Skip to content
View in the app

A better way to browse. Learn more.

Thailand News and Discussion Forum | ASEANNOW

A full-screen app on your home screen with push notifications, badges and more.

To install this app on iOS and iPadOS
  1. Tap the Share icon in Safari
  2. Scroll the menu and tap Add to Home Screen.
  3. Tap Add in the top-right corner.
To install this app on Android
  1. Tap the 3-dot menu (⋮) in the top-right corner of the browser.
  2. Tap Add to Home screen or Install app.
  3. Confirm by tapping Install.

Trump Confirms Surprise US Airstrikes on Iran’s Nuclear Sites, Including Fordo

Featured Replies

3 minutes ago, rabas said:

Iran’s Foreign Ministry spokesperson said the country’s nuclear installations were ‘badly damaged’ by US airstrikes, the Associated Press reported, though he didn’t provide further detail.

Of course they will say that so they don't get bombed again any time soon!!

If they said "you missed all is well" they would be bombed to oblivion!

  • Replies 647
  • Views 25.4k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Most Popular Posts

Posted Images

4 minutes ago, stevenl said:

Could be true, could be a smart move to mislead.

Keep your fingers crossed!

16 minutes ago, DezLez said:

Of course they will say that so they don't get bombed again any time soon!!

If they said "you missed all is well" they would be bombed to oblivion!

 

I've worked with Iranians for many years at fairly high levels. Their lies will never be so simple. They are masters at the art.

 

Here is more on the Foreign minister's comments. Long, click to read in full. 

 

 

 

1 hour ago, rabas said:
16 minutes ago. Now being widely reported.
 
Iran’s Foreign Ministry spokesperson said the country’s nuclear installations were ‘badly damaged’ by US airstrikes, the Associated Press reported, though he didn’t provide further detail.
 
AP, ABC news, Times of Israel, Bloomberg, Yahoo ...
 

Of course the Iran apologists will claim its a ruse and keep holding up the unfinished and preliminary DIA assessment and ignore everything else, bit like this.

 

1 hour ago, stevenl said:

Could be true, could be a smart move to mislead.

 

2 hours ago, stevenl said:

No, gleeful that trump announced obliteration without proper intel.

 

Because improper intel leaked the opposite?

5 minutes ago, Chomper Higgot said:

Well thanks for your spirited defense of the obviously exaggerated claims of ‘mission success’

We can now all enjoy the walk back:

 

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2025/jun/25/trump-and-hegseth-admit-doubts-over-irans-nuclear-sites-damage-by-us-strikes

Your link does not back your claims that it was not a "mission success"

20 minutes ago, nauseus said:

 

Because improper intel leaked the opposite?

No, because success or not is not clear. But trump always has to be seen as the winner, hence unsubstantiated claims.

3 minutes ago, Bkk Brian said:

Your link does not back your claims that it was not a "mission success"

He doesn't care, as a leftist, all he has are lies. 

30 minutes ago, Yellowtail said:

He doesn't care, as a leftist, all he has are lies. 

I think little details like this matter:

 

The DIA assessment also found that much of Iran’s stockpile of highly enriched uranium, which would provide the fuel for making any future nuclear warhead, had been moved before the strikes and may have been moved to other secret nuclear sites maintained by Iran.”

 

“Trump Confirms Surprise US Airstrikes on Iran’s Nuclear Sites, Including Fordo”

 

It seems there wasn’t enough surprise.

 

Maybe someone ran their mouth.

1 minute ago, Chomper Higgot said:

I think little details like this matter:

 

The DIA assessment also found that much of Iran’s stockpile of highly enriched uranium, which would provide the fuel for making any future nuclear warhead, had been moved before the strikes and may have been moved to other secret nuclear sites maintained by Iran.”

 

“Trump Confirms Surprise US Airstrikes on Iran’s Nuclear Sites, Including Fordo”

 

It seems there wasn’t enough surprise.

 

Maybe someone ran their mouth.

Well, they did have 60 days to move them, and the left is still howling that he moved too fast. 

To be fair to Trump, and in recognition of the need not to try to read between the lines of what he says, he never actually said”

 

“Hey Iran, we’ve got some bunker busting bombs that we are going to drop on your underground nuclear facilities, it might be an idea to relocated stuff you don’t want to lose”.

 

 

 

 

1 minute ago, Yellowtail said:

Well, they did have 60 days to move them, and the left is still howling that he moved too fast. 

Perhaps those claims of ‘obliteration’ were a little premature.

3 minutes ago, Chomper Higgot said:

Perhaps those claims of ‘obliteration’ were a little premature.

Perhaps, I'm sure that's what you are hoping for. 

 

 

15 minutes ago, Chomper Higgot said:

I think little details like this matter:

 

The DIA assessment also found that much of Iran’s stockpile of highly enriched uranium, which would provide the fuel for making any future nuclear warhead, had been moved before the strikes and may have been moved to other secret nuclear sites maintained by Iran.”

 

“Trump Confirms Surprise US Airstrikes on Iran’s Nuclear Sites, Including Fordo”

 

It seems there wasn’t enough surprise.

 

Maybe someone ran their mouth.

Maybe someone ran their mouth.

 

Yes you

 

58 minutes ago, Chomper Higgot said:

Well thanks for your spirited defense of the obviously exaggerated claims of ‘mission success’

Again your link does not support that claim.

 

Also from your link, you know, the little details you refer to.

 

"On Wednesday the defense secretary described the damage to Iran’s nuclear facilities by US and Israeli bombing as “moderate to severe”. He pledged there would be an FBI investigation of Pentagon leaks, but also claimed the leaked information was “false”.

 

That said you also made a case for Iran not to let the IAEA come to inspect and check, interesting.

4 minutes ago, Yellowtail said:

Perhaps, I'm sure that's what you are hoping for. 

 

 

That’s what an increasing number of reports are confirming.

 

 

1 minute ago, Chomper Higgot said:

That’s what an increasing number of reports are confirming.

 

 

What reports, like this one posted just a few posts up?

 

2 hours ago, rabas said:
16 minutes ago. Now being widely reported.
 
Iran’s Foreign Ministry spokesperson said the country’s nuclear installations were ‘badly damaged’ by US airstrikes, the Associated Press reported, though he didn’t provide further detail.
 
AP, ABC news, Times of Israel, Bloomberg, Yahoo ...
 

 

3 minutes ago, Chomper Higgot said:

That’s what an increasing number of reports are confirming.

 

 

Yeah, that's what every leftist media outlet is claiming, and every leftist is praying for. I know you guys are all atheists, but just in case...

6 hours ago, sharot724 said:

From the artical:

 

Democratic Rep. Pat Ryan of New York said on X on Tuesday that “Trump just cancelled a classified House briefing on the Iran strikes with zero explanation. The real reason? He claims he destroyed ‘all nuclear facilities and capability;’ his team knows they can’t back up his bluster and BS.”


The house defense committee has a duty of oversight and a right to examine intel evidence.

1 minute ago, Yellowtail said:

Yeah, that's what every leftist media outlet is claiming, and every leftist is praying for. I know you guys are all atheists, but just in case...

With references to a damage assessment.

  • Popular Post

It's amusing that:

 

The left was howling that Iran had no nuclear weapon program. 

 

Then Trump bombs Iran's nuclear weapon program. 

 

And now the left is howling that Trump's bombing failed to destroy Iran's nuclear weapon program. 

 

 

4 minutes ago, Chomper Higgot said:


The house defense committee has a duty of oversight and a right to examine intel evidence.

Ryan claims its bluster and bull<deleted>, well not according to more reports coming out and you still ignore your previous false claims

6 minutes ago, Yellowtail said:

It's amusing that:

 

The left was howling that Iran had no nuclear weapon program. 

 

Then Trump bombs Iran's nuclear weapon program. 

 

And now the left is howling that Trump's bombing failed to destroy Iran's nuclear weapon program. 

 

 

Or at least that’s the way you tell it.

 

  • Popular Post
Just now, Chomper Higgot said:

Or at least that’s the way you tell it.

 

Pretty accurate actually, read your own previous posts and false claims

33 minutes ago, Chomper Higgot said:

With references to a damage assessment.

 

Here's an assessment. Not a news story about a leak about a classified assessment that no one has seen because it is still classified. Also see www.jpost.com/middle-east/iran-news/article-858987

From the above post:

 

️Israel Atomic Energy Commission:

“The devastating US strike on Fordow destroyed the site's critical infrastructure and rendered the enrichment facility inoperable.”

 

From NY Times update:

 

As part of his effort to counter the preliminary intelligence report from the Pentagon, Mr. Trump, during his news conference, read part of a statement from the Israel Atomic Energy Commission.

 

“The devastating U.S. strike on Fordo destroyed the site’s critical infrastructure and rendered the enrichment facility totally inoperable,” the president said.

 

The statement, which the White House had distributed earlier, did not contain the word “totally,” but Mr. Trump inserted it.

 

via https://archive.ph/ONygg

 

 

The latest new high-resolution satellite images from Maxar reveal extra damage by the US and Israel

 

The Iran apologists will hate this.

 

The volume of grey dust visible in some of the satellite images may be sign of the level of destruction beneath the surface, analysts believe. "Deep below ground detonations of sufficient magnitude to expel the concrete as described would cause significant blast damage to underground structures," said Trevor Lawrence, head of the Centre for Energetics Technology, Cranfield University and an expert on effect of explosions. "Given the complexity of building these structures, significant damage is very unlikely to be repaired in the short term, if at all."

 

Previously unseen damage in the images reveal total wipe out of certain nuclear facilities. Particularly notable is the uranium conversion facility at Isfahan. You can't make a nuclear bomb with a conversion facility and that place is no longer on this planet!

 

"You can't do a nuclear weapon without a conversion facility, yet we can't even find where it is, where it used to be on the map - because the whole thing is just blackened out… it's gone… wiped out."

 

https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cdr3xxdrynko

From the above NYT via archive link:

 

International inspectors and nuclear experts agree that the extensive damage to the conversion facility created a key bottleneck in the weapons-making process, and agreed that rebuilding it would most likely take years. But that assumes that Iran did not build another conversion plant in secret, as part of an insurance policy against the destruction of its declared facilities, which are inspected by the International Atomic Energy Agency.

Its so much fun to watching the Iran lovers and America/Jew haters squirm. Give me plenty of thumbs down, express that frustration!!

 

Trump winning! America winning! Israel winning! Hows that feel boys? Almost as good as the election, wonder how many Iranian lovers are gonna slink away and reappear later as trolls

Create an account or sign in to comment

Recently Browsing 0

  • No registered users viewing this page.

Account

Navigation

Search

Search

Configure browser push notifications

Chrome (Android)
  1. Tap the lock icon next to the address bar.
  2. Tap Permissions → Notifications.
  3. Adjust your preference.
Chrome (Desktop)
  1. Click the padlock icon in the address bar.
  2. Select Site settings.
  3. Find Notifications and adjust your preference.