

 

  • Confused 1
  • Thanks 1
  • Haha 1
Posted
1 hour ago, impulse said:

 

You mean when one of his corporate flunkies recorded a payment to his attorney as a legal expense?

 

I mean..............

 

The case stems from a "hush money" payment of $130,000 to adult film star Stormy Daniels in 2016. Prosecutors from the Manhattan District Attorney's Office allege Trump worked to falsely and illegally categorize reimbursements to his lawyer to cover up the payment.

 

With the help of his former fixer Michael Cohen, Trump would allegedly pay Stormy Daniels $130,000 in 2016 to keep quiet about her story. After Trump became president, prosecutors say, he started reimbursing Cohen for the payment, which he would record in his financial records as legal fees to Cohen.

 

These payments could land Trump in prison. Prosecutors allege that Trump broke the law by falsifying these business records to hide illegal hush-money payments and protect Trump’s chances during the presidential election.

The former president faces 34 counts of falsifying business records in the first degree. Trump pleaded not guilty to all counts last April. The charges carry a maximum of four years in prison.

 

He is a crook who escaped justice, but still a crook!

  • Thanks 1
Posted
6 minutes ago, impulse said:

 

Since when are hush money payments illegal?

 

There was a myriad of testimony (the best was the National Enquirer guy) about the prevalence of payments to make stories go away.

 

Now you are being deliberately obtuse because it's the way this hush money payment was treated, because in doing so trump falsified business records to hide the payments and falsifying business records is illegal and an offence.

 

Read again: – the charge was that Trump worked to falsify and illegally categorise reimbursements to his lawyer to cover up the payment.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.




×
×
  • Create New...