3 minutes ago, JAG said:

2) on second thoughts, as a single white male living in Cambodia you may be qualified to ruminate on prices...

guess who just seceded the moral high ground

8 minutes ago, Yagoda said:

Which ones.

 

As many attorneys do

 

It's all value added after that, and the value is the politics

One of those justices is the notorious socialist John Roberts and the other was the fire breathing Marxist Antonin Scalia.

2 minutes ago, madone said:

guess who just seceded the moral high ground

I make no claim to the moral high ground.

 

I was merely offering an opinion - sauce, geese and ganders and so forth.

1 hour ago, JAG said:

 

The suggestion that she is a whore says far more about you than it ever does about her.

 

25 minutes ago, JAG said:

All you can do is turn to abuse!

 

1 hour ago, JAG said:

You really are a piece of work, remarking about a particularly offensive slur you made about a woman ( and yes I do defend her against it) does not make me in any way a supporter of the trans agenda, and especially of your twisted and bizarrely hate filled interpretation of it.

 

 

no you make no allusions at all to your own superiority. 

4 minutes ago, madone said:

 

 

 

 

no you make no allusions at all to your own superiority. 

It is you that are suggesting (wrongly as it happens) that I am claiming any moral high ground or "allusions of superiority".

1 minute ago, JAG said:

It is you that are suggesting (wrongly as it happens) that I am claiming any moral high ground or "allusions of superiority".

personally, I think you should just own it but, I understand how important it is for you to believe.


anyways, cheers, like is to short to engage at length with hypocrites
 

34 minutes ago, placeholder said:

One of those justices is the notorious socialist John Roberts and the other was the fire breathing Marxist Antonin Scalia.

Nice. Gives them some cred. This is New York right? Check judicial appointments in 6 months. Adds more cred. Angling for federal judge ships in the next admin too if it's Democratic. At any rate, New York State supreme Court or any New York State judge ship is a great gig. License to steal.

41 minutes ago, JAG said:

on second thoughts, as a single white male living in Cambodia you may be qualified to ruminate on prices...

Bet you don't have the balls to explain that comment lol

2 hours ago, Hummin said:

How many times you going to call lawyer whores in this tread?

 

Unbelievable you still allowed on this forum.

He is right though. They sell out to the highest bidder.

47 minutes ago, madone said:

Say what you will. 

 

 

vs

 

 

it is you and only you who brings her name into it and applies the term to her. 

 

I disagree with pretty much everything Yagoda says, but I don't feel the need to fabricate offenses or twist meaning.  

 

Whored in this context implies a mercenary, to the highest bidder for personal gain ethos, it is you alone who brings gender and alternative meaning into the conversation. 

That's characteristic of them. I can give them enough reality to make their heads explode.

2 hours ago, Hummin said:

How many times you going to call lawyer whores in this tread?

 

Unbelievable you still allowed on this forum.

Is the word whore something that's unacceptable? Doesnt appear blanked out. Speech policing much? 

 

You don't think US lawyers are whores?

What about Shakespeare?

10 minutes ago, Yagoda said:

Bet you don't have the balls to explain that comment lol

I don't think it needs explaining.

9 minutes ago, Harrisfan said:

He is right though. They sell out to the highest bidder.

Given the decisions lately of the supreme Court, I'd say six of those members might prove you have a point.

1 hour ago, placeholder said:

More idiocy. Do we need any more proof that you are not an American? If you were an American, you would know how prestigious it is to be a clerk for a supreme Court justice.

I admire your confidence in the intellect of the American public. Sadly I see no evidence to support such optimism. 

34 minutes ago, Hummin said:

Justice, it is all about fear square justice for everyone, not only one sided truth in the eye of the beholder, manipulated by heavy propaganda. 

 

You are a pure product of one sided propaganda 

Have you just woken up from a 4 year sleep? Your team ran on a "Get Trump" platform without a crime, which led to the biggest travesty of justice reviving expired crimes to persecute political rival. All the while sheilding a deeply corrupt child molester.

After cheering this on, the left do not get to lecture anybody on justice or truth.

7 minutes ago, SunnyinBangrak said:

Have you just woken up from a 4 year sleep? Your team ran on a "Get Trump" platform without a crime, which led to the biggest travesty of justice reviving expired crimes to persecute political rival. All the while sheilding a deeply corrupt child molester.

After cheering this on, the left do not get to lecture anybody on justice or truth.

There was plenty of evidence of crimes. Trump had a judge in Florida who made an extraordinary ruling overturning standard justice department practice. There wasn't time to appeal it. And the supreme Court decided that any crimes a president commits that might be conceivably connected to the office of president, can't be prosecuted. Even conservative legal commentators were mostly astonished by that decision.

24 minutes ago, SunnyinBangrak said:

Have you just woken up from a 4 year sleep? Your team ran on a "Get Trump" platform without a crime, which led to the biggest travesty of justice reviving expired crimes to persecute political rival. All the while sheilding a deeply corrupt child molester.

After cheering this on, the left do not get to lecture anybody on justice or truth.

My team? Fs get real, I'm not even guilty of being an American. Lucky me, my ancestors decided to stay in poverty and work it out. Proud of them, especially today

5 hours ago, Yagoda said:

All lawyers are whores.

And the new whore-in-chief -- easier looking at her than the years looking at her fellow Floridian the late AG Ms. Janet Reno.

6 hours ago, Yagoda said:

A career is important to a lawyer. They all just whored themselves into partnerships with some white shoe law firm attached to the Democrat crime organization.

Make sure they are never employed by the us government again.

Flames and replies removed.

On 2/14/2025 at 10:01 AM, placeholder said:

It's notable that the prosecutor was ordered to request that the case be dismissed without prejudice. What that means is that the charges against Adams could be revived anytime. In other words, it's a way to coerce Adams into cooperating with the Trump administration.

 

No, that means the current case is not justified by the (lack of) evidence.  Without prejudice means they can re-file the case if they feel they can prove it.

 

Shirley, if Trump was as corrupt as you say, he'd simply pardon his crony for all crimes, even if not yet uncovered, going back ten years.

 

That would be corruption!

40 minutes ago, jerrymahoney said:

And the new whore-in-chief -- easier looking at her than the years looking at her fellow Floridian the late AG Ms. Janet Reno.

Janet Reno was a Lizard Person.

2 hours ago, NoDisplayName said:

 

No, that means the current case is not justified by the (lack of) evidence.  Without prejudice means they can re-file the case if they feel they can prove it.

 

Shirley, if Trump was as corrupt as you say, he'd simply pardon his crony for all crimes, even if not yet uncovered, going back ten years.

 

That would be corruption!

State charges here, trump can not pardon.

 

They, well respected lawyers, feel there is too much evidence to dismiss. Those lawyers are well known to be far from lefties. They're calling out the quid pro quo here.

Good riddance.

They did the right thing, and I think Trump did the wrong thing by canceling the case . 

 

He should have let it play out in the court. 

13 minutes ago, stevenl said:

State charges here, trump can not pardon.

 

They, well respected lawyers, feel there is too much evidence to dismiss. Those lawyers are well known to be far from lefties. They're calling out the quid pro quo here.

 

If state charges, Trump would have no say over New York persecutors.  These are federal charges in federal court with, umm, federal persecutors defying their DOJ leadership.

 

But apparently Trump is not so corrupt as to give his crony a 10-year 10%-for-the-big-guy-so-never-even-gotta-go-to-trial-card.

11 minutes ago, Yellowtail said:

They did the right thing, and I think Trump did the wrong thing by canceling the case . 

 

He should have let it play out in the court. 

I always thought these charges were trumped up.  Plus, the timing was suspect.  

3 minutes ago, Mike_Hunt said:

I always thought these charges were trumped up.  Plus, the timing was suspect.  

I thought them a bit convenient, but they should have let it play out in court.

22 hours ago, NoDisplayName said:

 

No, that means the current case is not justified by the (lack of) evidence.  Without prejudice means they can re-file the case if they feel they can prove it.

 

Shirley, if Trump was as corrupt as you say, he'd simply pardon his crony for all crimes, even if not yet uncovered, going back ten years.

 

That would be corruption!

Nonsense. In fact, in the original letter to Sassoon, Bove specifically stated that the request for dismissal without prejudice hae nothing to do with lack of evidence but rather that other considerations took precedence. Namely, that Adams was cooperating with the Trump administration on immigration issues.

As for Trump's corruption, you've goit it exactly wrong. the reason Bove called for a dismissal without prejudice was to use that as a way to keep pressure on Adams to cooperate. If the government felt he wasn't cooperating, then they could refile the charges. 

Moreover, dismissing without prejudice and with theexpress option of again indicting Adams in the future creates obvious ethical problems, byimplicitly threatening future prosecution if Adams's cooperation with enforcing the immigration laws proves unsatisfactory to the Department. See In re Christoff, 690 N.E.2d 1135 (Ind. 1997)(disciplining prosecutor for threatening to renew a dormant criminal investigation against apotential candidate for public office in order to dissuade the candidate from running); Bruce A.

Page 8Green & Rebecca Roiphe, Who Should Police Politicization of the DOJ?, 35 Notre Dame J.L.Ethics & Pub. Pol'y 671, 681 (2021) ( noting that the Arizona Supreme Court disbarred the elected chief prosecutor of Maricopa County, Arizona, and his deputy, in part, for misusing their power to advance the chief prosecutor's partisan political interests) . Finally, given the highly generalized accusations of weaponization, weighed against the strength of the evidence against Adams, a court will likely question whether that basis is pretextual. See, e.g. , United States v. Greater Blouse,Skirt & Neckwear Contractors, 228 F. Supp. 483, 487 (S.D.N.Y. 1964) (courts “ should be satisfied that the reasons advanced for the proposed dismissal are substantial and the real grounds uponwhich the application is based")."

https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/25529921-danielle-sassoon-letter-to-ag/

 

13 minutes ago, placeholder said:

a dismissal without prejudice was to use that as a way to keep pressure on Adams to cooperate. If the government felt he wasn't cooperating, then they could refile the charges

 

SOP for law enforcement.

 

Got picked up for trafficking drugs?  We have bigger illegal alien fish to fry.  Go have a chat with Lt. Doge from the persecuter's office, and maybe you two can work out a deal.  Say, you're not allergic to wire, are you?