President Trump says he has ordered a “decisive” military action against Houthi rebels in Yemen, opening a new salvo against the Iran-backed group that has targeted shipping lanes in the Red Sea. Trump said the US would deploy “overwhelming lethal force” against the group “until we have achieved our objective.”

 

“They have waged an unrelenting campaign of piracy, violence, and terrorism against American, and other, ships, aircraft, and drones,” Trump wrote on Truth Social. He said US personnel were carrying out aerial attacks on Houthi bases, leaders and missile defenses “to protect American shipping, air, and naval assets, and to restore Navigational Freedom.”

 

 

“No terrorist force will stop American commercial and naval vessels from freely sailing the Waterways of the World,” Trump wrote. Trump approved the Houthi strike plan — which he requested to be drawn up several weeks ago — late last week, and the final order was given on Saturday to begin what officials describe as a sustained attack on the group’s positions in Yemen.

 

Further actions after Saturday will depend on battle damage assessments from this series of strikes, a US defense official told CNN. But there is expected to be more action against the Houthis over the next several weeks. A larger campaign of strikes took time to organize and plan because the US had to collect the intelligence necessary for more sweeping attacks against the Houthis, and that took a considerable amount of time. A senior military official recently told CNN the intel collection required for broader strikes had been completed.

 

The US has been working to degrade Houthi capabilities for months as the entity worked to disrupt international shipping lanes in the Red Sea, one of the world’s busiest waterways, calling the attacks a response to Israel’s war in Gaza against Hamas. The group has targeted more than 100 ships and vessels, including with drones, missiles and small ships.

 

The Biden administration sought to respond by carrying out targeted strikes on Houthi positions in Yemen, including attacking underground weapons storage facilities in October and November, but the actions did not prevent further attacks.

 

The Houthis had previously promised to stop attacks on ships in the Red Sea so long as the ceasefire deal between Israel and Hamas was maintained. For more than a year, the group had carried out attacks on cargo ships in what it called revenge against Israel for its military campaign in Gaza, leading to a protracted crisis in the sea’s busy shipping corridor.

 

“This ban will continue until the crossings into the Gaza Strip are opened and its needs for food and medicine are allowed to enter,” the Houthis said on Tuesday. “This is not a one off. This is the beginning of an ongoing series of events that will last days if not weeks,” a source familiar with the strategy told CNN. “There is not and will not be an invasion or troops on ground. But there will be a series of ongoing strategic targeted attacks.”

Earlier this year, Trump signed an order designating the Houthis a “foreign terrorist organization.”

 

Trump, in his message, said the Biden administration’s approach to the Houthis was “pathetically weak, so the unrestrained Houthis just kept going.”

 

Based on a report by CNN  2025-03-16

 

 

Trump is behaving too much like a warmonger for my liking. I preferred it when he was a negotiator.

 

If he's not careful, he's going to start a worse war than Ukraine, and one he's not going to win.

 

Everyone has a weak spot, and seems as though the M E is Trump's.

45 minutes ago, thaibeachlovers said:

Trump is behaving too much like a warmonger for my liking. I preferred it when he was a negotiator.

 

If he's not careful, he's going to start a worse war than Ukraine, and one he's not going to win.

 

Everyone has a weak spot, and seems as though the M E is Trump's.

You prefer the Houthis to carry on their terrorist activity attacking civilian ships in the Red Sea?

38 minutes ago, Bkk Brian said:

You prefer the Houthis to carry on their terrorist activity attacking civilian ships in the Red Sea?

That’s the rub: What happened to the world? One election cycle  goes by and it seems like ,everyone is appeasing Terrorist activity. 

22 hours ago, Bkk Brian said:

You prefer the Houthis to carry on their terrorist activity attacking civilian ships in the Red Sea?

I'd prefer Trump to make the Gaza catastrophe end, which would end the Houthi retaliation.

22 hours ago, thaibeachlovers said:

Trump is behaving too much like a warmonger for my liking. I preferred it when he was a negotiator.

 

If he's not careful, he's going to start a worse war than Ukraine, and one he's not going to win.

 

Everyone has a weak spot, and seems as though the M E is Trump's.

Yet, you defend Putin's actions in Ukraine. 

18 minutes ago, thaibeachlovers said:

I'd prefer Trump to make the Gaza catastrophe end, which would end the Houthi retaliation.

I'd prefer the terrorists in Gaza to release the US and other hostages as would Trump.

 

As for Houthis backed by Iran will never stop their terrorist activities unless their capacities are destroyed. Hence.......................

 

President Trump didn’t wait around—he ordered direct strikes on Iran-backed Houthi targets in Yemen, wiping out their weapons and securing the Red Sea.

 

46 minutes ago, TedG said:

Yet, you defend Putin's actions in Ukraine. 

Stop making it up. I have never defended Putin's actions. As usual you guys keep making statements with no basis in fact.

As I already have you on ignore, there is not much else I can do about the nonsense posts.

11 minutes ago, thaibeachlovers said:

Stop making it up. I have never defended Putin's actions. As usual you guys keep making statements with no basis in fact.

As I already have you on ignore, there is not much else I can do about the nonsense posts.

 

How's that "ignore" thingmabob working out for you?

17 minutes ago, thaibeachlovers said:

Stop making it up. I have never defended Putin's actions. As usual you guys keep making statements with no basis in fact.

As I already have you on ignore, there is not much else I can do about the nonsense posts.

You are ignoring the truth. 

it's a pity he doesn't do the same to Moscow 

So they just dropped some bombs again?  That's been going on for years.  I don't think Trump knows the meaning of overwhelming.  He must have meant impotent.

18 hours ago, Yolando said:

So they just dropped some bombs again?  That's been going on for years.  I don't think Trump knows the meaning of overwhelming.  He must have meant impotent.

I think the difference is the bombs are targeted to hit people and things that matter. Biden was just turning sand into glass.

22 hours ago, NanLaew said:

 

How's that "ignore" thingmabob working out for you?

Bored with the topic then? Must be to be wasting pixels making fatuous comments about me.

 

21 hours ago, Yolando said:

So they just dropped some bombs again?  That's been going on for years.  I don't think Trump knows the meaning of overwhelming.  He must have meant impotent.

I had great hopes for Trump this time, but he's losing the plot when it comes to the M E. When will the US learn that they can't win there, short of total war and the deaths of millions, as with Germany and Japan.

The US hasn't won a major war since WW2, whether directly as in Korea ( armistice ), Vietnam ( where they were defeated by a bunch of peasants ) or in Afghanistan, ( defeated by a bunch of peasants ), or by proxy as in Ukaraine or that other conflict where their ally can't defeat a bunch of lightly armed irregulars.

Trump avoided wars the first time by diplomacy, and I was hoping for a repeat, but he's very warmongerish this time.

 

IMO the M E is where western nation's wars always end up in a humiliating withdrawal.

When was the last time missiles and bombs dropped from 40,000 ft put an end to an asymmetric war?

 

 

 

14 minutes ago, Chomper Higgot said:

When was the last time missiles and bombs dropped from 40,000 ft put an end to an asymmetric war?

 

 

 

 

 

Oh, so you would prefer to see a terrorist organisation left completely unhindered to continue its terrorist activities of attacking innocent civilian ships, and aiming rockets at innocent Israeli citizens… quelle surprise

 

 

8 minutes ago, Eloquent pilgrim said:

 

 

Oh, so you would prefer to see a terrorist organisation left completely unhindered to continue its terrorist activities of attacking innocent civilian ships, and aiming rockets at innocent Israeli citizens… quelle surprise

 

 

That’s a conclusion that has no basis in my comment but rather from your own imagination.

 

 

1 hour ago, Chomper Higgot said:

When was the last time missiles and bombs dropped from 40,000 ft put an end to an asymmetric war?

 

 

 

Its called punching back with overwhelming force with precision strikes, up to you want to call it. Not enjoying the fireworks against the terrorists?

 

source

1 hour ago, Chomper Higgot said:

That’s a conclusion that has no basis in my comment but rather from your own imagination.

 

 

 

An easy conclusion to arrive at as far as you are concerned; although you are careful enough not to directly support muslim terrorist groups like Hamas, the Houthis and Hezbollah, you invariably criticise any action taken against them. This is particularly true if action against them is by Israel, or even the US.

 

And it is not an attempt to end the war between the Houthis and the Yemeni forces, it is aimed at degrading the capabilities of the Houthis, to prevent them from continually attacking innocent civilian shipping. Your continued criticism of any action against Islamic terrorism is palpable, and your position transparent.

 

 

 

 

7 hours ago, thaibeachlovers said:

On 3/17/2025 at 5:23 AM, NanLaew said:

 

How's that "ignore" thingmabob working out for you?

Bored with the topic then? Must be to be wasting pixels making fatuous comments about me.

 

Asked and answered then.

 

Many thanks.

On 3/17/2025 at 4:18 AM, thaibeachlovers said:

I'd prefer Trump to make the Gaza catastrophe end, which would end the Houthi retaliation.

 

Well, he hasn't and it didn't.

 

Next?

5 hours ago, Eloquent pilgrim said:

 

 

Oh, so you would prefer to see a terrorist organisation left completely unhindered to continue its terrorist activities of attacking innocent civilian ships, and aiming rockets at innocent Israeli citizens… quelle surprise

 

 

End the Gaza horror and the Houthis stop attacking ships. Apparently that's too complicated for some armchair warriors to understand.

20 minutes ago, NanLaew said:

 

Well, he hasn't and it didn't.

 

Next?

The Houthis will continue attacking shipping.

 

Next.

3 hours ago, Eloquent pilgrim said:

 

An easy conclusion to arrive at as far as you are concerned; although you are careful enough not to directly support muslim terrorist groups like Hamas, the Houthis and Hezbollah, you invariably criticise any action taken against them. This is particularly true if action against them is by Israel, or even the US.

 

And it is not an attempt to end the war between the Houthis and the Yemeni forces, it is aimed at degrading the capabilities of the Houthis, to prevent them from continually attacking innocent civilian shipping. Your continued criticism of any action against Islamic terrorism is palpable, and your position transparent.

 

 

 

 

I see you still struggling to answer the question I asked.

5 minutes ago, thaibeachlovers said:

End the Gaza horror and the Houthis stop attacking ships. Apparently that's too complicated for some armchair warriors to understand.

Ignore the snakes head as usual. Iran. Yes far too complicated for you, that's already been proven.

I wouldn't quite call it "overwhelming lethal force" just yet, that would be more along the lines of what happened in Gaza. But please Mr. President, make it so.

24 minutes ago, thaibeachlovers said:

End the Gaza horror and the Houthis stop attacking ships. Apparently that's too complicated for some armchair warriors to understand.

 

That’s easy, just tell Hamas to release the remaining, completely innocent hostages, that they have been holding (with help from UNRWA) for more than 500 days; or is that too complicated for your particular armchair ?

 

 

28 minutes ago, thaibeachlovers said:

End the Gaza horror and the Houthis stop attacking ships. Apparently that's too complicated for some armchair warriors to understand.

Go have a word with Hamas then, you seem to know everything, go point them in the right direction, like, don't execute civilians, or take hostages, because it makes them look like animals......

53 minutes ago, thaibeachlovers said:

End the Gaza horror and the Houthis stop attacking ships. Apparently that's too complicated for some armchair warriors to understand.

Even if the bombardment were to stop, the Houthis would soon find another excuse to resume.